The sufficient vitamin D and albumin level have a protective effect on COVID-19 infection | SpringerLink

"Our results show a direct association of vitamin D deficiency with the infection of COVID-19 and severity. According to our findings, 84.4% of patients with COVID-19 in this study had vitamin D deficiency. Moreover, the average level of albumin was significantly decreased in those infected patients who had respiratory symptoms. In the present study, a considerable negative correlation was established between the levels of vitamin D and the severity of COVID-19 infection. This reflects on the immunomodulatory and inhibitory nature of vitamin D to the viral replication."

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00203-021-02482-5#ethics

The sufficient vitamin D and albumin level have a protective effect on COVID-19 infection | SpringerLink

"Our results show a direct association of vitamin D deficiency with the infection of COVID-19 and severity. According to our findings, 84.4% of patients with COVID-19 in this study had vitamin D deficiency. Moreover, the average level of albumin was significantly decreased in those infected patients who had respiratory symptoms. In the present study, a considerable negative correlation was established between the levels of vitamin D and the severity of COVID-19 infection. This reflects on the immunomodulatory and inhibitory nature of vitamin D to the viral replication."

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00203-021-02482-5#ethics

Nobody needed any "vaccine" for Covid19. All everybody at risk ever needed was vitamin D.

Robin Monotti.

https://t.me/robinmg/8994

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00203-021-02482-5#ethics

Pfizer’s Own Informed Consent Documents Undermine FDA and CDC’s Cries of “Safe and Effective”

EXTRACT:
Pfizer’s own informed consent documents, recently obtained by ICAN, show it discloses potential concerns, including myocarditis, original antigenic sin, and birth defects, while the FDA & CDC whitewash these concerns to declare these products are safe and effective.

ICAN has now obtained the materials used by the Cincinnati’s Children’s Hospital in conducting its studies of the Pfizer booster vaccine, including in children. The documents prepared in consultation with Pfizer tell us a lot about how Pfizer understands the risks of its products.

Pfizer is clearly worried about the risks of myocarditis (heart inflammation) in kids. Pfizer’s own informed consent documents reveal that the risk of myocarditis may be as high as 1 in 1,000 (see page 4).

But the FDA and CDC blithely ignored this risk in approving the Pfizer mRNA shot in kids. Only after rushing this product through the approval process did the CDC begrudgingly admit that “Myocarditis and pericarditis have rarely been reported, especially in adolescents and young adult males within several days after COVID-19 vaccination.”

Pfizer is also aware of the possibility of original antigenic sin and pathogenic priming (unwanted immune responses that leave one worse off in response to a virus than if one had done nothing). Pfizer warns parents of clinical trial participants that “it cannot yet be ruled out that the study vaccine could make a later COVID-19 illness more severe” (emphasis added). The FDA and CDC go to great lengths to hide that information while proclaiming “safe and effective” over and over again like a mantra.

Pfizer appears very worried about the potential of the teratogenesis (harm to a developing fetus) and even possibly mutagenesis (harm to DNA). So even though this is a trial in children, Pfizer disclosed to the parents of these children that “the effects of the COVID-19 vaccine on sperm, a pregnancy, a fetus, or a nursing child are not known.”

But then Pfizer goes even further to state that:

—“If your daughter is pregnant, planning to become pregnant or is breast feeding a baby, she cannot be in the study as there may be risks to the unborn baby or nursing baby.Nobody knows what these risks are right now.”

—“If your daughter becomes pregnant, she will have to leave the study.”

—“If your child is a boy, and he thinks he may have gotten a girl pregnant, he or you must tell your child’s study doctor immediately. The study doctor may ask for information about the pregnancy and the birth of the baby. The study doctor may share this information with others who are working on this study.”

—“If your son is taking part in this study, he is not allowed to donate sperm for at least 28 days after his last vaccination.”

Let’s just pause to acknowledge just how deeply unsettling this language is. But it just goes to show that Pfizer wanted to make sure that they had no data at all on pregnancy outcomes. ...

CONTINUE HERE:
https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/pfizers-own-informed-consent-documents-undermine-fda-and-cdcs-cries-of-safe-and-effective/

#covid19 #Pfizer #informed_consent #ethics #vaccine_dangers

Nuremberg, 1947

EXTRACTS:
The first people gassed by the Nazis were not Jews in concentration camps (that came later), but disabled patients in psychiatric hospitals, murdered under the Third Reich’s “T4 Euthanasia Program.” Each of these death warrants was signed by a German physician. Even after the lethal regime turned its attention on Jews and other ethnic minorities, they continued to deploy quasi-public health justifications: Recall that the Jews were routinely demonized by the Nazis as “spreaders of disease.” ...

This principle [Article 1 of the Nuremberg Code] was further developed in the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association, the Belmont Report commissioned by the U.S. Federal Government in the 1970s, and subsequently codified under the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations in the “Common Rule,” the law governing human-subjects research in the United States.

Fast forward to 2020. In the face of the novel coronavirus, and the fears generated by media propaganda, the principle of free and informed consent was once again abandoned. The most egregious, but by no means the only, example was vaccine mandates enacted while the vaccines were still under emergency-use authorization, and, thus, by our federal government’s own definition, “experimental.”

How and why was the bulwark of 20th-century medical ethics abandoned so quickly, and with so little opposition from the medical and scientific establishment? What were the immediate effects? What will be the long-term, consequences of the shift back to a crass utilitarian ethic governing science, medicine, and public health during a pandemic?

CONTINUE HERE:
https://brownstone.org/articles/nuremberg-1947/

#covid19 #Nuremberg2 #ethics #informed_consent #crimes_against_humanity #Nazis #eugenics