Nodirjon's IELTSmates
9.53K subscribers
2.46K photos
841 videos
488 files
1.7K links
Owner: @NodirjonEgamberdiev (Overall 8.5)
IELTS Instructor at Everest Amir Temur (@EverestOfficial)
Teaching since 2018


Projects:
@UzIELTSbot - IELTS is easy with us!
(Almost all preparation materials)

📍 Everest Amir Temur
📞 +99895 144 90 40
Download Telegram
#writing #task2 #sample
Sample Band 7+ Essay
Writing Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

In many countries, young people are finding it harder and harder to find permanent jobs. Why is this happening? What can be done to improve the situation?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

You should write at least 250 words.


In this fast-moving age, with the development of education and modern technologies, people strive to have a secure job after graduating from colleges and universities. Despite their efforts, so many young adults in different parts of the world have a negative experience of finding a long-term job.

It so happens that most colleges and universities focus on students’ academic performance much more than their practical skills. Unfortunately, many companies reserve permanent job opportunities for experienced applicants because there is no need to invest much in their training. Lack of practical experience in new graduates puts them at a disadvantage as far as companies are concerned. The situation is made worse by the abundance of advanced technologies that can easily replace human labor. Robots and computers work more efficiently and with higher precision than humans. That shrinks the pool of available job placements even more, as companies only need to hire highly educated and experienced staff.

Fortunately, there is a number of solutions that can help inexperienced workers gain permanent employment. An obvious one is that universities could offer internships to their students, or arrange workshops in addition to classwork. This would help students to get training and experience in their respective fields. Also, the government could examine the demands of changing labor market and steer young people towards professions that will be popular in the coming years. Together with colleges and universities the government could create special awareness programs for graduates, providing them with an overview of various job offers and their benefits. This way students would be able to choose the right jobs for themselves.

To sum up, lack of demand in the labour market and insufficient experience are two major reasons why many young people have trouble finding a permanent position. Helping them gain hands-on experience as part of their studies and educating them about career options early on is key to improving the employment outcome for them.

Join ans share
@IELTSmates
Task 1-2 Band 9.0 Samples.pdf
7.4 MB
#writing #task1 #task2 #samples #ielts

Writing task 1 and task 2 samples worth reading.

Join and share ↙️
@IELTSmates
#exam #task2 #writing
Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life.
Is it a positive or negative development?

Join and share ↙️
@IELTSmates
#useful #idea #part3 #task2
Brilliant tactics: In China, parents paid a gamer to beat their son and undermine his confidence

According to
the parents, their child was an exemplary student and an obedient son until the fourth grade, when he began to play video games. Adults could not influence him in any way, so mother and father decided to resort to such an unusual method.

It is clarified that the parents paid the gamer $ 7 per hour. The game session lasted five hours, and the son of the customers suffered a crushing defeat.

It is noted that the parents' idea was a success and their child really lost interest in games and focused on studying.

P.S. A real life example to use in Speaking and Writing🤓

Join and share ⬇️
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#essay #task2 #sample
Since its discovery, nuclear energy has been a controversial technology.
What are some dangers connected with nuclear energy?
In your opinion, is nuclear energy a good or bad technology?


Nuclear energy has always been a much debated technology. This essay will discuss the dangers posed by its use and decide whether it is beneficial or harmful for humanity.

There are several issues associated with nuclear energy. These problems are evidenced in its history of disasters and destruction. Once the power of the atom had been discovered, it was almost immediately weaponised and used to destroy two cities filled with civilians. Even when nuclear technology was used for peaceful means, tragedy has still been connected with its use. The Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters along with many other smaller ones show that this technology is never truly safe even in supposedly technologically advanced countries.

However, nuclear technology is the best choice in many situations. The only current realistic affordable alternative to nuclear energy is the burning of fossil fuels. Studies show that fossil fuel emissions have claimed many more lives than nuclear disasters because air pollution slowly poisons people’s throats, lungs and respiratory systems. In addition, even though some may argue that solar, wind, wave or hydroelectricity are better alternatives, some cold landlocked nations such as Switzerland do not have consistent access to sunlight, wind or flowing rivers year-round. For these countries it would appear that nuclear energy, despite its dangers, is the best option.

In conclusion, although nuclear technology is undoubtedly dangerous due to radioactivity and its proven history, I believe in some contexts it is actually the best alternative to other more harmful or unreliable energy sources.

©️Beyden Dingle (Overall 9.0, W: 8.5)

Join and share 🔽
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#essay #task2 #sample
Some people argue that space exploration has had more to do with national pride than international effort.
To what extent do you agree with this?
How do you think space exploration will change in the future?

It
has been argued that the history of space exploration has been motivated more by nationalism than a desire to further humanity’s accomplishments. This essay will discuss this point of view and explore the new ways humanity will approach space exploration.

Although nationalism has been a factor in space exploration in the past, there are two clear reasons why humanity’s explorations of space should be considered as generally an international endeavor. Firstly, modern collaboration between countries with the international space station shows that outside the earth’s atmosphere, nations can come together to further humanity’s understanding and exploration of the universe. If space exploration were still grounded in nationalism, the very existence of the space station would be impossible. Secondly, the advent of private enterprise attempting to make humans a multiplanetary species shows that nationalism is becoming irrelevant. When companies like SpaceX finally reach Mars, it is more likely that the banner of a private company will be planted than the flag of a country.

The future holds many exciting possibilities in the exploration of our universe. It seems that the new ambition driving space technology innovation is the desire to go to Mars and live permanently beyond earth. Thus, the future of space exploration is likely to be based around planet colonization and living in harsh environments. In the more distant future, another possible change will be the desire for humans to achieve interstellar travel. Even though for now this seems impossible, with the discovery of new technology and new understandings of the nature of the universe, it is likely a matter of time before humanity will find a way to leave our solar system.

In conclusion, I believe that as a whole, humanity’s exploration of space has been driven more by shared sense of humanity than national pride, and it is no doubt true that the future of space exploration will go far beyond humanity’s current achievements.

©️Beyden Dingle (Overall 9.0, W: 8.5)

Join and share 🔽
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#essay #task2 #sample #opinion #balanced
Some educationalists argue that non-exam, arts-based subjects, such as music, drama, art and craft, should be compulsory in the secondary-school curriculum. They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Some
education experts believe that arts subjects should be mandatory in high school due to the benefits they provide to academic outcomes. Although this approach may not be ideal every case, I am of the opinion that arts subjects should generally be a required part of the school program.

There are a number of issues associated with making arts subjects mandatory. First of all, not all schools have the resources to provide this kind of an education. In the case of schools in poor countries or on tight budgets, attention must be given to subjects that the students will need for a financially successful future as a priority. Furthermore, it is true that certain arts subjects are not a perfect match for every student. Many students are introverted and shy, so to force them to take classes like drama and performance may be counterproductive.

However, in most cases, requiring students to have at least a certain amount of exposure to arts-based subjects is the right decision. Research has shown that learning a range of skills has a positive impact on cognitive ability and intelligence. For example, when Finland began to focus their education on exposing their students to a wider variety of subjects, the academic performance of their children rose to the best in the world. In addition, arts subjects have obvious benefits beyond academics. Arts subjects have the potential to introduce young people to activities, such as playing an instrument, that they may enjoy for the rest of their lives.

In conclusion, providing extensive arts programs is not realistic for every school, and not all students should not be forced to do every kind of art class. However, I do believe that whenever realistically possible, it should be mandatory for students to have some involvement in the arts.

©️ Beyden Dingle(Overall 9.0, W:8.5)

Join and share 🔽
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#task2 #ClassPractice
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nodirjon's IELTSmates
Photo
Task 1 and Task 2 - 2023 Ready.pdf
2.3 MB
#useful #writing #task1 #task2
Writing Task 1 and Task 1 past exam papers

Password: Nimaqilasan1

Join and share 🔽
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Nodirjon's IELTSmates
#plan #day28 #useful #immersion Day 28: Benefits And Drawbacks of Nuclear Energy Listening: - Podcast: "Nuclear Energy: Weighing Benefits and Risks for a Sustainable Future." …
#writing #task2 #doublequestion
I will send a Band 8.0+ essay later today, nasib.

Until then, you can also give it a try and send your version to the Discussion Group of the channel by incorporating insights from the podcast and articles above.

Join and share 🔽
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Nodirjon's IELTSmates
#writing #task2 #doublequestion I will send a Band 8.0+ essay later today, nasib. Until then, you can also give it a try and send your version to the Discussion Group of the channel by incorporating insights from the podcast and articles above. Join and…
#writing #task2 #essay #model
Nuclear energy has always been a much-debated technology. This essay will discuss the dangers posed by its use and decide whether it is beneficial or harmful for humanity.

There are several issues associated with nuclear energy. These problems are evidenced in its history of disasters and destruction. Once the power of the atom had been discovered, it was almost immediately weaponized and used to destroy two cities filled with civilians. Even when nuclear technology was used for peaceful means, tragedy has still been connected with its use. The Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters along with many other smaller ones show that this technology is never truly safe even in supposedly technologically advanced countries.

However, nuclear technology is the best choice in many situations. The only current realistic affordable alternative to nuclear energy is the burning of fossil fuels. Studies show that fossil fuel emissions have claimed many more lives than nuclear disasters because air pollution slowly poisons people’s throats, lungs and respiratory systems. In addition, even though some may argue that solar, wind, wave or hydroelectricity are better alternatives, some cold landlocked nations such as Switzerland do not have consistent access to sunlight, wind or flowing rivers year-round. For these countries it would appear that nuclear energy, despite its dangers, is the best option.

In conclusion, although nuclear technology is undoubtedly dangerous due to radioactivity and its proven history, I believe in some contexts it is actually the best alternative to other more harmful or unreliable energy sources.

247 words (Yes, it is OK)
Band 8.0+

Join and share 🔽
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Nodirjon's IELTSmates
Task 1 and Task 2 - 2023 Ready.pdf
Page 25;)

👉Source
Password: Nimaqilasan1

Join and share 🔽
@IELTSmates_Uz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM