#Newspaper
Education Bureau has a presentation mentioned “Separation of Powers” in 2011
Editor’s notes: When their reporter rechecked the website at 12:30 pm on 1 Sep, it showed “404 Page Not Found.” Readers can search relevant content about Patrick Chan’s “Separation of powers” quoted by the Education Bureau in “saved webpage (cache)” of a searching engine, Google. However, the relevant webpage cache which existed on 1 Sep is also deleted now.
(1 Sep) “Stand News” found a presentation prepared in 2011 by Patrick Chan Siu-oi, permanent Judge of Court of Final Appeal at that time, in Education Bureau’s website. At page 18 of the document with the title of “Basic Law, Rule of Law and Hong Kong’s advantage”, it mentioned “The rule of law as a system” and “Separation of powers (or three powers). It explained that functions of the Hong Kong government were carried out by 3 different branches, executive, legislative and judiciary, independently. Each of them had its own responsibilities and power, thereby avoiding centralisation of power and abuse of powers.
According to a press conference in Information Services Department, when Yueng Kwok-yung replied an inquiry of “white paper of one country two systems” in 2014, he said, “every government is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive and judicial. This is what is meant by “Separation of powers” in western countries - the three branches execute their separated roles and responsibilities independently. “
Source: Stand News, 404 Webcache
Translated by: Hong Kong Echo
Further reading:
Hong Kong Authorities Eradicate All Mentionings of "Separation of Powers" From Textbooks, their Websites and Database
https://t.me/guardiansofhongkong/24821
Separation of three powers in Hong Kong
https://twitter.com/hongkongecho/status/1301243656075010048?s=21
#1984InHongKong #RewriteHistory
Education Bureau has a presentation mentioned “Separation of Powers” in 2011
Editor’s notes: When their reporter rechecked the website at 12:30 pm on 1 Sep, it showed “404 Page Not Found.” Readers can search relevant content about Patrick Chan’s “Separation of powers” quoted by the Education Bureau in “saved webpage (cache)” of a searching engine, Google. However, the relevant webpage cache which existed on 1 Sep is also deleted now.
(1 Sep) “Stand News” found a presentation prepared in 2011 by Patrick Chan Siu-oi, permanent Judge of Court of Final Appeal at that time, in Education Bureau’s website. At page 18 of the document with the title of “Basic Law, Rule of Law and Hong Kong’s advantage”, it mentioned “The rule of law as a system” and “Separation of powers (or three powers). It explained that functions of the Hong Kong government were carried out by 3 different branches, executive, legislative and judiciary, independently. Each of them had its own responsibilities and power, thereby avoiding centralisation of power and abuse of powers.
According to a press conference in Information Services Department, when Yueng Kwok-yung replied an inquiry of “white paper of one country two systems” in 2014, he said, “every government is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive and judicial. This is what is meant by “Separation of powers” in western countries - the three branches execute their separated roles and responsibilities independently. “
Source: Stand News, 404 Webcache
Translated by: Hong Kong Echo
Further reading:
Hong Kong Authorities Eradicate All Mentionings of "Separation of Powers" From Textbooks, their Websites and Database
https://t.me/guardiansofhongkong/24821
Separation of three powers in Hong Kong
https://twitter.com/hongkongecho/status/1301243656075010048?s=21
#1984InHongKong #RewriteHistory
Twitter
Hong Kong Echo (@HongKongEcho) | Twitter
The latest Tweets from Hong Kong Echo (@HongKongEcho). #手足互科 We're volunteers translating columns+news related to HK+China, provide the #world #HK perspectives #StandWithHongKong #FollowBackHongKong
MUST READ: VERY IMPORTANT!!
China’s propaganda machine permeates the world, how “little pinks” and “red communist apps” are weaponized
//The propaganda machine’s “alternative facts” shape global opinion
//Hong Kong: the government and the public unite to “rewrite history”
//Official statements doled out from the “Chinese Central Kitchen”
//Flamewars, destroying information sources in 24 hours… wolf warrior diplomacy amidst the pandemic
//Zhenhua Data and other public opinion businesses continue expanding
//Who earns the money that the CCP throws into outsourcing “public opinion manipulation ventures”?
//Scholars discover that cross-strait intermediaries are key
//Content farms frequently build “bridges”
//“Little pinks” become the latest headache for the West
//Communist Red apps and social media platforms, the information war’s final campaign
Full translation by: Hong Kong Echo
Source: The Reporter
#China #PropagandaMachine #ContentFarms #LittlePinks #InternetTroll #RedCommunists #RewriteHistory
China’s propaganda machine permeates the world, how “little pinks” and “red communist apps” are weaponized
//The propaganda machine’s “alternative facts” shape global opinion
//Hong Kong: the government and the public unite to “rewrite history”
//Official statements doled out from the “Chinese Central Kitchen”
//Flamewars, destroying information sources in 24 hours… wolf warrior diplomacy amidst the pandemic
//Zhenhua Data and other public opinion businesses continue expanding
//Who earns the money that the CCP throws into outsourcing “public opinion manipulation ventures”?
//Scholars discover that cross-strait intermediaries are key
//Content farms frequently build “bridges”
//“Little pinks” become the latest headache for the West
//Communist Red apps and social media platforms, the information war’s final campaign
Full translation by: Hong Kong Echo
Source: The Reporter
#China #PropagandaMachine #ContentFarms #LittlePinks #InternetTroll #RedCommunists #RewriteHistory
www.twreporter.org
駛向全球的中共大外宣機器，如何把「小粉紅」與「紅色App」武器化？ - 報導者 The Reporter
趁COVID-19之亂，「中共製造」的輿情產業持續壯大，兩岸掮客角色關鍵。大外宣機器 ──特別是「紅色App」和「小粉紅」，已為全球民主國家帶來怎樣的挑戰？