#ufo #aliens
Смотрю и прям ожидаю, что кто-то из заседающих в один прекрасный момент снимет маску человека, а под ней...
Даже не особо бы удивился!
Хотя как же так, нам же Виббе и Сурдин объяснили, что это всё глюки и метеозонды, а эти тупыые американцы какие-то заседания конгресса собирают...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fytpesDRc50
Смотрю и прям ожидаю, что кто-то из заседающих в один прекрасный момент снимет маску человека, а под ней...
Даже не особо бы удивился!
Хотя как же так, нам же Виббе и Сурдин объяснили, что это всё глюки и метеозонды, а эти тупыые американцы какие-то заседания конгресса собирают...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fytpesDRc50
YouTube
LIVE | Congress Hearing On UFOs | Trump Administration Says America Can 'Handle The Truth' | US
LIVE | Congress Hearing On UFOs | Trump Administration Says America Can 'Handle The Truth' | US
Americans could soon learn more about what many have long suspected regarding unidentified flying objects. UFO whistleblower Luis Elizondo, a former Pentagon…
Americans could soon learn more about what many have long suspected regarding unidentified flying objects. UFO whistleblower Luis Elizondo, a former Pentagon…
#ufo #nhi #aliens
Изучаю сейчас материалы этого и прежнего слушаний Конгресса США по НЛО. Это просто обалдеть.
Получается, в Минобороны США уже десятилетиями действуют засекреченные от общественности, и даже Конгресса, спецпрограммы по изучению НЛО, под зонтиком этой Immaculate Constellation.
Заслушиваемые, в т.ч. бывший спецагент, затем директор, в военном подразделении по анализу данных, также бывший военный адмирал, утверждают, что Минобороны США получены и изучаются материальные образцы внеземной технологии.
В том числе биологические образцы. А как именно изучаются и для чего используются, на этом они говорят, что могут это разгласить только на непубличной части слушания.
Я всё правильно слышу и вижу? Протрите мне уши и глаза.
Во-первых, это не те люди, которые просто так бросаются словами.
Witnesses:
* Rear Adm. Tim Gallaudet (Ret.), former Commander, Navy Meteorology and Oceanography Command
* Mr. Lue Elizondo, former Director, Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP)
* Mr. Michael Shellenberger, Founder and Journalist, *Public*
* Mr. Michael Gold, former NASA official and member of the NASA UAP Independent Study Team
Во-вторых, это не то место, где можно без уголовных последствий давать ложные показания под присягой.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4-GcS1UQyg
Изучаю сейчас материалы этого и прежнего слушаний Конгресса США по НЛО. Это просто обалдеть.
Получается, в Минобороны США уже десятилетиями действуют засекреченные от общественности, и даже Конгресса, спецпрограммы по изучению НЛО, под зонтиком этой Immaculate Constellation.
Заслушиваемые, в т.ч. бывший спецагент, затем директор, в военном подразделении по анализу данных, также бывший военный адмирал, утверждают, что Минобороны США получены и изучаются материальные образцы внеземной технологии.
В том числе биологические образцы. А как именно изучаются и для чего используются, на этом они говорят, что могут это разгласить только на непубличной части слушания.
Я всё правильно слышу и вижу? Протрите мне уши и глаза.
Во-первых, это не те люди, которые просто так бросаются словами.
Witnesses:
* Rear Adm. Tim Gallaudet (Ret.), former Commander, Navy Meteorology and Oceanography Command
* Mr. Lue Elizondo, former Director, Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP)
* Mr. Michael Shellenberger, Founder and Journalist, *Public*
* Mr. Michael Gold, former NASA official and member of the NASA UAP Independent Study Team
Во-вторых, это не то место, где можно без уголовных последствий давать ложные показания под присягой.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4-GcS1UQyg
YouTube
The X-Files Opening Credits
I could not find a decent video of the opening credits/sequence on youtube so here it is! This is the opening credits from season 3 "Never Again". I am making no money off of this and it is copyrighted by Fox and Ten Thirteen...
😁1
#ufo #nhi #aliens
Rep. Burlison: So if that material exists today, who's in possession?
Mr. Elizondo: Sir, I wouldn't be able to have that conversation in an open hearing. We'd probably have to have that...
Rep. Burlison: Okay. My question to you then is, if we were in a secure setting, if we were in a SCIF, would you be able to provide or get access to something—whether it's visuals or material that we could put our hands on, or biologics—that would convince me, that would show me that we have non-human origins?
Mr. Elizondo: Sir, that decision would not be mine. That would be up to the gatekeepers still in the U.S. government.
Rep. Burlison: And who would we... so if you were in our shoes, where would you go from here? How would you get that information? A lot of times, we just don't know who to ask because we don't know where to go next. So if you were in our shoes, where would you go?
Mr. Elizondo: Well, I prefer to answer that question in a closed session.
...
Mr. Elizondo: I am, sir, aware of the reporting that biologics have been recovered. Again, my focus was more nuts and bolts, looking at the physical aspects of these phenomena, how they interacted around military equities and nuclear equities. So I'm certainly not a medical expert. I would not be able to probably provide you a whole lot of value in that, simply because I don't have the expertise.
Rep. Burlison: Was anything described as us having possession of bodies?
Mr. Elizondo: Yes.
Rep. Burlison: So if that material exists today, who's in possession?
Mr. Elizondo: Sir, I wouldn't be able to have that conversation in an open hearing. We'd probably have to have that...
Rep. Burlison: Okay. My question to you then is, if we were in a secure setting, if we were in a SCIF, would you be able to provide or get access to something—whether it's visuals or material that we could put our hands on, or biologics—that would convince me, that would show me that we have non-human origins?
Mr. Elizondo: Sir, that decision would not be mine. That would be up to the gatekeepers still in the U.S. government.
Rep. Burlison: And who would we... so if you were in our shoes, where would you go from here? How would you get that information? A lot of times, we just don't know who to ask because we don't know where to go next. So if you were in our shoes, where would you go?
Mr. Elizondo: Well, I prefer to answer that question in a closed session.
...
Mr. Elizondo: I am, sir, aware of the reporting that biologics have been recovered. Again, my focus was more nuts and bolts, looking at the physical aspects of these phenomena, how they interacted around military equities and nuclear equities. So I'm certainly not a medical expert. I would not be able to probably provide you a whole lot of value in that, simply because I don't have the expertise.
Rep. Burlison: Was anything described as us having possession of bodies?
Mr. Elizondo: Yes.
#ufo #nhi #aliens
Chairwoman Mace: Thank you. I move to allow myself and the ranking member five additional minutes for questions. Without objection, so ordered. Mr. Elizondo, were you read into the Immaculate Constellation program?
Mr. Elizondo: I would not be authorized to confirm nor deny the existence of any ongoing or past program, especially as it relates to a special access program, either by name or trigraph.
...
Mr. Elizondo: No, I didn't say that, ma'am. Lockheed Martin and others do quite a bit of work, both in our atmosphere, in space, and even underwater. There are certain efforts... It's a tough question you're asking, putting me on the spot here.
Chairwoman Mace: I'm looking for the answer.
Mr. Elizondo: Yes, ma'am. No, they are involved in a lot. I would rather let Lockheed Martin explain the different domains that they are involved with. I'm probably not authorized to discuss that, but they are involved in a lot of different areas and domains.
...
Rep. Ogles: So I think it's reasonable to conclude that if there is a threat to our personnel who are serving our country faithfully, that there should be oversight.
Adm. Gallaudet: 100%, Congressman. And in fact, that's the one thing that we've not talked about enough during this hearing: the fact that the government, the executive branch, not sharing with Congress what it knows about UAP infringes on your legislative and oversight responsibilities to such an extent that it's very concerning. I mean, if you look at national security or intelligence or foreign affairs or appropriations, you all have oversight and legislative responsibility regarding those. This UAP issue may be the greatest issue of our time, and it's being hid from you.
Chairwoman Mace: Thank you. I move to allow myself and the ranking member five additional minutes for questions. Without objection, so ordered. Mr. Elizondo, were you read into the Immaculate Constellation program?
Mr. Elizondo: I would not be authorized to confirm nor deny the existence of any ongoing or past program, especially as it relates to a special access program, either by name or trigraph.
...
Mr. Elizondo: No, I didn't say that, ma'am. Lockheed Martin and others do quite a bit of work, both in our atmosphere, in space, and even underwater. There are certain efforts... It's a tough question you're asking, putting me on the spot here.
Chairwoman Mace: I'm looking for the answer.
Mr. Elizondo: Yes, ma'am. No, they are involved in a lot. I would rather let Lockheed Martin explain the different domains that they are involved with. I'm probably not authorized to discuss that, but they are involved in a lot of different areas and domains.
...
Rep. Ogles: So I think it's reasonable to conclude that if there is a threat to our personnel who are serving our country faithfully, that there should be oversight.
Adm. Gallaudet: 100%, Congressman. And in fact, that's the one thing that we've not talked about enough during this hearing: the fact that the government, the executive branch, not sharing with Congress what it knows about UAP infringes on your legislative and oversight responsibilities to such an extent that it's very concerning. I mean, if you look at national security or intelligence or foreign affairs or appropriations, you all have oversight and legislative responsibility regarding those. This UAP issue may be the greatest issue of our time, and it's being hid from you.
#ufo #nhi #aliens
"This hearing is intended to help Congress and the American people to learn the extent of the programs and activities our government has engaged in with respect to UAPs and what knowledge it has yielded. This includes, of course, any knowledge of extraterrestrial life or technology of non-human origin. If government-funded research on UAPs has not yielded any useful knowledge, we also need to know those facts. Taxpayers deserve to know how much has been invested, how much has been spent. They shouldn't be kept in the dark to spare the Pentagon a little bit of embarrassment.
The reality is, despite their enormous taxpayer-funded budgets, the transparency of the Defense Department and the intelligence community have long been abysmal. The Pentagon has failed six consecutive audits. In fact, it's never actually passed one. Adding to this is a runaway overclassification of documents and materials, a reluctance to declassify materials when appropriate, and at times, an outright refusal to share critical information with Congress. In short, it's not a track record that instills trust.
So, Congress has tried in recent years to lift the veil and find out if information about UAPs is being withheld not only from the American public but also from their elected representatives in Congress. Part of the transparency effort was legislation that created in the Pentagon the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO. But the new office is struggling to get its footing. A recent statutorily required report from AARO intended to illuminate the government's historic assessment of UAPs was heavily criticized by those seeking UAP transparency. The report has stoked suspicions that AARO is unable, or perhaps unwilling, to bring forward the truth about the government's activities concerning UAPs. I am disturbed that AARO itself lacks transparency; even its budget is kept from the public.
So, if there is no "there there," are we spending money on it, and by how much? Why the secrecy if it's really no big deal and there's nothing there? Why hide it from the American people? Because I'm not a mathematician, but I can tell you that doesn't add up."
"This hearing is intended to help Congress and the American people to learn the extent of the programs and activities our government has engaged in with respect to UAPs and what knowledge it has yielded. This includes, of course, any knowledge of extraterrestrial life or technology of non-human origin. If government-funded research on UAPs has not yielded any useful knowledge, we also need to know those facts. Taxpayers deserve to know how much has been invested, how much has been spent. They shouldn't be kept in the dark to spare the Pentagon a little bit of embarrassment.
The reality is, despite their enormous taxpayer-funded budgets, the transparency of the Defense Department and the intelligence community have long been abysmal. The Pentagon has failed six consecutive audits. In fact, it's never actually passed one. Adding to this is a runaway overclassification of documents and materials, a reluctance to declassify materials when appropriate, and at times, an outright refusal to share critical information with Congress. In short, it's not a track record that instills trust.
So, Congress has tried in recent years to lift the veil and find out if information about UAPs is being withheld not only from the American public but also from their elected representatives in Congress. Part of the transparency effort was legislation that created in the Pentagon the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO. But the new office is struggling to get its footing. A recent statutorily required report from AARO intended to illuminate the government's historic assessment of UAPs was heavily criticized by those seeking UAP transparency. The report has stoked suspicions that AARO is unable, or perhaps unwilling, to bring forward the truth about the government's activities concerning UAPs. I am disturbed that AARO itself lacks transparency; even its budget is kept from the public.
So, if there is no "there there," are we spending money on it, and by how much? Why the secrecy if it's really no big deal and there's nothing there? Why hide it from the American people? Because I'm not a mathematician, but I can tell you that doesn't add up."
#ufo #nhi #aliens
"I'm deeply alarmed by the reporting of the massive drone swarm that flew over Langley Air Force Base in Virginia last December. Langley is the home of the First Fighter Wing, which maintains half of the F-22s in the U.S. Air Force inventory. Reports of this incident indicate these drones were roughly 20 feet long, flying more than 100 miles an hour at an altitude of over 3,000 feet. Yet the origin of these drones and their operators remains a mystery. This incident and other sightings near sensitive military installations highlight the complexity of the UAP challenge facing our intelligence, defense, and homeland security committees. Whether these phenomena are the result of foreign adversaries developing advanced technologies or something else entirely, we must take them seriously, investigate them thoroughly, and assess their implications on national defense.
The repeated UAP sightings around sensitive military sites underscore the need for innovative defensive strategies beyond traditional measures. They also highlight the urgent need for updated policies to address emerging threats, as well as more effective inter-agency cooperation and intelligence sharing. However, none of this is going to be possible without transparency. For far too long, critical information about UAPs has been either classified or ignored, leaving the American public and key congressmen without the clarity needed to make informed decisions. Declassifying reports and fostering a more open dialogue about UAPs will not only increase public trust but also encourage collaboration between government, the scientific community, and our allies. Quite frankly, there have been things that have been kept secret that are old enough that there is no reason they shouldn't be released, regardless of any so-called private information.
A transparent approach will allow us to share insights, identify patterns, and develop new strategic defenses. As we continue to investigate these phenomena, we must do so with a mindset of protecting our country, advancing scientific discovery, and upholding the trust of the American people, who right now, I don't think have trust. It's just obvious. I don't have trust. We cannot shy away from the unknown, especially when the stakes are so high. I look forward to discussing these matters with the witnesses today. I'm hopeful we can learn from their testimony and come out of this hearing with actionable ideas to advance UAP transparency. Actually, the idea is just to say, in my mind, go back 15 years and everything has to be released. I'm hopeful that we can learn from their testimony and come out of this hearing, and with that, I yield back."
"I'm deeply alarmed by the reporting of the massive drone swarm that flew over Langley Air Force Base in Virginia last December. Langley is the home of the First Fighter Wing, which maintains half of the F-22s in the U.S. Air Force inventory. Reports of this incident indicate these drones were roughly 20 feet long, flying more than 100 miles an hour at an altitude of over 3,000 feet. Yet the origin of these drones and their operators remains a mystery. This incident and other sightings near sensitive military installations highlight the complexity of the UAP challenge facing our intelligence, defense, and homeland security committees. Whether these phenomena are the result of foreign adversaries developing advanced technologies or something else entirely, we must take them seriously, investigate them thoroughly, and assess their implications on national defense.
The repeated UAP sightings around sensitive military sites underscore the need for innovative defensive strategies beyond traditional measures. They also highlight the urgent need for updated policies to address emerging threats, as well as more effective inter-agency cooperation and intelligence sharing. However, none of this is going to be possible without transparency. For far too long, critical information about UAPs has been either classified or ignored, leaving the American public and key congressmen without the clarity needed to make informed decisions. Declassifying reports and fostering a more open dialogue about UAPs will not only increase public trust but also encourage collaboration between government, the scientific community, and our allies. Quite frankly, there have been things that have been kept secret that are old enough that there is no reason they shouldn't be released, regardless of any so-called private information.
A transparent approach will allow us to share insights, identify patterns, and develop new strategic defenses. As we continue to investigate these phenomena, we must do so with a mindset of protecting our country, advancing scientific discovery, and upholding the trust of the American people, who right now, I don't think have trust. It's just obvious. I don't have trust. We cannot shy away from the unknown, especially when the stakes are so high. I look forward to discussing these matters with the witnesses today. I'm hopeful we can learn from their testimony and come out of this hearing with actionable ideas to advance UAP transparency. Actually, the idea is just to say, in my mind, go back 15 years and everything has to be released. I'm hopeful that we can learn from their testimony and come out of this hearing, and with that, I yield back."
#ufo #nhi #aliens
Mr. Elizondo: Greetings, Chairwoman Mace, Chairman Grothman, Ranking Members Connolly and Garcia, and members of the committee. It is my honor and privilege to testify before you on the issue of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, formerly known as UFOs. On behalf of our brave men and women in uniform and across the intelligence community, as well as my fellow Americans who have awaited this day, thank you for your leadership on this important matter.
Let me be clear: UAP are real. Advanced technologies not made by our government or any other government are monitoring sensitive military installations around the globe. Furthermore, the U.S. is in possession of UAP technologies, as are some of our adversaries. I believe we are in the midst of a multi-decade, secretive arms race—one funded by misallocated taxpayer dollars and hidden from our elected representatives and oversight bodies.
For many years, I was entrusted with protecting some of our nation's most sensitive programs. In my last position, I managed a special access program on behalf of the White House and the National Security Council. As such, I appreciate the need to protect certain sensitive intelligence and military information. I consider my oath to protect secrets as sacred, and I will always put the safety of the American people first.
With that said, I also understand the consequences of excessive secrecy and stove-piping. Nowhere was this more apparent than in the aftermath of 9/11, which many of us remember all too well. I believe that America's greatness depends on three elements: A) a watchful Congress, B) a responsive executive branch, and C) an informed public. Over the last decade and a half, I learned that certain UAP programs were, and are, operating without any of these elements. Although much of my government work on the UAP subject still remains classified, excessive secrecy has led to grave misdeeds against loyal civil servants, military personnel, and the public, all to hide the fact that we are not alone in the cosmos.
Mr. Elizondo: Greetings, Chairwoman Mace, Chairman Grothman, Ranking Members Connolly and Garcia, and members of the committee. It is my honor and privilege to testify before you on the issue of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, formerly known as UFOs. On behalf of our brave men and women in uniform and across the intelligence community, as well as my fellow Americans who have awaited this day, thank you for your leadership on this important matter.
Let me be clear: UAP are real. Advanced technologies not made by our government or any other government are monitoring sensitive military installations around the globe. Furthermore, the U.S. is in possession of UAP technologies, as are some of our adversaries. I believe we are in the midst of a multi-decade, secretive arms race—one funded by misallocated taxpayer dollars and hidden from our elected representatives and oversight bodies.
For many years, I was entrusted with protecting some of our nation's most sensitive programs. In my last position, I managed a special access program on behalf of the White House and the National Security Council. As such, I appreciate the need to protect certain sensitive intelligence and military information. I consider my oath to protect secrets as sacred, and I will always put the safety of the American people first.
With that said, I also understand the consequences of excessive secrecy and stove-piping. Nowhere was this more apparent than in the aftermath of 9/11, which many of us remember all too well. I believe that America's greatness depends on three elements: A) a watchful Congress, B) a responsive executive branch, and C) an informed public. Over the last decade and a half, I learned that certain UAP programs were, and are, operating without any of these elements. Although much of my government work on the UAP subject still remains classified, excessive secrecy has led to grave misdeeds against loyal civil servants, military personnel, and the public, all to hide the fact that we are not alone in the cosmos.
#ufo #nhi #aliens
Chairwoman Mace: Okay. Are you read into secret UAP crash retrieval programs?
Mr. Elizondo: We would have to have a conversation in a closed session, ma'am. I signed documentation three years ago that restricts my ability to discuss specifically crash retrievals. I submitted for my book through the DOPSR process, which took a year for it to be reviewed, and what is in the book is what I was told I'm allowed to talk about.
Chairwoman Mace: Has the government conducted secret UAP crash retrieval programs, yes or no?
Mr. Elizondo: Yes.
Chairwoman Mace: Were they designed to identify and reverse-engineer alien craft, yes or no?
Mr. Elizondo: Yes.
Chairwoman Mace: Do any U.S. contractors have the same...?
Mr. Elizondo: I would prefer to address that in a closed session, ma'am.
Chairwoman Mace: In your book, you mentioned government employees who've been injured by UAPs, placed on leave, and are receiving government compensation for their injuries. Is that correct?
Mr. Elizondo: That is correct.
Chairwoman Mace: How can the government deny we have recovered craft if they're paying people because they've been injured by recovered craft?
Mr. Elizondo: Ma'am, that's a great question. That's why I think we're here again, because I've seen the documentation by the U.S. government for several of these individuals who have sustained injuries as a result of a UAP incident.
...
Chairwoman Mace: Okay. What's the key takeaway, just in a few seconds, about the Immaculate Constellation document you provided us today?
Mr. Shellenberger: I think that what the American people need to know is that the U.S. military and intelligence community are sitting on a huge amount of visual and other information—still photos, video photos, other sensor information—and they have for a very long time. And it's not those fuzzy photos and videos that we've been given. There's very clear, high-resolution...
Chairwoman Mace: How many visuals, graphics, videos, photos?
Mr. Shellenberger: I mean, I've been told hundreds, you know, maybe thousands. I also wanted to say, because there was some conversation around concern about the revealing of these materials revealing the source collections, but some of these are shot from helicopters using normal videos of oceans. I just think that's absurd that somehow you're going to be revealing some secret U.S. technology by revealing that you've photographed orbs off the coast of Kuwait.
Chairwoman Mace: Okay. Are you read into secret UAP crash retrieval programs?
Mr. Elizondo: We would have to have a conversation in a closed session, ma'am. I signed documentation three years ago that restricts my ability to discuss specifically crash retrievals. I submitted for my book through the DOPSR process, which took a year for it to be reviewed, and what is in the book is what I was told I'm allowed to talk about.
Chairwoman Mace: Has the government conducted secret UAP crash retrieval programs, yes or no?
Mr. Elizondo: Yes.
Chairwoman Mace: Were they designed to identify and reverse-engineer alien craft, yes or no?
Mr. Elizondo: Yes.
Chairwoman Mace: Do any U.S. contractors have the same...?
Mr. Elizondo: I would prefer to address that in a closed session, ma'am.
Chairwoman Mace: In your book, you mentioned government employees who've been injured by UAPs, placed on leave, and are receiving government compensation for their injuries. Is that correct?
Mr. Elizondo: That is correct.
Chairwoman Mace: How can the government deny we have recovered craft if they're paying people because they've been injured by recovered craft?
Mr. Elizondo: Ma'am, that's a great question. That's why I think we're here again, because I've seen the documentation by the U.S. government for several of these individuals who have sustained injuries as a result of a UAP incident.
...
Chairwoman Mace: Okay. What's the key takeaway, just in a few seconds, about the Immaculate Constellation document you provided us today?
Mr. Shellenberger: I think that what the American people need to know is that the U.S. military and intelligence community are sitting on a huge amount of visual and other information—still photos, video photos, other sensor information—and they have for a very long time. And it's not those fuzzy photos and videos that we've been given. There's very clear, high-resolution...
Chairwoman Mace: How many visuals, graphics, videos, photos?
Mr. Shellenberger: I mean, I've been told hundreds, you know, maybe thousands. I also wanted to say, because there was some conversation around concern about the revealing of these materials revealing the source collections, but some of these are shot from helicopters using normal videos of oceans. I just think that's absurd that somehow you're going to be revealing some secret U.S. technology by revealing that you've photographed orbs off the coast of Kuwait.
#ufo #nhi #aliens
А это первое из недавних слушаний по теме НЛО, к которому так иронически все отнеслись в нашей блогосфере, и которое я тоже в своё время проигнорировал. А зря.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwSkXDmV6Io
А это первое из недавних слушаний по теме НЛО, к которому так иронически все отнеслись в нашей блогосфере, и которое я тоже в своё время проигнорировал. А зря.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwSkXDmV6Io
YouTube
UFO hearing: Eyewitnesses describe encounters with "non human" entities to Congress | FULL
The U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability heard explosive testimony Wednesday, not only about the mysterious craft that was beyond any known technological capabilities but also eyewitness accounts by former U.S. military personnel who said…
😁1
#ufo #aliens
https://medium.com/@thevalleylife/immaculate-constellation-inside-the-pentagons-most-secret-uap-surveillance-program-a4304fe86f3e
https://medium.com/@thevalleylife/immaculate-constellation-inside-the-pentagons-most-secret-uap-surveillance-program-a4304fe86f3e
Medium
Immaculate Constellation: Inside the Pentagon’s Most Secret UAP Surveillance Program
“Immaculate Constellation” is the codename for an unacknowledged Special Access Program (uSAP) — a level of secrecy reserved for highly…
#ufo #aliens #futurology
Очень ценю в людях способность удивляться.
Вот Джо в конце интервью сказал, что удивляется встроенному в Андроид переводчику реального времени. И я его понимаю - а как можно не удивляться?
Как можно считать языковую ИИ модель "той же логистической регрессией", "улучшенным Т9"? Как можно не изумляться, что свёрточная нейросеть отличает по фотографии кошек и собак?
Каким поленом (ну либо супергением, что менее вероятно) надо быть? Наверное, таким, которому и новости про контакт с инопланетянам, если таковой наступит, покажутся обыденными и не вызывающими интереса.
https://youtu.be/R8TqBrrqL4U?si=nVRoLMeUOqA3bq3P
Очень ценю в людях способность удивляться.
Вот Джо в конце интервью сказал, что удивляется встроенному в Андроид переводчику реального времени. И я его понимаю - а как можно не удивляться?
Как можно считать языковую ИИ модель "той же логистической регрессией", "улучшенным Т9"? Как можно не изумляться, что свёрточная нейросеть отличает по фотографии кошек и собак?
Каким поленом (ну либо супергением, что менее вероятно) надо быть? Наверное, таким, которому и новости про контакт с инопланетянам, если таковой наступит, покажутся обыденными и не вызывающими интереса.
https://youtu.be/R8TqBrrqL4U?si=nVRoLMeUOqA3bq3P
YouTube
Joe Rogan Experience #2065 - David Grusch
David Grusch is a former Air Force intelligence officer, representative of the National Reconnaissance Office to the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, and co-lead for Unidentified Aerial Phenomena analysis at the National Geo-Spacial Intelligence…
👎1😁1🙈1
#ufo #aliens
"Come with us, friends! Do not be afraid! They have built the conservatory for us!"
Прям очень сильно.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjQ2t_yNHQs
"Come with us, friends! Do not be afraid! They have built the conservatory for us!"
Прям очень сильно.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjQ2t_yNHQs
YouTube
Oats Studios - Volume 1 - Rakka
www.oatsstudios.com
Steam Page: http://store.steampowered.com/app/633030/
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/oatsstudios/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oatsstudios/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/oatsstudios
Steam Page: http://store.steampowered.com/app/633030/
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/oatsstudios/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oatsstudios/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/oatsstudios
#ufo #aliens
Ваще интересно. Джек Барбер, военный пилот, утверждавший на интервью, что перевозил на вертолете (упавшее/приземлённое?) НЛО, и что правительство/минобороны США использует специальные команды "псиоников" и техническое оборудовние, чтобы их "призывать", нашел спонсоров, собрал команду, и, если ему верить, в рамках проекта Skywatcher с ней собирает в частном порядке инфу по НЛО, выезжая в пустыню и используя те же самые методы "приманки".
НЛО детектируются радаром и пишутся на видео. Можете полюбоваться на таксономию из 7 классов НЛО, которые (якобы) удалось призвать и пронаблюдать его команде.
Что интересно, блюдца там нет, зато есть "скат" и "медуза".
Когда попробовали подлететь к медузе вертолетом, якобы их не подпустили, "как будто одеялом сверху накрыли".
В команде как будто бы серьёзныей учёный Гарри Нолан.
В планах у них полная публикация данных и пир ревью.
Попробую им написать, может )
https://skywatcher.ai/media
Ваще интересно. Джек Барбер, военный пилот, утверждавший на интервью, что перевозил на вертолете (упавшее/приземлённое?) НЛО, и что правительство/минобороны США использует специальные команды "псиоников" и техническое оборудовние, чтобы их "призывать", нашел спонсоров, собрал команду, и, если ему верить, в рамках проекта Skywatcher с ней собирает в частном порядке инфу по НЛО, выезжая в пустыню и используя те же самые методы "приманки".
НЛО детектируются радаром и пишутся на видео. Можете полюбоваться на таксономию из 7 классов НЛО, которые (якобы) удалось призвать и пронаблюдать его команде.
Что интересно, блюдца там нет, зато есть "скат" и "медуза".
Когда попробовали подлететь к медузе вертолетом, якобы их не подпустили, "как будто одеялом сверху накрыли".
В команде как будто бы серьёзныей учёный Гарри Нолан.
В планах у них полная публикация данных и пир ревью.
Попробую им написать, может )
https://skywatcher.ai/media
skywatcher.ai
Skywatcher | Defining The Future of Aerial Intelligence
Leveraging decades of operational experience to decode high-performance flight physics and unconventional aerial activities.
#ufo #aliens
Красотка, спортсменка, комсомолка - Анна Паулина Луна.
https://youtu.be/v-yPOBaYDOo?si=5lgAshtYPkIurZN0
Красотка, спортсменка, комсомолка - Анна Паулина Луна.
https://youtu.be/v-yPOBaYDOo?si=5lgAshtYPkIurZN0
YouTube
Joe Rogan Experience #2365 - Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
Anna Paulina Luna serves as U.S. representative for Florida's 13th congressional district. She is the author of two books: "Marrying the Beret: The Untold Stories of US Special Operations," and "Bringing them Home: The Untold Cost of Putting Missions First."…
👎1