Forwarded from World Council for Health
🚨 First Open Letter on the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty
Read the open letter here: worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/2022/03/pandemic-treaty/45591
WCH urges everyone to approach credible government representatives, political parties, trade unions, civil society groups, professionals, public figures, and independent media to:
✓ Raise awareness about the implications of the proposed global pandemic agreement
✓ Call for national campaigns that protect natural law and democratic constitutions
✓ Join credible civil society coalitions such as WCH
Download the open letter here.
#StopTheTreaty | Prepared by WCH Law and Activism Committee
📌 Follow World Council for Health:
➨ @WCH_org
🗣 Join the discussion:
➨ @worldforhealthchat
Read the open letter here: worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/2022/03/pandemic-treaty/45591
WCH urges everyone to approach credible government representatives, political parties, trade unions, civil society groups, professionals, public figures, and independent media to:
✓ Raise awareness about the implications of the proposed global pandemic agreement
✓ Call for national campaigns that protect natural law and democratic constitutions
✓ Join credible civil society coalitions such as WCH
Download the open letter here.
#StopTheTreaty | Prepared by WCH Law and Activism Committee
📌 Follow World Council for Health:
➨ @WCH_org
🗣 Join the discussion:
➨ @worldforhealthchat
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Please pay attention to this offensive threatened takeover of humanity through a new WHO treaty.
Since when has it ever made sense, in an alleged crisis, to put one agency in charge of all responses?
It doesn’t make sense, because they won’t know what is best.
Arguably, no one will, initially.
Imagine it’s a real crisis. History & logic tells us the best way to discover the best responses is to run many experiments & constantly compare outcomes.
Give control to one agency & you may be sure: they’ll get it wrong almost every time & won’t know why. And that’s setting aside the real motive: to seize control via fraudulent use of law.
Best wishes,
Mike
https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/we-must-act-to-stopthetreaty
Since when has it ever made sense, in an alleged crisis, to put one agency in charge of all responses?
It doesn’t make sense, because they won’t know what is best.
Arguably, no one will, initially.
Imagine it’s a real crisis. History & logic tells us the best way to discover the best responses is to run many experiments & constantly compare outcomes.
Give control to one agency & you may be sure: they’ll get it wrong almost every time & won’t know why. And that’s setting aside the real motive: to seize control via fraudulent use of law.
Best wishes,
Mike
https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/we-must-act-to-stopthetreaty
A Better Way to Health with Dr Tess Lawrie
We Must Act to #StopTheTreaty
“The proposed WHO agreement is unnecessary, and is a threat to sovereignty and inalienable rights."
Forwarded from Dr Tess Lawrie
We told the WHO we don’t want its pandemic treaty – now what?
If the WHO thought it could quietly let its public participation process slip past your attention, it was mistaken.
As mentioned previously, the WHO gave just five days for people to submit their views on its proposed pandemic treaty. Despite the lack of notice, many grassroots organisations did what they could to spread the word and the World Council for Health’s #StopTheTreaty campaign reached an astonishing 415 million people.
Many of you made written submissions expressing your concerns. So many of you in fact, that I hear the WHO’s website crashed on the last day, presumably as a result of too much traffic.
One person who quite understandably missed the deadline is Professor Robert Clancy, Australia’s leading Clinical Immunologist. He sent me the comment he’d wanted to submit and has agreed to let me share it with you.
View it here:
➨ drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/we-told-the-who-we-dont-want-its
Go have a read, and then I’ll share with you some good news. 🥰
📌 Follow Me:
➨ @DrTessLawrie
If the WHO thought it could quietly let its public participation process slip past your attention, it was mistaken.
As mentioned previously, the WHO gave just five days for people to submit their views on its proposed pandemic treaty. Despite the lack of notice, many grassroots organisations did what they could to spread the word and the World Council for Health’s #StopTheTreaty campaign reached an astonishing 415 million people.
Many of you made written submissions expressing your concerns. So many of you in fact, that I hear the WHO’s website crashed on the last day, presumably as a result of too much traffic.
One person who quite understandably missed the deadline is Professor Robert Clancy, Australia’s leading Clinical Immunologist. He sent me the comment he’d wanted to submit and has agreed to let me share it with you.
View it here:
➨ drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/we-told-the-who-we-dont-want-its
Go have a read, and then I’ll share with you some good news. 🥰
📌 Follow Me:
➨ @DrTessLawrie
A Better Way to Health with Dr Tess Lawrie
We told the WHO we don’t want its pandemic treaty – now what?
(Plus, a few words from Australia’s leading epidemiologist)