#Community #Capacity #Building (#CCB) for #Facilitation of #Marriage for #Young #Adults via #Social #Capital
#Amir_Mohammad_Shahsavarani [Correspobding Author]
#Mohammad_Sadegh_Shirinkam
#Mojtaba_Pourtalebiyan
#Mina_Fayazi
#Sargol_Nourbakhsh
#Kolsoum _Sattari
Abstract: #Community #capacity #building (#CCB) is one of the important structures in modern #empowerment area. Among #social #structures involved in CCB, #social _capital, according to the definition, is people’s #non_materialistic accumulation in their #social #relations #network that acts as a common good to expand the #capabilities of #individual in #societal activities. These two structures can be put together to form a solution within #marriage. This article studies the aspects of community capacity building (CCB) and social capital, the way they influence the process of mate selection and marriage, and how to improve the status of marriage through the social capital. The present #systematic #review including the review of marticles related to the community capacity building (CCB), social capital and marriage (with keywords, community capacity building, social capital, #social_trust, #social_networks, #social_exchange, #marriage, #fear_of_marriage, the effective factors in marriage, #social_facilitation of marriage, social capital in marriage) in scientific bases of Google Scholar, Pubmed, Science direct, Elsevier, Ebsco, Proquest, SID, IranDoc, PsychInfo, RoseNet, ISI Web of Science from 2000 to 20 January of 2014, was conducted in English and Persian sources. Entry criteria were comprised of the relevance to the keywords of the research, #quantitative aspects of the research, and a score of at least 2 in #Jadad_Scale. Based on research obtained from 658 sources, 141 sources were accepted and the main sources used in this article were 46. In this paper, after reviewing the basic concepts and definitions of community capacity building (CCB) and social capital, the role of social capital in marriage, the components of social capital (#social_sharing, #social_networking, #social_trust), ways of increasing social capital, and social capital facilitated through marriage have been examined.
Keywords: #Community_Capacity _Building (CCB), #capacity_development, #social_capital, #marriage, #social_communication, #social _trust, #social_networks, #socially _beneficial_behavior.
http://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/3546
#Amir_Mohammad_Shahsavarani [Correspobding Author]
#Mohammad_Sadegh_Shirinkam
#Mojtaba_Pourtalebiyan
#Mina_Fayazi
#Sargol_Nourbakhsh
#Kolsoum _Sattari
Abstract: #Community #capacity #building (#CCB) is one of the important structures in modern #empowerment area. Among #social #structures involved in CCB, #social _capital, according to the definition, is people’s #non_materialistic accumulation in their #social #relations #network that acts as a common good to expand the #capabilities of #individual in #societal activities. These two structures can be put together to form a solution within #marriage. This article studies the aspects of community capacity building (CCB) and social capital, the way they influence the process of mate selection and marriage, and how to improve the status of marriage through the social capital. The present #systematic #review including the review of marticles related to the community capacity building (CCB), social capital and marriage (with keywords, community capacity building, social capital, #social_trust, #social_networks, #social_exchange, #marriage, #fear_of_marriage, the effective factors in marriage, #social_facilitation of marriage, social capital in marriage) in scientific bases of Google Scholar, Pubmed, Science direct, Elsevier, Ebsco, Proquest, SID, IranDoc, PsychInfo, RoseNet, ISI Web of Science from 2000 to 20 January of 2014, was conducted in English and Persian sources. Entry criteria were comprised of the relevance to the keywords of the research, #quantitative aspects of the research, and a score of at least 2 in #Jadad_Scale. Based on research obtained from 658 sources, 141 sources were accepted and the main sources used in this article were 46. In this paper, after reviewing the basic concepts and definitions of community capacity building (CCB) and social capital, the role of social capital in marriage, the components of social capital (#social_sharing, #social_networking, #social_trust), ways of increasing social capital, and social capital facilitated through marriage have been examined.
Keywords: #Community_Capacity _Building (CCB), #capacity_development, #social_capital, #marriage, #social_communication, #social _trust, #social_networks, #socially _beneficial_behavior.
http://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/3546
Forwarded from دکتر امیر محمد شهسوارانی
♻️نیمرخ های #رفتاری #مباحثه در #فضای #مجازی
A #profile of #arguing #behaviors on #Facebook
پژوهشگران دانشگاه اکلاهما 🇺🇸، دانشگاه میسوری مرکزی 🇺🇸، و دانشگاه ایلینویز غربی 🇺🇸 در پژوهشی بدیع به تحلیل زیربناهای #روانی و #شخصیتی ارتباطات افراد در فضای مجازی پرداختند.
🔬در این پژوهش که به روش #تحلیل #محتوا صورت گرفت، 170 نفر داوطلب به سوالات #بازپاسخ و #بسته_پاسخ در مورد جدیدترین مباحثات خود در فضای مجازی (#فیسبوک) پاسخ دادند.
📚نتایج نشان دادند:
1️⃣افراد بیشتر علاقمند به بحث در مورد موضوعات عمومی و خارج از خود هستند؛ بحث هایی که حداقل 6 نفر در آنها دخیل بوده و حدوداً 30 پیام رد و بدل می شود.
2️⃣افراد در مباحثات بطور معمول چندین هدف را دنبال می کنند و اغلب در حال ترغیب/ دفاع از خود و دیگران هستند.
3️⃣اغلب مباحثات در فضای مجازی فیسبوک بدون نتیجه و راه حل بوده و بر روابط مباحثه کنندگان تاثیر ندارند؛ اما در 20درصد موارد مباحثات منجر به تخریب دایم ارتباطات افراد با سایر مباحثه گران شده است.
4️⃣اگر چه تعداد دوستان فرد ارتباطی با میزان بحث وی نداشت، میزان مباحثات دوستان فرد در فضای مجازی ارتباط مثبتی با میزان مباحثات فرد در اینترنت دارد.
Abstract
This study explored how people #argue on #social-networking #sites. Specifically, participants (N = 170) responded to #open and #closed-ended questions about the most recent #argument they had engaged in on #Facebook. Results of a content analysis of participants' answers revealed individuals tended to argue mostly about #public issues, in somewhat complex arguments that involved a median of six people and with about 30 comments exchanged. Individuals often pursued multiple goals, with persuasion and defending themselves or others also reported by some. Arguments tended to end without resolution, and most had no effects on arguers' #relationships; however, for 20% of the sample, arguments permanently damaged their relationships. Although the number of friends participants had did not have a substantial effect on their frequency of #arguing, the frequency with which one's friends argued on Facebook was positively related to one's own arguing frequency. These results are interpreted in connection to argumentation and #computer-mediated-communication literature. Limitations of the study as well as directions for future research are also discussed.
لینک منبع پیشنهادی برای مطالعه بیشتر 👇🏻(further reading)👇🏻
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.009
✅(در صورت جذابیت و علاقمندی به موضوع، مطلب را برای دیگران نیز بازنشر فرمایید).
📢کانال #دکترامیرمحمدشهسوارانی
🍃🌹🌸💐🌸🌹🍃
@DrAmirMohammadShahsavarani
A #profile of #arguing #behaviors on #Facebook
پژوهشگران دانشگاه اکلاهما 🇺🇸، دانشگاه میسوری مرکزی 🇺🇸، و دانشگاه ایلینویز غربی 🇺🇸 در پژوهشی بدیع به تحلیل زیربناهای #روانی و #شخصیتی ارتباطات افراد در فضای مجازی پرداختند.
🔬در این پژوهش که به روش #تحلیل #محتوا صورت گرفت، 170 نفر داوطلب به سوالات #بازپاسخ و #بسته_پاسخ در مورد جدیدترین مباحثات خود در فضای مجازی (#فیسبوک) پاسخ دادند.
📚نتایج نشان دادند:
1️⃣افراد بیشتر علاقمند به بحث در مورد موضوعات عمومی و خارج از خود هستند؛ بحث هایی که حداقل 6 نفر در آنها دخیل بوده و حدوداً 30 پیام رد و بدل می شود.
2️⃣افراد در مباحثات بطور معمول چندین هدف را دنبال می کنند و اغلب در حال ترغیب/ دفاع از خود و دیگران هستند.
3️⃣اغلب مباحثات در فضای مجازی فیسبوک بدون نتیجه و راه حل بوده و بر روابط مباحثه کنندگان تاثیر ندارند؛ اما در 20درصد موارد مباحثات منجر به تخریب دایم ارتباطات افراد با سایر مباحثه گران شده است.
4️⃣اگر چه تعداد دوستان فرد ارتباطی با میزان بحث وی نداشت، میزان مباحثات دوستان فرد در فضای مجازی ارتباط مثبتی با میزان مباحثات فرد در اینترنت دارد.
Abstract
This study explored how people #argue on #social-networking #sites. Specifically, participants (N = 170) responded to #open and #closed-ended questions about the most recent #argument they had engaged in on #Facebook. Results of a content analysis of participants' answers revealed individuals tended to argue mostly about #public issues, in somewhat complex arguments that involved a median of six people and with about 30 comments exchanged. Individuals often pursued multiple goals, with persuasion and defending themselves or others also reported by some. Arguments tended to end without resolution, and most had no effects on arguers' #relationships; however, for 20% of the sample, arguments permanently damaged their relationships. Although the number of friends participants had did not have a substantial effect on their frequency of #arguing, the frequency with which one's friends argued on Facebook was positively related to one's own arguing frequency. These results are interpreted in connection to argumentation and #computer-mediated-communication literature. Limitations of the study as well as directions for future research are also discussed.
لینک منبع پیشنهادی برای مطالعه بیشتر 👇🏻(further reading)👇🏻
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.009
✅(در صورت جذابیت و علاقمندی به موضوع، مطلب را برای دیگران نیز بازنشر فرمایید).
📢کانال #دکترامیرمحمدشهسوارانی
🍃🌹🌸💐🌸🌹🍃
@DrAmirMohammadShahsavarani