IELTS 9.0 √Suhrobjon Abdivaliev
📊TASK 1 BAR CHART! @WRITING_T
The bar chart compares American men and women across different age groups in terms of their salt consumption patterns in the year 2000.
Overall, individuals of all ages exceeded the recommended salt intake levels, except for children under 6 years old, with men consistently consuming higher amounts than their female counterparts. It is also clear that salt consumption increased with age, although there is evidence of reversal among older age brackets.
Beginning with the younger age categories, boys under the age of 6 consumed approximately 2000 milligrams of salt, nearly double the amount consumed by their female peers. The gender disparity narrowed down in the 6-11 age group, with boys consuming around 3500 milligrams compared to girls' consumption of 3000 milligrams. In the next age bracket, salt consumption continued to rise with age in males, reaching over 4000, while female consumption remained constant.
Of particular significance is the 20-39 age category, which marked the highest consumption levels, with men peaking at 4500 milligrams and women breaching the 3100-milligram threshold. In the 40-60 age group, however, there was a decrease in salt consumption, with men reducing their intake to just below 4000 milligrams and women maintaining a level of 3000 milligrams. Interestingly, although older men continued to consume high levels of salt, women in the over-60 age bracket adhered to the recommended salt intake guidelines.
Suhrobjon Abdivaliyev
@WRITING_T
Overall, individuals of all ages exceeded the recommended salt intake levels, except for children under 6 years old, with men consistently consuming higher amounts than their female counterparts. It is also clear that salt consumption increased with age, although there is evidence of reversal among older age brackets.
Beginning with the younger age categories, boys under the age of 6 consumed approximately 2000 milligrams of salt, nearly double the amount consumed by their female peers. The gender disparity narrowed down in the 6-11 age group, with boys consuming around 3500 milligrams compared to girls' consumption of 3000 milligrams. In the next age bracket, salt consumption continued to rise with age in males, reaching over 4000, while female consumption remained constant.
Of particular significance is the 20-39 age category, which marked the highest consumption levels, with men peaking at 4500 milligrams and women breaching the 3100-milligram threshold. In the 40-60 age group, however, there was a decrease in salt consumption, with men reducing their intake to just below 4000 milligrams and women maintaining a level of 3000 milligrams. Interestingly, although older men continued to consume high levels of salt, women in the over-60 age bracket adhered to the recommended salt intake guidelines.
Suhrobjon Abdivaliyev
@WRITING_T
👍28⚡5🔥4☃2❤1
IELTS 9.0 √Suhrobjon Abdivaliev
✅IELTS WRITING TASK 1! 📊Bar Chart! @WRITING_T
🔥A BAND 5.5 PERFORMANCE🔥
The bar chart compares five different age groups in terms of their donation rates in Britain during the years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, a higher proportion of British people were involved in charitable giving in 1990 compared to 2010. There was also a clear correlation between donation patterns and age in both years, although there is evidence of reversal among older age brackets.
Beginning with the younger age groups, approximately 16% of individuals aged 18-25 contributed to charity in 1990, a figure that dropped significantly to only 7% by 2010. The decline was less pronounced among those aged 26 to 35, where the percentage of donors decreased from over 30% in 1990 to a quarter in 2010. As for individuals aged 36 to 50, the proportion of donors breached the 40% threshold in 1990 but later fell to precisely 35%.
In contrast, older age groups followed rising donation patterns over the same period. The percentage of individuals aged 51 to 65 who donated money to charitable causes was 35% in 1990, which then saw a minimal increase of 5%. Likewise, the figure for donors in the oldest age category slightly rose, going from over 30% in 1990 to exactly 35% by 2010.
Subrobjon Abdivaliyev
@WRITING_T
The bar chart compares five different age groups in terms of their donation rates in Britain during the years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, a higher proportion of British people were involved in charitable giving in 1990 compared to 2010. There was also a clear correlation between donation patterns and age in both years, although there is evidence of reversal among older age brackets.
Beginning with the younger age groups, approximately 16% of individuals aged 18-25 contributed to charity in 1990, a figure that dropped significantly to only 7% by 2010. The decline was less pronounced among those aged 26 to 35, where the percentage of donors decreased from over 30% in 1990 to a quarter in 2010. As for individuals aged 36 to 50, the proportion of donors breached the 40% threshold in 1990 but later fell to precisely 35%.
In contrast, older age groups followed rising donation patterns over the same period. The percentage of individuals aged 51 to 65 who donated money to charitable causes was 35% in 1990, which then saw a minimal increase of 5%. Likewise, the figure for donors in the oldest age category slightly rose, going from over 30% in 1990 to exactly 35% by 2010.
Subrobjon Abdivaliyev
@WRITING_T
😁20👍19🔥9❤2🌚1
IELTS 9.0 √Suhrobjon Abdivaliev
✅IELTS WRITING TASK 2! 🏅Animal experimentation @WRITING_T
🔥A BAND 5.0 PERFORMANCE🔥
With the rapid advancements in science and technology, it has become increasingly common for scientists to conduct animal research to develop new medical treatments and assess product quality, particularly in developed countries. While opinions on the ethical nature of such experiments vary, I firmly advocate for the continuation of animal experimentation for the greater good of humanity.
Proponents of banning animal experimentation cite various reasons to support their stance. When animals are exploited in laboratories to produce and test medicines and vaccines, they are subjected to painful experiments, especially if equipment malfunctions and human errors take place. Given the suffering and cruelty in such scientific researches, animal rights activists argue that it is ethically wrong to cause any species of animals to suffer. Furthermore, advocates for the prohibition of animal testing point out the availability of alternative methods such as advabced computer modeling and in vitro studies that can replace animal experiments. In light of such alternatives, it seems reasonable to consider animal experimentation unnecessary.
Despite these arguments against animal experimentation, in my view, it is essential to continue with research involving animals. Using different species of animals for medical and scientific purposes not only facilitates the develpment of innovative medicines but also ensures the safety and efficiency of products consumed by humans. If populations continue to benefit from animal research programs, governments might also increase wildlife conservation efforts, creating a win-win scenario. In addition, animal testing remains an intergal part of science due to its effectiveness and reliability compared to alternative methods. The biological similarities between animals and humans make them irreplaceable in developing and evaluating treatments and products for human use. A case in point is the Covid-19 pandemic when animal testing made it much easier to test the safety and efficacy of vaccines against the virus.
In conclusion, while valid concerns are raised regarding the ethical implications of animal exploitation in scientific experiments, I contend that scientists should keep utilizing animals for medical research and product testing. Only through continuous and dependable animal testing programs can strides be made in developing new medicines and assessing their suitability for human consumption.
Suhrobjon Abdivaliyev
@WRITING_T
With the rapid advancements in science and technology, it has become increasingly common for scientists to conduct animal research to develop new medical treatments and assess product quality, particularly in developed countries. While opinions on the ethical nature of such experiments vary, I firmly advocate for the continuation of animal experimentation for the greater good of humanity.
Proponents of banning animal experimentation cite various reasons to support their stance. When animals are exploited in laboratories to produce and test medicines and vaccines, they are subjected to painful experiments, especially if equipment malfunctions and human errors take place. Given the suffering and cruelty in such scientific researches, animal rights activists argue that it is ethically wrong to cause any species of animals to suffer. Furthermore, advocates for the prohibition of animal testing point out the availability of alternative methods such as advabced computer modeling and in vitro studies that can replace animal experiments. In light of such alternatives, it seems reasonable to consider animal experimentation unnecessary.
Despite these arguments against animal experimentation, in my view, it is essential to continue with research involving animals. Using different species of animals for medical and scientific purposes not only facilitates the develpment of innovative medicines but also ensures the safety and efficiency of products consumed by humans. If populations continue to benefit from animal research programs, governments might also increase wildlife conservation efforts, creating a win-win scenario. In addition, animal testing remains an intergal part of science due to its effectiveness and reliability compared to alternative methods. The biological similarities between animals and humans make them irreplaceable in developing and evaluating treatments and products for human use. A case in point is the Covid-19 pandemic when animal testing made it much easier to test the safety and efficacy of vaccines against the virus.
In conclusion, while valid concerns are raised regarding the ethical implications of animal exploitation in scientific experiments, I contend that scientists should keep utilizing animals for medical research and product testing. Only through continuous and dependable animal testing programs can strides be made in developing new medicines and assessing their suitability for human consumption.
Suhrobjon Abdivaliyev
@WRITING_T
👍43🔥10😱6☃3❤3
Forwarded from COURSE PREP
🔥NICE VOCAB🔥
📝 Whenever I become obsessed with spiraling thoughts that sap away my productivity, I pull back, slow down, and recalibrate my mindset.
🥇Sap away productivity = reduce or compromise productivity.
🥈Recalibrate one’s mind = change the way one thinks about life.
@WRITING_T
📝 Whenever I become obsessed with spiraling thoughts that sap away my productivity, I pull back, slow down, and recalibrate my mindset.
🥇Sap away productivity = reduce or compromise productivity.
🥈Recalibrate one’s mind = change the way one thinks about life.
@WRITING_T
⚡21👍19🔥6😍4🎉1
🔥NICE VOCAB🔥
📝Due to my ambitious personality, I always seek opportunities for personal growth and resist the temptation to stagnate at all costs.
🥇Resist the temptation to = avoid doing things that they want to do but know they shouldn’t.
🥈At all costs = no matter how much effort or price is needed.
@WRITING_T
📝Due to my ambitious personality, I always seek opportunities for personal growth and resist the temptation to stagnate at all costs.
🥇Resist the temptation to = avoid doing things that they want to do but know they shouldn’t.
🥈At all costs = no matter how much effort or price is needed.
@WRITING_T
👍29🏆5🔥3😍1
IELTS 9.0 √Suhrobjon Abdivaliev
🔥NICE VOCAB🔥 📝Due to my ambitious personality, I always seek opportunities for personal growth and resist the temptation to stagnate at all costs. 🥇Resist the temptation to = avoid doing things that they want to do but know they shouldn’t. 🥈At all costs…
🙏🙏 PLEASE 🙏🙏
Resist the temptation to watch nonsense YouTube videos about how to get an IELTS 8.0 in 2 days.
Resist the temptation to watch nonsense YouTube videos about how to get an IELTS 8.0 in 2 days.
😁56👍13😱4❤2😍2
✅IELTS WRITING TASK 2!
📝I will write and share an almost impeccable essay on this topic a little bit later: before that, you can prepare your own masterpiece to compare your structures, phrases, and ideas with mine. In this way, you can identify areas where there is room for improvement.
@WRITING_T
📝I will write and share an almost impeccable essay on this topic a little bit later: before that, you can prepare your own masterpiece to compare your structures, phrases, and ideas with mine. In this way, you can identify areas where there is room for improvement.
@WRITING_T
👍60👏10🐳4😍1
IELTS 9.0 √Suhrobjon Abdivaliev
Bugun mana shu mavzu tushibdimi real examda?
😱38👍13👏5
IELTS 9.0 √Suhrobjon Abdivaliev
✅WRITING 2 BAND IMPROVEMENT! @WRITING_T
Endi desertga bitta WRITING 7.0 cha bo’lsa silliq ketadida😁!
👍32🔥2😍2
IELTS 9.0 √Suhrobjon Abdivaliev
✅WRITING-7.0 💥 A reflection of our work ethic and perseverance! @WRITING_T
“Biz ham bundan shodmiz: bundanda yuksak natijalar tilab qolamiz😁”. Bunaqa gaplarni admin qaydan topadi-ye.
Men o’qimagan “ chotki natija gazini bosing” deb yuribman.
Men o’qimagan “ chotki natija gazini bosing” deb yuribman.
😁82👍8👌1
IELTS 9.0 √Suhrobjon Abdivaliev
✅IELTS WRITING TASK 2! 📝I will write and share an almost impeccable essay on this topic a little bit later: before that, you can prepare your own masterpiece to compare your structures, phrases, and ideas with mine. In this way, you can identify areas where…
In response to urgent societal and environmental challenges, many argue that it is imperative for all individuals to contribute a certain portion of their earnings to support charitable causes. While there are valid reasons behind this proposal, I take issue with it.
Proponents of mandatory donations put forth personal and social justifications for their stance. At an individual level, donating a fixed percentage of one's income to charity can cultivate a heightened sense of social responsibility and civic duty, fostering a profound connection to community well-being. Knowing that their contributions can make a big difference in terms of promoting social prosperity and environmental preservation, individuals may derive a deep sense of purpose and fulfillment, ultimately enhancing their overall quality of life. On a broader societal scale, compulsory financial contributions to charitable organisations can serve as catalysts for empowering marginalized groups, such as abused children, displaced populations, and the homeless. This turn of events not only alleviates social issues of poverty and crime but also fosters social cohesion and solidarity.
Despite these arguments in favor of compulsory donations, in my view, imposing such obligations carries more drawbacks than benefits. Firstly, it goes against the fundamental ethos of charity - voluntary giving. Forcing individuals to donate a specific proportion of their salaries undermines the core values of altruism, potentially eroding the underlying principles of charitable acts. Secondly, it is crucial to acknowledge that people already fulfill their civic duties through mandatory tax payments. In a challenging economic landscape where many struggle to balance high taxes and utility bills with basic necessities, mandating charitable donations could compound financial constraints and provoke public resistance.
In conclusion, while mandatory donations can benefit individuals and society as a whole, I contend that such governmental mandates run the risk of distorting the true spirit of charity and face public opposition. Only through voluntary acts of generosity and philanthropy can strides be made in transforming the world into a better place to live in.
Suhrobjon Abdivaliyev
@WRITING_T
Proponents of mandatory donations put forth personal and social justifications for their stance. At an individual level, donating a fixed percentage of one's income to charity can cultivate a heightened sense of social responsibility and civic duty, fostering a profound connection to community well-being. Knowing that their contributions can make a big difference in terms of promoting social prosperity and environmental preservation, individuals may derive a deep sense of purpose and fulfillment, ultimately enhancing their overall quality of life. On a broader societal scale, compulsory financial contributions to charitable organisations can serve as catalysts for empowering marginalized groups, such as abused children, displaced populations, and the homeless. This turn of events not only alleviates social issues of poverty and crime but also fosters social cohesion and solidarity.
Despite these arguments in favor of compulsory donations, in my view, imposing such obligations carries more drawbacks than benefits. Firstly, it goes against the fundamental ethos of charity - voluntary giving. Forcing individuals to donate a specific proportion of their salaries undermines the core values of altruism, potentially eroding the underlying principles of charitable acts. Secondly, it is crucial to acknowledge that people already fulfill their civic duties through mandatory tax payments. In a challenging economic landscape where many struggle to balance high taxes and utility bills with basic necessities, mandating charitable donations could compound financial constraints and provoke public resistance.
In conclusion, while mandatory donations can benefit individuals and society as a whole, I contend that such governmental mandates run the risk of distorting the true spirit of charity and face public opposition. Only through voluntary acts of generosity and philanthropy can strides be made in transforming the world into a better place to live in.
Suhrobjon Abdivaliyev
@WRITING_T
👍29👏5❤2😱2😢1
Guys, what kind of social media platforms do you actively use and why?
👍23🔥3👌1
How many channels do you follow on Telegram?
Anonymous Poll
14%
Around 3
11%
Around 6
7%
Around 9
68%
More than 10
👍20🔥4👌2❤1
Bugun British Council CD IELTS da tushgan Reading Passage 1 va Listening section 4 ni xoxlaydiganlar yuqmi mabodo?
👍112🐳9👌4❤3😍2
Unda bugun bir soatdan keyin 21:00 da Reading Passage 1, Listening Part 4, va vaqt yetsa Writing Task 2 ni ham jonli ko'rib chiqamiz.
WRITING Task 1 ni ham topdim: balki Writing Task 2 va Task 1 ni birinchi ko’rishimiz ham mumkin.
WRITING Task 1 ni ham topdim: balki Writing Task 2 va Task 1 ni birinchi ko’rishimiz ham mumkin.
👍70🔥5🐳3