Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
WR IELTS ARCHIVE
Photo
I am sure that you will be flexible with writing various charts whether it is line graph or map, as long as you pay attention to every detail and write your own samples by sending to me @abdurahmon_sk😃 inshaa Alloh. Feel free to expect a "free" checking service. I just like to know your competence.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
WR IELTS ARCHIVE
Photo
The bar graph illustrates the different means of transport which were used by commuters of London in two different years, 2000 and 2020.
Overall, car was by far the most popular transport in both years, meaning people commuting at that time opted for faster way of travelling to work. The secod highest percentage of travellers preferred public transport to more environmentally-friendly ones, while walking to work was easily the least favourite option for people in both 2000 and 2020.
Analyzing the details regarding 2000 lifestyle in using transport to commute to work, the highest percentage(60%) of people in London opted to utilise cars to travel to their work, making this mode of transport the most favorable. However, more proportion of commuters chose public transpoprt such as trains, buses and underground than those who used bicyles instead, around 25% and 5% respectively. Interestingly, the lowest percentage of them walked to work, which meant healthy lifestyle was never more important than going to work on time or early.
In the latter year, however, car was still an all-time significant type of transport used by 50% of commuters, but public transport this year became more common, with 30% of people using for going to work. Ultimately, only 10% of London population used bicycles, which was similar to the percentage of those who walked.
220 words
Overall, car was by far the most popular transport in both years, meaning people commuting at that time opted for faster way of travelling to work. The secod highest percentage of travellers preferred public transport to more environmentally-friendly ones, while walking to work was easily the least favourite option for people in both 2000 and 2020.
Analyzing the details regarding 2000 lifestyle in using transport to commute to work, the highest percentage(60%) of people in London opted to utilise cars to travel to their work, making this mode of transport the most favorable. However, more proportion of commuters chose public transpoprt such as trains, buses and underground than those who used bicyles instead, around 25% and 5% respectively. Interestingly, the lowest percentage of them walked to work, which meant healthy lifestyle was never more important than going to work on time or early.
In the latter year, however, car was still an all-time significant type of transport used by 50% of commuters, but public transport this year became more common, with 30% of people using for going to work. Ultimately, only 10% of London population used bicycles, which was similar to the percentage of those who walked.
220 words
⚡1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
⚡1
Do you prefer online source or the ones that are on paper so that you can touch and feel while reading?
WR IELTS ARCHIVE
This is the very essay question that should be on our table tonight✅
1. It is noted that there should be an emphasis on making advancements in reading technologies such as online sources, books, or libraries instead of creating high volumes of traditional books. In this sense, it is beneficial to have better technology to make resources ubiquitous and easy to get, but I strongly contend that physical advantages are more significant when it comes to reading, allowing readers to have healthy eye sight coupled with enjoyment.
2. There is a view that online resources should be bettered in spite of having high volumes of paper books. Although traditional books offer reduced screen time and tactile experience, I strongly believe that technology allows people to have equitable access to digital sources together with user centred digital devices.
2. There is a view that online resources should be bettered in spite of having high volumes of paper books. Although traditional books offer reduced screen time and tactile experience, I strongly believe that technology allows people to have equitable access to digital sources together with user centred digital devices.
WR IELTS ARCHIVE
1. It is noted that there should be an emphasis on making advancements in reading technologies such as online sources, books, or libraries instead of creating high volumes of traditional books. In this sense, it is beneficial to have better technology to make…
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
TOPIC:
It is noted that forcing drivers to do annual driving tests is the most beneficial way of making traffic on the roads safe. This legal test is truly crucial to keep all the car owners aware of transportation rules so that people can be out of danger while commuting or walking on the streets, but I partly disapprove of this point as this could bring a few negative outcomes which cannot be ignored. These include the possibilities of job stress and wasting time.
Admittedly, taking a driving test at least once a year is the best option to somehow allow people who drive vehicles to test their abilities, and avoid potential car crashes when practising on a yearly basis, ensuring better safety on the roads for both passengers and drivers. In other words, people may become more cautious and awake when making decisions on driving cars after being repeatedly asked to assure or reassure their driving licences once a year by visiting certain facilities established by the government. Dying instantly, turning disabled, or being on a comma because of driving recklessly and without any knowledge of traffic rules in some Asian countries, especially in Uzbekistan, can be ultimate cases, which must be avoided by making them take the test annually. This law enforcement is the most significant choice when offering better safety for the public using roads.
That being said, this way of bettering road safety for traffic can lead to more negative implications, such as job stress for working individuals among people who live on cars by working as taxi or public transport drivers like buses. Driving test each year is equal to having unwanted stress by going to take the tests in person or memorising less common traffic rules to be prepared. The workers lose more interest in their jobs, leading them to be irresponsible for their daily work, which actually may decrease the safety. This is a negative development in modern society where self-controlled or build-in-AI vehicles are being the norm in some countries like the United States. These cars do not have drivers who should be able to know rules.
Another negative side of this solution to road safety is that people waste huge amount of time practising, revising, or rearranging what they learnt a year before the test simply because driving safely is not only attributed to being good at tests, but a regular practice on the road. Many people in Thailand, for example, have great amount of experience in driving, and this is not because of the fact that they do the tests regularly, but because of learning and driving every day without wasting time reading or preparing for the tests. These are the most important effects of this measure.
In conclusion, even though it is beneficial to take the driving tests every year for better safety on road, its negative sides can outweigh the positive.
482 words
The best way to increase road transport safety is to make vehicle drivers take a driving test each year. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is noted that forcing drivers to do annual driving tests is the most beneficial way of making traffic on the roads safe. This legal test is truly crucial to keep all the car owners aware of transportation rules so that people can be out of danger while commuting or walking on the streets, but I partly disapprove of this point as this could bring a few negative outcomes which cannot be ignored. These include the possibilities of job stress and wasting time.
Admittedly, taking a driving test at least once a year is the best option to somehow allow people who drive vehicles to test their abilities, and avoid potential car crashes when practising on a yearly basis, ensuring better safety on the roads for both passengers and drivers. In other words, people may become more cautious and awake when making decisions on driving cars after being repeatedly asked to assure or reassure their driving licences once a year by visiting certain facilities established by the government. Dying instantly, turning disabled, or being on a comma because of driving recklessly and without any knowledge of traffic rules in some Asian countries, especially in Uzbekistan, can be ultimate cases, which must be avoided by making them take the test annually. This law enforcement is the most significant choice when offering better safety for the public using roads.
That being said, this way of bettering road safety for traffic can lead to more negative implications, such as job stress for working individuals among people who live on cars by working as taxi or public transport drivers like buses. Driving test each year is equal to having unwanted stress by going to take the tests in person or memorising less common traffic rules to be prepared. The workers lose more interest in their jobs, leading them to be irresponsible for their daily work, which actually may decrease the safety. This is a negative development in modern society where self-controlled or build-in-AI vehicles are being the norm in some countries like the United States. These cars do not have drivers who should be able to know rules.
Another negative side of this solution to road safety is that people waste huge amount of time practising, revising, or rearranging what they learnt a year before the test simply because driving safely is not only attributed to being good at tests, but a regular practice on the road. Many people in Thailand, for example, have great amount of experience in driving, and this is not because of the fact that they do the tests regularly, but because of learning and driving every day without wasting time reading or preparing for the tests. These are the most important effects of this measure.
In conclusion, even though it is beneficial to take the driving tests every year for better safety on road, its negative sides can outweigh the positive.
482 words
⚡1
WR IELTS ARCHIVE
TOPIC: The best way to increase road transport safety is to make vehicle drivers take a driving test each year. To what extent do you agree or disagree? It is noted that forcing drivers to do annual driving tests is the most beneficial way of making traffic…
a pretty difficult essay queston, in fact.
In some cities, public parks and open spaces are being changed into gardens where local residents can grow their own fruits and vegetables. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
It is common that some cities are establishing new gardens for agricultural needs, such as growing fruits and vegetables, coming to the cost of demolishing recreational places like parks and open areas used by the local. While this establishment brings sufficient source of food and jobs for people, entertaining areas, and available spaces always remain significant just because many families may not be able to spend time outside, or may have a lack of areas for public events thanks to this replacement. These are the most disputable elements.
There are a few benefits from this change which are notable to consider when concentrating on growing food, allowing government to support people with agricultural lands after having more space for growing them. When people grow their own food in their private lands, they will spend less while buying groceries, or they may store them for long.
Another advantage of this trend is that there will be more job opportunities for an unemployed part of society, encouraging them to sell what they have, and some of them can export fruits and vegetables to other countries as salesmen. Some parts of Uzbekistan can be the most relative cases for this, where local residents are given lands to plant various types of fruits and vegetables for certain period of time, thus making them employed in their own places, also allowing them to have enough food in their households. These positive effects, however, may stay unbiased.
Albeit these advantages, this replacement may have greater causes for people’s social lives when it comes to the most important thing after work or school - entertainment. Because of having no places for park, families may not have walkable areas to spend some time talking, which may reduce their stress after a long week of working or studying, helping them unwind. Consequently, there will be a public annoyance towards government, wanting to have these areas to spend their holidays, weekends, or vacations. Many developed countries like Germany have more parks and open spaces than farm lands, and as a result, people and even tourists consider this country more natural and entertaining.
Additionally, removing these places may lead to a lack of public events, such as tournaments, festivals, and public meetings, resulting in public disgrace. Outside world makes more people happy when their houses or apartments feel uncomfortable, especially in city centres.
In conclusion, it is more rational to have enough areas for recreation and other purposes than focusing on a subtle part of agriculture across cities, as people always prioritise spending time more wisely.
425 words
⚡2❤1👍1