vx-underground
The cool thing about this social media profile growing in size is that it now frequently escapes the core demographic. This has resulted in very silly shenanigans. As many of my core audience knows, I frequently refer to my colleagues and peers as "nerds".โฆ
I'm not mad, or sad, or whatever. I am however profoundly confused.
Imagine changing a diaper, checking the Xitter, logging in, and you see a bunch of strangers calling you names and mean stuff
mfw
Imagine changing a diaper, checking the Xitter, logging in, and you see a bunch of strangers calling you names and mean stuff
mfw
๐ฅฐ57๐คฃ19๐7โค6๐4๐ฏ4๐ค1๐ค1
Conspiracy theorists going full theorist today. In the Department of Justice Epstein email releases it was discovered he played Fortnite.
Coincidentally, his Epic account was active after his death.
Coincidentally, his Epic account was active after his death.
๐คฃ98๐ฅฐ10๐6๐ฑ5๐ข3โค2
vx-underground
Conspiracy theorists going full theorist today. In the Department of Justice Epstein email releases it was discovered he played Fortnite. Coincidentally, his Epic account was active after his death.
Is Jeffrey Epstein actually alive? Is he a pro-gamer? Why hasn't he spent more money on V-bucks?
Find out next time on Dragon Ball Z
Find out next time on Dragon Ball Z
๐คฃ76โค16๐ฅฐ2
Non-nerds are asking how Mr. Al-Qudsi (mqudsi) is working to reconstruct redacted Epstein data. Here is a high-level summary that isn't as nerdy schizo
Mega tl;dr
> Send email
> Add attachment
> Emails no understand files
> Email turn files in text (Base64 encoding*)
> Image 1 is email turning attachment into text
> Send email
> Someone receive email
> Email reads add-on text
> "oh thats an attachment"
> Transforms into attachment you can see (Base64 decoding*)
> DoJ releases Epstein emails
> Didn't censor attachment stuff
> hehe big mistake, we can recover this
> Boom, all attachments "censored" now uncensored
> All hidden attachments now public
> Go to work
> Problems arise
> DoJ printed emails (???)
> Scanned printed emails back (???)
> Try to rebuild from email stuff
> Fails
> wtf.mp4
> Look inside
> DoJ printed as "Courier New" font
> L and 1 look the same
> Try to reconstruct
> Fails
> Computer can't figure difference between L and 1
> (Look at image 2)
> Can you even tell the difference???
To manually reconstruct all attachments from Epstein emails data forensic experts must find a way to programmatically determine which characters are L's and which are 1's. This is only a problem because the DoJ printed it as Courier New.
Proposed solution right now is bruteforce. Try every possible combination, swapping L's and 1's, check email thing, does it work? No? Repeat. However, this could take a long time.
Another solution is taking known email encoded thingies that work and compare it to Epstein files. Try to identify patterns and reconstruct it using machine learning.
Mega tl;dr
> Send email
> Add attachment
> Emails no understand files
> Email turn files in text (Base64 encoding*)
> Image 1 is email turning attachment into text
> Send email
> Someone receive email
> Email reads add-on text
> "oh thats an attachment"
> Transforms into attachment you can see (Base64 decoding*)
> DoJ releases Epstein emails
> Didn't censor attachment stuff
> hehe big mistake, we can recover this
> Boom, all attachments "censored" now uncensored
> All hidden attachments now public
> Go to work
> Problems arise
> DoJ printed emails (???)
> Scanned printed emails back (???)
> Try to rebuild from email stuff
> Fails
> wtf.mp4
> Look inside
> DoJ printed as "Courier New" font
> L and 1 look the same
> Try to reconstruct
> Fails
> Computer can't figure difference between L and 1
> (Look at image 2)
> Can you even tell the difference???
To manually reconstruct all attachments from Epstein emails data forensic experts must find a way to programmatically determine which characters are L's and which are 1's. This is only a problem because the DoJ printed it as Courier New.
Proposed solution right now is bruteforce. Try every possible combination, swapping L's and 1's, check email thing, does it work? No? Repeat. However, this could take a long time.
Another solution is taking known email encoded thingies that work and compare it to Epstein files. Try to identify patterns and reconstruct it using machine learning.
๐ฅฐ64โค20๐คฏ16๐ข4๐2๐2๐ค1
vx-underground
Non-nerds are asking how Mr. Al-Qudsi (mqudsi) is working to reconstruct redacted Epstein data. Here is a high-level summary that isn't as nerdy schizo Mega tl;dr > Send email > Add attachment > Emails no understand files > Email turn files in text (Base64โฆ
Update: Random nerd (literally, they didn't leave a name or anything, just a random message to Al-Qudsi) said he magnified the text, enhanced, zoomed in (unironically some CSI Miami bullshit), and noticed slight differences in the characters virtually invisible to the human eye, but still present in the documents.
He was able to increase the darkness and make the L's and 1's more pronounced to possibly solve the problem. However, this would require manually fixing the documents.
He was able to increase the darkness and make the L's and 1's more pronounced to possibly solve the problem. However, this would require manually fixing the documents.
โค69๐ฅฐ16๐ฅ8๐คฉ6โคโ๐ฅ4
Now that there is a tsunami of nerds trying to unredact Epstein file attachments, how long will it take for the weaponized autism to "crack the code" (solve the L = 1 problem), and release unredacted Epstein documents?
Anonymous Poll
33%
Less than 24 hours
39%
1 - 3 days
21%
A week or more
7%
Months
โค33๐ฅฐ10
Pam Bondi and Kash Patel when they realize the Epstein documents they had the interns censor weren't censored correctly (again for the 5th time) and now nerds are actively reverse engineering and decoding e-mail attachments to find redacted emails and redacted attachments
๐ฅฐ98๐คฃ57๐11โค6๐ฏ6๐1
Yesterday United States President Donald J. Trump commented that AI will be "bigger than the internet" and that the United States is "leading China by a lot".
This confirmed many beliefs that the internet is dead. Indeed, as I write this very post, you yourself could be AI
This confirmed many beliefs that the internet is dead. Indeed, as I write this very post, you yourself could be AI
๐70โคโ๐ฅ19โค9๐ข9๐ฑ5๐1๐ซก1
vx-underground
Yesterday United States President Donald J. Trump commented that AI will be "bigger than the internet" and that the United States is "leading China by a lot". This confirmed many beliefs that the internet is dead. Indeed, as I write this very post, you yourselfโฆ
OMG AM I AI
โค75๐17๐คฏ6๐ข6๐4๐4โคโ๐ฅ2๐ฅฐ2๐2
Chat, it's the space race. Except we're not racing to space, we're racing to programmatically decode attached Epstein email documents.
Last time on Dragon Ball Z: nerds noted that in the Epstein documents the DoJ failed to censor Base64 encoded email attachments. This means we have the means to extract the email attachments from the Epstein documents and see what is inside and uncensored.
Big problems occured. Upon further inspection nerds noted the Epstein documents use Corrier New. This font is a pain in the ass to work with. In summary, they cannot reliably tell the difference (programmatically) between an L and a 1.
Now we're off to the races. Who can solve it first and (probably) be murdered by a spooky shadowy government? (but have lots of clout on the internet)
The first proposed solution was brute force. Swap the L's and 1's, try every possible combination until it is successfully decoded. The problem with this method is that even a simple document has over 1,000,000 unique permutations. To swap every L and 1, try to decode, then test the file, would take (if your computer is fast as fuck boi) 3 seconds... so a small document would take (worse case scenario) 34 days to brute force.
The second proposed solution was transforming the PDF documents into high resolution images then programmatically enhancing the L's and 1's to make it easier to work with. While this sounds easy, it has proven to be challenging. Not all L's and 1's have the same characteristics visually. In other words, there's lots of edge cases that need to be accounted for. This will take a long time too.
The third proposed solution was using Claude or ChatGPT. While initially laughed it, Claude did have some minor success and did manage to successfully decode one document. Claude has subsequently failed on every other attempt thus far. Claude fails because of the points referenced in the proposed solution two up above (too many edge cases, font is inconsistent, not aligned, etc).
While nerds are off the races and working tirelessly to reverse engineer and decode these documents, internet non-nerds have also chimed in. Most notably by saying things such as:
- Why isn't it done yet?
- Just don't fix the L and 1
- This isn't hard, bro. I could do it
- You're doing it all wrong
While they remain critical, these people have not contributed meaningfully to the collective goal. I have no idea why they're back seat driving this project. It's actually very frustrating to read.
For reasons I do not understand, some people seem to be under the impression they're capable of solving a problem that hundreds, possibly thousands, of other people are actively trying to solve or are unable to solve.
Will nerds find a solution that works consistently? Will people on the internet stop back seat driving? Will we give up and instead do a mass brute force campaign? Is the government concerned by the tsunami wave of weaponized autism?
Find out next time on Dragon Ball Z
Last time on Dragon Ball Z: nerds noted that in the Epstein documents the DoJ failed to censor Base64 encoded email attachments. This means we have the means to extract the email attachments from the Epstein documents and see what is inside and uncensored.
Big problems occured. Upon further inspection nerds noted the Epstein documents use Corrier New. This font is a pain in the ass to work with. In summary, they cannot reliably tell the difference (programmatically) between an L and a 1.
Now we're off to the races. Who can solve it first and (probably) be murdered by a spooky shadowy government? (but have lots of clout on the internet)
The first proposed solution was brute force. Swap the L's and 1's, try every possible combination until it is successfully decoded. The problem with this method is that even a simple document has over 1,000,000 unique permutations. To swap every L and 1, try to decode, then test the file, would take (if your computer is fast as fuck boi) 3 seconds... so a small document would take (worse case scenario) 34 days to brute force.
The second proposed solution was transforming the PDF documents into high resolution images then programmatically enhancing the L's and 1's to make it easier to work with. While this sounds easy, it has proven to be challenging. Not all L's and 1's have the same characteristics visually. In other words, there's lots of edge cases that need to be accounted for. This will take a long time too.
The third proposed solution was using Claude or ChatGPT. While initially laughed it, Claude did have some minor success and did manage to successfully decode one document. Claude has subsequently failed on every other attempt thus far. Claude fails because of the points referenced in the proposed solution two up above (too many edge cases, font is inconsistent, not aligned, etc).
While nerds are off the races and working tirelessly to reverse engineer and decode these documents, internet non-nerds have also chimed in. Most notably by saying things such as:
- Why isn't it done yet?
- Just don't fix the L and 1
- This isn't hard, bro. I could do it
- You're doing it all wrong
While they remain critical, these people have not contributed meaningfully to the collective goal. I have no idea why they're back seat driving this project. It's actually very frustrating to read.
For reasons I do not understand, some people seem to be under the impression they're capable of solving a problem that hundreds, possibly thousands, of other people are actively trying to solve or are unable to solve.
Will nerds find a solution that works consistently? Will people on the internet stop back seat driving? Will we give up and instead do a mass brute force campaign? Is the government concerned by the tsunami wave of weaponized autism?
Find out next time on Dragon Ball Z
โค66๐คฃ28๐ฅฐ8๐ซก3
Chat, nerds have decoded more Epstein attachments.
The recently decoded attachment contains victim information. It is nothing but victim information. I will not share the decoded attachment because I do not believe it would be in good faith to share this victims face to the world.
In summary, he was paying people to stalk and spy on a teenage girl who had substance abuse problems. In the email his "detectives" we're sending Epstein photos of her social media profile. His "detectives" also shared photos of this teenage girl and her boyfriend.
In the email they inform Epstein they will increase surveillance on the teenage girl and her boyfriend.
The recently decoded attachment contains victim information. It is nothing but victim information. I will not share the decoded attachment because I do not believe it would be in good faith to share this victims face to the world.
In summary, he was paying people to stalk and spy on a teenage girl who had substance abuse problems. In the email his "detectives" we're sending Epstein photos of her social media profile. His "detectives" also shared photos of this teenage girl and her boyfriend.
In the email they inform Epstein they will increase surveillance on the teenage girl and her boyfriend.
๐ข103๐ซก25๐ฅฐ5๐คฏ3โค2๐1๐1
vx-underground
"Hey can you try to decode this document?" Dawg, I collect pictures of cats on the internet. I don't fucking know how these nerds are doing this shit. I'm just regurgitating what the real brains are doing Pic related
Can I decode these documents? No
Can I provide a silly picture of a cat? Yes
Can I provide a silly picture of a cat? Yes
๐32๐14๐ฅฐ8โค5๐ฅ5๐ฏ3๐2๐1๐ซก1