推特精选
8.68K subscribers
26K photos
5.84K videos
250 files
39.1K links
如需撤稿,请在评论区联系我们。我们谢绝营利性质或政府性质的合作,还请见谅。

如果您想关注更多频道,欢迎参考: t.me/channel_push
Download Telegram
BREAKING: The Appeals Court rules that the House Judiciary Committee has standing to enforce its MCGAHN subpoena. source
取り急ぎ 怒りを込めて 描きました
どうか 思いが伝わりますように source
Thread. One lady in @LoudMurmurs’s community wechat group works with Chinese adoptees who grew up in the US to reconnect with their birth parents — often underprivileged families. And of course the birth family often only uses wechat. link source
@dc4880 这个基本上做不到。参议院的实质权力是宪法规定的,要修宪削减其权力难如登天。而参议院一州两席这点,更是宪法特别规定了不允许修宪更改的。只有像filibuster这种参议院内部章程级别的问题,改革起来稍微容易一些。但要对参议院动根本性的大手术,那等于说要重新制宪。 source
@Oneoneder @AskAKorean agreed. And it's not limited to Ams (white or black), but a cross-cultural phenomenon. e.g. I wrote about how contemporary Chinese liberal intellectuals project their anxieties & perspectives to Am, drawing incredibly wrong conclusions & idolizing Trump link source
“Childcare care is basic infrastructure. If you want this economy to work, if you want to boost our G.D.P., or now, during a pandemic, if you want to get people back to work, then we need to make a national investment.” link source
@TankMan737 普选票协议本来就不是要改宪法(修宪门槛太高),而是通过州之间达成一致,共同支持全国普选票的胜者。如果只是各州自己去放弃赢者通吃,那先改的州就吃亏了,结果就是没几个州愿意改。 source
@AskAKorean I happened to be watching Netflix science documentary Connected today (a really great show btw) & was shocked by the guest's straight-faced distortion of history & the host's leaving it uncorrected: "before Pearl Harbor only Europe was at war & Japan was not involved." Asia: ??? source
I asked my six month old the same question and she said,

“The false dichotomy in the premise of this question proves the ongoing need for feminism. You would never ask a boy to choose between procreation and professional fulfillment” link source
Let’s be clear. WeChat isn’t a universal plus for the Chinese diaspora in US: it’s been used to monitor & pressure ppl. I hope alternatives w/fewer costs can be adopted quickly. But we shd be realistic that this does impose costs for Chinese gov’t action onto the Chinese people. link source