UN is working with China to implement Agenda 2030 worldwide via the Belt and Road Initiative (Chinese imperialism).
"António Guterres said that the Belt and Road Initiative is highly compatible with the goals pursued by the UN and is conducive to solving various problems facing the world today and addressing challenges such as financing for development and climate change. The Belt and Road Initiative is an important opportunity for all countries in the world. The UN stands ready to work closely with the Chinese side in the process of jointly building the Belt and Road Initiative to jointly promote the cause of peace and development of mankind."
The endgoal is to corral humanity into giant panopticon "Smart Cities", where we can be tracked and monitored 24/7 via our "digital identities" — which are part of the UN's ID2020 scheme and currently being implemented under the guise of "vaccine passports." Digital ID will likely form the basis of a social credit system, linked to wrongthink, carbon output, etc.
"António Guterres said that the Belt and Road Initiative is highly compatible with the goals pursued by the UN and is conducive to solving various problems facing the world today and addressing challenges such as financing for development and climate change. The Belt and Road Initiative is an important opportunity for all countries in the world. The UN stands ready to work closely with the Chinese side in the process of jointly building the Belt and Road Initiative to jointly promote the cause of peace and development of mankind."
The endgoal is to corral humanity into giant panopticon "Smart Cities", where we can be tracked and monitored 24/7 via our "digital identities" — which are part of the UN's ID2020 scheme and currently being implemented under the guise of "vaccine passports." Digital ID will likely form the basis of a social credit system, linked to wrongthink, carbon output, etc.
Study by Prognos, University of Basel's economic research facility, predicts that Germany will have a China-style social credit system by 2030. What a coincidence that this "prediction" perfectly aligns with the United Nations' Agenda 2030.
https://www.vorausschau.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/vorausschau/de/BMBF_Foresight_Wertestudie_Langfassung.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1
[Translated quotations below]
In the 2030s, a digital, participatory negotiated point system begins in Germany to set incentives for behavior change. In the course of the rise of China, point systems as an instrument of political control were discussed controversially around the world with a mixture of admiration and rejection.
Liberal democratic countries are also debating whether and in what form such a system should be adopted. The debates went far beyond the control of individual policy areas through point systems - such as immigration policy in Canada. Rather, the discourse was conducted about a fundamental policy control through point systems.
Similar to non-voters, those who voluntarily waive their right to vote, those who do not participate now also have to live with the decisions of the majority in the points system. That is why opponents of the point system like to refer to the principle of voluntariness as "window dressing", as one can never completely escape the system.
Original quotes in German:
In den 2030er Jahren beginnt in Deutschland ein digitales, partizipativ ausverhandeltes Punktesystem, Anreize zur Verhaltensänderung zu setzen. Im Zuge des Aufstiegs Chinas wurden Punktesysteme als Instrument der Politiksteuerung weltweit mit einer Mischung aus Bewunderung und Ablehnung kontrovers diskutiert.
Auch liberal-demokratische Länder debattieren darüber, ob und in welcher Form ein solches System übernommen werden sollte. Die Debatten gingen dabei weit über die Steuerung einzelner Politikfelder durch Punktesysteme – wie etwa der Einwanderungspolitik in Kanada – hinaus. Vielmehr wurde der Diskurs über eine grundsätzliche Politiksteuerung durch Punktesysteme geführt.
Ähnlich wie Nichtwählerinnen und -wähler, müssen die, die freiwillig auf ihr Wahlrecht verzichten, müssen die nicht Teilnehmenden nun auch im Punktesystem mit den Entscheidungen der Mehrheit leben. Daher wird das Prinzip der Freiwilligkeit gerne von Gegnerinnen und Gegnern des Punktesystems als „Augenwischerei“ bezeichnet, da man sich dem System nie vollumfänglich entziehen könne.
https://www.vorausschau.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/vorausschau/de/BMBF_Foresight_Wertestudie_Langfassung.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1
[Translated quotations below]
In the 2030s, a digital, participatory negotiated point system begins in Germany to set incentives for behavior change. In the course of the rise of China, point systems as an instrument of political control were discussed controversially around the world with a mixture of admiration and rejection.
Liberal democratic countries are also debating whether and in what form such a system should be adopted. The debates went far beyond the control of individual policy areas through point systems - such as immigration policy in Canada. Rather, the discourse was conducted about a fundamental policy control through point systems.
Similar to non-voters, those who voluntarily waive their right to vote, those who do not participate now also have to live with the decisions of the majority in the points system. That is why opponents of the point system like to refer to the principle of voluntariness as "window dressing", as one can never completely escape the system.
Original quotes in German:
In den 2030er Jahren beginnt in Deutschland ein digitales, partizipativ ausverhandeltes Punktesystem, Anreize zur Verhaltensänderung zu setzen. Im Zuge des Aufstiegs Chinas wurden Punktesysteme als Instrument der Politiksteuerung weltweit mit einer Mischung aus Bewunderung und Ablehnung kontrovers diskutiert.
Auch liberal-demokratische Länder debattieren darüber, ob und in welcher Form ein solches System übernommen werden sollte. Die Debatten gingen dabei weit über die Steuerung einzelner Politikfelder durch Punktesysteme – wie etwa der Einwanderungspolitik in Kanada – hinaus. Vielmehr wurde der Diskurs über eine grundsätzliche Politiksteuerung durch Punktesysteme geführt.
Ähnlich wie Nichtwählerinnen und -wähler, müssen die, die freiwillig auf ihr Wahlrecht verzichten, müssen die nicht Teilnehmenden nun auch im Punktesystem mit den Entscheidungen der Mehrheit leben. Daher wird das Prinzip der Freiwilligkeit gerne von Gegnerinnen und Gegnern des Punktesystems als „Augenwischerei“ bezeichnet, da man sich dem System nie vollumfänglich entziehen könne.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Not satire - Australian lockdowns.
Forwarded from Survive the Jive: All-feed
the Survive the Jive page and From Runes to Ruins pages are also gone. There was nothing on there that went against their community standards. The page had no strikes at all. They have given up all pretence of reason, and are just unpersoning people without reason.
Contact Facebook UK to register a formal complaint by dialling their London telephone number 0203 386 6000 or email zuck@fb.com to complain about what they did to me.
I appreciate you taking the time to defend me. If enough people cause a stir they are likely to respond.
Contact Facebook UK to register a formal complaint by dialling their London telephone number 0203 386 6000 or email zuck@fb.com to complain about what they did to me.
I appreciate you taking the time to defend me. If enough people cause a stir they are likely to respond.
Keith Woods newest vid - 15 minutes of straight-up CCP propaganda from a Tradworkers Party weirdo named Matthew Raphael Johnson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYD2jVK8cmA
According to Matthew Johnson, Duginism has been very influential on his own ideology — but remember, it's all just a schizo conspiracy theory and there is no concerted effort by GRU-funded shills to promote Eurasianism to Western nationalists.
Keith Woods loves promoting these glow in the dark freakshows.
According to Matthew Johnson, Duginism has been very influential on his own ideology — but remember, it's all just a schizo conspiracy theory and there is no concerted effort by GRU-funded shills to promote Eurasianism to Western nationalists.
Keith Woods loves promoting these glow in the dark freakshows.
Impossible not to hate medical industrial grunts after nearly 2 years of tiktok dance and mask bruises bullshit.
Not to mention the fact that they literally genocide their own populations via pure incompetence.
Not to mention the fact that they literally genocide their own populations via pure incompetence.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Australian federal government planning to de-anonymize the internet to facilitate a social credit system to combat "online abuse" — police will have access to individual's social media accounts, which will be linked to peoples passports.
All part of the wider Agenda 21 push for "digital identity" and the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
All part of the wider Agenda 21 push for "digital identity" and the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
European Union announced "vaccine passports" in 2018: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/vaccination/docs/2019-2022_roadmap_en.pdf
2022 is their designated date for: "Commission proposal for a common vaccination card/passport for EU citizens"
2022 is their designated date for: "Commission proposal for a common vaccination card/passport for EU citizens"