Thuletide
22.6K subscribers
5.96K photos
542 videos
27 files
2.8K links
Nationalist, Classical Liberal, moderate centrist (circa 1900). You can plagiarize any of my writing & content. Follow: t.me/racerealismchannel
Download Telegram
Sex bias in hiring does exist! Women are favored while men are discriminated against.

A meta analysis of real-world experiments spanning over four decades (1976-2020) found that all hiring bias against women has disappeared in the studied countries (mostly the West + China).

Since the 2000s, women have been favored for "female-type" and "gender-balanced" jobs, and since the 2010s, even "male-type" jobs have reached sex parity, meaning women are favored for "all jobs." [An odds ratio above 1 = male bias, below 1 = female bias].

The paper also surveyed US laymen and academics, who both overestimated sex bias in hiring practices to a significant degree — i.e. they hallucinated nonexistent discrimination against women.

Source: On the trajectory of discrimination: A meta-analysis and forecasting survey capturing 44 years of field experiments on gender and hiring decisions (2023)
Digital Panopticon Update: The KIDS Act passed within the House and only 32 Republicans voted against it.

It includes 14 bills (e.g. the Kids Online Safety Act) aimed at throttling online freedom.

- Age verification for using websites that host porn or other sexual content (this includes every social media platform)
- Age verification to send private messages
- Age verification to use in-game chats
- Most web/app features disabled by default unless age verified
- Restrictions on encrypted messaging
- Restrictions on AI chatbots
- Government-directed moderation / restriction of lawful speech
- etc.

As I said
, while the digital ID agenda has bipartisan support in America, it is primarily pushed by myopic GOP tradcuck retards who either don't understand or don't care that they are playing directly in the hands of the left. These people are a plague.
Digital Panopticon Update: New deanonymization feature on X/Twitter.

Mobile-based accounts are locked then forced to download the app and provide biometric data.

Web-based accounts are forced to "confirm they are human" by scanning a QR code with their mobile phones (leaking privacy-compromising device information), which begins the same biometric data harvesting process.
X/Twitter worked on the Kids Online Safety Act, part of the KIDS Act (recently passed in the House). They are 100% on board with digital identity and deanonymization.
Immigration is a less immediate and arguably less significant threat to the future of America and the West than online censorship/surveillance throttling the only quasi-free source of information and discourse available today.

Social credit systems loom on the horizon and people either don't care or actively facilitate and applaud the encroaching tyranny: "I support totaldox because I'm too dumb to spot Indian engagement farmers and AI bots on Twitter, and I'm too irresponsible of a parent to protect my kids from porn via the variety of tools that are already at my disposal."

If by some miracle, social credit systems do not materialize: In America the woke will still ruin your life for saying what needs to be said under your real name and face, and things are far worse in Western countries with intentionally nebulous "hate speech" laws; people are frequently jailed for voicing milquetoast opposition to leftist regimes.
I'd like to believe that Elon will come to his senses regarding digital ID etc., he's evidently open to having his mind changed and seems to take the opinions of twitter anons seriously, but I'm skeptical.
A 2010 paper found a high level of social mobility and meritocracy in Britain, with more intelligent people moving up the social ladder and vice versa.

Hard to believe this would be true today, given that the country is systemically anti-White to a degree that makes other Western countries look like White supremacist states.

https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603322503097
I have been reading 2010s studies on fiscal impact of immigration. So many papers include quotes like: "If we assume retarded unemployed thirdies will 'assimilate,' they might make a net-positive economic contribution by next century. Policy Recommendation: Increase gibs by 1 trillion dollars."

This is barely even hyperbole; the image contains snippets from a European Commission JRC study.

Most seem to follow this pattern:
- Real-world data proves thirdies are economically catastrophic
- Authors create fictional model based on delusional assumptions
- Model "proves" thirdies become economically beneficial at some point in the future
- Sponsored by EU & UN

Fortunately, we have more recent & reliable data, primarily that released by the Danish government and Amsterdam University (see here).
Ann Widdecombe, Reform UK's immigration and justice spokesperson, was assassinated.

Few details have been released, but apparently the suspect is a mentally retarded ("learning difficulties") recluse from Rotherham (located 270 miles from her home in Devon).

He somehow found her address*, knew when she would be at home, broke into her house, murdered her, stole nothing, and then returned to Rotherham.

British cops concluded that there is "nothing to suggest it was politically motivated."

Very suspicious circumstances.

* Edit: Just learned that her house was on TV five days earlier and is apparently listed on Google maps.
Trump admin aims to dismantle the International Criminal Court.

"The US is launching a diplomatic campaign with a single message—sovereign states over globalism... Using all the tools at our government's disposal, working beside every all with whom we can make common cause, we will dismantle the ICC—brick by brick, if necessary" - Marco Rubio

Summary from Reuters:
- Options under consideration include travel bans, visa revocations and increased sanctions
- Rubio and other US officials are pressuring countries to diplomatically isolate the ICC
- Countries relying on US assistance could face increased scrutiny if they refuse
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"The ICC is a global tribunal staffed by unelected globalists bureaucrats who claim their power is almost unlimited... It threatens every aspect of our political and legal system."

(video source)
Since the popularity of magic weight loss drugs (Ozempic/GLPs) is skyrocketing, I think it's important to redpill everybody on the Fat Pig Question.

Obesity is almost has heritable as IQ, at ~70%. Heritability is highest during adolescence, lowest during childhood.

The physiological traits that make an individual susceptible to weight gain may be adaptive under conditions of sporadic food scarcity, but we do not live under such conditions.

Moreover, mere susceptibility to weight gain does not make an individual fat. This is largely caused by the psychological/behavioral traits that correlate with fatness: Low IQ, low impulse control, various mental disorders, etc.

In brief: Fat people are dysgenic, and the fact that fat people can now mask (and spread) their fat genes via magic weight loss drugs is an unmitigated catastrophe. Do NOT breed with ex-fatties.

NB: Optimal body fat range for men and women is 18-24% and 21-28%, respectively (best for metabolic health, hormone balance longevity, etc.)