China's private tutoring ban increased expected total fertility by ~8% in areas where the policy was strongly enforced (from 1.61 to 1.73 children per family).
The following factors explained 43% of the variance: Reduced perceived educational competition between parents; reduced financial and time expenditure; improved parental health and parent-child relationships.
The effect on fertility intention was significantly smaller for mothers (0.03) than fathers (0.13), and for those who spent less time/money on education/tutoring before the ban. It was also slightly smaller for those with a bachelor's degree or above.
A very Asiatic way to increase birth rates, but at least we can extrapolate:
Reduce parental stress + increase time/resource availability = more babies (driven primarily by male fertility intention).
https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaf096
The following factors explained 43% of the variance: Reduced perceived educational competition between parents; reduced financial and time expenditure; improved parental health and parent-child relationships.
The effect on fertility intention was significantly smaller for mothers (0.03) than fathers (0.13), and for those who spent less time/money on education/tutoring before the ban. It was also slightly smaller for those with a bachelor's degree or above.
A very Asiatic way to increase birth rates, but at least we can extrapolate:
Reduce parental stress + increase time/resource availability = more babies (driven primarily by male fertility intention).
https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaf096
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Before and after montage of El Salvador shared by Bukele on twitter.
He fixed everything and all he had to do was throw the worst 2% of the population in jail for life.
Capitally punishing them all would've been better but he probably couldn't get away with that.
He fixed everything and all he had to do was throw the worst 2% of the population in jail for life.
Capitally punishing them all would've been better but he probably couldn't get away with that.
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
Public support for eugenic policies in the United States:
~40-50% of people support policies that encourage lower fertility among the poor, unintelligent, and criminal.
~40% of people support policies that encourage higher fertility among the intelligent.
~30% of people support the sterilization of criminals.
Support for eugenic policies correlates with the extent to which individuals view traits as genetically heritable.
~40-50% of people support policies that encourage lower fertility among the poor, unintelligent, and criminal.
~40% of people support policies that encourage higher fertility among the intelligent.
~30% of people support the sterilization of criminals.
Support for eugenic policies correlates with the extent to which individuals view traits as genetically heritable.
"We show that marriage rates decline when the predicted probability that a woman earns more than a man increases."
"Marriage rates declined substantially in the US, from about 81 percent in 1970 to 51 percent in 2010 for young adults aged 25 to 39."
"The secular increase in the aggregate likelihood that a woman earns more than a man explains 23 percent of the decline in the rates of marriage from 1970 to 2010."
Make Women Poor Again.
http://doi.org/10.3386/w19023
"Marriage rates declined substantially in the US, from about 81 percent in 1970 to 51 percent in 2010 for young adults aged 25 to 39."
"The secular increase in the aggregate likelihood that a woman earns more than a man explains 23 percent of the decline in the rates of marriage from 1970 to 2010."
Make Women Poor Again.
http://doi.org/10.3386/w19023
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
British news presenter recounts the horrific case of a 15-year-old girl who was dragged into the woods and raped by Afghan migrants.
The girl repeatedly begged members of the public for help, but they all ignored her. She recorded one such interaction with a woman on her phone; the woman asked "are you alright?" but seemingly did nothing to help her.
The presenter then says the ONLY policy that would prevent this from happening again — banning all immigration from Afghanistan — is "going too far" because it would result in the collective judgment of an entire ethnic group. He says the thought did cross his mind, but he convinced himself that it was wrong because it would be heckin' racist or whatever.
His "solution" is to keep the migrants in hotels until their asylum claims have been processed, after which, they would be free to roam the streets and rape until their hearts' content.
The girl repeatedly begged members of the public for help, but they all ignored her. She recorded one such interaction with a woman on her phone; the woman asked "are you alright?" but seemingly did nothing to help her.
The presenter then says the ONLY policy that would prevent this from happening again — banning all immigration from Afghanistan — is "going too far" because it would result in the collective judgment of an entire ethnic group. He says the thought did cross his mind, but he convinced himself that it was wrong because it would be heckin' racist or whatever.
His "solution" is to keep the migrants in hotels until their asylum claims have been processed, after which, they would be free to roam the streets and rape until their hearts' content.
Women lifting to become "muscle mommies" as a form of transgenderism (autoandrophilia) is one of my theories, but I'm sure somebody proposed it before I did.
Aside from narcissistic autoeroticism, women are retards who think traits they find attractive in men are traits that men find attractive in women; they wear heels (height), get high-paying jobs (resources), tattoos (dangerousness/ruggedness), buccal fat removal (chiseled features), etc. These are all forms of soft transgenderism resulting from the breakdown of gender norms.
When women learn that heterosexual men are generally not attracted to stereotypically masculine traits, they respond with total bewilderment ("But I'm a 35-year-old DOCTOR! Why can't I find a husband?!") or belligerent obstinance ("A REAL man would find [masculine trait] sexy, but you're just a small penis porn-brained incel").
All of these horrifying trends are amplified by female conformism and their obsession with status. For example, it's plausible that the astronomical whorishness of women online today was at least partially caused by the popularity of Onlyfans girls, leading to runaway whoredom. Women see that nudity = "status" (in their minds, followers + male attention = status), and conclude that they must post nudes to compete and become "high status."
Many of the behavioral traits that correlate with being an internet whore also correlate with trooning out in the gym, getting tattoos, piercings, etc., which reminds me of the Spiteful Mutant Hypothesis (or "social epistasis amplification model"): Dysgenic people reach critical mass in a society, acquire some level of cultural dominance, and negatively influence the behavior of would-be normal people around them. Those who resist these trends are generally theorized to be more genetically healthy (mentally stable, etc.), although this may not necessarily be the case; natural nonconformists (autistics, psychopaths, etc.) may resist these trends out of pure disagreeableness.
Female intrasexual sabotage (encouraging unattractive behaviors among sexual competitors, distinct from being a spiteful mutant) undoubtedly contributes to these trends, but I'm unsure to what extent. "Wow, girl, you look GREAT with 12-year-old boy hair. You should go bald next. Fat? No way, you look beautiful. In fact, you should eat even more!"
Regarding women trooning out in the gym, specifically: Many are "former" anorexics for whom lifting became a "healthy" (obviously, they are not healthy, they are infertile) outlet for their body dysmorphia and obsessive-compulsive thinking around food and weight.
Anyway, to conclude: Every healthy society in human history has been structured in a way that mitigates the natural retardation of women. We must repeal their rights for their own good.
Aside from narcissistic autoeroticism, women are retards who think traits they find attractive in men are traits that men find attractive in women; they wear heels (height), get high-paying jobs (resources), tattoos (dangerousness/ruggedness), buccal fat removal (chiseled features), etc. These are all forms of soft transgenderism resulting from the breakdown of gender norms.
When women learn that heterosexual men are generally not attracted to stereotypically masculine traits, they respond with total bewilderment ("But I'm a 35-year-old DOCTOR! Why can't I find a husband?!") or belligerent obstinance ("A REAL man would find [masculine trait] sexy, but you're just a small penis porn-brained incel").
All of these horrifying trends are amplified by female conformism and their obsession with status. For example, it's plausible that the astronomical whorishness of women online today was at least partially caused by the popularity of Onlyfans girls, leading to runaway whoredom. Women see that nudity = "status" (in their minds, followers + male attention = status), and conclude that they must post nudes to compete and become "high status."
Many of the behavioral traits that correlate with being an internet whore also correlate with trooning out in the gym, getting tattoos, piercings, etc., which reminds me of the Spiteful Mutant Hypothesis (or "social epistasis amplification model"): Dysgenic people reach critical mass in a society, acquire some level of cultural dominance, and negatively influence the behavior of would-be normal people around them. Those who resist these trends are generally theorized to be more genetically healthy (mentally stable, etc.), although this may not necessarily be the case; natural nonconformists (autistics, psychopaths, etc.) may resist these trends out of pure disagreeableness.
Female intrasexual sabotage (encouraging unattractive behaviors among sexual competitors, distinct from being a spiteful mutant) undoubtedly contributes to these trends, but I'm unsure to what extent. "Wow, girl, you look GREAT with 12-year-old boy hair. You should go bald next. Fat? No way, you look beautiful. In fact, you should eat even more!"
Regarding women trooning out in the gym, specifically: Many are "former" anorexics for whom lifting became a "healthy" (obviously, they are not healthy, they are infertile) outlet for their body dysmorphia and obsessive-compulsive thinking around food and weight.
Anyway, to conclude: Every healthy society in human history has been structured in a way that mitigates the natural retardation of women. We must repeal their rights for their own good.
X (formerly Twitter)
Melian Refugee (@escapefrommelos) on X
I don't remember where I first heard this, but there's the theory that some women want "abs" for the same reason some transexual men like to cross dress... in the men it has a name, "Autogynephilia": getting turned on by seeing yourself with something you…
Sex differences in general knowledge:
Test measured 19 domains of general knowledge, grouped into six first-order factors and one second-order general factor.
Men significantly outscored women on the second-order general factor and four out of six first-order factors: Current Affairs (0.82d), Physical Health and Recreation (0.75d), Science (0.58d), and Arts (0.31d).
Women significantly outscored men on the first-order factor of Family (-0.46d) but, surprisingly, there was no sex difference in the first-order factor of Fashion (-0.01d).
Women outscored men in the domains of Fashion, Popular Music, Medicine, and Cookery.
"Data obtained from 469 female and 167 male undergraduates"
Source: Lynn, Irwing, Cammock (2001)
Test measured 19 domains of general knowledge, grouped into six first-order factors and one second-order general factor.
Men significantly outscored women on the second-order general factor and four out of six first-order factors: Current Affairs (0.82d), Physical Health and Recreation (0.75d), Science (0.58d), and Arts (0.31d).
Women significantly outscored men on the first-order factor of Family (-0.46d) but, surprisingly, there was no sex difference in the first-order factor of Fashion (-0.01d).
Women outscored men in the domains of Fashion, Popular Music, Medicine, and Cookery.
"Data obtained from 469 female and 167 male undergraduates"
Source: Lynn, Irwing, Cammock (2001)
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
Average annual and lifetime net cost per migrant, by country of origin.
Danish and Dutch data, respectively.
Danish and Dutch data, respectively.
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
National average IQ vs. lifetime net fiscal contribution per migrant (Dutch data):
The only significant net-positive contributors were Northern Europeans, North Americans, and the Japanese.
Every non-White ethnic group made a net-negative contribution, excluding the Israelis and "Four Asian Tigers" (Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore), who made a minor net-positive contribution, and the aforementioned Japanese.
The only significant net-positive contributors were Northern Europeans, North Americans, and the Japanese.
Every non-White ethnic group made a net-negative contribution, excluding the Israelis and "Four Asian Tigers" (Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore), who made a minor net-positive contribution, and the aforementioned Japanese.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Big Balls (former DOGE employee): “White men in particular have been completely villainized in society… and our older generations have kind of just let it happen.”
Restore Britain is pro-youth and pro-freedom:
"I am with the young British men and women who feel crushed under inflated house prices, stagnating wages, record tax burden and just generally a really piss-poor standard of living that is falling embarrassingly far behind countries we once competed with."
https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/2039702964852392212
"It wasn’t that long ago millions of young people had some of the best months of their lives stolen from them all to unsuccessfully avoid what was a nasty cold for the overwhelming majority. To suggest youngsters have not sacrificed anything in recent years is offensive guff."
https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/2039939670616760500
"The way to give our young people their future back is not more tax, more regulation, more government. It's to cut. Cut, cut, cut. Slash it back. All of it. A regulation bonfire visible from space."
https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/1995493230193045824
"I am with the young British men and women who feel crushed under inflated house prices, stagnating wages, record tax burden and just generally a really piss-poor standard of living that is falling embarrassingly far behind countries we once competed with."
https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/2039702964852392212
"It wasn’t that long ago millions of young people had some of the best months of their lives stolen from them all to unsuccessfully avoid what was a nasty cold for the overwhelming majority. To suggest youngsters have not sacrificed anything in recent years is offensive guff."
https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/2039939670616760500
"The way to give our young people their future back is not more tax, more regulation, more government. It's to cut. Cut, cut, cut. Slash it back. All of it. A regulation bonfire visible from space."
https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/1995493230193045824