Trump: "When I got in last time, I had no idea how to govern, and I got surrounded by donors and corporate people who said you appoint this guy and appoint that guy... I appointed a lot of bad people. This time I'm not gonna do that. I'm not gonna do it their way. I'm gonna start my own transition team three months early."
RFK: "There are no corporate lobbyists on that transition team. And, usually, it's 100% corporate lobbyists."
https://x.com/ChristianM_74/status/1850437361101885465
RFK: "There are no corporate lobbyists on that transition team. And, usually, it's 100% corporate lobbyists."
https://x.com/ChristianM_74/status/1850437361101885465
X (formerly Twitter)
Christian Movick (@ChristianM_74) on X
NEW: Robert Kenendy Jr. says that Donald Trump is breaking tradition by privately funding his transition team and has already started it three months early.
Kennedy began by talking about why he's chosen to trust Trump, saying, "I've talked to Donald Trump…
Kennedy began by talking about why he's chosen to trust Trump, saying, "I've talked to Donald Trump…
I had absolute confidence in Trump's victory. I'll never forgive the scum on the "right" who spent the last two years campaigning against Trump. I'll never forget the fools who were blackpilling over fake polls and shit-tier "memes" astroturfed by postwall foids from the DNC marketing department. But I will forgive the fools, if they repent.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Bannon: "This entire phony thing is getting swept out. Biden is getting swept out. Kamala Harris is getting swept out. MSNBC is getting swept out. The Justice Department is getting swept out. The FBI is getting swept out. You're going to pay the price for trying to destroy this country. You don't deserve any respect, you don't deserve any empathy, and you don't deserve any pity."
CLEAR THEM OUT!
CLEAR THEM OUT!
Currently reading Project 2035: Building a Trump Movement to Last by Mystery Grove, some quotes below:
Although Trump has provided America with an unprecedented opportunity, I believe the risk of disaster has never been higher than it is right now. As one Russian official said of attempts by the Czar to modernize Imperial Russia shortly before the Revolution: “The most dangerous thing you can do to a bad system is try to reform it.”
Although I have long dismissed any suggestion that widespread rightwing political violence is imminent, I do believe that a violent leftwing revolution with a serious chance of overthrowing America’s Constitutional order and replacing it with a new system will arrive within the next 10 years. This presents an enormous challenge for the incoming Trump administration and whatever is to follow. The conservative movement of today is in a bad place to meet this challenge.
I have decided to write this essay (hopefully my last on contemporary politics) to explain what I think the problem is and propose solutions.
...
Many mainstream Republican influencers seemed committed to snatching defeat from the jaws of victory during this election cycle. From the professional pro-life movement to gun rights activists, attacks on Trump by rightwingers poured in from all sides. It was not just nobodies and obvious bad actors.
Perhaps even more disingenuous criticism emerged from the “far right,” which, though it has seen its ideas enjoy broader adoption than at any time in the last half century, began a series of shifting attacks on Trump on his two strongest issues: Immigration and foreign policy. These attacks were designed solely to damage Trump, though for some months many critics pretended as though they were trying to “help” the Trump campaign. As Trump’s lead became more and more pronounced these people began openly advocating for total defeat in the present to allow for the theoretical future victory of a “more pure” candidate.
Although there certainly was a degree of coordination and institutional funding behind the various attacks on Trump from the Right (interestingly, one major node of anti-Trump activity was indicted for taking large amounts of cash from Russian agents), I believe that the overwhelming majority of participants earnestly held these objectively stupid and harmful beliefs.... As I said to myself after Kyle Rittenhouse inexplicably declared on video that he could not vote for Trump in good conscience: “There is something wrong with people.”
...
It was surreal to see so many rightwingers get sent into complete hysteria by the obviously astroturfed enthusiasm for Kamala Harris that followed her initial announcement.
Panic is contagious. Despair is contagious. People could not understand that what they were seeing was fake, and that, even if it hadn’t been fake, it would still have been harmful to publicly respond in that way. After all: They’re just thinking out loud. They’re just engaging in “the discourse.” These pisspants conservatives make minor problems worse and turn fake issues into real ones.
Exacerbating this confusion, pettiness and personality feuds often lead rightwingers to adopt nonsensical or counterproductive positions solely to “own” their online opponents. I will always remember seeing rightwingers defend the L.A. Times Bombing, an incident in 1910 during which leftist terrorists blew up a conservative newspaper and killed dozens of people, because they objected to me personally. It soon became clear that they had no idea what the L.A. Times Bombing even was, they just supported it because I opposed it. I don’t know who those people were or why they might have disliked me (there are many valid possibilities), but that kind of dishonest thinking is commonplace now.
Although Trump has provided America with an unprecedented opportunity, I believe the risk of disaster has never been higher than it is right now. As one Russian official said of attempts by the Czar to modernize Imperial Russia shortly before the Revolution: “The most dangerous thing you can do to a bad system is try to reform it.”
Although I have long dismissed any suggestion that widespread rightwing political violence is imminent, I do believe that a violent leftwing revolution with a serious chance of overthrowing America’s Constitutional order and replacing it with a new system will arrive within the next 10 years. This presents an enormous challenge for the incoming Trump administration and whatever is to follow. The conservative movement of today is in a bad place to meet this challenge.
I have decided to write this essay (hopefully my last on contemporary politics) to explain what I think the problem is and propose solutions.
...
Many mainstream Republican influencers seemed committed to snatching defeat from the jaws of victory during this election cycle. From the professional pro-life movement to gun rights activists, attacks on Trump by rightwingers poured in from all sides. It was not just nobodies and obvious bad actors.
Perhaps even more disingenuous criticism emerged from the “far right,” which, though it has seen its ideas enjoy broader adoption than at any time in the last half century, began a series of shifting attacks on Trump on his two strongest issues: Immigration and foreign policy. These attacks were designed solely to damage Trump, though for some months many critics pretended as though they were trying to “help” the Trump campaign. As Trump’s lead became more and more pronounced these people began openly advocating for total defeat in the present to allow for the theoretical future victory of a “more pure” candidate.
Although there certainly was a degree of coordination and institutional funding behind the various attacks on Trump from the Right (interestingly, one major node of anti-Trump activity was indicted for taking large amounts of cash from Russian agents), I believe that the overwhelming majority of participants earnestly held these objectively stupid and harmful beliefs.... As I said to myself after Kyle Rittenhouse inexplicably declared on video that he could not vote for Trump in good conscience: “There is something wrong with people.”
...
It was surreal to see so many rightwingers get sent into complete hysteria by the obviously astroturfed enthusiasm for Kamala Harris that followed her initial announcement.
Panic is contagious. Despair is contagious. People could not understand that what they were seeing was fake, and that, even if it hadn’t been fake, it would still have been harmful to publicly respond in that way. After all: They’re just thinking out loud. They’re just engaging in “the discourse.” These pisspants conservatives make minor problems worse and turn fake issues into real ones.
Exacerbating this confusion, pettiness and personality feuds often lead rightwingers to adopt nonsensical or counterproductive positions solely to “own” their online opponents. I will always remember seeing rightwingers defend the L.A. Times Bombing, an incident in 1910 during which leftist terrorists blew up a conservative newspaper and killed dozens of people, because they objected to me personally. It soon became clear that they had no idea what the L.A. Times Bombing even was, they just supported it because I opposed it. I don’t know who those people were or why they might have disliked me (there are many valid possibilities), but that kind of dishonest thinking is commonplace now.
Theconundrumcluster
Project 2035: Building a Trump Movement to Last
Welcome to the Good Timeline
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
Fiscal impact by race in the US:
Only Whites and Asians make net positive contributions. Blacks and Hispanics collectively make a colossal $1522 billion net negative contribution.
Currently, Asians who migrate to America are of higher socioeconomic status and above average intelligence in their respective homelands. However, if Asians were to mass migrate, they would likely make a net negative contribution. The average IQ of China is approximately 100, while the average IQ of India is around 76 (see: Most Accurate National IQs Possible).
Source: Fiscal Impact by Race in 2022 by Alden Whitfeld (follow him on X here)
Edit: Alden has updated the article with more accurate estimates. Image amended accordingly.
Only Whites and Asians make net positive contributions. Blacks and Hispanics collectively make a colossal $1522 billion net negative contribution.
Currently, Asians who migrate to America are of higher socioeconomic status and above average intelligence in their respective homelands. However, if Asians were to mass migrate, they would likely make a net negative contribution. The average IQ of China is approximately 100, while the average IQ of India is around 76 (see: Most Accurate National IQs Possible).
Source: Fiscal Impact by Race in 2022 by Alden Whitfeld (follow him on X here)
Edit: Alden has updated the article with more accurate estimates. Image amended accordingly.
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
NBC's 2024 exit polls.
Despite Trump's focus on mass deportation, he did surprisingly well with minorities, other than Blacks and Jews.
This should go without saying, but don't take these poll results as gospel.
(Source)
Despite Trump's focus on mass deportation, he did surprisingly well with minorities, other than Blacks and Jews.
This should go without saying, but don't take these poll results as gospel.
(Source)
1 million Indians will have their green card eligibility revoked on day one.
"Donald Trump says he will sign an executive order to end birthright citizenship for the children of illegal migrants on his first day in office" (source)
Tired of winning yet?
"Donald Trump says he will sign an executive order to end birthright citizenship for the children of illegal migrants on his first day in office" (source)
Tired of winning yet?