Shocking revelation: Despite crying about Affirmative Action and Black crime (while blaming Black crime on White people), Asians are still Democrap voting libtards.
https://twitter.com/pewresearch/status/1661774888091418626
https://twitter.com/pewresearch/status/1661774888091418626
Forwarded from New Channel is: ArminiusNew
🇩🇰#Denmark
Danish government released violent crime conviction rates by the perpetrator's country of origin.
Data shows foreigners from MENA/Africa are more than 5x likely to commit crimes.
“Migration is a strength” is the greatest lie ever told. It is anything BUT a strength.
Danish government released violent crime conviction rates by the perpetrator's country of origin.
Data shows foreigners from MENA/Africa are more than 5x likely to commit crimes.
“Migration is a strength” is the greatest lie ever told. It is anything BUT a strength.
Anon asks: "Were the Sogdians, Wusun, Bactrians, and similar Indo-European peoples White?"
I've called them "White" and "Northern European" in the past based on historical depictions and descriptions, which consistently show and describe them as having pale skin, blue/green eyes, and often red/blond hair. This was before the genetic data was released.
Their Andronovo ancestors genetically cluster with modern Northern Europeans, but Sogdians and Wusun had ~20% ancestry from the Middle Eastern BMAC culture and 10% ancestry from Siberian East Asians. Now I would say that they, like Scythians, were "off-White."
Their Pamiri descendants, who have even more Middle Eastern and some Indian ancestry, often look Northern European today. So, I think it's safe to assume that Sogdians, Wusun, etc. would look pretty similar to modern Northern Europeans. However, genetically, I would not classify them as White.
Note: Kangju = Sogdian.
I've called them "White" and "Northern European" in the past based on historical depictions and descriptions, which consistently show and describe them as having pale skin, blue/green eyes, and often red/blond hair. This was before the genetic data was released.
Their Andronovo ancestors genetically cluster with modern Northern Europeans, but Sogdians and Wusun had ~20% ancestry from the Middle Eastern BMAC culture and 10% ancestry from Siberian East Asians. Now I would say that they, like Scythians, were "off-White."
Their Pamiri descendants, who have even more Middle Eastern and some Indian ancestry, often look Northern European today. So, I think it's safe to assume that Sogdians, Wusun, etc. would look pretty similar to modern Northern Europeans. However, genetically, I would not classify them as White.
Note: Kangju = Sogdian.
Genetics of the Middle East.
Anon asks: "Occasionally, European-like phenotypes crop up in Middle Eastern populations. Is this due to Anatolian Neolithic Farmer admixture?"
Yes, mostly due to admixture from Anatolian Farmers, but also admixture from Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers and Yamnaya-related Western Steppe Herders.
All of these populations had light/intermediate skin pigmentation, and minor amounts of blue eyes and blondism.
Neolithic Iranians and Levantine Natufians, the other major contributors to the Middle Eastern genepool, were swarthier in comparison.
Anon asks: "Occasionally, European-like phenotypes crop up in Middle Eastern populations. Is this due to Anatolian Neolithic Farmer admixture?"
Yes, mostly due to admixture from Anatolian Farmers, but also admixture from Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers and Yamnaya-related Western Steppe Herders.
All of these populations had light/intermediate skin pigmentation, and minor amounts of blue eyes and blondism.
Neolithic Iranians and Levantine Natufians, the other major contributors to the Middle Eastern genepool, were swarthier in comparison.
At least 75% of the West's problems today could be fixed simply by repatriating everyone who migrated here since the late 20th Century.
Data from the UK shows that 40% of all migrants have been there for less than a decade. Migrants have deeper roots and ties to their actual home countries than they do to the West.
No reason why laws can't be changed and newcomers "asked" to leave. If laws were changed to let them in, then the same laws can be changed to kick them out.
Data from the UK shows that 40% of all migrants have been there for less than a decade. Migrants have deeper roots and ties to their actual home countries than they do to the West.
No reason why laws can't be changed and newcomers "asked" to leave. If laws were changed to let them in, then the same laws can be changed to kick them out.
Iceland considered banning circumcision, the ADL threatened that they will use their connections to associate Iceland with Nazism (which they admit is a lie) and destroy their economy.
Mixed-race girls (White/Black, French/Japanese) describes their identity struggles, feeling racially homeless, torn between two cultures. Countless stories like this from mixed-race people all over the internet.
This is exactly why Globalists promote miscegenation. Without a strong common culture & ethnic identity to rally around, the people become lost & weak. Those with no real connection to the nation won't defend it from Globalist looting. Divide and conquer on a biological level.
This is exactly why Globalists promote miscegenation. Without a strong common culture & ethnic identity to rally around, the people become lost & weak. Those with no real connection to the nation won't defend it from Globalist looting. Divide and conquer on a biological level.
Rephrasing this for clarity: The main reason Globalists promote miscegenation is that ethnic groups (the root of nationalism and the nation-state) are the biggest obstacle to Globalism and one-world governance. Demolish the ethnic group and you demolish the nation-state.
Telegram
Thuletide
Mixed-race girls (White/Black, French/Japanese) describes their identity struggles, feeling racially homeless, torn between two cultures. Countless stories like this from mixed-race people all over the internet.
This is exactly why Globalists promote miscegenation.…
This is exactly why Globalists promote miscegenation.…
Only ~0.005% of all animal species "display homosexual behaviors," among which scientists included things like straight females helping to raise each other's offspring. Moreover, homosexual behavior observed in captive animal species is often never seen among their wild counterparts.
I wonder how much of this is due to behavioral sink caused by captivity Unlimited resources + zero natural selection = rampant dysgenics, as we see in modern man. Behavioral disorders have been described as "endemic" among zoo chimps.
I wonder how much of this is due to behavioral sink caused by captivity Unlimited resources + zero natural selection = rampant dysgenics, as we see in modern man. Behavioral disorders have been described as "endemic" among zoo chimps.
Forwarded from Joel Davis (censored)
A lot of people talked shit from their armchairs about it, but the boycott was successful at doing serious damage. We're talking a $27 Billion loss and counting on total stock value of Anheuser-Busch, the parent company of Bud Light. Conservatives are getting better at this culture war stuff, I've noticed a far more subdued celebration of 'pride month' than in previous years by the corporate world.
If the Right can keep scoring these anti-LGBT culture war Ws, its only a matter of time before the same tactics and approach are applied against a particularly egregious expression of the antiwhite agenda and the culture war is racialised. The Right is learning to fight just as White Identity Politics is on the precipice of going mainstream. The cultural counter-revolution is brewing, we need to keep dumping fuel on the fire.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereksaul/2023/05/31/anheuser-busch-stock-enters-bear-territory-amid-anti-trans-bud-light-backlash/?sh=4793e9111bfe
This btw is also why its so important that the talking points in Keith's thread which Joe Rogan retweeted are promoted. For too long conservatives have simply viewed leftists as "crazy" rather than evil. The resolve to crush the enemy can only come from a moral conviction that their defeat is imperative, they who are most intolerant will win the culture war.
If the Right can keep scoring these anti-LGBT culture war Ws, its only a matter of time before the same tactics and approach are applied against a particularly egregious expression of the antiwhite agenda and the culture war is racialised. The Right is learning to fight just as White Identity Politics is on the precipice of going mainstream. The cultural counter-revolution is brewing, we need to keep dumping fuel on the fire.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereksaul/2023/05/31/anheuser-busch-stock-enters-bear-territory-amid-anti-trans-bud-light-backlash/?sh=4793e9111bfe
This btw is also why its so important that the talking points in Keith's thread which Joe Rogan retweeted are promoted. For too long conservatives have simply viewed leftists as "crazy" rather than evil. The resolve to crush the enemy can only come from a moral conviction that their defeat is imperative, they who are most intolerant will win the culture war.
Forbes
Anheuser-Busch Stock Enters Bear Territory Amid Anti-Trans Bud Light Backlash
Beer has “officially become a microcosm” of the American political landscape, Bernstein analysts noted, as the Bud Light parent company’s recent market losses top $25 billion.
Regarding the last paragraph of Joel's post:
There is some good data proving that the Left is evil in the two Substack articles below. Specifically the stuff about malicious envy, spite, willingness to inflict harm, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, victimhood signaling, and selfishness. The second article is longer and has a lot more citations.
- The Leftist Personality: Left-Wing ideology as a biological phenomenon
- The Hunter-Gatherer Fitness Model of Political Ideology
I've also included a bunch of images from studies proving that Leftists are anti-White and that being exposed Left-Wing ideology (White Privilege Theory) makes people more anti-White.
Many people are waking up to the "libtards are insane" question, it's a short leap to concluding that libtards are both insane and evil.
There is some good data proving that the Left is evil in the two Substack articles below. Specifically the stuff about malicious envy, spite, willingness to inflict harm, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, victimhood signaling, and selfishness. The second article is longer and has a lot more citations.
- The Leftist Personality: Left-Wing ideology as a biological phenomenon
- The Hunter-Gatherer Fitness Model of Political Ideology
I've also included a bunch of images from studies proving that Leftists are anti-White and that being exposed Left-Wing ideology (White Privilege Theory) makes people more anti-White.
Many people are waking up to the "libtards are insane" question, it's a short leap to concluding that libtards are both insane and evil.