Afterthought to this post: The Dissident Right is basically a "nationalist international" in the same vein as the Ethical Culture Movement or World League for Sexual Reform — except we spread based ideas instead of cucked ideas. The major difference is that it's incredibly difficult for us to create real world organizations due to Western police states, ludicrous laws, anarcho-tyranny, etc. But there is clearly a benefit to this sort of international organization.
Telegram
Thuletide
The Great Awokening as a Global Phenomenon:
"Looking at prejudice-specific topics, we obtain additional evidence that the abrupt rise in the usage of prejudice specific terminology did not begin in the the United States." (Source)
For years I've tried to…
"Looking at prejudice-specific topics, we obtain additional evidence that the abrupt rise in the usage of prejudice specific terminology did not begin in the the United States." (Source)
For years I've tried to…
Forwarded from Disclose.tv
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
NOW - White House: "LGBTQI+ kids are resilient, they're fierce, they fight back, they're not going anywhere."
@disclosetv
@disclosetv
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
My favorite part of this podcast was the 5 minutes of brutally honest classism at the end.
Nationalists don't like to talk about this for some reason, but the welfare state (aka taxpayer-funded dysgenics programs) alone is are enough collapse Western civilization, even without mass migration.
We pay the dumbest, least competent/successful people to have infinite babies while the smartest people have basically checked out of breeding altogether.
It doesn't take a genius to see where we're heading. In a few generations, we as a race will be too dumb to maintain civilization.
Nationalists don't like to talk about this for some reason, but the welfare state (aka taxpayer-funded dysgenics programs) alone is are enough collapse Western civilization, even without mass migration.
We pay the dumbest, least competent/successful people to have infinite babies while the smartest people have basically checked out of breeding altogether.
It doesn't take a genius to see where we're heading. In a few generations, we as a race will be too dumb to maintain civilization.
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
Cozy story time podcast with Morgoth and Gio, very entertaining: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhpL0bsyZjQ
YouTube
Ruled Britannia Ft. @MorgothsReview1 (Content Minded Ep. 38).
Strap in for a comfy and meaningful conversation with the Almighty Morgoth! We talk about many things, especially about Britain’s past and future, current politics, 90s music nostalgia, High Strangeness, the online RW and much more! the full version includes…
James Lindsay is pro-multiracialism and believes that multiculturalism is bad because it prevents racial intermixing.
He believes that "the races can get alone fine" and that any disagreement is caused by the Far-Left trying to "start a race war"
His entire worldview is just Globalism circa 2015, pre-transgenderism but post-gay marriage.
He believes that "the races can get alone fine" and that any disagreement is caused by the Far-Left trying to "start a race war"
His entire worldview is just Globalism circa 2015, pre-transgenderism but post-gay marriage.
Article: Is "Wokeness" just Communism? - Responding to Paul Gottfried
Paul Gottfried recently published a bad article arguing that "wokeness" is "not real Communism." I deboonked his arguments here.
Bottom line: If Karl "abolish all traditional culture" Marx were alive today, he would be waving an LBGT flag and chanting "Black Lives Matter."
Paul Gottfried recently published a bad article arguing that "wokeness" is "not real Communism." I deboonked his arguments here.
Bottom line: If Karl "abolish all traditional culture" Marx were alive today, he would be waving an LBGT flag and chanting "Black Lives Matter."
Thuletide
Is “Wokeness” just Communism? – Responding to Paul Gottfried
TL;DR: Yes, wokeness is just Communism.
Dumbest quote from Gottfried's article by far:
"Communism in Europe, at least in practice, never showed the frenzied nihilistic energy that seems endemic to the woke left. From tearing down statues to abolishing genders to inciting mob violence against white Americans to throwing open borders for invasion by Third World migrants, the woke left seems far more socially and culturally destructive than most past Communist governments."
"Communism in Europe, at least in practice, never showed the frenzied nihilistic energy that seems endemic to the woke left. From tearing down statues to abolishing genders to inciting mob violence against white Americans to throwing open borders for invasion by Third World migrants, the woke left seems far more socially and culturally destructive than most past Communist governments."
Forwarded from Media Tricks Exposed ✨
Elon Musk accuses the BBC of covering up Covid vaccine injuries
"Does the BBC hold itself at all responsible for misinformation regarding masking and side effects of vaccinations, and not reporting on that at all? What about the fact that the BBC was put under pressure by the British government to change the editorial policy?"
He also accuses the unlikable reporter of being a liar, for his "hate speech" narrative. This reporter goes through life with everyone he meets wanting to punch him in the face, you can just tell.
In a report broadcast later on BBC News, neither of these two segments were shown.
🔗 Full interview
✨ @MediaTricks
"Does the BBC hold itself at all responsible for misinformation regarding masking and side effects of vaccinations, and not reporting on that at all? What about the fact that the BBC was put under pressure by the British government to change the editorial policy?"
He also accuses the unlikable reporter of being a liar, for his "hate speech" narrative. This reporter goes through life with everyone he meets wanting to punch him in the face, you can just tell.
In a report broadcast later on BBC News, neither of these two segments were shown.
🔗 Full interview
✨ @MediaTricks
Forwarded from Survive the Jive: All-feed
TGO ran a poll on whether the PIE speakers should be called Aryan or IE and the responses reveal how confused most people are about why the shift happened.
Early on in IE studies there was an erroneous belief that Sanskrit was the most archaic of all IE languages and that it therefore represented an early break from PIE. But this was corrected in the 19th c. when people pointed out that is just because Vedic Sanskrit, as a liturgical language, is preserved in the Bronze age form. Hindi is actually less conservative than Icelandic or Lithuanian and the ancestors of those languages at the time the Rigveda was composed were most likely more archaic than Vedic. Now everyone knows Proto-Indo-Iranic (PII) is not an early break-off from PIE at all but emerged about 1000 years AFTER PIE was spoken.
But because we know the speakers of PII referred to themselves as Aryans, there emerged a trend among academics early on to conflate PIE and PII and refer to the speakers of both as Aryans. J. G. Rhode in 1820 posited the theory that the Aryans came from Central Asia (which was correct) but this meant, due to contemporary assumptions, that people also thought PIE was from Central Asia, and this erroneous belief persisted among academics for some 50 years and among less learned folks for far longer. Many Indo-Europeanists; Grimm, Muller, Pott, Lassen, Schleicher believed PIE came from Asia until the tide changed when Dr Latham in 1851 posited that PIE came from Europe. Subsequent scholarship has vindicated Latham but it has taken a long time to prove that Ukraine is the real homeland of PIE.
Once we learned that PIE was European, the Asiatic term Aryan became inappropriate to describe them. The Nazis used it, but Nazis also believed in silly Asian origin ideas that were already disproven in their time. “Aryan” was still used by scholars such as Issac Taylor to refer to PIE people as recently as 1892 in his book ‘Origin of the Aryans’, although he begins the book with an entire chapter on ‘the Aryan controversy’ where he explains why the term Aryan is no longer appropriate to refer to PIE.
The PII (Sintashta and Andronovo cultures) called themselves Aryans and are an important historic culture which it is useful to refer to with this word. Calling their ancestors in Europe from 1000 years earlier, by a PII word, even if it has a PIE origin, is like calling Bell Beakers “Romans” or calling the British “Americans”.
This isn’t about political correctness or the Nazis, this is about using a word that makes sense. When you say ‘Aryan’, you not only look like a Neo-Nazi, you also look like you don’t understand the field of IE studies at all. Very, very bad idea to promote this.
Early on in IE studies there was an erroneous belief that Sanskrit was the most archaic of all IE languages and that it therefore represented an early break from PIE. But this was corrected in the 19th c. when people pointed out that is just because Vedic Sanskrit, as a liturgical language, is preserved in the Bronze age form. Hindi is actually less conservative than Icelandic or Lithuanian and the ancestors of those languages at the time the Rigveda was composed were most likely more archaic than Vedic. Now everyone knows Proto-Indo-Iranic (PII) is not an early break-off from PIE at all but emerged about 1000 years AFTER PIE was spoken.
But because we know the speakers of PII referred to themselves as Aryans, there emerged a trend among academics early on to conflate PIE and PII and refer to the speakers of both as Aryans. J. G. Rhode in 1820 posited the theory that the Aryans came from Central Asia (which was correct) but this meant, due to contemporary assumptions, that people also thought PIE was from Central Asia, and this erroneous belief persisted among academics for some 50 years and among less learned folks for far longer. Many Indo-Europeanists; Grimm, Muller, Pott, Lassen, Schleicher believed PIE came from Asia until the tide changed when Dr Latham in 1851 posited that PIE came from Europe. Subsequent scholarship has vindicated Latham but it has taken a long time to prove that Ukraine is the real homeland of PIE.
Once we learned that PIE was European, the Asiatic term Aryan became inappropriate to describe them. The Nazis used it, but Nazis also believed in silly Asian origin ideas that were already disproven in their time. “Aryan” was still used by scholars such as Issac Taylor to refer to PIE people as recently as 1892 in his book ‘Origin of the Aryans’, although he begins the book with an entire chapter on ‘the Aryan controversy’ where he explains why the term Aryan is no longer appropriate to refer to PIE.
The PII (Sintashta and Andronovo cultures) called themselves Aryans and are an important historic culture which it is useful to refer to with this word. Calling their ancestors in Europe from 1000 years earlier, by a PII word, even if it has a PIE origin, is like calling Bell Beakers “Romans” or calling the British “Americans”.
This isn’t about political correctness or the Nazis, this is about using a word that makes sense. When you say ‘Aryan’, you not only look like a Neo-Nazi, you also look like you don’t understand the field of IE studies at all. Very, very bad idea to promote this.
Forwarded from Thuletide
Popular Leftist myth:
Postwar decolonization was due to plucky brown Socialist rebels overthrowing their colonial overlords and sticking it to the evil White man. Western powers fought hard to defend their colonies because they were terrified by the combined might of Socialism and people of color.
Reality:
"Western powers" (now in the hands of globalists and libtards) supported non-White Socialist revolutionaries against their White governments in almost every anti-colonial revolutionary war, alongside the USSR and Communist China in many cases. Colonial governments didn't lose a single war but were forced to decolonize by combined economic warfare and political pressure from both Western and Communist powers. Some voluntarily decolonized to avoid war.
Postwar decolonization was due to plucky brown Socialist rebels overthrowing their colonial overlords and sticking it to the evil White man. Western powers fought hard to defend their colonies because they were terrified by the combined might of Socialism and people of color.
Reality:
"Western powers" (now in the hands of globalists and libtards) supported non-White Socialist revolutionaries against their White governments in almost every anti-colonial revolutionary war, alongside the USSR and Communist China in many cases. Colonial governments didn't lose a single war but were forced to decolonize by combined economic warfare and political pressure from both Western and Communist powers. Some voluntarily decolonized to avoid war.