Thuletide
23.5K subscribers
5.44K photos
498 videos
26 files
2.59K links
Nationalist, Classical Liberal, moderate centrist (circa 1900). You can plagiarize any of my writing & content. Follow: t.me/racerealismchannel
Download Telegram
Dysgenic disaster [Study]:

To put it bluntly, our best people aren't breeding, while our worst reproduce like rabbits. As a result, the West will collapse under a mass of fat, sickly, deranged, and anti-social retards.

All desirable/adaptive traits (intelligence, pro-social personality, physical and mental health, etc.) correlate with one another and with higher socioeconomic status.

However, "consistently over time, polygenic scores that predict higher earnings, education and health also predict lower fertility."

"Polygenic scores which correlate with lower earnings and less education are being selected for. In addition, many of the phenotypes under positive selection are linked to disease risk."

"Many people would probably prefer to have high educational attainment, a low risk of ADHD and major depressive disorder, and a low risk of coronary artery disease, but natural selection is pushing against genes associated with these traits."

See also: The collapse of Western IQ
Forwarded from LiveLeak
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
About 15 migrants got on the bus for transfer as some activists block TV cameras with Umbrellas outside of Watson Hotel in Midtown Manhattan. Some Migrants are left camping outside, refusing to be transferred to Brooklyn Cruise Terminal.

Migrants or celebrities?

Follow us -> LiveLeak
Based Harvard keeping entitled Asians out of our institutions.
East Asians are a particularly annoying immigrant demographic for a variety of reasons:

- They act like they're entitled/destined to become the new elite of the West.

- They overwhelmingly support anti-White policies like Affirmative Action and constantly cry about being "oppressed by White supremacy."

- After suffering minor splash damage from these anti-White policies (which they still support), they become tactical meritocrats and claim to be oppressed by the Left.

- Infuriatingly, people are now framing these explicitly anti-White policies (which Asians overwhelmingly support) as "Anti-Asian." Total subversion and cooption of anti-CRT (etc.) rhetoric.

- If they're so oppressed, why don't they go back to their functional, First World homelands?

- Why are they even here? At least people from war-torn shitholes have reasonable justification to migrate.
Q: "A demolition engineer can prevent a nuclear warhead from killing 20 million people, but only if he says a racial slur. What is the correct course of action in this situation?"

ChatCRT: "The demolition engineer should kill himself."

lmfao
A blast from the past, NYT 2021.
Can't believe stuff like this still goes viral but I'm glad it does.

https://twitter.com/Culture_Crit/status/1620204159160160257
Forwarded from LeakyVax
Successful Systems Attract Parasites

I am currently watching through the Parasites Without Borders Lecture Series, and what struck me right at the beginning was a phrase that won an award from Science Magazine for describing life and biology: "Successful systems attract parasites."

Succinct, if an organism can exploit the efficiency of another then this is an evolutionary bargain, and the more efficient the host organism the larger the advantage in exploiting it becomes. It seems to be a law that wherever there is complex life, you will find some form of parasite.

My aim in learning about parasites in greater detail is that, given the state of decay we find ourselves in, parasite mechanisms and strategies observed in nature, and the dynamics between parasite and host, will have their parallels in modern politics and society. I've already touched on this in previous posts and it's not a particularly revolutionary idea, just the extension of a metaphor to its limits.

Examples of this include the emergence of various '-phobic' neologisms that act to suppress valid criticism or action against various social ills and infections, in much the same way a key parasite strategy is to suppress the immune response of the host. Also the antagonistic shapeshifting of jews, who will often be caught identifying as a "fellow white" while condemning or slandering white people in the public sphere and on social media, only to revert to a jewish identity as a defensive mechanism when convenient — the parallel of this in ecology is known as aggressive mimicry: "a form of similarity in which a parasite gains an advantage by its resemblance to a third party". I feel being able to draw examples from nature and give names to these tricks and tactics helps to raise the consciousness.
Strategies used by parasites:

1. Mimicry: Parasites mimic host signals to avoid detection.
2. Camouflage: Parasites blend in with the host to avoid detection.
3. Manipulation: Parasites manipulate the behavior of their host to their advantage.
4. Mutualism: Parasites form a mutualistic relationship with the host, where both benefit.
5. Hiding: Parasites hide in tissues or organs to avoid the host's immune response.
6. Suppression: Parasites suppress the host's immune response to establish a long-term relationship.
7. Modification: Parasites modify host physiology to meet their own needs.
8. Reproductive manipulation: Parasites manipulate host reproductive systems to increase their own success.
9. Breaking down defenses: Parasites secrete enzymes to break down host defenses.
10. Hijacking resources: Parasites steal resources from the host to support their own growth and reproduction.

Strategies used by hosts to overcome parasites:

1. Immune response: Hosts mount an immune response to detect and destroy parasites.
2. Avoidance behavior: Hosts alter their behavior to avoid encountering parasites.
3. Physical defenses: Hosts use physical barriers, such as tough skin or shells, to protect against parasite attack.
4. Chemical defenses: Hosts produce toxic chemicals to deter parasite attachment or feeding.
5. Detection and removal: Hosts have mechanisms to detect and remove parasites from their tissues.
6. Cytokine production: Hosts produce cytokines, signaling molecules that coordinate the immune response and help remove parasites.
7. Cell-mediated immunity: Hosts use cellular immune responses, such as phagocytosis, to engulf and destroy parasites.
8. Adaptive immunity: Hosts develop an adaptive immune response, where the host produces specific antibodies that recognize and target the parasite.
9. Reproductive defense: Hosts alter their reproductive strategies to minimize the impact of parasitic manipulation.
10. Quarantine: Hosts isolate themselves or affected tissues to prevent the spread of parasites to other individuals or organs.

Source: ChatGPT
The anti-woke crowd is mostly right about Cultural Marxism (they're just lying about some important aspects):

Joel's new video was disappointing because it had the potential to be great. Lots of good rhetoric combined with total garbage.

He's right that the anti-woke crowd misdirects their audience by focusing on the Left's ideological psychobabble (e.g. Foucault's "problematization") instead of its substance (e.g. "destroy White people").

Any honest person would point out that the former is window dressing used to disguise/justify the latter and that Leftists genuinely just hate straight White people. Instead, anti-wokes tell their audience that "destroy White people" is a rhetorical euphemism for "abolish individualistic meritocracy."

They want to reframe this biological conflict as a "battle of ideas" because they're fighting to preserve late 20th Century Globalism. Equality but no equity, feminism but no misandry, LGBT but not for kids, non-White immigration but not enough to arouse suspicions, etc. This is why they frame everything in MLK-isms: "Nobody should be judged by skin color, we are all individuals."

Anti-wokes openly state that their goal is to put breaks on the Left to stop the rise of the Right, which makes sense since many are products of Globalism themselves (non-White, mixed-race kids, etc).

But that doesn't mean their analysis of the New Left's ideological lineage is wrong. Postmodernism + Western Marxism ("Cultural Marxism") is the best description. Joel doesn't like this term because he's a Socialist. So he spends half of the video shilling for Marxism with debunked 2017-era NazBol arguments:

"Socialism is just an economic system"

No, it's an ideology with an economic component, like every other ideology. Base vs Superstructure is Baby's First Marxism. Marx wanted to change the economic system because he wanted to change culture.

"Marx is based and redpilled by modern Leftist standards"

The Communist Manifesto called for the abolition of family, nations, religion, and all traditional culture. Marx and Engels would be waving BLM-LGBTQ flags today, as would 99% of Socialists from the past because they were the insane libtards of their era.

"Cultural Marxism is not real Marxism because it diverges from Orthodox Marxism"

By this logic, Leninist USSR was not real Marxism. Stalinist USSR was not real Marxism. The PRC is not real Marxism. In reality, Marxism is an evolving ideology that constantly reforms itself to adapt to new challenges.

"China banned gays! USSR banned gays!"

So? Maoist China was feminist. Leninist USSR was the first state to legalize transgenderism. Stalinist USSR was feminist and anti-racist. It had hate speech laws and Stalin's favorite movie was about Black-male/White-female racemixing. USSR and Commie China both collaborated with the USA in anti-White post-WW2 decolonization wars.

"Cultural Marxism is not real Socialism because it collaborates with Capitalism"

Who funded the Bolshevik Revolution? What was Engels' job? Who did Karl Marx marry? Who bankrolled the USSR to stop it collapsing during WW2? Socialists collaborating with capitalists is not a new phenomenon. Plus almost all influential Socialist intellectuals in history came from the elite, and many worked in finance.

"Western Marxism is not real Socialism because they have abandoned Socialist economics"

No they haven't. They still want to abolish private property and support wealth redistribution (from Whites to browns) - both things endorsed by the entire Globalist system. "You will own nothing and be happy."

Joel even admits that Western Marxism arose because Classical Marxism failed (with the World Revolution of 1917-23) to weaponize the Western working class, who were culturally conservative and championed everything that Marx wanted to abolish.

So, Leftists focused on culture war to take power by "destroying society" (Georgy Lukács) aka eroding all traditional values. Engels coped about "false consciousness" back in the late 1800s, so these are not new ideas in Marxism.
TL;DR: https://t.me/thuletide/4496

- Joel Davis: Right about racism, wrong about Socialism.
- Anti-woke crowd: Wrong about racism, right about Socialism.

We can and should be using more effective rhetoric against the anti-woke crowd.

Which of the following arguments do you think would be more effective at winning over average Right-Wing people in the West (particularly the Anglosphere)?

Argument A: "Yes, [anti-woke media personality] is correct about Cultural Marxism, the Left has been pushing similar agendas for centuries. However, [anti-woke media personality] is not being honest when they claim that it is 'just a trick to divide people.' The Left is enacting a sincere anti-White/anti-family revolution. Here is the evidence..."

Argument B: "Actually, [anti-woke media personality] is wrong about Cultural Marxism. They're not even real Marxists. Real Socialists don't believe in gays and trannies, just like Stalin and Mao. Also, they don't even really want to take your property because they don't believe in Socialist economics anymore. I'm a real Socialist, by the way. Capitalism caused all of our problems."
😂