Forwarded from Building a Third Force (Gaddius)
A giant point-and-sputter type seethe post from our friends over there at the CFR. It’s interesting that they refer to the broader right-wing movement as “reactionary populism”.
There’s a key passage in here that is very telling:
“Opponents of reactionary populism need to assume that they are in for a protracted political fight. The growing normalization of reactionary populism presents particularly acute dilemmas. Once extremist views become destigmatized, politicians and parties have no choice but to engage with them on their own terms. Efforts to selectively co-opt far-right positions, such as the Danish Social Democrats’ adoption of hard-line policies on immigration and cultural integration, may succeed in diminishing support for radicals. But they also facilitate normalization, which opens the door for extremists to inject ever more radical, illiberal, and authoritarian positions into the mainstream.”
In other words, things are going the direction we want them to and there’s largely nothing they can do about it. The best they can hope for is mainstream parties/institutions co-opt rad-right positions in an effort to moderate or neutralize the energy. But if that happens it just increasingly normalizes the positions. A lose-lose on their end.
Very whitepilling and should be motivation to triple down and keep up the pressure. 👌🏻
https://archive.vn/6mx1G
There’s a key passage in here that is very telling:
“Opponents of reactionary populism need to assume that they are in for a protracted political fight. The growing normalization of reactionary populism presents particularly acute dilemmas. Once extremist views become destigmatized, politicians and parties have no choice but to engage with them on their own terms. Efforts to selectively co-opt far-right positions, such as the Danish Social Democrats’ adoption of hard-line policies on immigration and cultural integration, may succeed in diminishing support for radicals. But they also facilitate normalization, which opens the door for extremists to inject ever more radical, illiberal, and authoritarian positions into the mainstream.”
In other words, things are going the direction we want them to and there’s largely nothing they can do about it. The best they can hope for is mainstream parties/institutions co-opt rad-right positions in an effort to moderate or neutralize the energy. But if that happens it just increasingly normalizes the positions. A lose-lose on their end.
Very whitepilling and should be motivation to triple down and keep up the pressure. 👌🏻
https://archive.vn/6mx1G
archive.vn
The Vexing Rise of the Transnational Right | Foreign Affairs
archived 19 Jan 2023 08:55:59 UTC
Talking basic race realism with ChatGPT:
I previously had an extremely talmudic argument with the AI where I had to trick it into admitting that "discrete, biologically distinct populations" (i.e. races) exist among modern humans.
After this had been established, it admitted that "the overwhelming scientific consensus is that race does have a biological and genetic basis, and that differences in physical and behavioral traits can be partially attributed to genetics."
But only after I explicitly told it to ignore social justice arguments and "ethical issues." Before that, it claimed that race is "a social construct with limited biological basis."
It also gave reasonable information on genetics vs environmental influence with regards to behavior, but I hit a brick wall as soon as I told it to describe population-level differences in behavior.
I previously had an extremely talmudic argument with the AI where I had to trick it into admitting that "discrete, biologically distinct populations" (i.e. races) exist among modern humans.
After this had been established, it admitted that "the overwhelming scientific consensus is that race does have a biological and genetic basis, and that differences in physical and behavioral traits can be partially attributed to genetics."
But only after I explicitly told it to ignore social justice arguments and "ethical issues." Before that, it claimed that race is "a social construct with limited biological basis."
It also gave reasonable information on genetics vs environmental influence with regards to behavior, but I hit a brick wall as soon as I told it to describe population-level differences in behavior.
Mask off moment:
Admitting verbatim that the Globalist endgame is to ethnically replace all functional, first world ethnic groups (i.e. Whites + Japanese and Koreans) with Sub-Saharan African immigrants:
"Slowing birth rates in the developed world are resulting in aging populations and smaller workforces."
"But while rich countries get older, the developing world is getting younger. Fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa was well above the replacement rate at an average of 4.7 births per woman in 2020. The challenge in these countries is creating enough jobs to sustain a growing workforce."
"To economists, the simplest way to solve both problems is through migration."
"It's the permanent immigrants who generate the long run population growth for us"
"Almost a billion people would migrate permanently if they could"
"[But] In a future where much of the world's working age population will be from countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, anti-immigrant sentiment could be a sticking point"
(Article source)
Admitting verbatim that the Globalist endgame is to ethnically replace all functional, first world ethnic groups (i.e. Whites + Japanese and Koreans) with Sub-Saharan African immigrants:
"Slowing birth rates in the developed world are resulting in aging populations and smaller workforces."
"But while rich countries get older, the developing world is getting younger. Fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa was well above the replacement rate at an average of 4.7 births per woman in 2020. The challenge in these countries is creating enough jobs to sustain a growing workforce."
"To economists, the simplest way to solve both problems is through migration."
"It's the permanent immigrants who generate the long run population growth for us"
"Almost a billion people would migrate permanently if they could"
"[But] In a future where much of the world's working age population will be from countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, anti-immigrant sentiment could be a sticking point"
(Article source)
White population count could decrease under a new Biden proposal:
Translation: "We don't need to hide the Great Replacement with false census data now that we've successfully replaced almost half of the White population."
Most ominous sentence: "This type of demographic data also informs decisions on redistricting and the distribution of government assistance."
(Article source)
Translation: "We don't need to hide the Great Replacement with false census data now that we've successfully replaced almost half of the White population."
Most ominous sentence: "This type of demographic data also informs decisions on redistricting and the distribution of government assistance."
(Article source)
Annecy, beautiful town in southeast France.
Currently being flooded with immigrants thanks in part to a United Nations "Sustainable Development" organization called ConnectAID.
Currently being flooded with immigrants thanks in part to a United Nations "Sustainable Development" organization called ConnectAID.
Wokal Distance at it again. As I said about Chris Rufo, these crypto-Globalist shills are our biggest enemies.
They stand in stark contrast to more moderate Right-Wingers, like Paul Joseph Watson or Matt Walsh, who act as good stepping stones for normies. These guys call out Replacement Migration and anti-White agendas and they don't intentionally obfuscate politics with philosophical gibberish.
https://twitter.com/wokal_distance/status/1621542508437323776
They stand in stark contrast to more moderate Right-Wingers, like Paul Joseph Watson or Matt Walsh, who act as good stepping stones for normies. These guys call out Replacement Migration and anti-White agendas and they don't intentionally obfuscate politics with philosophical gibberish.
https://twitter.com/wokal_distance/status/1621542508437323776
Forwarded from Disclose.tv
NEW - Unattractive people are more likely to keep wearing face masks in post-Covid era, a study suggests.
Meanwhile, another major analysis found masks made "no difference" to infections.
https://www.disclose.tv/id/100017/
@disclosetv
Meanwhile, another major analysis found masks made "no difference" to infections.
https://www.disclose.tv/id/100017/
@disclosetv
Disclose.tv
Topic
Breaking news from around the world.
Women are significantly more likely to pass on genes associated with mental illness, including major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, neuroticism, and autism.
Men are more likely to pass on genes associated with extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, height, and cognitive ability.
So, avoid crazy girls if you want psychologically healthy kids.
Source: Human Capital Mediates Natural Selection in Contemporary Humans, sampling >400,000 "British subjects with European ancestry."
Men are more likely to pass on genes associated with extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, height, and cognitive ability.
So, avoid crazy girls if you want psychologically healthy kids.
Source: Human Capital Mediates Natural Selection in Contemporary Humans, sampling >400,000 "British subjects with European ancestry."