"East Asians committing mass shootings in California: White people to blame."

"You would have a far-Right government in every country in Europe"

An item in the Swedish news caught my attention the other day.

Swedish state TV was in Davos. They took the opportunity to interview Alex Karp, head of tech company Palantir.

Palantir has developed AI technology for American intelligence agencies and now they're working with Ukrainian military to counter the Russian invasion.

What caught my attention was an offhand comment Karp made about a completely different topic...

After the mandatory cringe COVID fist-bump, he tells the reporter about one of his AI products:

"This product has stopped major terror attacks multiple times every year... And I believe... One of the things I'm most proud of is that... if those terror attacks had happened, you would have a far-Right government in every single country in Europe... and especially in the [Nordic countries]."

Presumably, Karp is saying that migrants would have caused so many terror attacks that every country in Europe would elect a "far-Right" government to end the madness.

Now, this brings up several issues:

1. Mass immigration is such a bad idea that you need the latest AI tech to prevent if from causing civil war. (And even with that tech, mass immigration is destroying Europe.)

2. The appropriate response would be to elect "far-Right" governments to end the problem. In fact, that is what people would do if not for this AI technology.

3. What does this say about our "democracy"? European countries need to elect "far-Right" governments, but the ruling class is using the latest AI tech to prevent that from happening...

Source: Svt (You can hear Karp's statement in the video)

NEW - 300,000 non-Covid excess deaths in the US since 2020.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11671593/America-suffered-300-000-non-Covid-excess-deaths-2020.html

@disclosetv

NEW - Nearly 3,000 more Brits than usual are dying each week.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11671587/Massive-spike-excess-deaths-sparks-calls-urgent-investigation.html

@disclosetv

Happy Australia Day 🇦🇺❤️

"[Sweden] prioritized the free speech "rights" of a white foreigner over the safety of Swedish Muslims."

Rasmus Paludan is a Swedish citizen. So, even by this logic, he's just as Swedish as the so-called "Swedish muslims."

In reality, two neighbouring Nordic ethnic groups have infinitely more in common with each other than with these racially and culturally alien Middle Eastern colonizers, who will always be foreign to Europe.

https://twitter.com/KhaledBeydoun/status/1617376236849725441

"Unpopular take: mass immigration could save this country."
— Joel Berry, Managing Editor of The Babylon Bee (this Tweet isn't satire).

Totally delusional post for so many reasons.

1. Shilling for mass migration is not "unpopular" but the #1 policy of the entire globalist order and supported by every single libtard.

2. If immigrants could "save" the US, then why can't they save their own countries? The US needs to be saved from immigrants who are turning it into Brazil 2.0.

3. Immigrants are not more hardworking. Over half of them are on welfare. They (alongside Blacks) use so much welfare that they put the US into a budget deficit every single year.

4. The evil Democraps did not destroy African Americans' culture and have not conspired to keep them poor and on welfare. This is just how they behave when White people aren't babysitting them and forcing them to adhere to rigid moral social standards. Citation: The entirety of Sub-Saharan Africa.

lol some illiterate doofus interpreted this post as pro-EU rather than anti-China and anti-NWO. I didn't even mention the EU.

Very common problem on the DR. Say you don't care about Palestine and people claim that you're pro-Israel. Say you don't like the Russian government and people claim that you're pro-NATO. Say you don't like Socialism and people claim that you're a Libertarian.

Totally braindead.

ChatGPT on mass migration:

"Mass migration could be used to dilute the political power of certain groups by increasing the number of people who have the right to vote, making it more difficult for any one group to achieve a majority. This could be particularly useful for [...] political groups that want to maintain their power in the face of growing opposition."

(From this Twitter thread)

Sharpening arguments against Globalism by asking AI chatbots loaded questions seems like a very fruitful strategy.

People act like mass deportations are impossible but Algeria kicked out a million Whites (~12% of the population) in a couple of years after they gained independence [1] [2].

Similarly, Tunisia and Morocco each kicked out a quarter of a million Whites (~7% and ~5 of their populations, respectively) [3] [4] [5] [6].

Huge demographic turnovers can occur in the blink of an eye. Europeans were in North Africa for over a century but most non-Whites haven't even lived in the West for a single decade. They could be sent home as quickly as they arrived.

Peacefully deporting them would, theoretically, be easy and inexpensive. Simply banning them from accessing welfare and making them pay to use public services (e.g. healthcare in Europe) would cause many to immediately self-deport.

Since over 50% of immigrants are on welfare, the money saved could then be used to finance deportation logistics. Even paying them a lump sum to leave would be cheaper than keeping them here.

Babylon Bee editor has meltdown and promotes genocide of Whites after being called out for posting pro-mass migration nonsense.

(Tweet source)

"Race is fake and meaningless but sex is real."

Bizarre selective biological realism. His cognitive dissonance levels must be off the charts.

The argument that Joel Berry used is pretty common race-denialist rhetoric, and it makes no sense whatsoever. If race doesn't exist, then how can race-mixing exist?

Very similar to the continuum fallacy: "If race is real, then how do mixed-race people exist? Checkmate, bigot."

This stuff is constantly promoted by Left-Wing activist-academics. Early last year, the inappropriately named "Science" Journal published a study claiming that race isn't real because New York is full of mixed-race people.