Academic promotion of violence against whites:

Non-Whites in Western academia often promote violence against White people, making genocidal statements, like "abolish Whiteness" or "abolish the White race by any means necessary."

Someone asked me for proof that non-Whites say they want to harm Whites. So, here it is. This is what they're promoting at the top of our society in our "respectable" institutions — and we aren't even a minority yet!

There are six examples in this image, but it would be easy to find countless others.
- Harvard: Noel Ignatiev, Jewish
- UC Irvine: Mark Levine, Jewish
- Cambridge, UK: Priyamvada Gopal, Indian
- University of Georgia: Irami Osei-Frampong, Black
- Yale: Aruna Khilanani, Indian
- Texas A&M: Tommy Curry, Black

Jack vs Elon regarding child exploitation on Twitter.

Elon Musk's Twitter Leaks have unveiled that Twitter, in collaboration with government officials and the FBI, spent infinitely more time and resources suppressing their political opponents than they did purging child pornography from their site.

New article
Stochastic Terrorism: Non-White academics promote violence against Whites with real-world consequences

According to Dictionary.com, Stochastic Terrorism is “the public demonization of a person or group resulting in the incitement of a violent act, which is statistically probable but whose specifics cannot be predicted.”

This article goes through the promotion of violence against Whites from the top down, beginning with academia, which arguably plays the largest role in defining a society's ideology because they "educate" future elites.

The first day of MillenniYule is here!

Follow Woes’s Odysee to watch it live

https://odysee.com/@millennialwoes:4

"Liberalism hurts us, but it also hurts non-whites and that is also a tragedy"

"We have given the smallpox blanket of democracy, rule of law, and human rights to the third world"

"We created this poison, unleashed it on the world, and although we have suffered greatly, others will yet suffer worse."

"This is a powerful framing"

"Any nationalism not repulsive to normal people must be founded on something other than chauvinism."

- https://t.me/ImperiumPressOfficial/1729

TL;DR: "SINISTER and DUPLICITOUS Whites are intentionally DESTROYING People of Color with our EVIL LIBERALISM, just like we GENOCIDED the Amerindians and Abbos!!!"

Very powerful framing indeed. Not a great basis for nationalism when Whites are under threat of global extinction and a demonized global minority.

There's a huge difference between saying the above, and pointing out that Globalism is homogenizing the planet and destroying true biological and cultural diversity because elites want to create a world government.

The former is anti-White nonsense, the latter is a useful Baby's First Redpill to get Whites on board with advancing their own racial interests and opposing Globalism.

"What’s happening globally is quite simple—[Third World people] are coming in contact with 100% proof, high-test, late-stage liberalism"

Is it really? This article doesn't mention the true primary cause of falling birth rates: Industrialization, which is not a development unique to White Wester- sorry I mean "Liberal" countries.

The NRx-like idea that modern so-called "Liberalism" is a natural outgrowth of Classical Liberalism is half-baked, at best. The transformation was a civilization-scale revolution that overthrew the old European Classical Liberal order.

You can make the argument that certain Classical Liberal values, like free speech, gave this revolution a foothold. But what we see today is a new Globalist elite, that is predominantly Jewish-led but increasingly multiethnic, wearing an Anglo-Saxon Liberal skinsuit while it projects the Socialist values of the USSR upon the world: Feminism, wealth redistribution, racial egalitarianism, Third Worldism, "hate speech" censorship, LGBT rights, etc.

The data in this article is interesting, and it's 100% true that Left-Wing values harm birth rates. Leftism is extremely maladaptive. But the article would have been 1,000 times better without the toxic anti-White framing. Remove the few sentences about keeping brown people in brown countries and it's often indistinguishable from Critical Race Theory infographics on "the Evils of Cultural Whiteness."

This is a good example of why I rail so hard against wholesome chungus Third Worldism. It's a very slippery slope. One minute you're saying "Free Palestine," and the next you're saying that Whites are using "liberalism" to enact a worldwide genocide upon People of Color. Whites are in a very precarious situation here. We have to be very careful about how we frame things.

Would like to hear a response from Imperium Press on this one.

"We can't even discuss the framing issue until we discuss the Liberal Question."
https://t.me/ImperiumPressOfficial/1732

What a convenient way to avoid addressing the fact that you are promoting Critical Race Theory-tier anti-White narratives.

In this post I raised 3 points:

1. The narrative Imperium Press put forward in that article is clearly anti-White and often near-indistinguishable from Critical Race Theory ("Evil Whites are using 'liberalism' to enact a worldwide genocide upon People of Color!")

2. The article doesn't mention industrialism, which predicts low birth rates and is by no means unique to "Liberal" (White Western) countries (see: USSR, PRC, etc.). This debunks the article's central thesis that "Liberalism" alone is responsible for decreasing birth rates.

3. The "Liberalism" (Globalism) of today is the result of, well, basically foreign ethnic conquest and occupation, and it is significantly qualitatively different from the Liberalism of e.g. the 1920s (eugenics, scientific racism, immigration restriction, segregation, etc.).

Of course Imperium Press focuses on the final and, in this context, least important point, so he can promote his theory that transgenderism is a natural and inevitable consequence of... I don't know, the Anglo-Saxon Magna Carta of 1215 AD?

If Imperium Press doesn't feel guilty, then why did he write an entire article claiming White people released liberalism as an asymmetric warfare bioweapon to essentially genocide brown people by destroying their birth rates? He even propagated the anti-White "smallpox blanket genocide" blood libel. That's White guilt 101.

I don't feel any guilt at all for what Globalists are doing around the world, and I certainly don't attribute their actions to White people, like this guy does.

These Third Worldist types will call people "sociopaths" and "chauvinists" if they don't cry endless crocodile tears for woes of the Global Majority. It's very abnormal behavior for a supposedly pro-White / Right-Wing individual.

The message they're sending out to people is terrible. It's a horseshoe of the Left's "toxic Whiteness" but instead of Whites being evil & guilty for spreading "White supremacy, patriarchy, and colonialism," we're evil & guilty for spreading so-called "Liberalism."

Imagine being a White-guilt ridden normie who is beginning to question the anti-White narratives but when you find a supposedly pro-White dissident movement, they're peddling the same anti-White narratives as the average Communist — smallpox blankets and Liberalism. Give me a break.

You're reading guilt into it because you're a faggot like Thuletide with a repressed guilt complex. I don't feel any guilt over spreading cultural AIDS, but that's not to say we should keep doing it.