NORTHMAN REVIEW

This is a much more in depth review than the one I wrote in April for my blog. This time I have added more sources and I have analysed each relevant scene meticulously. Watching this review will enhance your enjoyment and appreciation of the film nine fold!

https://youtu.be/9Ro2RAKLFVc

Given this was filmed before the pandemic*, what Peterson explains here probably contributes more than a little to his recent meltdowns and crusade against online anonymity.

*(Joe Rogan Episode 1006, September 1, 2017)

Q: What happens when so-called "White Supremacy" is defeated and the reins of power are handed to "People of Color"?

A: "South Africa’s performance on a range of social, economic and governance measures deteriorated more in the past 12 years than any other nation not at war"

https://archive.vn/Jh9a0

Americans near-unanimously dislike Putin and Xi Jinping.

Unsurprisingly, Democraps (Socialist libtards) are more favorable to Xi Jinping (a Socialist libtard) than Republicans are.

https://twitter.com/CarrollDoherty/status/1601336581205688321

Edit: Keith Woods is also a Socialist libtard https://t.me/keith_woods/3461

New article:
Wikipedia Censorship: The (so-called) “No Nazis” Policy

Good morning! Here's an article I forgot to publish.

The "No Nazis" Policy is a list of forbidden beliefs/facts that Wikipedia classes as "demonstrably false, completely unsupported by evidence, or impossible to prove, without exception." You will be immediately banned for editing any of them into Wikipedia's articles.

It includes the beliefs that White people exist, that Whites should have safe & homogenous homelands, that Replacement Migration exists, that censoring so-called "hate speech" violates free speech, and facts like racial/ethnic disparities in IQ and criminality.

See also: This article, which reveals how Wikipedia uses millions of dollars of donation money to fund anti-White organizations.

Something scrambled Leftists' brains and crippled their threat-detection abilities, making them more amicable to out-groups.

I wonder if the Dissident Right people who shill for Russia, China, MENA, and foreign brown people, in general, suffer from the same ailments as Leftists.

Academic promotion of violence against whites:

Non-Whites in Western academia often promote violence against White people, making genocidal statements, like "abolish Whiteness" or "abolish the White race by any means necessary."

Someone asked me for proof that non-Whites say they want to harm Whites. So, here it is. This is what they're promoting at the top of our society in our "respectable" institutions — and we aren't even a minority yet!

There are six examples in this image, but it would be easy to find countless others.
- Harvard: Noel Ignatiev, Jewish
- UC Irvine: Mark Levine, Jewish
- Cambridge, UK: Priyamvada Gopal, Indian
- University of Georgia: Irami Osei-Frampong, Black
- Yale: Aruna Khilanani, Indian
- Texas A&M: Tommy Curry, Black

Jack vs Elon regarding child exploitation on Twitter.

Elon Musk's Twitter Leaks have unveiled that Twitter, in collaboration with government officials and the FBI, spent infinitely more time and resources suppressing their political opponents than they did purging child pornography from their site.

New article
Stochastic Terrorism: Non-White academics promote violence against Whites with real-world consequences

According to Dictionary.com, Stochastic Terrorism is “the public demonization of a person or group resulting in the incitement of a violent act, which is statistically probable but whose specifics cannot be predicted.”

This article goes through the promotion of violence against Whites from the top down, beginning with academia, which arguably plays the largest role in defining a society's ideology because they "educate" future elites.

The first day of MillenniYule is here!

Follow Woes’s Odysee to watch it live

https://odysee.com/@millennialwoes:4

"Liberalism hurts us, but it also hurts non-whites and that is also a tragedy"

"We have given the smallpox blanket of democracy, rule of law, and human rights to the third world"

"We created this poison, unleashed it on the world, and although we have suffered greatly, others will yet suffer worse."

"This is a powerful framing"

"Any nationalism not repulsive to normal people must be founded on something other than chauvinism."

- https://t.me/ImperiumPressOfficial/1729

TL;DR: "SINISTER and DUPLICITOUS Whites are intentionally DESTROYING People of Color with our EVIL LIBERALISM, just like we GENOCIDED the Amerindians and Abbos!!!"

Very powerful framing indeed. Not a great basis for nationalism when Whites are under threat of global extinction and a demonized global minority.

There's a huge difference between saying the above, and pointing out that Globalism is homogenizing the planet and destroying true biological and cultural diversity because elites want to create a world government.

The former is anti-White nonsense, the latter is a useful Baby's First Redpill to get Whites on board with advancing their own racial interests and opposing Globalism.

"What’s happening globally is quite simple—[Third World people] are coming in contact with 100% proof, high-test, late-stage liberalism"

Is it really? This article doesn't mention the true primary cause of falling birth rates: Industrialization, which is not a development unique to White Wester- sorry I mean "Liberal" countries.

The NRx-like idea that modern so-called "Liberalism" is a natural outgrowth of Classical Liberalism is half-baked, at best. The transformation was a civilization-scale revolution that overthrew the old European Classical Liberal order.

You can make the argument that certain Classical Liberal values, like free speech, gave this revolution a foothold. But what we see today is a new Globalist elite, that is predominantly Jewish-led but increasingly multiethnic, wearing an Anglo-Saxon Liberal skinsuit while it projects the Socialist values of the USSR upon the world: Feminism, wealth redistribution, racial egalitarianism, Third Worldism, "hate speech" censorship, LGBT rights, etc.

The data in this article is interesting, and it's 100% true that Left-Wing values harm birth rates. Leftism is extremely maladaptive. But the article would have been 1,000 times better without the toxic anti-White framing. Remove the few sentences about keeping brown people in brown countries and it's often indistinguishable from Critical Race Theory infographics on "the Evils of Cultural Whiteness."

This is a good example of why I rail so hard against wholesome chungus Third Worldism. It's a very slippery slope. One minute you're saying "Free Palestine," and the next you're saying that Whites are using "liberalism" to enact a worldwide genocide upon People of Color. Whites are in a very precarious situation here. We have to be very careful about how we frame things.

Would like to hear a response from Imperium Press on this one.

"We can't even discuss the framing issue until we discuss the Liberal Question."
https://t.me/ImperiumPressOfficial/1732

What a convenient way to avoid addressing the fact that you are promoting Critical Race Theory-tier anti-White narratives.

In this post I raised 3 points:

1. The narrative Imperium Press put forward in that article is clearly anti-White and often near-indistinguishable from Critical Race Theory ("Evil Whites are using 'liberalism' to enact a worldwide genocide upon People of Color!")

2. The article doesn't mention industrialism, which predicts low birth rates and is by no means unique to "Liberal" (White Western) countries (see: USSR, PRC, etc.). This debunks the article's central thesis that "Liberalism" alone is responsible for decreasing birth rates.

3. The "Liberalism" (Globalism) of today is the result of, well, basically foreign ethnic conquest and occupation, and it is significantly qualitatively different from the Liberalism of e.g. the 1920s (eugenics, scientific racism, immigration restriction, segregation, etc.).

Of course Imperium Press focuses on the final and, in this context, least important point, so he can promote his theory that transgenderism is a natural and inevitable consequence of... I don't know, the Anglo-Saxon Magna Carta of 1215 AD?