WEF lady says that they “own the science” and worked with Google to ensure that only UN approved info shows up at the top of search results.

New hate speech laws coming to Ireland?

Justice Minister Helen McEntee confirmed yesterday she will bring the legislation before the Dail within a few weeks.

The Department of Justice said: “The bill proposes new offences relating to incitement to violence or hatred with penalties of up to five years imprisonment for conviction or indictment.”

The new bill will create for the first time in Ireland specific hate crime offences.

Their justice minister has a horrific goblin phenotype (not a dogwhistle she's just ugly).

https://www.dublinlive.ie/news/dublin-news/bigots-racists-homophobes-face-up-25142392

8 billion humans on earth soon. Here is a visualization of the distribution.

Russian state ideology = Duginism:

Here's the Jewish guy who translated all of Dugin's works into English repeating what I've been saying for years: That Duginism is the Russian state ideology.

However, in Duginism, "civilizational sovereignty" actually means Russian imperialism and "anti-Westernism" means thinly-veiled anti-Whiteism.

Promoting "multipolarity" is simply a strategy for Russia to replace America as world hegemon, and the "traditional values" are completely superficial, of course.

Russia is an AIDS-infested, divorce ridden, baby-genociding country that is less religious than America. See: Russia is Nigeria with snow. Transgenderism is legal in Russia too. Very trad.

Dugin's personal emblem is the satanic chaos sigil (it's on all of his books and websites), he is a self-proclaimed follower of Franz Boas (one of the founding fathers of Cultural Marxist race denialism), and he promoted transgenderism in his book Fourth Political Theory.

Thuletide vindicated again, what a surprise!

Dugin promoting transgenderism in Fourth Political Theory:

"the Fourth Political Theory, in our opinion, goes forward [...] By going beyond the limits of gender which we know, we get to the domain of uncertainty, androgyny, and sex as practised by the angels."

This is the unnamed "philosopher" that Putin mentioned in his recent speech.

I hope Bolsonaro wins. Italian/German ancestry, very socially conservative, voter base predominantly White men, and I've never seen him say anything anti-White. He's as good as you'll get in a country like Brazil.

I have some disagreements, but having these sorts of leaders in power is definitely a net positive. They shift global politics to the right, give other Right-Wingers hope and inspiration, and provide contemporary proof-of-concept for our ideals.

Edit: The Left might rig the election tbh as they did to Trump in 2020.

Russia’s partial mobilization has turned into one of the world’s strictest compulsory vaccination decrees
https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/russia-begins-vaccinating-mobilized

Retarded new trend that Leftists love:

Blaming all of the problems caused by "diversity" (e.g. alienation, isolation, lack of social cohesion and trust) on dumb bs, like a lack of "walkable cities" or "mixed-use cities" or trains and trams, or the fact that there are no "third spaces" (non-commercial public gathering areas), or that cafés and coffee shops don't stay open until 2AM, like in the Middle East.

Generally, it's all stuff that did exist (and still does exist in many places) but was made impossible by "diversity."

IMO this trend serves two purposes:
1) Distracting people from the race issue by redirecting their focus onto a myopic secondary issue (which can only be fixed if the race issue is resolved first).
2) Attacking "soulless suburbs" because White people live there (which only exist in the first place because "diversity" ruined the places where White people used to live).

https://t.me/thuletide/3718

I see these posts going viral all the time, so obviously people want to live in "normal" cities. However, they also want to live in "diverse" cities, so unfortunately that's not going to happen. You can pick one or the other, you can't have both. They're inversely proportional.

You want to live in a cozy and safe little town, with little cafés and bars and bookshops in the residential areas, like France or Japan?

Sorry, you chose diversity. Now your only options are the "soulless suburbs" or the crime-ridden favela (don't worry, it's "mixed-use"!). Better luck next life.

https://t.me/fyrgen/2023

I have noticed that rhetoric has shifted from being anti-Globalist or anti-NWO or anti-ZOG to being explicitly anti-American, blaming Americans for everything that Globalist elites are doing.

The shift happened slowly over the past couple of years, but significantly ramped up after the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Even people who used to blame everything on Jews or "Zionists" now blame everything on Americans (or Anglos, but mostly Americans). Very suspicious...

Fyrgen said: 'America' (the people) is largely good. The corporate/financial/governmental machine (which tragically misleads and misrepresents the people) is bad. Same goes for most nations on Earth.

Since I shit on Russia a lot, I should clarify that I don't have anything against the Russian people. I have met many on my world travels and they were always pleasant. Sure, I call them collectively degenerate and so on, but that is just a fact and a criticism that applies to (almost) every other White ethnic group too.

This is a prime example of anti-Americanism stunting peoples' understanding of how the West got into this mess: https://t.me/markacollett/6176

I've researched the history of post-WW2 "Civil Rights" revolutions in every Anglosphere country. In the UK, homegrown commies (particularly Fabian Socialists) were massively overrepresented.

They weren't American agents, they were British Socialists doing what Socialists always do. Many of them had ties to the USSR, rather than the US, but the UK has been a hotbed of Communism since the 1800s. British Leftists were instrumental in founding the United Nations, and pioneering transhumanism and other globalist poisons.

Consider Mark Collett's examples of how "America" ruined the UK: "sexual liberation, free love, pornography, mass immigration, tolerance..."

Tolerance:
Two influential Socialists (one Fabian, one the son of a Jewish Russian revolutionary) were behind the 1965 Race Relations Act, which is basically the UK's Civil Rights Act.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Soskice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fenner_Brockway

Edit: Anti-racism conferences were hosted in London colleges in the early 1900s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Universal_Races_Congress

Mass immigration:
Tony Blair's Labor government (the Labor Party was founded by the Fabian Society) opened the UK's borders: "It didn't just happen: the deliberate policy of ministers from late 2000 [...] was to open up the UK to mass migration."
https://archive.vn/7F6ml

Free love:
The "free love" movement was pioneered in the UK before WW2 by Leftists from organizations like the Fellowship of the New Life (which founded the Fabian Society). I'm sure Mark has heard of people like Bertrand Russell (who was banned from teaching in 1940s America for being a degenerate).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_love#Origins_of_the_movement

Pornography:
I'm not very familiar with UK porn laws. They're confusing and more strict (on paper) than other Western countries. However, I don't see any Americans credited for normalizing UK porn in this article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornography_in_the_United_Kingdom

All of this info was easy to uncover, but I guess posting the truth is not as easy as posting "hurr durr Americans ruined everything."

Matt Walsh hit with JQ gotcha question:

The guy asking the question came across terribly. This bad approach lets people handwave the JQ as a baseless schizo topic.

Doing IRL stuff is not the same as posting online for an audience of people who are already interested in "far-right" politics. It requires a lot of tact and good optics.

You can't run on stage and shout "WELL WHAT ABOUT THE BERGSTEINS?" expecting to win over an audience of people who are still in the shallow end of breaking the conditioning.

Walsh is doing great work turning a lot of normal people against Leftist gender stuff and, unlike many other mainstream conservatives, he has the balls to expose the anti-White agenda too.

Yes, we know who pays Walsh and why he won't touch the JQ, but the Right needs people who are "clean" in this regard and capable of shifting the Overton window without being completely deplatformed and unpersoned as a hateful Nazi bigot.

Inappropriately shouting "WELL WHAT ABOUT THE JEWS?" is the IRL equivalent of those terrible old Smoloko images.

It looks bad and you're not going to redpill any sensible people that way.

The JQ is a very sensitive topic today, so it requires a lot of solid evidence and tact.