Recent questions asked in Thuletide blog comments:
Q1: "Wouldn't removing Whites from public and political life be unprofitable for the same elites that are pushing these policies?"
A: Yes. Even "diversifying" a single company reduces its profitability by harming social cohesion and so on. However, elites aren't motivated solely by profit. Many things they do are simply designed to harm society. Consider their obsession with normalizing pedophilia, for example.
Q2: "If Whites were eradicated from the West and only non-Whites were left to maintain the system, wouldn't the world become forever stagnant?"
A: Yes. The West is already stagnant after Whites have been disenfranchized and brainwashed for a couple of generations. We are dull primitives compared to pre-WW2 Westerners, "superior" in technology but inferior in every other respect: Health, intelligence, morality, artistry, innovation, etc.
So, this raises a third question: Why are elites doing this if it isn't profitable and it will inevitably lead to societal decline or collapse, resulting in civil war or a Brazil-tier favela slum civilization?
Long story short, the Brazil-tier favela slum civilization seems to be their end goal. A two-tiered society whereby the masses live in squalid poverty and the elites live in what is essentially a technologically advanced breakaway civilization. Like this image but more extreme.
They seem to believe that a Jewish-dominated multi-racial upper class can indefinitely rule over a mongrelized "coffee-colored" low IQ underclass, as long as they use AI and automation to keep the gears of society moving, have enough surveillance technology to suppress political dissent, and offset their own IQ decline and post-industrial dysgenics via transhumanism and genetic engineering.
See also: A Brief Introduction to Societal Collapse
Q1: "Wouldn't removing Whites from public and political life be unprofitable for the same elites that are pushing these policies?"
A: Yes. Even "diversifying" a single company reduces its profitability by harming social cohesion and so on. However, elites aren't motivated solely by profit. Many things they do are simply designed to harm society. Consider their obsession with normalizing pedophilia, for example.
Q2: "If Whites were eradicated from the West and only non-Whites were left to maintain the system, wouldn't the world become forever stagnant?"
A: Yes. The West is already stagnant after Whites have been disenfranchized and brainwashed for a couple of generations. We are dull primitives compared to pre-WW2 Westerners, "superior" in technology but inferior in every other respect: Health, intelligence, morality, artistry, innovation, etc.
So, this raises a third question: Why are elites doing this if it isn't profitable and it will inevitably lead to societal decline or collapse, resulting in civil war or a Brazil-tier favela slum civilization?
Long story short, the Brazil-tier favela slum civilization seems to be their end goal. A two-tiered society whereby the masses live in squalid poverty and the elites live in what is essentially a technologically advanced breakaway civilization. Like this image but more extreme.
They seem to believe that a Jewish-dominated multi-racial upper class can indefinitely rule over a mongrelized "coffee-colored" low IQ underclass, as long as they use AI and automation to keep the gears of society moving, have enough surveillance technology to suppress political dissent, and offset their own IQ decline and post-industrial dysgenics via transhumanism and genetic engineering.
See also: A Brief Introduction to Societal Collapse
Canada: 35% (14/39) of the Trudeau Cabinet are World Economic Forum members, Agenda Contributors, or Young Global Leaders
https://archive.ph/mrmIE
https://archive.ph/mrmIE
LiveLeak is a horrible crystal ball that lets you preview the West when it's 25% White and the average IQ is around 75
2020: "The Great Replacement is a White nationalist conspiracy theory."
2022: "Actually, we've already replaced you, so just get over it!"
https://twitter.com/AyoCaesar/status/1559096019115294720
Note the abuse of language too:
Biological diversification is when one homogeneous group splits into multiple subgroups that become distinct via divergent evolution. Multiple distinct groups merging into one homogeneous group is the destruction of diversity. In Leftist newspeak, "increasing diversity" just means "decreasing Whiteness."
2022: "Actually, we've already replaced you, so just get over it!"
https://twitter.com/AyoCaesar/status/1559096019115294720
Note the abuse of language too:
Biological diversification is when one homogeneous group splits into multiple subgroups that become distinct via divergent evolution. Multiple distinct groups merging into one homogeneous group is the destruction of diversity. In Leftist newspeak, "increasing diversity" just means "decreasing Whiteness."
btw Ash Sarkar works for George Soros by proxy via Novara Media https://archive.vn/wy947
Made a new Twitter account: "@th_letide"
You can send questions, abuse, etc here: https://twitter.com/th_letide/
Will probably just post the same stuff as telegram/gab tbh
You can send questions, abuse, etc here: https://twitter.com/th_letide/
Will probably just post the same stuff as telegram/gab tbh
Study: Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats
TL;DR:
- Weakly affiliated Democrats had higher natural testosterone levels than strongly affiliated democrats (lower testosterone = more Left-Wing).
- Receiving testosterone treatment made weakly affiliated Democrats more supportive of Republicans (higher testosterone = more Right-Wing).
- The treatment also improved their overall mood.
- "No effects" were found for testosterone treatment in strongly affiliated Democrats (not sure what the study meant by this tbh - maybe that treatment didn't alter political alignment).
Study concludes: "Our findings provide evidence that neuroactive hormones affect political preferences."
Source: https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view
TL;DR:
- Weakly affiliated Democrats had higher natural testosterone levels than strongly affiliated democrats (lower testosterone = more Left-Wing).
- Receiving testosterone treatment made weakly affiliated Democrats more supportive of Republicans (higher testosterone = more Right-Wing).
- The treatment also improved their overall mood.
- "No effects" were found for testosterone treatment in strongly affiliated Democrats (not sure what the study meant by this tbh - maybe that treatment didn't alter political alignment).
Study concludes: "Our findings provide evidence that neuroactive hormones affect political preferences."
Source: https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view
People on telegram often complain that I haven't enabled comments and claim that it's because I'm "scared of getting owned" or deb00nked or whatever.
That's obviously not the case. If you really want to seethe at me then you can easily do it via Twitter, Gab, my blog comment section, etc.
I haven't enabled comments because telegram has a lot of feds, fedposters, and anti-social lunatics (due to its lack of moderation) who would ruin the chat for all of the normal people. Edit: And also potentially get normal people in trouble, some countries e.g. Germany have very harsh laws.
I've seen the state of other comment sections and I don't want to waste my time herding cats. At least Twitter etc does the moderating for me, keeping fedposters at bay.
That's obviously not the case. If you really want to seethe at me then you can easily do it via Twitter, Gab, my blog comment section, etc.
I haven't enabled comments because telegram has a lot of feds, fedposters, and anti-social lunatics (due to its lack of moderation) who would ruin the chat for all of the normal people. Edit: And also potentially get normal people in trouble, some countries e.g. Germany have very harsh laws.
I've seen the state of other comment sections and I don't want to waste my time herding cats. At least Twitter etc does the moderating for me, keeping fedposters at bay.
I would enable telegram comments if it wouldn't become a cesspit because I like talking to people and debating / exchanging ideas.
I especially like reading/answering thoughtful comments that people leave on my blog. So big thanks to anyone who's done that.
(Painting unrelated, found it on my desktop)
I especially like reading/answering thoughtful comments that people leave on my blog. So big thanks to anyone who's done that.
(Painting unrelated, found it on my desktop)
Study: Global food insecurity and famine from reduced crop, marine fishery and livestock production due to climate disruption from nuclear war soot injection
"Atmospheric soot loadings from nuclear weapon detonation would cause disruptions to the Earth’s climate, limiting terrestrial and aquatic food production."
"We estimate more than 2 billion people could die from nuclear war between India and Pakistan, and more than 5 billion could die from a war between the United States and Russia—underlining the importance of global cooperation in preventing nuclear war."
Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-022-00573-0
"Atmospheric soot loadings from nuclear weapon detonation would cause disruptions to the Earth’s climate, limiting terrestrial and aquatic food production."
"We estimate more than 2 billion people could die from nuclear war between India and Pakistan, and more than 5 billion could die from a war between the United States and Russia—underlining the importance of global cooperation in preventing nuclear war."
Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-022-00573-0
Nature
Global food insecurity and famine from reduced crop, marine fishery and livestock production due to climate disruption from nuclear…
Nature Food - Calorie availability and extent of food shortages for each nation are estimated following regional or global nuclear war, including impacts on major crops, livestock and fishery...
Forwarded from Thuletide
The problem with blaming everything on "Liberalism" (e.g. inaccurately calling the New World Order the "Liberal World Order") is that "Liberal" just becomes synonymous with "Western," which makes no sense at all when countries like China are key players in said world order. It's not like they're out here defending property rights, free trade, and freedom of association. It conveniently absolves all of the other countries that are on board with globalist machinations and the push for world government (or "world governance").
Plus, most of the Western elite really don't care about Liberalism all that much, as demonstrated by their responses to COVID, "Climate Change," and so on. They're basically technocratic Socialists, kinda like H. G. Wells and some other Fabians. It's quite obvious that their end goal isn't to create a "Liberal" world but some sort of one world Communist government, modeled on China, combined with transhumanism and weird New Age religion bullshit. They've said this many times. See for example this paper by Robert Muller, "the philosopher of the United Nations" and ex UN Assistant Secretary-General:
Proper Earth Government: A Framework and Ways to Create It (2005)
https://archive.ph/l4RYW
Plus, most of the Western elite really don't care about Liberalism all that much, as demonstrated by their responses to COVID, "Climate Change," and so on. They're basically technocratic Socialists, kinda like H. G. Wells and some other Fabians. It's quite obvious that their end goal isn't to create a "Liberal" world but some sort of one world Communist government, modeled on China, combined with transhumanism and weird New Age religion bullshit. They've said this many times. See for example this paper by Robert Muller, "the philosopher of the United Nations" and ex UN Assistant Secretary-General:
Proper Earth Government: A Framework and Ways to Create It (2005)
https://archive.ph/l4RYW
archive.ph
https://search.archives.un.org/uploads/r/united-nations-archives/5/9/…
archived 4 Apr 2022 18:31:58 UTC