Popular Leftist myth:
Postwar decolonization was due to plucky brown Socialist rebels overthrowing their colonial overlords and sticking it to the evil White man. Western powers fought hard to defend their colonies because they were terrified by the combined might of Socialism and people of color.
Reality:
"Western powers" (now in the hands of globalists and libtards) supported non-White Socialist revolutionaries against their White governments in almost every anti-colonial revolutionary war, alongside the USSR and Communist China in many cases. Colonial governments didn't lose a single war but were forced to decolonize by combined economic warfare and political pressure from both Western and Communist powers. Some voluntarily decolonized to avoid war.
Postwar decolonization was due to plucky brown Socialist rebels overthrowing their colonial overlords and sticking it to the evil White man. Western powers fought hard to defend their colonies because they were terrified by the combined might of Socialism and people of color.
Reality:
"Western powers" (now in the hands of globalists and libtards) supported non-White Socialist revolutionaries against their White governments in almost every anti-colonial revolutionary war, alongside the USSR and Communist China in many cases. Colonial governments didn't lose a single war but were forced to decolonize by combined economic warfare and political pressure from both Western and Communist powers. Some voluntarily decolonized to avoid war.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Amsterdam in 1896
Recent questions asked in Thuletide blog comments:
Q1: "Wouldn't removing Whites from public and political life be unprofitable for the same elites that are pushing these policies?"
A: Yes. Even "diversifying" a single company reduces its profitability by harming social cohesion and so on. However, elites aren't motivated solely by profit. Many things they do are simply designed to harm society. Consider their obsession with normalizing pedophilia, for example.
Q2: "If Whites were eradicated from the West and only non-Whites were left to maintain the system, wouldn't the world become forever stagnant?"
A: Yes. The West is already stagnant after Whites have been disenfranchized and brainwashed for a couple of generations. We are dull primitives compared to pre-WW2 Westerners, "superior" in technology but inferior in every other respect: Health, intelligence, morality, artistry, innovation, etc.
So, this raises a third question: Why are elites doing this if it isn't profitable and it will inevitably lead to societal decline or collapse, resulting in civil war or a Brazil-tier favela slum civilization?
Long story short, the Brazil-tier favela slum civilization seems to be their end goal. A two-tiered society whereby the masses live in squalid poverty and the elites live in what is essentially a technologically advanced breakaway civilization. Like this image but more extreme.
They seem to believe that a Jewish-dominated multi-racial upper class can indefinitely rule over a mongrelized "coffee-colored" low IQ underclass, as long as they use AI and automation to keep the gears of society moving, have enough surveillance technology to suppress political dissent, and offset their own IQ decline and post-industrial dysgenics via transhumanism and genetic engineering.
See also: A Brief Introduction to Societal Collapse
Q1: "Wouldn't removing Whites from public and political life be unprofitable for the same elites that are pushing these policies?"
A: Yes. Even "diversifying" a single company reduces its profitability by harming social cohesion and so on. However, elites aren't motivated solely by profit. Many things they do are simply designed to harm society. Consider their obsession with normalizing pedophilia, for example.
Q2: "If Whites were eradicated from the West and only non-Whites were left to maintain the system, wouldn't the world become forever stagnant?"
A: Yes. The West is already stagnant after Whites have been disenfranchized and brainwashed for a couple of generations. We are dull primitives compared to pre-WW2 Westerners, "superior" in technology but inferior in every other respect: Health, intelligence, morality, artistry, innovation, etc.
So, this raises a third question: Why are elites doing this if it isn't profitable and it will inevitably lead to societal decline or collapse, resulting in civil war or a Brazil-tier favela slum civilization?
Long story short, the Brazil-tier favela slum civilization seems to be their end goal. A two-tiered society whereby the masses live in squalid poverty and the elites live in what is essentially a technologically advanced breakaway civilization. Like this image but more extreme.
They seem to believe that a Jewish-dominated multi-racial upper class can indefinitely rule over a mongrelized "coffee-colored" low IQ underclass, as long as they use AI and automation to keep the gears of society moving, have enough surveillance technology to suppress political dissent, and offset their own IQ decline and post-industrial dysgenics via transhumanism and genetic engineering.
See also: A Brief Introduction to Societal Collapse
Canada: 35% (14/39) of the Trudeau Cabinet are World Economic Forum members, Agenda Contributors, or Young Global Leaders
https://archive.ph/mrmIE
https://archive.ph/mrmIE
LiveLeak is a horrible crystal ball that lets you preview the West when it's 25% White and the average IQ is around 75
2020: "The Great Replacement is a White nationalist conspiracy theory."
2022: "Actually, we've already replaced you, so just get over it!"
https://twitter.com/AyoCaesar/status/1559096019115294720
Note the abuse of language too:
Biological diversification is when one homogeneous group splits into multiple subgroups that become distinct via divergent evolution. Multiple distinct groups merging into one homogeneous group is the destruction of diversity. In Leftist newspeak, "increasing diversity" just means "decreasing Whiteness."
2022: "Actually, we've already replaced you, so just get over it!"
https://twitter.com/AyoCaesar/status/1559096019115294720
Note the abuse of language too:
Biological diversification is when one homogeneous group splits into multiple subgroups that become distinct via divergent evolution. Multiple distinct groups merging into one homogeneous group is the destruction of diversity. In Leftist newspeak, "increasing diversity" just means "decreasing Whiteness."
btw Ash Sarkar works for George Soros by proxy via Novara Media https://archive.vn/wy947