btw, both Roosevelt and Churchill were 33rd degree Freemasons and were "personally advised" by international bankers. Pretty important facts that are often omitted from historical "deep-dives" into WW2.

Judge from Alex Jones' trial, Maya Guerra Gamble. They hit him with the Democrap's strongest soldier: A fat Mexican (potentially Sephardi) feminist vaxhead. No way it's gonna be fair.

Right-Wingers love putting the cart before the horse like this.

"Is the regime Leftist? No! Leftists simply buy into the regime's propaganda :)"

Very bad because it validates the Leftist hoax that they are oppressed victims fighting against The Man, when in reality they are The Man and the oppressors.

(Edit: Removed the twitter username. Don't wanna pick on some random guy, just using his tweet as an example)

Civic "Nationalism" = Globalism In One Country

'Climate Crisis' Propaganda as Psychological Sterilization

It is well known that historically the largest killer of children has been infectious disease, this has radically dropped in the past couple hundred years since the industrial revolution and this change has many important implications. However, the second largest killer throughout human history has been what is known as 'tactical infanticide' — the brutal practice of murdering offspring in times of environmental scarcity to prevent starvation.

Perception of the resources in the environment, known as the carrying capacity, can motivate such brutal actions and also strongly influence the number of offspring born in many species, including humans. With this in mind, I believe the psychology created by hysterical climate crisis messaging and polar bear atrocity propaganda, targeted largely at Europeans, is an underhanded form of sterilizing population control.

To elaborate, territories closer to the equator are able to grow food year round, whereas territories further north experience periodic harsh winters. This difference in the resource availability creates differences in the behaviour of the populations in these respective territories.

This is demonstrated in species of bee. European bees, which were able to be domesticated by Europeans, will create and store large amounts of honey to survive the winter. Whereas African bees create less honey, only producing it as needed, and are more aggressive as their hives are often harvested destructively by predators like the African honey badger, so investing lots of resources in building a large and complex hive only for it to be destroyed isn't worth the cost, and the hives that are built require more protection. (Excellent video on European, African, and Africanized 'Killer' Bees by @DevonStack available here and on Odysee).

I believe this is paralleled in humans, and that those that have been under harsh winter selection in the northern territories and have had to prepare in advance of such winters are more susceptible to signals about the environment than those adapted closer to the equator, and that therefor messaging designed to create a certain perception of the environment, like the current climate crisis hysteria, will have an asymmetrically inhibitory effect on Europeans compared to non-Europeans in the same territory.

Although there are now many examples in opinion pieces and activist campaigns calling explicitly for people to have "one less child" to reduce their carbon footprint, I believe climate crisis propaganda broadly stimulates much deeper psychological drives that nudge Europeans toward breeding less in a way that is nefarious and needs to be articulated.

Infant and Child Death in the Human Environment of Evolutionary Adaptation | Evolution and Human Behavior (2013)
Differences Between European and African Honey Bees | University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (2009)
Invasive Species - @DevonStack

"When we take the technocrat agendas in their entirety, from forced vaccinations to censorship, property confiscation to surveillance, liberal values appear to us more like a maiden who is about to be gang raped than a higher philosophical principle to be defended. Populists and conspiracy theorists online can in some ways rest assured, whatever world order is being birthed before our eyes, it certainly isn't liberal." - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGQNiqXBDhw

Agree! Globalism =/= Liberalism. Another great Morgoth video.

Australia: Man tracks down the doctor who gave one of his family members a COVID vaccine that killed them.

I'm surprised that things like this aren't more common, considering the damage that has been caused by these toxic injections.

source: https://twitter.com/4th_System/status/1555693134641672194

Communist Party USA poster, 1932

The Left wins because 1) they have huge financial backing, 2) they have smart people in high places, and 3) they control the institutions that smart people have to pass through to get to the high places.

Nothing will change if Right-Wingers voluntarily embrace downward mobility and relegate themselves to the political equivalent of peasants or serfs.

"Open borders! Refugees welcome! Diversity is our greatest strength!"

"Okay, here's a bunch of Latinx illegals to culturally enrich your neighbourhood"

"Arrgghhh!! Noo not like that!"

Constantly astounded that Leftists can be so openly duplicitous and hypocritical on every single political issue. No shame whatsoever.

https://twitter.com/MSNBC/status/1555633526221029379

https://t.me/thuletide/3388

Hiding out on a homestead or being a redpilled electrician and waiting for the NWO to blow over isn't going to stop White people from going extinct or change the course of Globalism. You have to be in the political game to win it or even alter it.

Tradesmen and other working-class people are already based enough. The majority of the population in every White country has always opposed the Globalist agenda. Has that ever stopped it from advancing?

Right-Wingers need to be rich, successful, and influential. If not, we will lose. Even creating parallel institutions or NGOs (e.g. Rich Houck's idea of a White SPLC) is impossible to achieve without money and influence.

Disagree? Here's a list of peasant revolutions to check your chance of overthrowing the government without elite backing or influence (spoiler: It's 0%): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_peasant_revolts

James Lindsey banned from twitter for calling out the pedo agenda.

I have disagreements with his solutions but his analysis of Leftism was mostly correct (despite his tendency to overcomplicate things) and, generally speaking, he did good work drawing attention to anti-White and anti-family agendas.

Funny meme but, as far as I know, French people are more likely to identify with their Celtic Gaulish ancestors than Germanic Franks or Latin Romans (they descend from all three, in varying amounts).