"We are far better at recruiting Latinos [...] this new, energetic and popular form of the right is a Latino movement, and it is the future." - Bronze Age Pervert, 2019
https://archive.ph/zs4yS
Bronze Age Pervert is accusing me of being a liar. So, here is my defense:
Initially, he accused me of being a liar because I posted a screenshot of two of his Tweets that called for the conquest of Europe by Russia (https://i.imgur.com/ofoYvzN.png). The second Tweet was a "joke" about Russia nuking Europe but expressed the same sentiment as the first non-joke tweet. As we all know, irony is a mask for sincerity. The second Tweet also had a gay porn type gif attached to it, which I cropped out for obvious reasons. He claimed that removing the gay gif (which did not alter the meaning of the Tweet at all) made me a "liar."
Obviously, this did not win people to his side.
So, he instead accused me of being a liar because I (apparently) said that he supported "Castizo Futurism" about six months ago, which he claims to have never supported. I don't think I did, but it may have happened. I can't remember.
The context here is that a not insignificant number of BAP's followers (mostly the inner circle, it seems) relentlessly shilled for Hispanic immigration into America and for the courting of Hispanics as a political demographic, because Latinx are based and redpilled and "natural conservatives" and so on. They even used Kalergi-tier rhetoric, talking about "reinvigorating" WASPs via an infusion of Latinx blood: https://i.imgur.com/IowVLqk.png
This went on for weeks or even months (I forget tbh) and devolved into a huge shitstorm without BAP saying a word. He constantly retweeted these people while they were posting this anti-White, anti-American, globalist nonsense. Even bigname accounts, like his friend Zero HP Lovecraft, sided with the "Castizo Futurists" to deride immigration opponents: https://i.imgur.com/g6KFBbB.png (this poll was a cheap gotcha: "Disagree with immigration? Hmm looks like you're gay :^) hehe").
Eventually, after these Hispanics mass reported me and many of my mutuals, resulting in countless people getting banned, BAP DM'd me an old Tweet of his expressing support for Anglo-America. I don't remember the exact conservation, but it went something along the lines of "If this is what you support, then why do you retweet all of these anti-White Mexicans?"
He posted the Tweet publicly and called for an end to hostilities on both sides, I retweeted and screenshotted the Tweet (https://i.imgur.com/pSsWrBT.png) to use against his pro-immigration followers.
He is now claiming I was angry that he supported Anglo-America because this meant I "could not lie about him" supporting "Castizo Futurism." This was obviously not the case, given that I shared the Tweet and actually liked BAP at this point. However, I was annoyed that he promoted these people and that they got me and my friends banned from Twitter.
Well, here's the clinch: Apparently, BAP did promote "Castizo Futurism" in 2019 via an article he wrote for Claremont:
"We are far better at recruiting Latinos [...] this new, energetic and popular form of the right is a Latino movement, and it is the future."
https://archive.ph/zs4yS
As an aside, the "Castizo Futurism" shilling on Twitter miraculously coincided with the GOP's push to transition into a party of "multiracial working class populism," i.e. "castizo futurism" by another name.
Anyway, I may have a bad habit of disregarding nuance, but I am not a liar. BAP, on the other hand, certainly is.
Edit: I realize that few people probably care about "Twitter drama" but I don't like people lying about me, especially by accusing me of being the liar lol
https://archive.ph/zs4yS
Bronze Age Pervert is accusing me of being a liar. So, here is my defense:
Initially, he accused me of being a liar because I posted a screenshot of two of his Tweets that called for the conquest of Europe by Russia (https://i.imgur.com/ofoYvzN.png). The second Tweet was a "joke" about Russia nuking Europe but expressed the same sentiment as the first non-joke tweet. As we all know, irony is a mask for sincerity. The second Tweet also had a gay porn type gif attached to it, which I cropped out for obvious reasons. He claimed that removing the gay gif (which did not alter the meaning of the Tweet at all) made me a "liar."
Obviously, this did not win people to his side.
So, he instead accused me of being a liar because I (apparently) said that he supported "Castizo Futurism" about six months ago, which he claims to have never supported. I don't think I did, but it may have happened. I can't remember.
The context here is that a not insignificant number of BAP's followers (mostly the inner circle, it seems) relentlessly shilled for Hispanic immigration into America and for the courting of Hispanics as a political demographic, because Latinx are based and redpilled and "natural conservatives" and so on. They even used Kalergi-tier rhetoric, talking about "reinvigorating" WASPs via an infusion of Latinx blood: https://i.imgur.com/IowVLqk.png
This went on for weeks or even months (I forget tbh) and devolved into a huge shitstorm without BAP saying a word. He constantly retweeted these people while they were posting this anti-White, anti-American, globalist nonsense. Even bigname accounts, like his friend Zero HP Lovecraft, sided with the "Castizo Futurists" to deride immigration opponents: https://i.imgur.com/g6KFBbB.png (this poll was a cheap gotcha: "Disagree with immigration? Hmm looks like you're gay :^) hehe").
Eventually, after these Hispanics mass reported me and many of my mutuals, resulting in countless people getting banned, BAP DM'd me an old Tweet of his expressing support for Anglo-America. I don't remember the exact conservation, but it went something along the lines of "If this is what you support, then why do you retweet all of these anti-White Mexicans?"
He posted the Tweet publicly and called for an end to hostilities on both sides, I retweeted and screenshotted the Tweet (https://i.imgur.com/pSsWrBT.png) to use against his pro-immigration followers.
He is now claiming I was angry that he supported Anglo-America because this meant I "could not lie about him" supporting "Castizo Futurism." This was obviously not the case, given that I shared the Tweet and actually liked BAP at this point. However, I was annoyed that he promoted these people and that they got me and my friends banned from Twitter.
Well, here's the clinch: Apparently, BAP did promote "Castizo Futurism" in 2019 via an article he wrote for Claremont:
"We are far better at recruiting Latinos [...] this new, energetic and popular form of the right is a Latino movement, and it is the future."
https://archive.ph/zs4yS
As an aside, the "Castizo Futurism" shilling on Twitter miraculously coincided with the GOP's push to transition into a party of "multiracial working class populism," i.e. "castizo futurism" by another name.
Anyway, I may have a bad habit of disregarding nuance, but I am not a liar. BAP, on the other hand, certainly is.
Edit: I realize that few people probably care about "Twitter drama" but I don't like people lying about me, especially by accusing me of being the liar lol
archive.ph
America’s Delusional Elite Is Done - The American Mind
archived 20 Jan 2021 14:52:36 UTC
Sweden: Dolph Lundgren dropping redpills 🇸🇪
Nice to see a celebrity to using their influence for good instead of evil, for once. He isn't being explicit, but everyone knows what he's talking about.
Sources:
https://twitter.com/cartoonAttorney/status/1553721025728315394
https://www.instagram.com/p/CfEzGdLJ-FQ
Nice to see a celebrity to using their influence for good instead of evil, for once. He isn't being explicit, but everyone knows what he's talking about.
Sources:
https://twitter.com/cartoonAttorney/status/1553721025728315394
https://www.instagram.com/p/CfEzGdLJ-FQ
UK: Man arrested for "causing anxiety with a social media post"
Apparently he retweeted Laurence Fox, who changed his profile picture to the BLM-LGBT "woke swastika."
European thought crime laws are insane, but England's are particularly bad. They are very vague and enforced in an egregiously one-sided manner against the native population.
If I recall correctly, "hate speech" laws are enforced via all of Europe's so-called "Civil Rights" Acts, which should be known as the "Globalism Acts," since all they do is discriminate against Whites and force open borders and racial integration.
So, until these acts are repealed, native Europeans will get thrown in jail for posting memes that "offend" or "cause anxiety" to "minorities."
Source: https://twitter.com/PaulEmbery/status/1553471082501398528
Apparently he retweeted Laurence Fox, who changed his profile picture to the BLM-LGBT "woke swastika."
European thought crime laws are insane, but England's are particularly bad. They are very vague and enforced in an egregiously one-sided manner against the native population.
If I recall correctly, "hate speech" laws are enforced via all of Europe's so-called "Civil Rights" Acts, which should be known as the "Globalism Acts," since all they do is discriminate against Whites and force open borders and racial integration.
So, until these acts are repealed, native Europeans will get thrown in jail for posting memes that "offend" or "cause anxiety" to "minorities."
Source: https://twitter.com/PaulEmbery/status/1553471082501398528
What's most insane about this story of the Anglo guy getting arrested is that he didn't violate any specific laws like "don't post swastikas" or "don't make fun of gays." The literal law in the UK is that if you post something online that causes someone "anxiety" or "distress" then it's a hate crime.
British people are posting memes like the above image in response to the original Tweet, which is good, but they don't seem to understand that they have no free speech whatsoever. They live in the modern equivalent of Bolshevik USSR.
British people are posting memes like the above image in response to the original Tweet, which is good, but they don't seem to understand that they have no free speech whatsoever. They live in the modern equivalent of Bolshevik USSR.
Nice twitter account discovered:
19th Century in Color
https://twitter.com/19thCenturyPh
Easy to see that while the technology was inferior, the minds were vastly superior. Nobody builds architecture like this anymore.
Pictures :
Bamberg, German Empire (c. 1890) 🇩🇪
Tréport, France (c. 1895) 🇫🇷
Dumfries, Scotland (c. 1890) 🏴
Milan, Italy (c. 1895) 🇮🇹
Brighton, England (1883) 🏴
19th Century in Color
https://twitter.com/19thCenturyPh
Easy to see that while the technology was inferior, the minds were vastly superior. Nobody builds architecture like this anymore.
Pictures :
Bamberg, German Empire (c. 1890) 🇩🇪
Tréport, France (c. 1895) 🇫🇷
Dumfries, Scotland (c. 1890) 🏴
Milan, Italy (c. 1895) 🇮🇹
Brighton, England (1883) 🏴
I'm astonished that some geneticists, like Johannes Krause and David Reich, claim that Proto-Indo-European languages came from the Fertile Crescent, meaning that Middle Easterners brought them into the European steppe region.
The Fertile Crescent was full of literate civilizations and their recorded languages are clearly Afro-Asiatic, discounting Sumerian which is an isolate.
There's no correlation between Middle Eastern ancestry and Indo-European languages, discounting the female Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer ancestry in Proto-Indo-Europeans. We know PIE culture was extremely patriarchal, so unlikely that CHG wives imposed PIE language on East Euro HG men.
Yamnaya-type ancestry is found everywhere we find Indo-European languages. The only exception is Anatolia, which is currently poorly sampled. But there is still evidence of PIE DNA in the region during the Bronze Age at Kaman-Kalehöyük and Alalakh, both of which were within the Hittite Empire. Unless my genetic model is bad but I don't think that's the case.
The Fertile Crescent was full of literate civilizations and their recorded languages are clearly Afro-Asiatic, discounting Sumerian which is an isolate.
There's no correlation between Middle Eastern ancestry and Indo-European languages, discounting the female Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer ancestry in Proto-Indo-Europeans. We know PIE culture was extremely patriarchal, so unlikely that CHG wives imposed PIE language on East Euro HG men.
Yamnaya-type ancestry is found everywhere we find Indo-European languages. The only exception is Anatolia, which is currently poorly sampled. But there is still evidence of PIE DNA in the region during the Bronze Age at Kaman-Kalehöyük and Alalakh, both of which were within the Hittite Empire. Unless my genetic model is bad but I don't think that's the case.
https://t.me/thuletide/3335?single
There are two more giant plot holes in the silly theory that the Proto-Indo-European homeland is in the Middle East.
Firstly, there is no evidence of Indo-European culture south of the Caucasus before PIE-type genetics arose on the European steppe during the Eneolithic around 5500 BC. If PIE originated in the Middle East, there would be traces of PIE cultural elements (PIE gods etc) in the Middle East.
Secondly, by the Eneolithic when the PIE genetic cluster was forming in Europe, the Caucasus was populated by people who were a mix of Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers, Anatolian Farmers, and Neolithic Iranians. Genetic models show that PIEs have no ancestry from these populations. Their Caucasus ancestry was from people who had 100% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer ancestry, or were a mix of EHG and CHG.
David Anthony said that the CHG ancestry in PIE probably came from a fisher population that lived on the Volga estuary : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MOrEA84qvo
There are two more giant plot holes in the silly theory that the Proto-Indo-European homeland is in the Middle East.
Firstly, there is no evidence of Indo-European culture south of the Caucasus before PIE-type genetics arose on the European steppe during the Eneolithic around 5500 BC. If PIE originated in the Middle East, there would be traces of PIE cultural elements (PIE gods etc) in the Middle East.
Secondly, by the Eneolithic when the PIE genetic cluster was forming in Europe, the Caucasus was populated by people who were a mix of Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers, Anatolian Farmers, and Neolithic Iranians. Genetic models show that PIEs have no ancestry from these populations. Their Caucasus ancestry was from people who had 100% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer ancestry, or were a mix of EHG and CHG.
David Anthony said that the CHG ancestry in PIE probably came from a fisher population that lived on the Volga estuary : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MOrEA84qvo