Forwarded from Survive the Jive: All-feed
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A preview from my soon to be released doc about Indo-European cosmology. This part attempts to connect the 'water of hell' (itself associated with memories of the dead and divine wisdom) with the IE tradition of ritual beverages such as honey mead - thus explaining why early IE people took ritual beverage vessels to the grave.
Remember two years ago when they enacted a worldwide anti-White revolution during the peak of the scamdemic lockdowns?
"There is no consensus amongst historians of the origins on the Jutes. [...] it appears that they were a mixed race tribe of admixed Gutones, Cimbri, Teutons and Charudes, also called Eudoses, [2] Eotenas,[3] Iutae[1] and Euthiones.[4]"
— https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jutes
Wikipedia moment
— https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jutes
Wikipedia moment
curious that Reddit and Twitter banned the word "groomer" as soon as children mysteriously started to contract monkeypox
Will Orban apologize for his speech against race-mixing?
Anonymous Poll
32%
Orban will cuck
68%
Orban will double down
Forwarded from Jared Howe / So To Speak
Terms like "unipolar order" and "American hegemony" are contrived and sodomistic.
"Trans-Atlantic" globalists may use western nations as a base of operations for their fiat banking schemes, but that's not out of some fidelity to Western peoples.
Likewise, Pan-Eurasian globalists may use Eastern nations as a base of operations for their fiat banking schemes, but that's not out of some fidelity to Eastern nations.
It's out of fidelity to their Judeo-Bolshevik agenda.
Many globalists in America are American in name only. They may hold American citizenship, but they don't meet any of the other traditional or historical criteria for what it means to be part of the American ethno-racial group.
Even if they did, globalism doesn't have a national identity. It may be tempting to assign one when geopolitical conflicts emerge between seemingly warring sects of globalists, but the utility of these labels is limited to distinguishing between such groups. It would be a mistake to infer a sense of patriotism or national identity from them.
At the end of the day, the number of "poles" in a globalist world order is inconsequential to the fact that it's still a globalist world order.
Making the US subordinate to India and China under the framework of the UN doesn't do jack shit to reduce the size or scope of global government.
All it does is further disenfranchise whites so that we can be further subjugated to hostile non-white foreigners.
If the balance of global power within this political framework shifts from the West to the East, it will be because globalists are themselves abandoning the West for the East.
...which is really just another way of saying that they're abandoning whites for non-whites.
Once they finish seizing your means of production through fifth plank central banking, it'll be on to greener pastures...
"Trans-Atlantic" globalists may use western nations as a base of operations for their fiat banking schemes, but that's not out of some fidelity to Western peoples.
Likewise, Pan-Eurasian globalists may use Eastern nations as a base of operations for their fiat banking schemes, but that's not out of some fidelity to Eastern nations.
It's out of fidelity to their Judeo-Bolshevik agenda.
Many globalists in America are American in name only. They may hold American citizenship, but they don't meet any of the other traditional or historical criteria for what it means to be part of the American ethno-racial group.
Even if they did, globalism doesn't have a national identity. It may be tempting to assign one when geopolitical conflicts emerge between seemingly warring sects of globalists, but the utility of these labels is limited to distinguishing between such groups. It would be a mistake to infer a sense of patriotism or national identity from them.
At the end of the day, the number of "poles" in a globalist world order is inconsequential to the fact that it's still a globalist world order.
Making the US subordinate to India and China under the framework of the UN doesn't do jack shit to reduce the size or scope of global government.
All it does is further disenfranchise whites so that we can be further subjugated to hostile non-white foreigners.
If the balance of global power within this political framework shifts from the West to the East, it will be because globalists are themselves abandoning the West for the East.
...which is really just another way of saying that they're abandoning whites for non-whites.
Once they finish seizing your means of production through fifth plank central banking, it'll be on to greener pastures...
I wouldn't describe the terms 'unipolar order' and 'American hegemony' as "sodomistic" but I agree with the above argument.
Globalism is a global problem but there has been a concerted effort in recent years to blame globalism exclusively on the US and, by proxy, White Americans. Extremely sinister, considering that White Americans are some of the biggest victims of globalism.
The US could disappear into thin air tomorrow and globalism would exist almost unchanged. There would still be a world financial empire pulling the strings. There would still be countless globalist NGOs and multilateral organizations. Every country in the world would still be a UN member state. The Left would still have total political hegemony in the West. Immigration would continue unimpeded. Western countries would still pay their yearly tribute to Israel. Agenda 21/2030 would progress as planned. Etc etc etc
Globalism is a global problem but there has been a concerted effort in recent years to blame globalism exclusively on the US and, by proxy, White Americans. Extremely sinister, considering that White Americans are some of the biggest victims of globalism.
The US could disappear into thin air tomorrow and globalism would exist almost unchanged. There would still be a world financial empire pulling the strings. There would still be countless globalist NGOs and multilateral organizations. Every country in the world would still be a UN member state. The Left would still have total political hegemony in the West. Immigration would continue unimpeded. Western countries would still pay their yearly tribute to Israel. Agenda 21/2030 would progress as planned. Etc etc etc
Someone sent me a DM of Eric Striker calling the Founding Fathers "proto-Bolsheviks" btw, which was in response to a (funny) shitstorm in the Alt-Right sphere caused by this post: https://t.me/thuletide/3240 — Just so you know where that guy stands on America.
Edit -> Citation: https://t.me/c/1289624618/264473
Edit -> Citation: https://t.me/c/1289624618/264473
Telegram
Thuletide
And my other point regarding National Socialism is that trying to rehabilitate something that the average person sees as being worse than pedophilia is not just a bad political strategy, it's suicidal. It's the political equivalent of declaring yourself a…
Cast of new Lord of the Rings admit that the series was specifically designed to push a globalist, anti-White ("pro-diversity") agenda.
“Part of the story we’re trying to tell is you have people of different races coming together to defeat a common enemy”
“We are redressing the balance within the film and television, television industry and of course, this franchise and I hope, lots of franchises moving forward.”
“Tolkien is for everyone. His stories are about his fictional races doing their best work when they leave the isolation of their own cultures and come together.”
“You’re trying to look at this through a modern lens and the world is global and people now expect to see this kind of world globally represented.”
“For new generations this is their version of Tolkien, this is what my daughter will see of Tolkien’s works.”
Source:
Rings Of Power UK star: my character is the face of necessary redress of balance
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/rings-power-uk-star-character-005916826.html
“Part of the story we’re trying to tell is you have people of different races coming together to defeat a common enemy”
“We are redressing the balance within the film and television, television industry and of course, this franchise and I hope, lots of franchises moving forward.”
“Tolkien is for everyone. His stories are about his fictional races doing their best work when they leave the isolation of their own cultures and come together.”
“You’re trying to look at this through a modern lens and the world is global and people now expect to see this kind of world globally represented.”
“For new generations this is their version of Tolkien, this is what my daughter will see of Tolkien’s works.”
Source:
Rings Of Power UK star: my character is the face of necessary redress of balance
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/rings-power-uk-star-character-005916826.html