Don't really know anything about the Australian election but this meme guy won a seat

ADL was one of the organizations pulling the strings behind the 1965 immigration act.

Article:
The Great Replacement: A “White supremacist conspiracy theory” promoted by every Left-Wing media outlet

Contains:
- A short definition of the Great Replacement.
- An explanation of the Celebration Parallax ("it's not happening but it's good that it is and you deserve it").
- Some demographic statistics (population projections and fertility rates).
- An archive of Left-Wing media outlets promoting every aspect of the Great Replacement "conspiracy theory."

https://t.me/BertieBassett4Life/3725

With leftist theory, most of their observations are true, it's just that their rationalizations, conclusions, and solutions are always totally retarded. Plus, their works are full of needlessly convoluted and verbose gibberish.

Those guys did write some useful stuff, but it all seems pretty straightforward and obvious when you translate it into normal person language. I'll summarize below for anyone who isnt familiar.

Basically, these Western/Cultural Marxist guys (Althusser, Gramsci, etc) were trying to figure out why The Revolution failed everywhere except the place they didnt expect it to succeed, and why all of the proles of Europe sided with their "oppressors" over a bunch of Marxist scumbags who just wanted to become their new oppressors, and to destroy all of their nations, traditions, and cultural values.

Normal people say "we dont want to destroy all of our own culture etc because these things give our lives meaning, stability, serve biologically adaptive purposes (e.g. marriage traditions promote fertility and community), and so on." But Marxists basically think all of that stuff is a spook invented by the nasty capitalists to enslave the masses through "false consciousness" and make them love their own oppression, so they have to invent a bunch of convoluted theories to explain it.

Not really familiar with his solutions, but Althusser's theory of ideology is basically just that the ruling class use both ideology and force to make the masses do what they want, and that the masses are a bunch of NPCs with no agency who are programmed by ideology to live a certain way. Some other leftists semi-deb00nked this point by saying "then why do some people resist the dominant ideology?"

Gramsci's theory of cultural hegemony is pretty similar: The ruling class uses apparatus like media and education, alongside manipulation of language etc., to program the masses with an ideology by normalizing it as the default culture. This tricks the masses into thinking that the ideology is just "common sense." See modern Leftists who claim that their insane beliefs (e.g. child genital mutilation) are just "being a good person" — it's a "fish doesnt know it's in water" situation.

Foucault imo was the most interesting and seemed to have more original ideas. His theory of power is that it isnt held by one individual or group but expressed at every level of society. If someone can make you do something against your will, they have power over you. Helpful for understanding the "oppression olympics" inverted power hierarchy in the west (gay trumps straight, POC trumps gay, trans trumps all, etc.). Foucault wrote a bunch of genealogies on power using selected case studies (e.g. prison systems) to figure out how "power" of ruling class is expressed in modern societies, where it seems to be hidden. He invented different modes of power that operate in conjunction and build on one another. His baseline is sovereign power (to kill and take), and then disciplinary power (to regulate behavior), and biopower (to control biology and life of entire societies). He also talked of pastoral power (coercive nurturing with a religious/salvation aspect) - a good example of this is the leftist regime declaring that they "fight for the oppressed." This is extremely simplified ofc.

Anyway, back to my original point : most leftist theory is just pointing at normal stuff and then pathologizing it, but sometimes they do have useful observations. it's just that nothing else they say is useful.

Edit: btw not dunking on AA here at all I just saw his post and went on a ramble

https://t.me/tolerantfellowgram/446

How is it "disinformation" to point out that all of the leading global governance organizations, think tanks, bankers, etc. are promoting the Great Replacement? Orgs like UN, CFR, and WEF represent the interests of the ruling class.

I've already wrote a ton of stuff explaining when open borders were implemented, who was behind it, etc. - e.g. I posted this about the ADL not even 24 hours ago https://t.me/thuletide/2861

Homosexual Israeli transhumanist WEF shill Yuval Noah Harari (one of Bill Gates' favorite authors):

"Covid is critical because this is what convinces people to accept to legitimize total biometric surveillance. We need to not just monitor people, we need to monitor what’s happening under their skin”

This is like a tacky caricature of a "bad guy", but basically all transhumanists are like this. Zero self-awareness. Or maybe they just don't care how they come across to the plebian masses.

Checking in on the British libtards (they're still insane). Two thousand quote tweets of "omg this is literally fascism."
https://twitter.com/StephenJamesGBR/status/1528295204012408832/retweets/with_comments

I've said this before, but there's something very disturbing about British leftists. American leftists generally just screech like unhinged retards or act all smug and ironic. British leftists also do the smug thing too, but they also have this very sinister vibe to them that I don't notice with leftists of other countries. British state propaganda is similar, like they're actively trying to be as creepy and 1984ish as possible.

One of the main ideological divides on the DR is between First Worldists and Third Worldists, epitomized by opinions on Israel / Jews.

First Worldists generally don't care about Israel beyond the Zionist lobby meddling in our affairs (sometimes even praise its policies e.g. genetic testing people for citizenship) and often view Jews as one of many nepotistic out-groups that are openly hostile to our ethnic interests.

Third Worldists generally view Israel as an evil imperialist project that has conquered and oppressed the native Palestinians, and they often hate or resent Jews simply because they are a successful and powerful ethnic group and view Jews (or specifically "Zionists") as some sort of Platonic evil and the source of all worldly poisons.

The third Worldist view leads people to some very wacky conclusions:

- Imperialism/colonialism is inherently evil and bad (because Jews are doing colonialism in Israel), therefore we need to promote Leftist "post-colonialism."
- Private property is bad because Jews use capitalism and corporations to their political advantage.
- If you don't defend the interests of poor oppressed peoples around the world (e.g. the Palestinians) then you are some sort of dysfunctional sociopath (and probably anti-White too).
- Leftists care about poor oppressed peoples and are often anti-Zionist (because they also view Israel as a nasty imperialist project) ergo Leftists are "the good guys."
- Foreign peoples who are openly hostile to Whites but are also hostile to Israel and/or Jews are also "the good guys" and potential political allies.
- Jews are the only foreign ethnic group that is hostile to Whites and every other non-White race would happily be our best friends (if not for those nasty Jews telling them to hate us).
- Everything bad that ever happens is because of Jews and nobody has any agency except Jews (e.g., the Great Reset "isn't real" because "there are no Jews involved").

These sound like strawman but they are pretty much verbatim quotes.

I guess this is all just a handy proxy for master vs slave morality but you can often predict a person's entire worldview, from economics to foreign policy, just from their opinions on Israel.

ICYMI, article:

The Great Replacement: A “White supremacist conspiracy theory” promoted by every Left-Wing media outlet

Contains:
- A short definition of the Great Replacement.
- An explanation of the Celebration Parallax ("it's not happening but it's good that it is and you deserve it").
- Some demographic statistics (population projections and fertility rates).
- An archive of Left-Wing media outlets promoting every aspect of the Great Replacement "conspiracy theory."

President of Alibaba Group says they're developing a "carbon footprint" tracker for "consumers to track their own carbon footprint." It will record everywhere they go, everything they buy, and everything they eat.

This sort of tech will obviously be used for some sort of social credit system and some sort of carbon tax and/or "climate reparations."

United Nations made this voluntary climate reparations platform back in 2016:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160330183327/https://offset.climateneutralnow.org/

"the UN Carbon Offset Platform is an e-commerce platform where a company, an organization or a regular citizen can purchase units (carbon credits) to compensate greenhouse gas emissions or to simply support action on climate."
- https://web.archive.org/web/20220418205051/https://unfccc.int/climate-action/climate-neutral-now/united-nations-carbon-offset-platform

https://t.me/joeldavisx/439

"Why did the West only go to shit after WW2 and not before?"

TL;DR answer:

WW2 was the final victory of the globalist cartel over nationalism. It was regime change. They had been trying to subversively wrestle power from Western elites for centuries and finally succeeded. With pesky nationalists and traditional elites of the way (or indoctrinated) they could get to work building the NWO and forcing their vision upon humanity (homosex mocha world).

Longer answer:

All of the stuff you named in your original post contributed to the death of the West in some way (some significantly more than others) but the main cause is pretty simple: Subversion, conquest, and occupation by a hostile elite.

You're right that everything went to shit in the West after WW2 but that's only because the foundations for making everything go to shit were laid before WW2.

It's a huge mistake to discount the genealogical approach because almost all of our problems today are the end result of ~200 years of highly organized subversion. If anything, discounting pre-20th Century events removes agency from history.

If you look at the history of globalist orgs like the United Nations, you see the same names and belief systems recurring time and time again (including some weird connections like Theosophy and Quakerism), many of which remain powerful and influential to this day.

These people worked tirelessly to subvert the Western elite for generation after generation, creating societies and NGOs, colonizing colleges, etc. The Frankfurt School only found a home at Columbia University because it was already infested with Leftists.

The shit that they peddle to the masses today was peddled to Western elites 100 years ago, e.g. trying to normalize sexual revolution: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_League_for_Sexual_Reform

Now it's their great-great-grandkids causing the same problems. They do this shit whenever they take power. They did it in Weimar Germany, they did it in Bolshevik Russia, now they're doing it throughout the entire West.

Major difference today is that these problems have been exacerbated immensely by Third Industrial Revolution technologies (e.g. internet), which often have weird glowie/globalist origins.

Edit: But in general I agree with the point that before WW2 basically every nation in the West would be regarded as insane wignats by today's standards, and you can't just handwave away this radical transition by saying "uhh Liberalism umm Marxism" (even if those things contributed to the decline).