Kinda reminds me of nationalists shilling for COVID tyranny because it was "based authoritarianism that would defeat the [so-called] Liberal world order."

Being a dissident is when you endorse your mortal enemies' power grabs. The more you shill for your enemies, the more of a dissident you are.

A response to this article by @Thuletide:

I admire Thuletide's work and there are aspects of his article I agree with. Namely: Terrorism is a bad idea, neo-Nazi LARPing won't achieve anything, and that there are areas of political and other activism which could be effective and are worth engaging in by those who have the resources to do so.

There are, however, a couple of points I disagree with and I'll go into a bit more detail on these...

'Hiding in the woods' is a common phrase thrown at those who seek to detach from the system. But it ignores the real motivation and long-term agenda of those seeking to extricate themselves from the System. Speaking for myself—someone who has been working towards a considerable level of detachment—my reasons for doing so are to regroup, relearn, rebuild and restore a certain level of freedom which only comes with independence. Detachment is not an end in itself, but a means-to-an-end. This is particularly applicable when you have children, for how can they ever challenge the System when they've grown up dependent upon it? I'd argue that this explains the failure of the Boomer generation to preserve our nations and our values; they were very well catered for by the System, and deep-down they cannot bring themselves to truly oppose it. A sort of Stockholm Syndrome.

It's true that They won't leave us alone, but a neglected factor in all of this is that of consent. There's a reason the chequered board is a key Masonic symbol and it's this: Society is a game, with rules and tactics. Victory (freedom and/or prosperity) is reserved for those who learn the rules and master the game. Most of what we suffer is by our own choice. Nobody forced us to remain citizens of this society, and when you know how the law works this becomes clear.

The uncomfortable truth is that this is not our society. It hasn't been for a long time. We're effectively tenants. I'm not talking about the land, the folk and the natural realm, but the hyper-technological veneer placed upon it: The statutes, the roads, the grid, the media/communication network, the financial system, and so on. Our ancestors may have been hired to help build these things, but they're not our creation (and what you create, you own). If you want to know how long we've been living within a system not our own, watch a documentary called Secrets in Plain Sight. Our enemy have rules to follow, and the less engaged we are with their system, the less power they hold over us.

In response to the accusation of 'cowardice', I'd argue that it requires far more courage to disengage from the State than to remain within its bosom. Learning and using the law properly is a more daunting task than reading political philosophy and casting a ballot every few years. And besides, it is a means-to-an-end; one of eventual confrontation but this time with a stronger, healthier, more knowledgeable generation of dissidents.

To conclude, my position is that right now there is no overall political solution. We can achieve regional victories (as @MarcMalone is doing with his America 21 initiative) but the Global System feeds upon our attention and will always have a way of digesting our forays into politics in a way which nourishes rather than harms it. Every political movement at this time will be spun by the omnipotent media to favour the Global Agenda. Not even victories in regional politics can change that, but those regional victories can balkanize society in a way which may be useful.

And who's to say we can't detach and engage in regional politics or other forms of activism to affect wider change?

I don't want to spend all of my time "infighting." It's actually very annoying. I would much prefer to dedicate my time to other things.

But I feel compelled to do it because I noticed that the DR was being driven off the rails and it seemed like nobody was willing to instigate "infighting" or even mildly criticize DR talking heads.

The DR has extremely cult-like behavior whereby media personalities become deified. They gather up a small following of dedicated fans who hang on their every word and then viciously gatekeep their audience by accusing any critics of being feds or whatever — regardless of how valid their criticisms are and how much evidence they have in support.

I think part of the problem is that the DR has no clearly defined set of first principles. This means that it invariably gets dragged down insane and counterintuitive paths.

In the past couple of years alone I've seen people:
- Shilling for Stalinist USSR as "le trad utopia."
- Shilling for Islam (including the Islamic conquest of Europe).
- Shilling for ChiComs and Socialism in general.
- Trying to ally with "based" Leftists (who do not exist and never did).
- Calling people "anti-White" because they don't care about Palestine or some other Third World tribal conflict.
- Spending all time trying to rehabilitate bad mustache man (aka the modern equivalent of Satan).
- Saying that they want hostile foreign civilizations to destroy and conquer our own.
- Saying that they want our entire civilization to be burned to the ground because le tribal hunter-gatherer LARP (I was guilty of this one, my bad).
- And most recently, celebrating anti-White terrorist attacks just because the perpetrator was a "based racist Hotep" or because the little White girls who were killed "would just grow up to be whores anyway."
- (Edit): And shilling for COVID vaccines, lockdowns, and even social credit systems (!) as "based authoritarianism" that will "defeat Liberalism."

Imagine how bad the DR would be without infighting?

Andy Ngo did a good rundown of the Brooklyn mass shooter: https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1514029565622075405

Seems to be a Black nationalist Communist hotep who posted about killing Whites many times.

What a coincidence

Reminder to read Great Reset = Neo-Holodomor? ‘Food Chain Reaction’: A simulation like Operation Lockstep but for a global famine caused by food chain collapse

Related articles:

Operation Lockstep: 2010 Rockefeller Foundation paper perfectly “predicts” the COVID scamdemic [Full text]

Bill Gates and Rockefeller Foundations collaborate with the United Nations to produce guide for blockchain-based “vaccine passport” (digital identity)

Whitepill statistics on race from the Incels Wiki "blackpill" section https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill

(This data is listed in the blackpill section because East Asians are overrepresented in inceldom so they seethe about White girls preferring White men)

I had no idea that "Incels Wiki" even existed. Found it accidentally when looking for a study about spiteful mutants.

The site seems to contain a lot of useful data but not sure how healthy it would be for an incel to read this sort of stuff. Probably just make them worse.

Still, with ~33% of young men not getting laid in the last year, it's a pretty important social phenomenon to come to terms with and this website seems well researched.

This is the study btw :
Social Epistasis Amplifies the Fitness Costs of Deleterious Mutations, Engendering Rapid Fitness Decline Among Modernized Populations (2017)
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0084-x

The basic theory of the "social epistasis amplification model (SEAM)" is that harmful genetic mutations in group-living animals (e.g. humans) don't just harm the individual carrying said mutations, but damage the overall reproductive fitness of their entire group (e.g. a human society or country), including those who don't carry said mutations.

Biologically maladaptive people ("spiteful mutants") disrupt societal processes and institutions that enforce or encourage evolutionarily adaptive behavior (e.g. religious institutions, marriage, etc.) for a variety of reasons. Maybe they are mentally ill, ugly, have an inferiority complex, feel socially maligned in some way, and so on — all signs of poor genetic health caused by a high level of harmful mutations.

Feminist cat ladies are a good example of this phenomenon: They prey on young women who would usually get married and have children (evolutionarily adaptive behavior) and convince them to become whores who abort all of their babies (extremely maladaptive behavior).

The study posits that SEAM may explain the Behavioral Sink phenomenon that was exposed by Calhoun's "Rat Utopia" experiments. Calhoun put rats in an enclosure and gave them unlimited resources, causing their population to boom. At a certain population size, the rats became completely dysfunctional: They exhibited sexual perversions, suffered spontaneous miscarriages, did not raise their litters, killed their own offspring, some became cannibals, some became frenetically overactive, others completely retreated from society, and so on.

Previously, Behavioral Sink was attributed to the negative psychological impact of overpopulation, but this study argues that the rats experienced a "mutational meltdown." Basically, Calhoun removed natural selection from the equation, enabling rats with harmful or maladaptive genetic mutations to survive into adulthood and reproduce. Each subsequent generation became progressively more genetically damaged until the Spiteful Mutant rats reached a critical mass, whereby their maladaptive behavior influenced the entire colony, at which point, the Rat Utopia collapsed and the entire population went extinct.

Westerners currently live in the human equivalent of Calhoun's Rat Utopia and we're seeing very similar results today.

Don't get too excited about Mr Brain Implants buying Twitter.

The alt-right retards who call people "lightswitch brains" claim that anyone who doesn't shill for Palestine is a Zionist, anyone who doesn't shill for Russia supports NATO, anyone who doesn't shill for China supports the "American" government, and so on. No idea how their followers can't see the deception but I guess that's how cults operate.

"Check out my cool nationalist movement!"

"Sure, what do you do all day?"

"We shill for foreign people who hate us"

The problem with blaming everything on "Liberalism" (e.g. inaccurately calling the New World Order the "Liberal World Order") is that "Liberal" just becomes synonymous with "Western," which makes no sense at all when countries like China are key players in said world order. It's not like they're out here defending property rights, free trade, and freedom of association. It conveniently absolves all of the other countries that are on board with globalist machinations and the push for world government (or "world governance").

Plus, most of the Western elite really don't care about Liberalism all that much, as demonstrated by their responses to COVID, "Climate Change," and so on. They're basically technocratic Socialists, kinda like H. G. Wells and some other Fabians. It's quite obvious that their end goal isn't to create a "Liberal" world but some sort of one world Communist government, modeled on China, combined with transhumanism and weird New Age religion bullshit. They've said this many times. See for example this paper by Robert Muller, "the philosopher of the United Nations" and ex UN Assistant Secretary-General:

Proper Earth Government: A Framework and Ways to Create It (2005)
https://archive.ph/l4RYW

Race riots in Sweden because a Danish politician burned a Quran. Riots have also spread to Norway.

Remember to listen to Alt-Right ecelebs who tell you that these people are your noble allies in the "one struggle" against globalism.

Source: https://twitter.com/HKaaman/status/1514961750030012419

New article:
The History of Racial Anthropology and Human Taxonomy

This article debunks the modern myth that race was "invented" in the 1800s by Europeans who, for some bizarre reason, needed a convoluted scientific excuse to justify slavery and colonialism (unlike every other race on earth, who just enslaved people for the heck of it).

It provides a brief history of race concepts dating from Classical Antiquity to the Modern Era, and contextualizes the progressive evolution of "race" through time.

(Let me know if you spot any typos I wrote this one pretty quickly).

You wrote a lot of stuff but addressed literally none of my points.

If I wanted to be technical about it I wouldn't use the word "Liberal" at all, since it isn't clearly Liberalism.

What you call "victimary liberalism" is just Cultural Marxism or basic bitch Socialism, the same thing that Leftists have been peddling for years.

The "Right" who are scared of using the government to own the Left are Liberals (and they have been thoroughly infected with Cultural Marxist mindvirus).

Globalists/Leftists who want to create a technocratic behemoth, strip everyone of private property, destroy all traditional cultures, nation-states, and the family unit (aka implement every objective from the Communist Manfiesto) are clearly not Liberals.

https://t.me/joeldavisx/358

Edit: Plus, my original point (that you didn't even mention) was that we are dealing with an international system and oligarchy that incorporates and infects many non-"Liberal" countries, all of which are willingly advancing their decidedly non-Liberal technocratic agenda.

Graincel diet causes manletism:
https://phys.org/news/2022-04-european-farmers-heights.html

"A combined study of genetics and skeletal remains show that the switch from primarily hunting, gathering and foraging to farming about 12,000 years ago in Europe may have had negative health effects as indicated by shorter than expected heights in the earliest farmers"

"individuals from the Neolithic, taking into account their genetically indicated potential heights, were an average of 1.5 inches shorter than previous individuals and 0.87 inches shorter than subsequent individuals."

If switching from hunter-gatherer diet to graincel diet is this bad, then imagine how damaging Agenda 21 vegan bugpaste diets will be.

This is a superbly insightful post by Millennial Woes. It shows authenticity, humility, and is fascinating to read because in one fell swoop it lets us understand his mindset prior and post scamdemic. That's important because he speaks for a large portion of the Dissident Right. I also find it hopeful, for it highlights the fact that TPTB have exposed themselves enormously over the last two years (just as they did to a lesser extent with 9/11). Millions of people now know which forms of activism not to waste their time on, and which path they should rather be walking.

Happy to see this post (https://t.me/millennialwoes/4918) from Millennial Woes, even if the content is bleak.

I've spent years trying to explain that what people believe to be nation-state governments are basically just front offices for the one world governing system and that basically every (relevant) country in the world is controlled (or at least heavily influenced) by an international oligarchy that operates via banks/funds (e.g. BlackRock), think tanks (e.g. CFR), NGOs (e.g. Open Society), and "global governance" organizations (e.g. UN). Even many nationalists thought I was crazy. People just didn't get it. Many still don't.

I've also known about Agenda 21 etc for a long time and even mentioned it in my first ever article written back in 2019, on how globalists use pseudo-"environmentalism" to advance a technocratic agenda. The article also talked about the climate change "carbon" scam (e.g. UN's Carbon Footprint Offset Platform) and predicted some sort of "climate reparations" tax.

I'm not saying all of this to be conceited, my point is that I knew all of this stuff already and I was still totally blindsided by COVID until a couple of months unto the scamdemic. And even after I put 2+2 together, I was still astounded by just how efficient and interconnected the world system is.

The stuff about DARPA working with official CCP agencies to produce COVID in a lab is just nuts. But so is all of the Great Reset / Agenda 21 stuff, like the UN x Belt and Road imperialism colab, Smart Cities, worldwide digital identity, and so on. I should've expected it but I didn't realize just how bad it was. The transhumanism angle is something that I really didn't pay attention to either, it comes across as totally ludicrous but seems to be a lynchpin of the globalist project.

COVID definitely made me re-evaluate my own ideological stances too, like buying into the dumb eco collapse cult accelerationism bullshit that was in vogue on the Right from 2017 until the scamdemic.