Are globalists intentionally causing catabolic collapse in the West?
Step 1:
Artificially inflate African population via unsustainable food "aid" and "charity."
Step 2:
Import millions of Africans into tiny Western countries, causing massive overpopulation.
Step 3:
Discredit naysayers as evil racists who want to starve African children and genocide refugees.
Step 4:
Western civilization is unable to cope with ecologically unsustainable overpopulation and thus collapses.
Step 5:
Massive depopulation is caused by societal collapse, starvation, civil war, etc.
Step 1:
Artificially inflate African population via unsustainable food "aid" and "charity."
Step 2:
Import millions of Africans into tiny Western countries, causing massive overpopulation.
Step 3:
Discredit naysayers as evil racists who want to starve African children and genocide refugees.
Step 4:
Western civilization is unable to cope with ecologically unsustainable overpopulation and thus collapses.
Step 5:
Massive depopulation is caused by societal collapse, starvation, civil war, etc.
lol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Bonding_and_Nurture_Kinship
Translation: Leftist "cultural anthropologists" from Columbia University and Franz Boas' American Anthropological Association have spent decades claiming that genetic relatedness has nothing to do with human kinship; actual scientists (biologists, etc.) do not buy the bullshit.
Edit: Max Holland is a disgusting anti-White Libtard btw
Translation: Leftist "cultural anthropologists" from Columbia University and Franz Boas' American Anthropological Association have spent decades claiming that genetic relatedness has nothing to do with human kinship; actual scientists (biologists, etc.) do not buy the bullshit.
Edit: Max Holland is a disgusting anti-White Libtard btw
"The Leftist Personality"
I wonder if there is a modern equivalent to The Authoritarian Personality (by Frankfurt School's Adorno & co), but for Leftists? The Authoritarian Personality used a minuscule sample size and was based on Freudo-Marxist gibberish, but we have a lot of actual data and real studies on Leftist psychology at this point. It would be good if somebody compiled it all into one single study or literature review — The Authoritarian Personality influences Leftist arguments to this day.
I know there are a few examples of stuff like this already but I don't know any that are contemporary, exclusively dedicated to the subject, and backed up with lots of data:
- Analysis of Leftist psychology features throughout the work of Ted Kaczynski (e.g. Technological Slavery 2010)
- Francisco Franco's military studied the psychology of captured Marxists (Biopsychism of Marxist Fanaticism 1938)
- Nietzsche's analysis of "slave moralists" features throughout his entire bibliography from 1886 onwards
- Rich Houck also makes the case for Leftism-as-mental-illness in Liberalism Unmasked (2018)
Emil Kirkegaard wrote the study Mental illness and the Left in 2020, which did have a big sample size, but it just recorded rates of mental illness vs ideology and didn't have much analysis, other than vaguely suggesting a link between mental illness and attending college.
Maybe something like this hypothetical "The Leftist Personality" already exists but I haven't yet discovered it?
I wonder if there is a modern equivalent to The Authoritarian Personality (by Frankfurt School's Adorno & co), but for Leftists? The Authoritarian Personality used a minuscule sample size and was based on Freudo-Marxist gibberish, but we have a lot of actual data and real studies on Leftist psychology at this point. It would be good if somebody compiled it all into one single study or literature review — The Authoritarian Personality influences Leftist arguments to this day.
I know there are a few examples of stuff like this already but I don't know any that are contemporary, exclusively dedicated to the subject, and backed up with lots of data:
- Analysis of Leftist psychology features throughout the work of Ted Kaczynski (e.g. Technological Slavery 2010)
- Francisco Franco's military studied the psychology of captured Marxists (Biopsychism of Marxist Fanaticism 1938)
- Nietzsche's analysis of "slave moralists" features throughout his entire bibliography from 1886 onwards
- Rich Houck also makes the case for Leftism-as-mental-illness in Liberalism Unmasked (2018)
Emil Kirkegaard wrote the study Mental illness and the Left in 2020, which did have a big sample size, but it just recorded rates of mental illness vs ideology and didn't have much analysis, other than vaguely suggesting a link between mental illness and attending college.
Maybe something like this hypothetical "The Leftist Personality" already exists but I haven't yet discovered it?
Reminder that globalists invented the term "New World Order."
Here are a few examples:
Marx and Engels used the term in their 1845 book The Holy Family, when explaining that Communism is a continuation of French Revolution and that they aimed to overthrow the "old world order" [1].
In 1919, Woodrow Wilson used "new international order" in a speech to congress [2] and "new order of the world" in another speech [3].
H. G. Wells wrote The New World Order in 1940, which became an official doctrinal template for the United Nations [4].
Also in 1940, Arthur Greenwood used the term in an official UK government announcement published via The New York Times [5].
In 1991, the United Nations' James S. Sutterlin used the term in an article published via the Council on Foreign Relation's magazine, Foreign Affairs [6].
Henry Kissinger uses the term constantly, this example is from 1992 [7]. He also wrote a book called World Order in 2014 [8].
Tony Blair used the term in an official government address in 2000 [9].
Here are a few examples:
Marx and Engels used the term in their 1845 book The Holy Family, when explaining that Communism is a continuation of French Revolution and that they aimed to overthrow the "old world order" [1].
In 1919, Woodrow Wilson used "new international order" in a speech to congress [2] and "new order of the world" in another speech [3].
H. G. Wells wrote The New World Order in 1940, which became an official doctrinal template for the United Nations [4].
Also in 1940, Arthur Greenwood used the term in an official UK government announcement published via The New York Times [5].
In 1991, the United Nations' James S. Sutterlin used the term in an article published via the Council on Foreign Relation's magazine, Foreign Affairs [6].
Henry Kissinger uses the term constantly, this example is from 1992 [7]. He also wrote a book called World Order in 2014 [8].
Tony Blair used the term in an official government address in 2000 [9].
Last example I couldn't fit in the previous post (https://t.me/thuletide/2463):
The Royal Institute of International Affairs used the term "New World Order" in 2019 when referring to the world banking operation founded by the United Nations cabal: "[Bretton Woods] established the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank as the key institutions to manage this new world order." [10].
The Royal Institute of International Affairs used the term "New World Order" in 2019 when referring to the world banking operation founded by the United Nations cabal: "[Bretton Woods] established the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank as the key institutions to manage this new world order." [10].
Telegram
Thuletide
Reminder that globalists invented the term "New World Order."
Here are a few examples:
Marx and Engels used the term in their 1845 book The Holy Family, when explaining that Communism is a continuation of French Revolution and that they aimed to overthrow…
Here are a few examples:
Marx and Engels used the term in their 1845 book The Holy Family, when explaining that Communism is a continuation of French Revolution and that they aimed to overthrow…
Been trying/failing to pick a normal pseudonym for over a year, so now I'm crowdsourcing it. Wish I could just write under my real name tbh, it dates back to Anglo-Saxon period England.
Edit: if you click to the original post below, you can add suggestions in the comment section.
Edit 2: Someone asked about ethnicity in comments: Pseudonym has to be Anglo-American. Most of my ancestry is originally British and the rest is Afrikaner (recently learned that my South African side was like half Rhodesian so I'm way less Dutch than I thought I was).
Edit: if you click to the original post below, you can add suggestions in the comment section.
Edit 2: Someone asked about ethnicity in comments: Pseudonym has to be Anglo-American. Most of my ancestry is originally British and the rest is Afrikaner (recently learned that my South African side was like half Rhodesian so I'm way less Dutch than I thought I was).
Good suggestions everyone. Thank you for posting "Hitler" three times, that was very helpful https://t.me/thuletide/2470
Almost every week I see some "Right-Winger" talking about the necessity of "deconstructing" or "transcending" the political spectrum, or similar goofy nonsense.
I've said this a thousand times but you will NEVER catch a Leftist saying "ummm Left vs Right is a false dichotomy, we need to think outside of the box." They just say "all Right-Wingers are evil, redact everyone to the Right of Trotsky."
You aren't smart for going all postmodernist on rigidly defined archetypes that can be projected backward throughout the entirety of human history. Everyone knows what Right-Wing and Left-Wing mean.
The problem today is that the Overton window has shifted so far Left that the so-called "Right-Wing" is almost entirely Leftist in nature. We're got so-called "conservatives" repeating Marxist theory verbatim.
I've said this a thousand times but you will NEVER catch a Leftist saying "ummm Left vs Right is a false dichotomy, we need to think outside of the box." They just say "all Right-Wingers are evil, redact everyone to the Right of Trotsky."
You aren't smart for going all postmodernist on rigidly defined archetypes that can be projected backward throughout the entirety of human history. Everyone knows what Right-Wing and Left-Wing mean.
The problem today is that the Overton window has shifted so far Left that the so-called "Right-Wing" is almost entirely Leftist in nature. We're got so-called "conservatives" repeating Marxist theory verbatim.