Forwarded from Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺
I’ve noticed female body types tend to pass through trends which create expectations for how women should look, but these trends are more important to women themselves than they are to men.
For example, throughout the 90s it was “fashionable” or expected of women to be particularly skinny. Even though men didn’t necessarily care if a woman met the skinny-enough criteria (physically, men are always more interested in face, tits and ass), women took this skinny trend very seriously and often tortured themselves in its pursuit.
But where do these trends begin? And who are the trend setters? Ostensibly it’s the female Hollywood actors, the female newsreaders and female fashion models in the magazines, which 90s women were especially addicted to buying and reading. These are the idols which influence how women feel about their bodies and cause them to develop physical expectations of themselves.
Naturally, healthy women of good childbearing capacity are generally thicker in the bottom half, curvier and wider-hipped than the “skinny young boy body” stereotype presented as the female norm in the 90s, a physical expectation of women created largely by gay men who still dominate the fashion industry. Small wonder why these men would prefer to see women looking more like young boys than real females.
Anyway, this skinny-girl trend gave birth to widespread depression, anorexia and eating-disorders among women of society. Of course none of the magazine editors and “culture-leaders” were ever held accountable for this psychological torment.
These days, although the residue of the skinny woman propaganda trend still haunts the middle-aged female psych, the trend has changed and skinny is no longer “in fashion”. Women are now encouraged by cultural influencers (and by each other) not only to develop their curves but to show them off in public, with the leggings epidemic.
Gyms are full of women doing glute and quad exercises, “booty-building” is a thing and wearing leggings as tight and as transparent as is socially acceptable is the new norm. It’s safe to say that this new female body image and dress-style together with the feminist “I should be able to dress however I want and be safe” mantra is the present day trend.
Of course, not only are women never safe on their own regardless of how they dress, but they are significantly less safe and less interesting on a personal level when they succumb to this leggings-thottery. Leggings culture and feminist “slut-dressing” has ironically turned women into walking sexual objects and eye-candy for men –which is exactly what feminists initially claimed to be liberating women from.
However it’s unrealistic to expect women to break or deviate from this trend on their own. Women are unfortunately always at the mercy of cultural trends, especially when it comes to body-type and dress style.
But most women aren’t completely retarded when it comes to recognising harmful influence broadcasted by media propagandists and cultural trend-setters, the “fat-acceptance” message for example was largely ignored by most women, partly because fat has no healthy aesthetic and because most men don’t like fat chicks.
This indicates that male attention does play a role in influencing how women dress and the standard of health they keep, which is why it is important for men to practice only paying attention to women who are visibly of healthy child-bearing capacity, not obviously possessed by gay cultural idols and dressing more humbly.
For example, throughout the 90s it was “fashionable” or expected of women to be particularly skinny. Even though men didn’t necessarily care if a woman met the skinny-enough criteria (physically, men are always more interested in face, tits and ass), women took this skinny trend very seriously and often tortured themselves in its pursuit.
But where do these trends begin? And who are the trend setters? Ostensibly it’s the female Hollywood actors, the female newsreaders and female fashion models in the magazines, which 90s women were especially addicted to buying and reading. These are the idols which influence how women feel about their bodies and cause them to develop physical expectations of themselves.
Naturally, healthy women of good childbearing capacity are generally thicker in the bottom half, curvier and wider-hipped than the “skinny young boy body” stereotype presented as the female norm in the 90s, a physical expectation of women created largely by gay men who still dominate the fashion industry. Small wonder why these men would prefer to see women looking more like young boys than real females.
Anyway, this skinny-girl trend gave birth to widespread depression, anorexia and eating-disorders among women of society. Of course none of the magazine editors and “culture-leaders” were ever held accountable for this psychological torment.
These days, although the residue of the skinny woman propaganda trend still haunts the middle-aged female psych, the trend has changed and skinny is no longer “in fashion”. Women are now encouraged by cultural influencers (and by each other) not only to develop their curves but to show them off in public, with the leggings epidemic.
Gyms are full of women doing glute and quad exercises, “booty-building” is a thing and wearing leggings as tight and as transparent as is socially acceptable is the new norm. It’s safe to say that this new female body image and dress-style together with the feminist “I should be able to dress however I want and be safe” mantra is the present day trend.
Of course, not only are women never safe on their own regardless of how they dress, but they are significantly less safe and less interesting on a personal level when they succumb to this leggings-thottery. Leggings culture and feminist “slut-dressing” has ironically turned women into walking sexual objects and eye-candy for men –which is exactly what feminists initially claimed to be liberating women from.
However it’s unrealistic to expect women to break or deviate from this trend on their own. Women are unfortunately always at the mercy of cultural trends, especially when it comes to body-type and dress style.
But most women aren’t completely retarded when it comes to recognising harmful influence broadcasted by media propagandists and cultural trend-setters, the “fat-acceptance” message for example was largely ignored by most women, partly because fat has no healthy aesthetic and because most men don’t like fat chicks.
This indicates that male attention does play a role in influencing how women dress and the standard of health they keep, which is why it is important for men to practice only paying attention to women who are visibly of healthy child-bearing capacity, not obviously possessed by gay cultural idols and dressing more humbly.
MSM released another ridiculous depiction of Jesus - this time they turned him into a Jamaican (https://twitter.com/bbcbrasil/status/1378145578199224323).
For "some reason," all modern depictions of Jesus paint him out to be darker pigmented than the average Saudi, when according to available DNA evidence, the population of Northern Israel was genetically closest to modern day peoples like Samaritans, Lebanese, and Druze — who all look far more similar to depictions of Jesus from Classical Antiquity than the deep-fried Saudi Jesuses peddled by the MSM.
For "some reason," all modern depictions of Jesus paint him out to be darker pigmented than the average Saudi, when according to available DNA evidence, the population of Northern Israel was genetically closest to modern day peoples like Samaritans, Lebanese, and Druze — who all look far more similar to depictions of Jesus from Classical Antiquity than the deep-fried Saudi Jesuses peddled by the MSM.
Portrait of Jesus by facial reconstruction artist Alessandro Tomasi.
Alessandro, who is Lebanese, generally produces good facial reconstruction works, fair and accurate in terms of pigmentation.
Source: https://twitter.com/ATomasi__/status/1376859969329463297
Alessandro, who is Lebanese, generally produces good facial reconstruction works, fair and accurate in terms of pigmentation.
Source: https://twitter.com/ATomasi__/status/1376859969329463297
striker matt parrot defending BLM.png
533.1 KB
Remember when Eric Striker and Matt Parrot of TWP defended Black Lives Matter? I member.
Weird how nobody ever holds these people accountable for all of the weird shit they say, isn't it?
Weird how nobody ever holds these people accountable for all of the weird shit they say, isn't it?
post colonialism keith woods matt parrot.png
253.4 KB
Remember when Matt Parrot and Keith Woods tried to make "post-colonialism" (a literal anti-white Marxist critical race theory-style ideology) go mainstream among nationalists, while defending imperialist China and imperialist Russia? I remember.
Really weird how nobody ever holds these people accountable for all of the weird shit they say.
Really weird how nobody ever holds these people accountable for all of the weird shit they say.
richard spencer holodomor denial.png
165.1 KB
Remember when Richard Spencer denied the Holodomor? I remember.
So, strange, so strange.
So, strange, so strange.
keith woods anti social freaks.png
529.8 KB
Remember when Keith Woods said that white people taking their own side (i.e., ignoring Middle Eastern squabbles) was the "sociopathic" behavior of "anti-social freaks"?
Really makes ya think.
Really makes ya think.
Remember when Mike Enoch claimed that Muslims and Jews have no unity against whites, other than on "privileged college campuses" — or when he said that if Palestinians were raping European women, that would be all the more reason to support them.
In a TRS podcast on Islam (https://web.archive.org/web/20200514183056/https://altcensored.com/watch?v=knTMe7ZiuVI), Striker and Enoch both massively downplayed the Islamic conquest of Europe as "some clashes in Spain or whatever" and "some stuff from the Middle Ages."
Again, no accountability.
In a TRS podcast on Islam (https://web.archive.org/web/20200514183056/https://altcensored.com/watch?v=knTMe7ZiuVI), Striker and Enoch both massively downplayed the Islamic conquest of Europe as "some clashes in Spain or whatever" and "some stuff from the Middle Ages."
Again, no accountability.
The entire leadership of the Alt-Right has first degree connections to the vehemently anti-white spook Aleksandr Dugin (who is almost certainly a GRU agent), as do many European "Identitarians" such as De Benoist and Sellner. All of the necessary evidence is contained in these images, though they are by no means exhaustive.
If you ask these people about this extremely bizarre connection, they will accuse *you* of being the fed. Mike Enoch claimed that this is "all in your mind" — while standing next to the two most open Dugin-affiliates of the gang.
Once again, nobody holds these people accountable, and they provide no answers or explanations.
Note that Dugin's Foundation of Geopolitics stresses the importance of Russian-Islamic "anti-Atlanticist" (i.e. Anti-Western) alliance.
If you ask these people about this extremely bizarre connection, they will accuse *you* of being the fed. Mike Enoch claimed that this is "all in your mind" — while standing next to the two most open Dugin-affiliates of the gang.
Once again, nobody holds these people accountable, and they provide no answers or explanations.
Note that Dugin's Foundation of Geopolitics stresses the importance of Russian-Islamic "anti-Atlanticist" (i.e. Anti-Western) alliance.