The Left is utterly obsessed with the idea of "deradicalizing" the so-called "Far-Right."
What they mean by "deradicalization" is indoctrination. They're desperate to get their claws into the few remaining politically normal, sane*, and non-oversocialized people, to initiate them into their schizophrenic, suicidal death cult.
* As sane as you can be in this world, anyway.
The idea that the Left is "deradicalizing" the Right is all the more preposterous when you consider that the Left's modus operandi is an entropic process of constant radicalization. The Leftists of today are deranged extremists in the eyes of 99.9999999999999% of humans who have ever lived, including the vast majority of Leftists who were alive even five decades ago.
Maybe the Right should appropriate their language and use the term "deradicalization" when referring to people getting 'redpilled.'
I don't think that it's impossible for Leftists to deradicalize; I was a Tankie, at one point. However, the likelihood of it happening will significantly decrease as the Left and Right enter ideological total war. The Left will continue to prune their ranks and squeeze out the few remaining vaguely normal and sane people, to the point that the Left exclusively consists of the most maladaptive, resentful freaks imaginable.
A problem with online Right-Wing politics in general is that it can be extremely antisocial, which is a side effect of internet culture, but it doesn't exactly give people who are disenfranchised with the Left an easy way in. That being said, I've seen many Leftists complain that the Right is happy to take on board somebody who was an Anarcho-Communist two weeks ago, while the Left's process of supposed "deradicalization" entails endless self-flagellation, groveling, and a lifetime of repenting for perceived sins with no option for redemption.
Related thought: The Right should be advertising themselves not just as the upholders of tradition, culture, nation, etc., but of basic normality. The so-called "Far-Right" are the only people around today whose views are in line with those that were regarded as normal and healthy -- those that were objectively normal and healthy, more accurately -- throughout the entirety of recorded history, until the end of the Second World War.
I have nothing to conclude with I just wanted to share some recent thoughts.
What they mean by "deradicalization" is indoctrination. They're desperate to get their claws into the few remaining politically normal, sane*, and non-oversocialized people, to initiate them into their schizophrenic, suicidal death cult.
* As sane as you can be in this world, anyway.
The idea that the Left is "deradicalizing" the Right is all the more preposterous when you consider that the Left's modus operandi is an entropic process of constant radicalization. The Leftists of today are deranged extremists in the eyes of 99.9999999999999% of humans who have ever lived, including the vast majority of Leftists who were alive even five decades ago.
Maybe the Right should appropriate their language and use the term "deradicalization" when referring to people getting 'redpilled.'
I don't think that it's impossible for Leftists to deradicalize; I was a Tankie, at one point. However, the likelihood of it happening will significantly decrease as the Left and Right enter ideological total war. The Left will continue to prune their ranks and squeeze out the few remaining vaguely normal and sane people, to the point that the Left exclusively consists of the most maladaptive, resentful freaks imaginable.
A problem with online Right-Wing politics in general is that it can be extremely antisocial, which is a side effect of internet culture, but it doesn't exactly give people who are disenfranchised with the Left an easy way in. That being said, I've seen many Leftists complain that the Right is happy to take on board somebody who was an Anarcho-Communist two weeks ago, while the Left's process of supposed "deradicalization" entails endless self-flagellation, groveling, and a lifetime of repenting for perceived sins with no option for redemption.
Related thought: The Right should be advertising themselves not just as the upholders of tradition, culture, nation, etc., but of basic normality. The so-called "Far-Right" are the only people around today whose views are in line with those that were regarded as normal and healthy -- those that were objectively normal and healthy, more accurately -- throughout the entirety of recorded history, until the end of the Second World War.
I have nothing to conclude with I just wanted to share some recent thoughts.
messianic age montage 1.png
2.6 MB
Messianic Age and the New World Order
TL;DR: According to Jewish religious superstitions, the year 2240 AD (Jewish year 6000) is the deadline by which their messiah must arrive. He will unite all of humanity into a global 'United Nations' and usher in "world peace." Jews will enjoy a thousand year Shabbat ("day of rest"), while everyone else must obey the Noahide Laws. Those who do not are to be punished by execution via decapitation. The Noahide laws forbid "idol worship", and they class Christ as an "idol." You do the math. Note that the rainbow is a symbol of the Noahide Laws.
This is the metaphysical motivation behind the New World Order.
These are their words, not mine, and this is all publicly available information that is easy to find.
The image doesn't contain everything that you need to know, but it's a good start.
TL;DR: According to Jewish religious superstitions, the year 2240 AD (Jewish year 6000) is the deadline by which their messiah must arrive. He will unite all of humanity into a global 'United Nations' and usher in "world peace." Jews will enjoy a thousand year Shabbat ("day of rest"), while everyone else must obey the Noahide Laws. Those who do not are to be punished by execution via decapitation. The Noahide laws forbid "idol worship", and they class Christ as an "idol." You do the math. Note that the rainbow is a symbol of the Noahide Laws.
This is the metaphysical motivation behind the New World Order.
These are their words, not mine, and this is all publicly available information that is easy to find.
The image doesn't contain everything that you need to know, but it's a good start.
Keith Woods is full of shit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXIwnlAcUqQ
He flat out denied the existence of The Great Reset for a long time, labeling it a kook "conspiracy theory," even after elites had publicized numerous documents on the agenda. Now he produces video claiming that the Great Reset is simply a way for "capitalists" to avoid paying taxes and offload their "guilt" — what guilt? they're psychopaths — and that the New World Order is constructed purely to facilitate capital growth.
The direction that the United Nations network (to which the World Economic Forum belongs) aim to take the world is near-identical to the vision laid about by the Fabian Socialists, and to Communism *in practice*, as it has historically been implemented — a totalitarian, technocratic dictatorship, with a self-elected, self-serving elite. The only difference is that "The Party" are goons from the United Nations, Council on Foreign Relations, and so on.
The World Economic Forum has repeatedly announced that they aim to bring forth global "socialism," infuse capitalism with Marxism, and implement universal basic income, to create a world in which people will "own nothing" and rent everything by 2030.
- https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/05/over-40-of-americans-now-support-some-form-of-socialism/
- https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/06/could-capitalism-need-some-marxism-to-survive-the-4th-industrial-revolution/
- https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/covid-19-universal-basic-income-social-inequality/
- https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/how-life-could-change-2030/
Much of Wood's video on WEF/TGR is dedicated to explaining why this is absolutely, totally, definitely not Communism/Socialism. Of course, as a self-identified socialist (see his vid: 'Reclaiming Socialism From The Left' 2019), it's in his interest to claim that socialism was a good boi who dindu nuffin.
Woods defines Communism in the same way that Marxist ideologues define it : "Communism is when the proletariat owns the means of production" — which has never happened in any Communist society in history; they all devolve into depraved totalitarianism. He may as well be arguing that "real Communism/socialism has never been tried."
The true purpose of Communism is not to "free the workers" from "Capitalism," nor establish proletarian control over the means of production, but to manufacture a new breed of serfs and create a planet of deracinated, godless, slaves.
Communism is an ideological tool designed to overthrow an existing ruling elite, and create a highly centralized, totalitarian dictatorship to secure the position of the new ruling class. All of the "workers paradise" nonsense — which Woods regards as the defining characteristic of Communism — exists merely to trick workers into killing their own elites and replacing them with "The Party."
Ever since Woods was taken under the wing of the bioluminescent GRU spook Richard Spencer, he has consistently muddied the waters of nationalism and acted as pied piper, leading thousands of nationalists to a muddled and confused worldview. The list of topics that he has produced subversive content on is near-endless: His defense of various Communist regimes around the world (Kosovo, China, etc), flat out denying the existence of Western Marxism (colloquially labeled 'Cultural Marxism'), shilling for COVID lockdowns, insane anti-white "post-colonialism" nonsense (a Marxist narrative), promotion of Islam, Third Worldism, and so on.
I warned about Duginist / Neo-Eurasianist influence a long time ago, and the people I warned about have only became more subversive and/or retarded. Read this article and tell me there's no funny business going on: https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/08/16/alt-right-and-identitarian-links-to-aleksandr-dugin-tldr-version-pdf/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXIwnlAcUqQ
He flat out denied the existence of The Great Reset for a long time, labeling it a kook "conspiracy theory," even after elites had publicized numerous documents on the agenda. Now he produces video claiming that the Great Reset is simply a way for "capitalists" to avoid paying taxes and offload their "guilt" — what guilt? they're psychopaths — and that the New World Order is constructed purely to facilitate capital growth.
The direction that the United Nations network (to which the World Economic Forum belongs) aim to take the world is near-identical to the vision laid about by the Fabian Socialists, and to Communism *in practice*, as it has historically been implemented — a totalitarian, technocratic dictatorship, with a self-elected, self-serving elite. The only difference is that "The Party" are goons from the United Nations, Council on Foreign Relations, and so on.
The World Economic Forum has repeatedly announced that they aim to bring forth global "socialism," infuse capitalism with Marxism, and implement universal basic income, to create a world in which people will "own nothing" and rent everything by 2030.
- https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/05/over-40-of-americans-now-support-some-form-of-socialism/
- https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/06/could-capitalism-need-some-marxism-to-survive-the-4th-industrial-revolution/
- https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/covid-19-universal-basic-income-social-inequality/
- https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/how-life-could-change-2030/
Much of Wood's video on WEF/TGR is dedicated to explaining why this is absolutely, totally, definitely not Communism/Socialism. Of course, as a self-identified socialist (see his vid: 'Reclaiming Socialism From The Left' 2019), it's in his interest to claim that socialism was a good boi who dindu nuffin.
Woods defines Communism in the same way that Marxist ideologues define it : "Communism is when the proletariat owns the means of production" — which has never happened in any Communist society in history; they all devolve into depraved totalitarianism. He may as well be arguing that "real Communism/socialism has never been tried."
The true purpose of Communism is not to "free the workers" from "Capitalism," nor establish proletarian control over the means of production, but to manufacture a new breed of serfs and create a planet of deracinated, godless, slaves.
Communism is an ideological tool designed to overthrow an existing ruling elite, and create a highly centralized, totalitarian dictatorship to secure the position of the new ruling class. All of the "workers paradise" nonsense — which Woods regards as the defining characteristic of Communism — exists merely to trick workers into killing their own elites and replacing them with "The Party."
Ever since Woods was taken under the wing of the bioluminescent GRU spook Richard Spencer, he has consistently muddied the waters of nationalism and acted as pied piper, leading thousands of nationalists to a muddled and confused worldview. The list of topics that he has produced subversive content on is near-endless: His defense of various Communist regimes around the world (Kosovo, China, etc), flat out denying the existence of Western Marxism (colloquially labeled 'Cultural Marxism'), shilling for COVID lockdowns, insane anti-white "post-colonialism" nonsense (a Marxist narrative), promotion of Islam, Third Worldism, and so on.
I warned about Duginist / Neo-Eurasianist influence a long time ago, and the people I warned about have only became more subversive and/or retarded. Read this article and tell me there's no funny business going on: https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/08/16/alt-right-and-identitarian-links-to-aleksandr-dugin-tldr-version-pdf/
YouTube
The Truth About The World Economic Forum
Is The Great Reset Agenda of the World Economic Forum a communist takeover, or just another cynical power grab by the oligarchs?
🔹 All my other platforms and ways to support available here: https://bio.link/keithwoods
🔹 Cryptocurrency donations: https:…
🔹 All my other platforms and ways to support available here: https://bio.link/keithwoods
🔹 Cryptocurrency donations: https:…
Here are all articles I have written on COVID1984, Great Reset, the transhumanist agenda, and so on.
>An Introduction to Fabian Socialism via Brave New World and 1984
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/01/22/an-introduction-to-fabian-socialism-via-brave-new-world-and-1984/
(This article is not strictly about the Great Reset but provides a brief intro to one of the most influential ideologies behind modern globalism).
>COVID19, The Great Reset, and Transhumanism
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/11/21/covid19-the-great-reset-and-transhumanism/
>COVID1984: It’s just the flu (literally)
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/01/16/covid1984-its-just-the-flu-literally/
>Chinese COVID Apocalypse Hoax Propaganda from Early 2020
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/12/05/chinese-covid-apocalypse-hoax-propaganda-from-early-2020/
>Your Chance of Dying from COVID19: The Official Facts™ (According to the UK Govt)
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/03/19/your-chance-of-dying-from-covid19-the-official-facts-according-to-the-uk-govt/
>Planet Lockdown – The Great Reset Agenda Explained [Banned from YouTube]
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/planet-lockdown-the-great-reset-agenda-explained-banned-from-youtube/
>UK Approves Pfizer “COVID” “Vaccine” Containing Nanotechnology, Potentially Gene-Altering mRNA, and more. May lead to mass infertility, warns former ex-Pfizer CSO
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/12/04/uk-approves-pfizer-covid-vaccine-containing-nanotechnology-potentially-gene-altering-mrna-and-more-may-lead-to-mass-infertility-warns-former-ex-pfizer-cso/
>Eat The Bugs, Bigot: Slave diets for thee but not for me
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/01/28/eat-the-bugs-bigot-slave-diets-for-thee-but-not-for-me/
>Visa files centralized blockchain patent: One World Currency inbound
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/05/22/visa-files-centralized-blockchain-patent-one-world-currency-inbound/
I also recommend you check out my post from yesterday on the Messianic Age and how it relates to the New World Order.
>An Introduction to Fabian Socialism via Brave New World and 1984
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/01/22/an-introduction-to-fabian-socialism-via-brave-new-world-and-1984/
(This article is not strictly about the Great Reset but provides a brief intro to one of the most influential ideologies behind modern globalism).
>COVID19, The Great Reset, and Transhumanism
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/11/21/covid19-the-great-reset-and-transhumanism/
>COVID1984: It’s just the flu (literally)
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/01/16/covid1984-its-just-the-flu-literally/
>Chinese COVID Apocalypse Hoax Propaganda from Early 2020
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/12/05/chinese-covid-apocalypse-hoax-propaganda-from-early-2020/
>Your Chance of Dying from COVID19: The Official Facts™ (According to the UK Govt)
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/03/19/your-chance-of-dying-from-covid19-the-official-facts-according-to-the-uk-govt/
>Planet Lockdown – The Great Reset Agenda Explained [Banned from YouTube]
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/planet-lockdown-the-great-reset-agenda-explained-banned-from-youtube/
>UK Approves Pfizer “COVID” “Vaccine” Containing Nanotechnology, Potentially Gene-Altering mRNA, and more. May lead to mass infertility, warns former ex-Pfizer CSO
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/12/04/uk-approves-pfizer-covid-vaccine-containing-nanotechnology-potentially-gene-altering-mrna-and-more-may-lead-to-mass-infertility-warns-former-ex-pfizer-cso/
>Eat The Bugs, Bigot: Slave diets for thee but not for me
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/01/28/eat-the-bugs-bigot-slave-diets-for-thee-but-not-for-me/
>Visa files centralized blockchain patent: One World Currency inbound
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/05/22/visa-files-centralized-blockchain-patent-one-world-currency-inbound/
I also recommend you check out my post from yesterday on the Messianic Age and how it relates to the New World Order.
Thuletide
An Introduction to Fabian Socialism via Brave New World and 1984
1200 wordsUpdated 1/27/2021 1984 is often mistakenly believed to be a diatribe against Fascism. It’s a reasonable assumption, since the book was published in 1949, immediately after the concl…
Forwarded from Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺
I’ve noticed female body types tend to pass through trends which create expectations for how women should look, but these trends are more important to women themselves than they are to men.
For example, throughout the 90s it was “fashionable” or expected of women to be particularly skinny. Even though men didn’t necessarily care if a woman met the skinny-enough criteria (physically, men are always more interested in face, tits and ass), women took this skinny trend very seriously and often tortured themselves in its pursuit.
But where do these trends begin? And who are the trend setters? Ostensibly it’s the female Hollywood actors, the female newsreaders and female fashion models in the magazines, which 90s women were especially addicted to buying and reading. These are the idols which influence how women feel about their bodies and cause them to develop physical expectations of themselves.
Naturally, healthy women of good childbearing capacity are generally thicker in the bottom half, curvier and wider-hipped than the “skinny young boy body” stereotype presented as the female norm in the 90s, a physical expectation of women created largely by gay men who still dominate the fashion industry. Small wonder why these men would prefer to see women looking more like young boys than real females.
Anyway, this skinny-girl trend gave birth to widespread depression, anorexia and eating-disorders among women of society. Of course none of the magazine editors and “culture-leaders” were ever held accountable for this psychological torment.
These days, although the residue of the skinny woman propaganda trend still haunts the middle-aged female psych, the trend has changed and skinny is no longer “in fashion”. Women are now encouraged by cultural influencers (and by each other) not only to develop their curves but to show them off in public, with the leggings epidemic.
Gyms are full of women doing glute and quad exercises, “booty-building” is a thing and wearing leggings as tight and as transparent as is socially acceptable is the new norm. It’s safe to say that this new female body image and dress-style together with the feminist “I should be able to dress however I want and be safe” mantra is the present day trend.
Of course, not only are women never safe on their own regardless of how they dress, but they are significantly less safe and less interesting on a personal level when they succumb to this leggings-thottery. Leggings culture and feminist “slut-dressing” has ironically turned women into walking sexual objects and eye-candy for men –which is exactly what feminists initially claimed to be liberating women from.
However it’s unrealistic to expect women to break or deviate from this trend on their own. Women are unfortunately always at the mercy of cultural trends, especially when it comes to body-type and dress style.
But most women aren’t completely retarded when it comes to recognising harmful influence broadcasted by media propagandists and cultural trend-setters, the “fat-acceptance” message for example was largely ignored by most women, partly because fat has no healthy aesthetic and because most men don’t like fat chicks.
This indicates that male attention does play a role in influencing how women dress and the standard of health they keep, which is why it is important for men to practice only paying attention to women who are visibly of healthy child-bearing capacity, not obviously possessed by gay cultural idols and dressing more humbly.
For example, throughout the 90s it was “fashionable” or expected of women to be particularly skinny. Even though men didn’t necessarily care if a woman met the skinny-enough criteria (physically, men are always more interested in face, tits and ass), women took this skinny trend very seriously and often tortured themselves in its pursuit.
But where do these trends begin? And who are the trend setters? Ostensibly it’s the female Hollywood actors, the female newsreaders and female fashion models in the magazines, which 90s women were especially addicted to buying and reading. These are the idols which influence how women feel about their bodies and cause them to develop physical expectations of themselves.
Naturally, healthy women of good childbearing capacity are generally thicker in the bottom half, curvier and wider-hipped than the “skinny young boy body” stereotype presented as the female norm in the 90s, a physical expectation of women created largely by gay men who still dominate the fashion industry. Small wonder why these men would prefer to see women looking more like young boys than real females.
Anyway, this skinny-girl trend gave birth to widespread depression, anorexia and eating-disorders among women of society. Of course none of the magazine editors and “culture-leaders” were ever held accountable for this psychological torment.
These days, although the residue of the skinny woman propaganda trend still haunts the middle-aged female psych, the trend has changed and skinny is no longer “in fashion”. Women are now encouraged by cultural influencers (and by each other) not only to develop their curves but to show them off in public, with the leggings epidemic.
Gyms are full of women doing glute and quad exercises, “booty-building” is a thing and wearing leggings as tight and as transparent as is socially acceptable is the new norm. It’s safe to say that this new female body image and dress-style together with the feminist “I should be able to dress however I want and be safe” mantra is the present day trend.
Of course, not only are women never safe on their own regardless of how they dress, but they are significantly less safe and less interesting on a personal level when they succumb to this leggings-thottery. Leggings culture and feminist “slut-dressing” has ironically turned women into walking sexual objects and eye-candy for men –which is exactly what feminists initially claimed to be liberating women from.
However it’s unrealistic to expect women to break or deviate from this trend on their own. Women are unfortunately always at the mercy of cultural trends, especially when it comes to body-type and dress style.
But most women aren’t completely retarded when it comes to recognising harmful influence broadcasted by media propagandists and cultural trend-setters, the “fat-acceptance” message for example was largely ignored by most women, partly because fat has no healthy aesthetic and because most men don’t like fat chicks.
This indicates that male attention does play a role in influencing how women dress and the standard of health they keep, which is why it is important for men to practice only paying attention to women who are visibly of healthy child-bearing capacity, not obviously possessed by gay cultural idols and dressing more humbly.
MSM released another ridiculous depiction of Jesus - this time they turned him into a Jamaican (https://twitter.com/bbcbrasil/status/1378145578199224323).
For "some reason," all modern depictions of Jesus paint him out to be darker pigmented than the average Saudi, when according to available DNA evidence, the population of Northern Israel was genetically closest to modern day peoples like Samaritans, Lebanese, and Druze — who all look far more similar to depictions of Jesus from Classical Antiquity than the deep-fried Saudi Jesuses peddled by the MSM.
For "some reason," all modern depictions of Jesus paint him out to be darker pigmented than the average Saudi, when according to available DNA evidence, the population of Northern Israel was genetically closest to modern day peoples like Samaritans, Lebanese, and Druze — who all look far more similar to depictions of Jesus from Classical Antiquity than the deep-fried Saudi Jesuses peddled by the MSM.
Portrait of Jesus by facial reconstruction artist Alessandro Tomasi.
Alessandro, who is Lebanese, generally produces good facial reconstruction works, fair and accurate in terms of pigmentation.
Source: https://twitter.com/ATomasi__/status/1376859969329463297
Alessandro, who is Lebanese, generally produces good facial reconstruction works, fair and accurate in terms of pigmentation.
Source: https://twitter.com/ATomasi__/status/1376859969329463297
striker matt parrot defending BLM.png
533.1 KB
Remember when Eric Striker and Matt Parrot of TWP defended Black Lives Matter? I member.
Weird how nobody ever holds these people accountable for all of the weird shit they say, isn't it?
Weird how nobody ever holds these people accountable for all of the weird shit they say, isn't it?
post colonialism keith woods matt parrot.png
253.4 KB
Remember when Matt Parrot and Keith Woods tried to make "post-colonialism" (a literal anti-white Marxist critical race theory-style ideology) go mainstream among nationalists, while defending imperialist China and imperialist Russia? I remember.
Really weird how nobody ever holds these people accountable for all of the weird shit they say.
Really weird how nobody ever holds these people accountable for all of the weird shit they say.
richard spencer holodomor denial.png
165.1 KB
Remember when Richard Spencer denied the Holodomor? I remember.
So, strange, so strange.
So, strange, so strange.
keith woods anti social freaks.png
529.8 KB
Remember when Keith Woods said that white people taking their own side (i.e., ignoring Middle Eastern squabbles) was the "sociopathic" behavior of "anti-social freaks"?
Really makes ya think.
Really makes ya think.
Remember when Mike Enoch claimed that Muslims and Jews have no unity against whites, other than on "privileged college campuses" — or when he said that if Palestinians were raping European women, that would be all the more reason to support them.
In a TRS podcast on Islam (https://web.archive.org/web/20200514183056/https://altcensored.com/watch?v=knTMe7ZiuVI), Striker and Enoch both massively downplayed the Islamic conquest of Europe as "some clashes in Spain or whatever" and "some stuff from the Middle Ages."
Again, no accountability.
In a TRS podcast on Islam (https://web.archive.org/web/20200514183056/https://altcensored.com/watch?v=knTMe7ZiuVI), Striker and Enoch both massively downplayed the Islamic conquest of Europe as "some clashes in Spain or whatever" and "some stuff from the Middle Ages."
Again, no accountability.