Brief, simplified history of Marxist ideology from Marx to present:
In 1848, the Communist Manifesto laid out a handful of primary objectives, including:
- Abolition of property
- Destruction of family
- Destruction of nations
- Destruction of traditional culture
- Founding of a monopolistic, centralized banking system
- Centralization of all production, communication, and transport in the hands of "the state" (the ruling elite)
These objectives are shared by 99.99% of modern Leftists and they haven't diverged from these goals in almost 2 centuries.
(Btw the Communist Manifesto is like 20 pages long, I recommend reading it).
Marxism before 1923 aimed to achieve these objectives via a "colorblind" proletarian revolution against the "capitalist overlords" that they called the World Revolution. This strategy had failed miserably because the workers overwhelmingly sided with various nationalist movements (mostly Fascism) because they didn't like the idea of abolishing their families, property, nations, and traditions.
This led to two developmental pathways in Marxism, in the East and the West, both of which converge at the same endpoint.
In the East, Marxism from Lenin onwards shifted focus to the global struggle of the "oppressed races" against the "capitalist imperialists" (White people), while still paying lip service to "proletarian revolution." You'll see Marxists describing some ethnic groups as "proletarian nations of the world" and so on, which is just their obfuscatory way of saying "brown people."
Stalin implemented "socialism in one country", which was not nationalism — the USSR was a multi-racial empire — but the idea that the USSR must serve as a stable base of operations from which Communism could be spread throughout the world. Stalin had Leninist ideals.
Mao developed Marxist "anti-imperialist" ideology further with his Third Worldism, and both the USSR and PRC funded brown Communist insurgencies against White colonial states, e.g. Rhodesia and South Africa.
When people claim that "Marxists were based/trad/patriotic in the past," this is basically only true for the Third World Marxists, who were already serving the globalist agenda simply by revolting against White global hegemony.
Plus, they weren't really based at all. They still preached feminism, sometimes sexual depravity, and so on. But, most importantly, they only preached nationalism from the perspective of:
"brown nationalism = oppressed = good"
"white nationalism = oppressors = evil"
Meanwhile, Marxism in the West developed various strategies of cultural subversion (see: Frankfurt School, New School) that aimed to destroy the nationalistic spirit and traditional cultures of the Western proletariat. This was designed to soften up the masses for full globalist conquest and basically boiled down to:
"freaks = oppressed = good"
"normal people = oppressors = evil"
However, Western Marxists were also inspired by the "anti-imperialist" ideologies of Lenin & friends, which eventually led to the creation of things like Critical Race Theory and "intersectionality," which is the idea that all "oppressed" groups must unite against the "oppressors" (straight White men and, increasingly, White women).
Although much of the Left today does not vocally identify as Marxist, they still advance the primary objectives laid out in the Communist Manifesto.
Furthermore, the Left ideologically dominates the West to such a degree that many Leftists don't identify with any specific ideology at all. They simply declare that their insane political beliefs are "being a good person." Some of the most stringent Leftists around today have never read a single word of Marx, or Lenin, or Mao, or Gramsci, Lukacs, Marcuse, Adorno, but espouse their ideologies almost verbatim.
I've made all of these points before but I can't emphasize this enough. It's vital information for understanding our enemies.
In 1848, the Communist Manifesto laid out a handful of primary objectives, including:
- Abolition of property
- Destruction of family
- Destruction of nations
- Destruction of traditional culture
- Founding of a monopolistic, centralized banking system
- Centralization of all production, communication, and transport in the hands of "the state" (the ruling elite)
These objectives are shared by 99.99% of modern Leftists and they haven't diverged from these goals in almost 2 centuries.
(Btw the Communist Manifesto is like 20 pages long, I recommend reading it).
Marxism before 1923 aimed to achieve these objectives via a "colorblind" proletarian revolution against the "capitalist overlords" that they called the World Revolution. This strategy had failed miserably because the workers overwhelmingly sided with various nationalist movements (mostly Fascism) because they didn't like the idea of abolishing their families, property, nations, and traditions.
This led to two developmental pathways in Marxism, in the East and the West, both of which converge at the same endpoint.
In the East, Marxism from Lenin onwards shifted focus to the global struggle of the "oppressed races" against the "capitalist imperialists" (White people), while still paying lip service to "proletarian revolution." You'll see Marxists describing some ethnic groups as "proletarian nations of the world" and so on, which is just their obfuscatory way of saying "brown people."
Stalin implemented "socialism in one country", which was not nationalism — the USSR was a multi-racial empire — but the idea that the USSR must serve as a stable base of operations from which Communism could be spread throughout the world. Stalin had Leninist ideals.
Mao developed Marxist "anti-imperialist" ideology further with his Third Worldism, and both the USSR and PRC funded brown Communist insurgencies against White colonial states, e.g. Rhodesia and South Africa.
When people claim that "Marxists were based/trad/patriotic in the past," this is basically only true for the Third World Marxists, who were already serving the globalist agenda simply by revolting against White global hegemony.
Plus, they weren't really based at all. They still preached feminism, sometimes sexual depravity, and so on. But, most importantly, they only preached nationalism from the perspective of:
"brown nationalism = oppressed = good"
"white nationalism = oppressors = evil"
Meanwhile, Marxism in the West developed various strategies of cultural subversion (see: Frankfurt School, New School) that aimed to destroy the nationalistic spirit and traditional cultures of the Western proletariat. This was designed to soften up the masses for full globalist conquest and basically boiled down to:
"freaks = oppressed = good"
"normal people = oppressors = evil"
However, Western Marxists were also inspired by the "anti-imperialist" ideologies of Lenin & friends, which eventually led to the creation of things like Critical Race Theory and "intersectionality," which is the idea that all "oppressed" groups must unite against the "oppressors" (straight White men and, increasingly, White women).
Although much of the Left today does not vocally identify as Marxist, they still advance the primary objectives laid out in the Communist Manifesto.
Furthermore, the Left ideologically dominates the West to such a degree that many Leftists don't identify with any specific ideology at all. They simply declare that their insane political beliefs are "being a good person." Some of the most stringent Leftists around today have never read a single word of Marx, or Lenin, or Mao, or Gramsci, Lukacs, Marcuse, Adorno, but espouse their ideologies almost verbatim.
I've made all of these points before but I can't emphasize this enough. It's vital information for understanding our enemies.
Forwarded from https://t.me/Right_Wing_Research
Fu (2021)
'In Western Europe, the European-origin population share declines from 90% today to 45% by 2100 assuming present migration rates, but with no further migration this share will be 74%. In North America, the European share drops from 62% to 34%'
'In Western Europe, the European-origin population share declines from 90% today to 45% by 2100 assuming present migration rates, but with no further migration this share will be 74%. In North America, the European share drops from 62% to 34%'
mankindquarterly.org
Forecasting Ethnic Compositions in All Countries
Migration has significantly altered the ethnic compositions of many countries and will likely continue to do so in the future. What will these ethnic compositions be? This paper attempts to answer this question for all countries and all years up to 2100 under…
People don't appreciate how much relative territory and resources are lost in White countries due to immigration because immigrants cluster in cities. Visualizing this loss as overall landmass puts White genocide into perspective.
Take Europe for example:
- The continent is currently 90% White. That's equivalent to losing territory the size of France and Spain.
- By 2100, Europe is predicted to be 45% White at current rates of migration, or 75% White if all immigration is immediately halted today.
- 45% is equivalent to losing the entire European peninsula, except for Russia (non-Siberian) and Ukraine.
Take Europe for example:
- The continent is currently 90% White. That's equivalent to losing territory the size of France and Spain.
- By 2100, Europe is predicted to be 45% White at current rates of migration, or 75% White if all immigration is immediately halted today.
- 45% is equivalent to losing the entire European peninsula, except for Russia (non-Siberian) and Ukraine.
Forwarded from Morgoth's Review
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Jordan Peterson is back to his old tricks here, he's cleverly misleading the anti-vaccine movement in the same way he misled young white men on 'identity politics'.
He comes across as sympathetic and understanding, he says things you want to hear. He's an authority figure you want on your team. But pay to attention to the actual content here. Peterson is arguing that the current madness around vaccines and lockdowns is being driven by scared people warping opinion polls that the politicians take notice of.
This is bollocks!
Every single aspect of the agenda is top down, he needs to look no further than his own Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, who is a former apprentice of the WEF's young leaders scheme along with Adern in New Zealand.
The reason so many people are terrified is because of the media, and government propaganda, once again, top-down and at the behest of an international cabal.
In fact Peterson seems to want you to look everywhere except at his old friends in the NGO's and UN.
He comes across as sympathetic and understanding, he says things you want to hear. He's an authority figure you want on your team. But pay to attention to the actual content here. Peterson is arguing that the current madness around vaccines and lockdowns is being driven by scared people warping opinion polls that the politicians take notice of.
This is bollocks!
Every single aspect of the agenda is top down, he needs to look no further than his own Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, who is a former apprentice of the WEF's young leaders scheme along with Adern in New Zealand.
The reason so many people are terrified is because of the media, and government propaganda, once again, top-down and at the behest of an international cabal.
In fact Peterson seems to want you to look everywhere except at his old friends in the NGO's and UN.
The Fuggerei in Bavaria is the world's oldest social housing. Rent is $1 per year.
"The One" in Bel-Air is the world's most expensive house. It's worth $500mil.
Impoverished German grandmas have more aristocratic taste than the world's richest property developers.
"The One" in Bel-Air is the world's most expensive house. It's worth $500mil.
Impoverished German grandmas have more aristocratic taste than the world's richest property developers.
KYLE ACQUITTED. LIBTARDS SEETHING. HUGE L FOR COMMUNIST PEDOPHILES EVERYWHERE. LETS. FUCKING. GO.
Pigs in Holland are confirmed to have shot an anti-hoaxvid-tyranny protestor, perhaps killing him. He was standing still minding his own business. Dutch Leftists are celebrating it.
Note: this is just a link to the video, not a celebration of the shooting
https://twitter.com/Plakplaat63/status/1461802888930410505
Note: this is just a link to the video, not a celebration of the shooting
https://twitter.com/Plakplaat63/status/1461802888930410505
Twitter
Plakplaat
#Rotterdam heel gek.
"Reject racist vigilante terror"
Anti-White Communists are back to doing what they do best: Crying out in pain as they strike you.
The Left is desperately trying to memoryhole their terrorist insurgencies of 2020.
Anti-White Communists are back to doing what they do best: Crying out in pain as they strike you.
The Left is desperately trying to memoryhole their terrorist insurgencies of 2020.
Are Jews White/European?
Image containing everything you need to know.
HD: https://i.ibb.co/vP9WwjS/are-jews-white-european-infographic.jpg
TL;DR: Ashkenazi Jews are half Middle Eastern and half European, which is exactly what their phenotypes show: A random 50/50 mix of Levantine and European facial features. Other Jews have more Middle Eastern ancestry.
Now I don't wanna hear any more nonsense about Jews being White. You wouldn't call a half-Arab European, so you shouldn't call a half-Canaanite European either. Jews are a distinct race of people with their own unique, non-European culture.
Image containing everything you need to know.
HD: https://i.ibb.co/vP9WwjS/are-jews-white-european-infographic.jpg
TL;DR: Ashkenazi Jews are half Middle Eastern and half European, which is exactly what their phenotypes show: A random 50/50 mix of Levantine and European facial features. Other Jews have more Middle Eastern ancestry.
Now I don't wanna hear any more nonsense about Jews being White. You wouldn't call a half-Arab European, so you shouldn't call a half-Canaanite European either. Jews are a distinct race of people with their own unique, non-European culture.