Thuletide
23.4K subscribers
5.44K photos
498 videos
26 files
2.59K links
Nationalist, Classical Liberal, moderate centrist (circa 1900). You can plagiarize any of my writing & content. Follow: t.me/racerealismchannel
Download Telegram
Smithsonian Mag lying by omission regarding new Tarim Mummies study
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/bronze-age-mummies-in-china-were-part-of-mysterious-ancient-group-180978953/
— "migrants from West Asia" = ethnically Northern European Indo-Europeans who migrated into Central Asia in the Bronze Age
— ANE ancestry "particularly in Siberia and North America" = ignoring 20-35% ANE ancestry in Northern Europe
— "facial features unusual in Asian populations" = Caucasoid/Europid phenotypes

I explained the study (which, to be frank, is just as badly written and full of lies as the mainstream media reporting) in this article:
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/10/29/tocharian-update-ccp-study-on-xinjiang-tarim-basin-mummies-is-full-of-lies-unproven-claims-and-disinformation/
This is a model of Ancient North Eurasian ancestry throughout Europe. Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer (CHG) is ~40% ANE so add 40% of the CHG percentage onto the ANE percentage. Dzudzuana sample (CHG without ANE) is still unavailable.

So, Finnish is actually 33.74% ANE, English 25.16%, Serbian 23.3%, and so on. This model is just an estimate, not 100% accurate.
Survive the Jive discusses recent findings on Tarim mummies. He was much more diplomatic than my angry rant but still covers all of the important criticisms and plot holes of the paper, and also points out some very interesting facts relating to Ancient North Eurasian derived cultures around the world. Good podcast, as always
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCRsTDXzMFo
There is a myth, created by professional geneticists, that the Proto-Indo-Europeans were genetically 50% East European Hunter-Gatherer and 50% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer. No doubt they run with this narrative because they are obsessed with overinflating the "non-European" origin of modern Europeans.

The early Corded Ware population, which was responsible for the overwhelming majority of PIE expansion throughout Eurasia, had ~60% EHG, ~25-30% CHG, and ~10-15 EEF ancestry.

Yamnaya had 55:35% EHG:CHG, but Yamnaya migrations seem to have been limited to Greco-Balkans region (via Catacomb Culture) and Altai-Mongolia (via Afanasievo Culture).

More information in this short article (couldn't fit everything into a TG post):
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/10/30/proto-indo-european-genetics-did-they-have-5050-ehg-chg-ancestry-short-answer-no/
They literally just renamed Homo rhodesiensis to Homo bodoensis because Rhodesiensis is named after Cecil Rhodes (and he's a heckin imperialist bigot) and now they're pretending that it's a new species.
French public urinal constructed in 1875 is more beautiful than every public monument constructed in the West after WW2.
Good video challenging the standard single dispersal Out of Africa human model for human origins. He even mentioned the fact that South Americans have mysterious Australoids ancestry, indicating that America was settled by Australoids before Amerindians arrived from Siberia via the Beringian.

I'm still undecided on OoA. The theory seems plausible, but if the general idea is accurate, then there is no way that it occurred in one single migration. There must have been at least two migrations, with Australoids leaving Africa thousands of years before Eurasians.

Plus, the fact that Eurasians have Neanderthal ancestry, Australoids and East Asians have Denisovan ancestry, and Sub-Saharan Africans have up to 19% (!) ancestry from an unknown Homo species vindicates the multiregional hypothesis to a degree.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ezpth6R9jE
I don't think Marxism needs or deserves a more complicated analysis than: "It's an ideology created and used by people who hate White people to take power from White people."

Marxism was first created predominantly by Jews who were trying to take over Europe and establish a world government / global empire. As Marx wrote way back in the Communist Manifesto, they planned to abolish nations, the family, and private property then found a dictatorship in which all production was centralized in the hands of the state (branded as "the workers").

After they failed to conquer Europe via their "World Revolution" (1917-23), Marxist ideology saw two major developments.

Firstly, it was transformed by Lenin into an anti-imperialist/anti-colonialist ideology designed to destroy the European empires of the world. It was then adopted widely throughout the Third World by liberation movements. [Edit: I should also point out that other Socialist movements, such as the Fabians, were very involved with promoting anti-imperialism].

Secondly, after the colossal failure of Marxism to trick the White proletariat into killing their leaders and putting Jews in charge, it was developed into Cultural Marxism by Frankfurt School & friends. This was specifically designed to erode nationalist and conservative social values, and is basically the main theoretical underpinning of modern "woke" ideology (as I'm sure we're all pretty familiar with at this point).

So, in summary: An ideology created and used by people who hate White people to take power from White people. Simple. No need for theorycel nonsense.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_revolution#Communist_movements
While I'm on the subject of Marxism, check out my article "Karl Marx’s Ancestry and Elite Connections: What is being hidden from us?"

Marx was a cousin of the Rothschilds and linked to the international rabbinic elite.
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/03/05/karl-marxs
“The Rise of Agricultural Civilization in China: The Disparity between Archeological Discovery and the Documentary Record and Its Explanation”
by Zhou Jixu, 2006.
http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp175_chinese_civilization_agriculture.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2EGEoeolXwLynlql18NarTMxMb0GdfQu3tbwIJu7KW6puh5YzC7ejGIW0

“Abstract This research project puts forward an entirely new viewpoint on the prehistory of the Yellow River area and the evidence for it: the civilization of the Yellow River is not a result of an independent evolution, but of the impact of a foreign upon a native culture.

The Yellow Emperor’s nation held the middle reaches of the Yellow River because of their strong force, but they consolidated, expanded, and continued their rule in China by accepting the indigenous agricultural culture. The occupying nation was a branch of the Proto-Indo-European.

This paper tries to reveal the historical facts with the evidence of archeology, ancient documents, and historical linguistics.”
Forwarded from Semiogogue
An interesting question: If the elites want global depopulation (which I believe that they do), then why are they feeding the Third World? Why are they causing such a massive boom in populations like Africa by running huge food programs, water aid, medicine, etc.?

I think the answer may be simple: A global neo-Holodomor strategy using boom-bust cycles.

First they boom African (or other Third World) populations, then they import the overinflated African population into non-African countries, which causes a population bust (i.e. mass starvation) in these non-African countries because they are ecologically incapable of sustaining their overpopulation.
Leftist critiques of "The System" make much more sense when you realize that by "The System" they mean "working- and middle-class White people."

When leftists complain that the state, big tech, corporations, etc. are "racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, refugee haters," what they're actually doing is accusing the ruling class (who are obviously not any of those things) of not doing enough to crush the White working/middle-class (who, generally speaking, are all of those things, even if they won't publicly admit it).
Forwarded from Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺
“Single issue violent extremism” is a thing down here now.

Why? Because dissidents aren’t even ideologically motivated anymore, they’re literally just people who want to be left alone.

“Single issue violent extremism” means: “we’re treating anyone who takes issue with anything the government does as a potential terrorist.”

“Single issue violent extremism can include anti-lockdown protesters and people who don’t believe in vaccination.” Says Australian Security Intelligence boss.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/asio-raises-alarm-about-single-issue-violent-extremism-20211025-p592y0.html
There is as much evidence for ancient Europeans having green skin as there is for them having "black" or "very dark" skin because geneticists have never tested any ancient Eurasian sample for literally the only two genes that are confirmed to cause black skin; the MFSD12 variants. These MFSD12 genes are only found in Subsaharan Africans and Australoids today, or people with ancestry from these populations (e.g. Indians).

From the early Gravettian period (~32,000 BC), Europeans probably had pigmentation that was similar to modern Inuits or something like that. I will write article explaining pigmentation genetics soon.
This meme applies to every singe immigrant in the West. Algerians in France, Palestinians in England, Somalis in Sweden. They do this shit everywhere they go.