🚨🇵🇰⚡️🇦🇫 To see live footage of the recent development head over to @ThePakistanNews
I will make an analysis later on this.🔥
Long Live Pakistan 🇵🇰
@ThePulsePoint
I will make an analysis later on this.🔥
Long Live Pakistan 🇵🇰
@ThePulsePoint
❤9🔥1
ThePulsePoint pinned «🚨🇵🇰⚡️🇦🇫 To see live footage of the recent development head over to @ThePakistanNews I will make an analysis later on this.🔥 Long Live Pakistan 🇵🇰 @ThePulsePoint»
✍️ 🇵🇰⚔️ From Containment to Consequence: Pakistan Changes the Rules
For years, Pakistan absorbed the cost of cross-border militancy. Thousands of soldiers martyred. Tens of thousands wounded. Civilians targeted in markets, mosques, and schools. Entire regions of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa lived under the shadow of fear.
Restraint was shown. Dialogue was attempted. Ceasefires were tried.
But containment has failed.
Now, Pakistan is doing what many citizens have long demanded: shifting from reacting to attacks… to neutralising the infrastructure that enables them.
If safe havens exist, they will be denied. If launchpads operate, they will be dismantled. If networks plan against Pakistan, they will be disrupted.
This is not escalation for the sake of escalation. It is strategic correction.
For the people of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and the former tribal areas, It is survival situation.
These communities have endured assassination campaigns, suicide bombings, extortion rackets, and ideological coercion. They know exactly where these networks operate and how fighters move across porous terrain.
The public mood has shifted. There is growing support for decisive measures that target the root of the threat rather than endlessly absorbing its consequences.
Pakistan has made one consistent demand:
Put it in writing.
Take verifiable action against TTP elements operating from Afghan soil.
Symbolic detentions are not structural dismantlement.
Temporary lulls are not long-term guarantees.
If cross-border militancy continues, the strategic calculus changes.
Pakistan is not a distant superpower operating seven seas away. It is a neighbour with deep intelligence visibility, historical entanglement, and direct exposure to consequences.
Proximity changes doctrine.
The era of passive tolerance appears to be over. What replaces it is deterrence through consequence.
The objective is simple:
End the cycle.
Restore border stability.
Ensure that no external territory can be used to spill blood inside Pakistan.
Whether this marks the beginning of sustained deterrence or prolonged confrontation depends on what happens next.
But one thing is clear:
Pakistan has decided that the cost of inaction is higher than the cost of action.
@ThePulsePoint 🇵🇰
For years, Pakistan absorbed the cost of cross-border militancy. Thousands of soldiers martyred. Tens of thousands wounded. Civilians targeted in markets, mosques, and schools. Entire regions of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa lived under the shadow of fear.
Restraint was shown. Dialogue was attempted. Ceasefires were tried.
But containment has failed.
Now, Pakistan is doing what many citizens have long demanded: shifting from reacting to attacks… to neutralising the infrastructure that enables them.
If safe havens exist, they will be denied. If launchpads operate, they will be dismantled. If networks plan against Pakistan, they will be disrupted.
This is not escalation for the sake of escalation. It is strategic correction.
For the people of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and the former tribal areas, It is survival situation.
These communities have endured assassination campaigns, suicide bombings, extortion rackets, and ideological coercion. They know exactly where these networks operate and how fighters move across porous terrain.
The public mood has shifted. There is growing support for decisive measures that target the root of the threat rather than endlessly absorbing its consequences.
Pakistan has made one consistent demand:
Put it in writing.
Take verifiable action against TTP elements operating from Afghan soil.
Symbolic detentions are not structural dismantlement.
Temporary lulls are not long-term guarantees.
If cross-border militancy continues, the strategic calculus changes.
Pakistan is not a distant superpower operating seven seas away. It is a neighbour with deep intelligence visibility, historical entanglement, and direct exposure to consequences.
Proximity changes doctrine.
The era of passive tolerance appears to be over. What replaces it is deterrence through consequence.
The objective is simple:
End the cycle.
Restore border stability.
Ensure that no external territory can be used to spill blood inside Pakistan.
Whether this marks the beginning of sustained deterrence or prolonged confrontation depends on what happens next.
But one thing is clear:
Pakistan has decided that the cost of inaction is higher than the cost of action.
@ThePulsePoint 🇵🇰
1❤3👎1
Forwarded from ThePulsePoint
Abdul Qadeer Khan the legend who made this statement a possibility “The Erasure Will Be Mutual. 🇵🇰🚀
@ThePulsePoint
@ThePulsePoint
❤8
✍️ 🇮🇷⚔️ Current Standing: This War Will End Through Attrition, Not Occupation
The war between Iran, the United States, and Israel is not going to end with regime change in Tehran.
You are not going to see American forces marching through Iranian streets. This is not Iraq in 2003.
This is a war of attrition.
A war of attrition is not about capturing territory. It is about exhausting the opponent until the cost of continuing becomes too high.
Iran’s military structure is not designed to collapse if one command centre is destroyed. It operates through layered networks. The regular army, the Revolutionary Guard, missile divisions, naval units in the Gulf, and allied groups across the region form a decentralised system.
If central leadership is targeted, operations do not simply stop. Units continue functioning independently.
That matters.
The United States and Israel have overwhelming air power. They can strike infrastructure, command nodes, and military facilities with precision.
But attrition wars are not decided in the first month.
Look at the Vietnam War. Military superiority did not guarantee political victory.
Look at the Iraq War. The regime fell quickly, but the conflict dragged on for years.
Look at the War in Afghanistan. Two decades of engagement ended without strategic transformation.
These examples show one thing clearly. Endurance often matters more than firepower.
Iran does not need to defeat the United States or Israel conventionally. It needs to impose sustained cost.
Missile exchanges against regional bases.
Pressure through allied forces.
Disruption in key maritime routes.
Gradual escalation that forces political leaders to reassess.
The United States has advanced defence systems, but no defence is unlimited. Interceptors cost money. Deployments stretch logistics. Casualties shift domestic politics.
Attrition is slow. It is grinding. It tests patience more than power.
This war will not end when one side runs out of bombs.
It will end when one side calculates that continuation carries greater risk than compromise.
The real question is not who can strike harder.
It is who can endure longer.
That is how this war ends.
(My two cents on the situation as I currently see it.)
@ThePulsePoint 🌍
The war between Iran, the United States, and Israel is not going to end with regime change in Tehran.
You are not going to see American forces marching through Iranian streets. This is not Iraq in 2003.
This is a war of attrition.
A war of attrition is not about capturing territory. It is about exhausting the opponent until the cost of continuing becomes too high.
Iran’s military structure is not designed to collapse if one command centre is destroyed. It operates through layered networks. The regular army, the Revolutionary Guard, missile divisions, naval units in the Gulf, and allied groups across the region form a decentralised system.
If central leadership is targeted, operations do not simply stop. Units continue functioning independently.
That matters.
The United States and Israel have overwhelming air power. They can strike infrastructure, command nodes, and military facilities with precision.
But attrition wars are not decided in the first month.
Look at the Vietnam War. Military superiority did not guarantee political victory.
Look at the Iraq War. The regime fell quickly, but the conflict dragged on for years.
Look at the War in Afghanistan. Two decades of engagement ended without strategic transformation.
These examples show one thing clearly. Endurance often matters more than firepower.
Iran does not need to defeat the United States or Israel conventionally. It needs to impose sustained cost.
Missile exchanges against regional bases.
Pressure through allied forces.
Disruption in key maritime routes.
Gradual escalation that forces political leaders to reassess.
The United States has advanced defence systems, but no defence is unlimited. Interceptors cost money. Deployments stretch logistics. Casualties shift domestic politics.
Attrition is slow. It is grinding. It tests patience more than power.
This war will not end when one side runs out of bombs.
It will end when one side calculates that continuation carries greater risk than compromise.
The real question is not who can strike harder.
It is who can endure longer.
That is how this war ends.
(My two cents on the situation as I currently see it.)
@ThePulsePoint 🌍
❤5
ThePulsePoint
✍️ 🇮🇷⚔️ Current Standing: This War Will End Through Attrition, Not Occupation The war between Iran, the United States, and Israel is not going to end with regime change in Tehran. You are not going to see American forces marching through Iranian streets.…
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
✍️ 🇸🇦⚖️ Strategic Restraint: Why Saudi Arabia Is Avoiding War With Iran
Despite the escalating confrontation involving Iran, the United States, and Israel, Saudi Arabia is signalling that it has no intention of being drawn into a conflict that does not directly serve its interests.
Saudi state media have recently pushed back against what officials describe as misleading narratives attempting to create panic across the Gulf and pressure regional states into taking sides. From Riyadh’s perspective, a regional war would immediately place critical oil infrastructure, shipping routes, and global energy markets at risk.
Recent developments help explain the Saudi position. Iranian strikes between February 28 and March 2 targeted U.S. facilities located at bases such as King Fahd and Prince Sultan, yet there has been no confirmed damage to Saudi national infrastructure. Saudi officials also publicly criticised the prioritisation of air defence resources in the region, arguing that protecting Israel appeared to take precedence over broader Gulf security.
Diplomacy has also played a quiet role behind the scenes. Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar revealed that Islamabad engaged Tehran directly and urged restraint regarding Saudi territory, referencing the longstanding defence cooperation between Pakistan and the Kingdom. According to Dar, Iran agreed to avoid targeting Saudi Arabia as long there is a guarantee of no hostility from the kingdom.
Islamabad’s position appears to have been clear. Pakistan does not want conflict between Muslim nations and prefers de-escalation wherever possible. However, any direct attacks on Saudi civilian infrastructure or population centres could activate the security understandings between the two countries, leaving Pakistan little choice but to respond. Preventing such a situation was precisely the objective of the diplomatic engagement.
Shortly afterward, drones struck Saudi Aramco facilities in Ras Tanura. Western outlets quickly blamed Iran, while Tehran rejected the accusation and described it as a possible provocation. Saudi Arabia itself has not publicly attributed responsibility.
For Riyadh, remaining outside the conflict protects both domestic stability and the global energy market. Regional diplomacy, including quiet mediation efforts by countries such as Pakistan, shows that several states are actively trying to prevent the confrontation from spreading further across the Gulf.
@ThePulsePoint 🌍
Despite the escalating confrontation involving Iran, the United States, and Israel, Saudi Arabia is signalling that it has no intention of being drawn into a conflict that does not directly serve its interests.
Saudi state media have recently pushed back against what officials describe as misleading narratives attempting to create panic across the Gulf and pressure regional states into taking sides. From Riyadh’s perspective, a regional war would immediately place critical oil infrastructure, shipping routes, and global energy markets at risk.
Recent developments help explain the Saudi position. Iranian strikes between February 28 and March 2 targeted U.S. facilities located at bases such as King Fahd and Prince Sultan, yet there has been no confirmed damage to Saudi national infrastructure. Saudi officials also publicly criticised the prioritisation of air defence resources in the region, arguing that protecting Israel appeared to take precedence over broader Gulf security.
Diplomacy has also played a quiet role behind the scenes. Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar revealed that Islamabad engaged Tehran directly and urged restraint regarding Saudi territory, referencing the longstanding defence cooperation between Pakistan and the Kingdom. According to Dar, Iran agreed to avoid targeting Saudi Arabia as long there is a guarantee of no hostility from the kingdom.
Islamabad’s position appears to have been clear. Pakistan does not want conflict between Muslim nations and prefers de-escalation wherever possible. However, any direct attacks on Saudi civilian infrastructure or population centres could activate the security understandings between the two countries, leaving Pakistan little choice but to respond. Preventing such a situation was precisely the objective of the diplomatic engagement.
Shortly afterward, drones struck Saudi Aramco facilities in Ras Tanura. Western outlets quickly blamed Iran, while Tehran rejected the accusation and described it as a possible provocation. Saudi Arabia itself has not publicly attributed responsibility.
For Riyadh, remaining outside the conflict protects both domestic stability and the global energy market. Regional diplomacy, including quiet mediation efforts by countries such as Pakistan, shows that several states are actively trying to prevent the confrontation from spreading further across the Gulf.
@ThePulsePoint 🌍
❤1
Forwarded from WheelsOfDefensePK
⚡🇵🇰⚔️🇦🇫 — Operation Ghazab-Lil-Haqq
نَصْرٌ مِّنَ اللَّهِ وَفَتْحٌ قَرِيبٌ
@WheelsOfDefensePK
Ghazi Capt Ashan (144L/C) Injured by a sniper hit, yet standing fearless on the frontline. With blood on his uniform but courage in his heart, he raised the flag on the enemy post with a proud smile. Even while wounded, he continued the fight and neutralized multiple terrorist. That smile wasn’t of pain it was the smile of victory, bravery, and an unbreakable spirit. Such warriors remind us that the sons of Pakistan never step back, even when wounded.
نَصْرٌ مِّنَ اللَّهِ وَفَتْحٌ قَرِيبٌ
@WheelsOfDefensePK
❤4
🚢🌏🇵🇰 Pakistan Offers Karachi Port as Global Cargo Hub Amid Middle East Shipping Tensions
Pakistan has offered its Karachi seaport for uninterrupted global cargo transshipments as escalating tensions in the Middle East threaten key maritime trade routes.
The Port of Karachi, operated by the Karachi Port Trust, announced that it is ready to accommodate international shipping lines facing disruptions across Gulf shipping lanes. With uncertainty around routes near the Strait of Hormuz one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints Karachi is positioning itself as an alternative hub for cargo handling and redistribution.
By allowing vessels to dock, offload containers, and redirect shipments through Pakistan, the port aims to maintain the continuity of global trade flows. The move could also increase Pakistan’s role in regional logistics while generating additional port revenues and strengthening its strategic importance in international shipping networks.
@ThePulsePoint 🌍
Pakistan has offered its Karachi seaport for uninterrupted global cargo transshipments as escalating tensions in the Middle East threaten key maritime trade routes.
The Port of Karachi, operated by the Karachi Port Trust, announced that it is ready to accommodate international shipping lines facing disruptions across Gulf shipping lanes. With uncertainty around routes near the Strait of Hormuz one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints Karachi is positioning itself as an alternative hub for cargo handling and redistribution.
By allowing vessels to dock, offload containers, and redirect shipments through Pakistan, the port aims to maintain the continuity of global trade flows. The move could also increase Pakistan’s role in regional logistics while generating additional port revenues and strengthening its strategic importance in international shipping networks.
@ThePulsePoint 🌍
❤5🤣3👍1
🚨🇵🇰🤝🇷🇺 Russian Crude Oil Shipment Headed to Pakistan Amid Global Energy Uncertainty
A shipment carrying roughly 733,000 barrels of Russian crude oil is reportedly on its way to Pakistan as the country continues expanding energy cooperation with Moscow.
Pakistan began importing discounted Russian crude in 2023, part of efforts to reduce fuel costs and diversify energy supplies that have traditionally depended heavily on Middle Eastern producers.
With instability affecting key global shipping routes, diversifying oil sources has become increasingly important for Pakistan’s energy security. Expanding imports from alternative suppliers while also investing in domestic oil and gas exploration could help strengthen long-term energy stability.
@ThePulsePoint
A shipment carrying roughly 733,000 barrels of Russian crude oil is reportedly on its way to Pakistan as the country continues expanding energy cooperation with Moscow.
Pakistan began importing discounted Russian crude in 2023, part of efforts to reduce fuel costs and diversify energy supplies that have traditionally depended heavily on Middle Eastern producers.
With instability affecting key global shipping routes, diversifying oil sources has become increasingly important for Pakistan’s energy security. Expanding imports from alternative suppliers while also investing in domestic oil and gas exploration could help strengthen long-term energy stability.
@ThePulsePoint
❤3👍2🤣2
Another few posts on the current ongoing regional conflict or keep the posts related to Pakistan only?
Anonymous Poll
77%
Regional Conflict
23%
Pakistan Only
ThePulsePoint
Another few posts on the current ongoing regional conflict or keep the posts related to Pakistan only?
I could make a few analysis posts on the following:
How Russia & China is currently aiding Iran in this conflict.
World Economic downturn caused by this conflict.
Ukraine & Gulf countries in discussion for potential military equipment swaps.
American allies begging for the halt of this conflict.
Vote so I know.
How Russia & China is currently aiding Iran in this conflict.
World Economic downturn caused by this conflict.
Ukraine & Gulf countries in discussion for potential military equipment swaps.
American allies begging for the halt of this conflict.
Vote so I know.
❤4👍1
ThePulsePoint pinned «Another few posts on the current ongoing regional conflict or keep the posts related to Pakistan only? »
✍️ 🇷🇺🇨🇳🇮🇷 External Support: How Russia and China Are Backing Iran Indirectly
While Russia and China are not expected to enter the conflict kinetically, both countries remain major intelligence powers and appear to be assisting Iran from that angle.
Russia’s role is largely believed to involve regional surveillance and military monitoring. By sharing data on air activity, naval movements, and operational patterns across the Gulf, Moscow can help Iran track potential threats and identify strategic targets without deploying forces of its own. With Russia heavily engaged in the Ukraine war, intelligence cooperation is the most realistic form of support it can provide.
China’s involvement appears to focus more on satellite capability and technical cooperation. Beijing has extensive space-based surveillance systems and analysts believe satellite imagery and reconnaissance data may be helping Iran assess strike impacts and refine targeting.
Together, this kind of intelligence support can significantly increase battlefield awareness. Access to accurate surveillance and movement data makes it easier to identify specific targets and explains how Iran has been able to carry out relatively precise strikes against military positions in Israel and U.S. assets across parts of the Gulf.
Washington has warned both Moscow and Beijing against providing assistance that could escalate the conflict further. For now, however, their involvement appears to remain indirect, centred on intelligence, technology, and strategic coordination rather than direct military intervention.
@ThePulsePoint 🌍
While Russia and China are not expected to enter the conflict kinetically, both countries remain major intelligence powers and appear to be assisting Iran from that angle.
Russia’s role is largely believed to involve regional surveillance and military monitoring. By sharing data on air activity, naval movements, and operational patterns across the Gulf, Moscow can help Iran track potential threats and identify strategic targets without deploying forces of its own. With Russia heavily engaged in the Ukraine war, intelligence cooperation is the most realistic form of support it can provide.
China’s involvement appears to focus more on satellite capability and technical cooperation. Beijing has extensive space-based surveillance systems and analysts believe satellite imagery and reconnaissance data may be helping Iran assess strike impacts and refine targeting.
Together, this kind of intelligence support can significantly increase battlefield awareness. Access to accurate surveillance and movement data makes it easier to identify specific targets and explains how Iran has been able to carry out relatively precise strikes against military positions in Israel and U.S. assets across parts of the Gulf.
Washington has warned both Moscow and Beijing against providing assistance that could escalate the conflict further. For now, however, their involvement appears to remain indirect, centred on intelligence, technology, and strategic coordination rather than direct military intervention.
@ThePulsePoint 🌍
1👍3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
There is absolutely no concern whatsoever. 🤷
Sleep tight, your armed forces have you covered.
@ThePulsePoint
Sleep tight, your armed forces have you covered.
@ThePulsePoint
⚡5
🚨🇵🇰🤝🇮🇷 NEW: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi thanked Pakistan for expressing solidarity with Iran and its people amid the ongoing conflict with the U.S. and Israel.
The statement came as a Pakistan-flagged oil tanker successfully transited the Strait of Hormuz, despite heavy restrictions on shipping during the crisis.
Also, we have hit 400 subs! ⚡️
@ThePulsePoint
The statement came as a Pakistan-flagged oil tanker successfully transited the Strait of Hormuz, despite heavy restrictions on shipping during the crisis.
Also, we have hit 400 subs! ⚡️
@ThePulsePoint
❤4
On 6 January 2014, Aitzaz Hasan, a 15-year-old student from Hangu in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, carried out an act of extraordinary bravery that saved countless lives.
After identifying a suicide bomber attempting to enter his school, Aitzaz made the decision to intervene. He stopped the attacker at the entrance, preventing him from reaching over 2,000 students inside.
The explosives detonated during the confrontation, and Aitzaz was killed instantly.
His actions prevented a mass-casualty attack and led to him being recognised as a national hero. He was posthumously awarded the Sitara-e-Shujaat, one of Pakistan’s highest honours for bravery.
His legacy continues to be remembered across Pakistan as a powerful example of courage, sacrifice, and selflessness.
Rest in power, Aitzaz. Your legacy lives on. 🇵🇰
@ThePulsePoint
After identifying a suicide bomber attempting to enter his school, Aitzaz made the decision to intervene. He stopped the attacker at the entrance, preventing him from reaching over 2,000 students inside.
The explosives detonated during the confrontation, and Aitzaz was killed instantly.
His actions prevented a mass-casualty attack and led to him being recognised as a national hero. He was posthumously awarded the Sitara-e-Shujaat, one of Pakistan’s highest honours for bravery.
His legacy continues to be remembered across Pakistan as a powerful example of courage, sacrifice, and selflessness.
Rest in power, Aitzaz. Your legacy lives on. 🇵🇰
@ThePulsePoint
❤11
✍️ 🇵🇰 The Quiet Power: Pakistan’s Role in Preventing Escalation
Pakistan isn’t acting as a traditional mediator in the US–Iran crisis. There are no formal talks, and Iran publicly denies negotiations are even happening. Instead, Islamabad is doing something far more complex, managing the conditions that keep diplomacy alive under active conflict.
In real terms, that means keeping multiple pressure points stable at once: maintaining Iran’s engagement without internal hardliners shutting it down, keeping Washington’s diplomatic window open, and ensuring regional actors like Saudi Arabia don’t escalate.
Over just 72 hours, Pakistan:
– Held direct leadership calls with the US, Iran, and Saudi Arabia
– Acted as the channel for a US proposal to Tehran
– Coordinated with Turkey, Egypt, and Gulf partners
– Hosted a critical multilateral meeting shifted to Islamabad
One of the clearest signals of trust came when Iranian oil tankers transited the Strait of Hormuz under Pakistani flags. In a conflict where adversaries won’t speak directly, that kind of move is a deliberate message, Pakistan is trusted by both sides to carry signals safely.
At the same time, the process is under constant threat. Israeli strikes continue, and each escalation risks collapsing the narrow window for de-escalation. Pakistan’s role now also involves shaping the narrative calling out actions that undermine peace before they derail progress.
What’s at stake is far bigger than the region:
– Potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz
– Oil prices spiking beyond $200
– Global inflation and debt crises
– Long-term geopolitical instability
This isn’t about headline diplomacy. It’s about preventing a chain reaction the global system may not be able to absorb.
The window is short. The pressure is high. And Pakistan is at the centre of holding it together.
@ThePulsePoint
Pakistan isn’t acting as a traditional mediator in the US–Iran crisis. There are no formal talks, and Iran publicly denies negotiations are even happening. Instead, Islamabad is doing something far more complex, managing the conditions that keep diplomacy alive under active conflict.
In real terms, that means keeping multiple pressure points stable at once: maintaining Iran’s engagement without internal hardliners shutting it down, keeping Washington’s diplomatic window open, and ensuring regional actors like Saudi Arabia don’t escalate.
Over just 72 hours, Pakistan:
– Held direct leadership calls with the US, Iran, and Saudi Arabia
– Acted as the channel for a US proposal to Tehran
– Coordinated with Turkey, Egypt, and Gulf partners
– Hosted a critical multilateral meeting shifted to Islamabad
One of the clearest signals of trust came when Iranian oil tankers transited the Strait of Hormuz under Pakistani flags. In a conflict where adversaries won’t speak directly, that kind of move is a deliberate message, Pakistan is trusted by both sides to carry signals safely.
At the same time, the process is under constant threat. Israeli strikes continue, and each escalation risks collapsing the narrow window for de-escalation. Pakistan’s role now also involves shaping the narrative calling out actions that undermine peace before they derail progress.
What’s at stake is far bigger than the region:
– Potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz
– Oil prices spiking beyond $200
– Global inflation and debt crises
– Long-term geopolitical instability
This isn’t about headline diplomacy. It’s about preventing a chain reaction the global system may not be able to absorb.
The window is short. The pressure is high. And Pakistan is at the centre of holding it together.
@ThePulsePoint
❤8🤡3🥱1