Timeline: Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi Case
This page gives background and details about the charges brought against Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi in connection with two public statements he made in April and September of 2021.
https://doctors4covidethics.org/timeline-of-the-events/
This page gives background and details about the charges brought against Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi in connection with two public statements he made in April and September of 2021.
https://doctors4covidethics.org/timeline-of-the-events/
Zeitleiste zum Fall Prof. Bhakdi auf Deutsch
(Prof. Bhakdi case timeline in German)
“Auf dieser Seite finden Sie Hintergrundinformationen und Einzelheiten zu den gegen Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi erhobenen Vorwürfen im Zusammenhang mit zwei öffentlichen Äußerungen, die er im April und September 2021 abgegeben hat.”
Lesen mehr: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Zeitleiste_Bhakdi.pdf
(Prof. Bhakdi case timeline in German)
“Auf dieser Seite finden Sie Hintergrundinformationen und Einzelheiten zu den gegen Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi erhobenen Vorwürfen im Zusammenhang mit zwei öffentlichen Äußerungen, die er im April und September 2021 abgegeben hat.”
Lesen mehr: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Zeitleiste_Bhakdi.pdf
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Please pray for Dr Sucharit Bhakti. He faces trial on Monday. Join this Telegram Group for updates.
https://t.me/+qNdGolfCJUQ5Zjgx.
Such a kind and gentle man who vocally stood up to oppose inappropriate use of experimental injections. It’s because of his speaking truth, as a very experienced immunologist, that he’s being targeted by the German authorities.
“The best people possess a feeling for beauty, the courage to take risks, the discipline to tell the truth, the capacity for sacrifice. Ironically, their virtues make them vulnerable; they are often wounded, sometimes destroyed”.
Ernest Hemingway -
A Farewell to Arms
https://t.me/+qNdGolfCJUQ5Zjgx.
Such a kind and gentle man who vocally stood up to oppose inappropriate use of experimental injections. It’s because of his speaking truth, as a very experienced immunologist, that he’s being targeted by the German authorities.
“The best people possess a feeling for beauty, the courage to take risks, the discipline to tell the truth, the capacity for sacrifice. Ironically, their virtues make them vulnerable; they are often wounded, sometimes destroyed”.
Ernest Hemingway -
A Farewell to Arms
Telegram
GROUP: Sucharit Bhakdi Case Updates
For the latest updates on the case of Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi (account run by journalists covering the court proceedings)
Forwarded from The Solari Report
Catherine Austin Fitts | Ottawa Day 1 | National Citizens Inquiry
The NCI’s purpose is to listen, to learn, and to recommend. What went right? What went wrong? How can Canadians and our governments better react to national crises in the future in a manner that balances the interests of all members of our society?
Catherine Austin Fitts testifying before the National Citizens Inquiry on Day 1 of the Ottawa hearings in Ontario.
Click to Watch👇
https://tube2.solari.com/catherine-austin-fitts-ottawa-day-1-national-citizens-inquiry/
The NCI’s purpose is to listen, to learn, and to recommend. What went right? What went wrong? How can Canadians and our governments better react to national crises in the future in a manner that balances the interests of all members of our society?
Catherine Austin Fitts testifying before the National Citizens Inquiry on Day 1 of the Ottawa hearings in Ontario.
Click to Watch👇
https://tube2.solari.com/catherine-austin-fitts-ottawa-day-1-national-citizens-inquiry/
Important information about Prof. Bhakdi’s case:
The prosecution initially closed the preliminary proceedings against Prof. Bhakdi for a lack of sufficient suspicion in November 2021.
According to a letter sent by the prosecutor to the complainants, which has been translated into English, it states: “The public prosecutor's office can only bring public charges if a conviction of the defendant would be overwhelmingly likely in the course of a main hearing. However, this was not the case. The statements in the video in question do not yet exceed the threshold of a criminal offense prosecutable under Section 130 of the Criminal Code. The statements are directed primarily against the state of Israel as such.”
Two of the complainants then filed an appeal of the prosecution’s decision. The case was reopened shortly after.
Read more here: https://doctors4covidethics.org/timeline-of-the-events/
The prosecution initially closed the preliminary proceedings against Prof. Bhakdi for a lack of sufficient suspicion in November 2021.
According to a letter sent by the prosecutor to the complainants, which has been translated into English, it states: “The public prosecutor's office can only bring public charges if a conviction of the defendant would be overwhelmingly likely in the course of a main hearing. However, this was not the case. The statements in the video in question do not yet exceed the threshold of a criminal offense prosecutable under Section 130 of the Criminal Code. The statements are directed primarily against the state of Israel as such.”
Two of the complainants then filed an appeal of the prosecution’s decision. The case was reopened shortly after.
Read more here: https://doctors4covidethics.org/timeline-of-the-events/
Court has adjourned for at least 45 min. Prof. Bhakdi’s lawyers argued three reasons for the court to drop the case. 1) the prosecution didn’t have the full video at the time when it opened the court proceedings 2) they didn’t make an effort to receive the entire video (which contained the alleged anti-Semitic statements) 3) concerns over the indictment containing Prof. Bhakdi’s private info. The judge adjourned court for a break to consider these arguments.
Forwarded from Taylor Hudak
Court was in session for about 40 minutes and is now adjourned again. The judge stated that his current assessment based upon the videos in which the alleged antisemitic remarks were made, that it does not justify a punishment of the accused. This assessment can change during the course of the hearing. A police officer was called to testify as a defense witness but was unable to because he did not receive permission. Court is now back in session
Forwarded from Taylor Hudak
The police officer defense witness testified. The officer answered questions about his report. It was a very brief testimony. He answered factual questions surrounding the campaign speech from Sept. 24, 2021. He said it was a peaceful and lawful event. We are on a five minute break now. During the next session, we will watch the 90 minute interview Prof. Bhakdi did with Kai Stuht, which contains the statements in question.
Forwarded from Taylor Hudak
The prosecutor wanted to address how many views, likes and shares the videos received. The defense argues that’s not relevant the judge agrees. The judge will not allow anymore witnesses to be heard. He seems to agree there is sufficient evidence. The prosecutor and defense has 60 minutes to draft their final pleas
Forwarded from Taylor Hudak
Prosecutor Silke Fussinger completed her final argument. For the first charge she asked for 90 Euros paid daily for 150 days and for the second charge, she asked for 90 Euros paid daily for 70 days. She summed it up and came to 90 Euros paid daily for 180 days. We are now on a 10 minute break. The defense will deliver its final arguments when court reconvenes.
Forwarded from Taylor Hudak
All three of Prof. Bhakdi's lawyers spoke as part of the final argument to the court. Martin Schwab, Prof. Bhakdi's main lawyer, spoke about Sucharit's conviction in the media before the hearing. He then focused on the two charges. Regarding the charge stemming from Sucharit's interview with Kai Stuht, Schwab stated that Sucharit did not insult Israeli people according to a specific German law. He provided more context to Sucharit's statements in the interview stating that the Israeli people were the first to be injected under the emergency authorization. Schwab reiterated Sucharit was not insulting the Israeli people but expressing concern and worry for them. He said the interpretation of Sucharit's words was completely wrong. Schwab asked for a not guilty verdict. Lawyer Tobias Weissenborn pointed out that Sucharit was not addressing the Israeli people but rather the Israeli government. He mentioned that Sucharit is a Buddhist who advocates for peace and unity. Weissenborn mentioned the prosecutor's shortcomings (not watching the full videos or investigating properly).
Forwarded from Taylor Hudak
Sven Lausen argued that the prosecution misunderstood that Sucharit was speaking at the campaign event as a candidate and that, of course, politicians should have a broader range in what they speak about. Lausen says the prosecutor is dividing people by bringing forth these charges and that she has a duty to evaluate and investigate the evidence, and she did not do so properly. Lausen argued that the prosecutor has the wrong impression because she only watched a portions of the video. He said her 6 page long indictment lacks knowledge. Lausen also said she was requesting access when also saying her investigation was closed on the same day. Prosecutor never said anything about the letter written by the Holocaust victims to the EMA in the indictment and that the indictment was evil and that the prosecutor wanted it make Sucharit an example.