๐STUDY KOREAN LANGUAGE๐
Reasons And Causes
Reasons And Causes
๐STUDY KOREAN LANGUAGE๐
-๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ gi ddaemune ( Because)
The connective -๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ is used to express cause and reason. S1 + ๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ is equivalent to the phrase because of S1, S2.
Structure :
Also, note that while this connective is used with verbs and adjectives, the form '-๋๋ฌธ์" (without the '-๊ธฐ") is used with nouns and has the same meaning.
The conjugation rule is simple. The presence of ๋ฐ์นจ or not does not change conjugation.
Example :
์ค๊ตญ์์์ ์ข์ํ์ง ๋๋ฌธ์ ์ค๊ตญ์์์ ๋จน์์ด์.
jungkuk-eumsik-eul joh-a-haji ddaemune jungkuk-eumsik-eul meog-eosseoyo.
Because i like Chinese food, I ate Chinese food.
์ ๋ ์ํ์ ๋ชป ๋ดค๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ ๋ํ๊ต ๋ชป ๊ฐ์.
jeoneun siheum-eul mos bwassgi ddaemune daehagyo mos gayo.
Because i did bab on the test, i wont be able to go to University.
๋น ๋๋ฌธ์ ์ ๊ฐ์ ์ถ์ด์.
Bi ddaemune an gayo sipeoyo
Because of the rain, i dont want to go.
-๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ gi ddaemune ( Because)
The connective -๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ is used to express cause and reason. S1 + ๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ is equivalent to the phrase because of S1, S2.
Structure :
Also, note that while this connective is used with verbs and adjectives, the form '-๋๋ฌธ์" (without the '-๊ธฐ") is used with nouns and has the same meaning.
The conjugation rule is simple. The presence of ๋ฐ์นจ or not does not change conjugation.
Example :
์ค๊ตญ์์์ ์ข์ํ์ง ๋๋ฌธ์ ์ค๊ตญ์์์ ๋จน์์ด์.
jungkuk-eumsik-eul joh-a-haji ddaemune jungkuk-eumsik-eul meog-eosseoyo.
Because i like Chinese food, I ate Chinese food.
์ ๋ ์ํ์ ๋ชป ๋ดค๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ ๋ํ๊ต ๋ชป ๊ฐ์.
jeoneun siheum-eul mos bwassgi ddaemune daehagyo mos gayo.
Because i did bab on the test, i wont be able to go to University.
๋น ๋๋ฌธ์ ์ ๊ฐ์ ์ถ์ด์.
Bi ddaemune an gayo sipeoyo
Because of the rain, i dont want to go.
๐STUDY KOREAN LANGUAGE๐
-(์ผ) ๋๊น
In this lesson, you will learn how to use ~(์ผ)๋๊น and ~(์ผ)๋ between two clauses to create a meaning that is similar to ~์/์ด์. Of course, just like every other grammatical principle, there are some subtle nuances that you should know about. Letโs get started.
Because of: ~(์ผ)๋๊น
In Lesson 37 you learned that you can place ~์/์ด์ between two clauses to create the meaning of โbecause,โ โsoโ or โtherefore.โ For example:
์ ๊ฐ ๋ฐฐ๊ฐ ์ ๊ณ ํ์ ๋ ๋จน๊ธฐ ์ซ์ด์.
Jega baega an gopaseo deo meoggi silh-eoyo.
I donโt want to eat anymore because I am full.
์ํ์ ๋ชป ๋ด์ ์ธ๊ณ ์ถ์ด์.
siheom-eul mos bwaseo ulgo sipeoyo.
I want to cry because I did poorly on the exam.
You can also place ~(์ผ)๋๊น between clauses to create a very similar meaning. For example:
์ ๊ฐ ๋ฐฐ๊ฐ ์ ๊ณ ํ๋๊น ๋ ๋จน๊ธฐ ์ซ์ด์.
Jega baega an gopeunigga deo meoggi silheoyo.
I donโt want to eat anymore because I am full.
The subtle difference between these two grammatical principles is that ~(์ผ)๋๊น is commonly used when the first clause is an excuse as to why the second clause occurs (usually an excuse as to why something canโt be done). As such, sometimes there is the slight feeling that the speaker is annoyed at the cause for something not happening. For example:
ํ๊ต์ ๊ฐ์ผ ๋๋๊น ์ง๊ธ ๋ชป ๋ง๋์.
hagyo-e gaya dwinigga jigeum mos mannayo.
I need to go to school, so I wonโt be able to meet.
์๋ฐฉ์ด ์์ฃผ ์๋๋ฌ์ฐ๋๊น ์ ๋ ์ ์ ๋ชป ์ค์ด์.
yeopbang-i aju siggeuleowonigga jeoneun jam-meul mos jass-eoyo.
The room next to us is very loud, so I couldnโt sleep.
Unlike ~ ์/์ด์, the clause preceding ~(์ผ)๋๊น can be conjugated into the past tense. For example:
์ด์ ๋๋ฌด ๋ฐ๋นด์ผ๋๊น ๋ชป ๊ฐ์ด์.
eoje neomu babbaseunigga mos gasseoyo.
I couldnโt go yesterday because I was so busy.
๋๋ฅผ ์ข์ํ์ง ์์์ผ๋๊น ํค์ด์ก์ด.
neoleul joh-ahaji anhasseunigga he-eojyeosseo.
I broke up with you because I didnโt like you.
It is also common to end a sentence with ~(์ผ)๋๊น. This is similar to ending a sentence with โ~์/์ด์,โ in that the speaker is actually creating an incomplete sentence where the end of the sentence can be assumed from context. In practice, this is typically used to answer a question, where the answer starts with โbecauseโฆโ For example:
Person 1: ์ง๊ธ ๋ง๋ ์ ์์ด์?
Can you meet now?
Person 2: ์๋์~ ๋ชป ๋ง๋์. ํ๊ต์ ๊ฐ์ผ ๋๋๊น์
No, because I have to go to school
Person 1: ๊ทธ๊ฒ์ ์ด ๊ฑฐ์ผ? = Are you going to buy that?
Person 2: ์๋์~ ๋ชป ์ฌ์. ๋์ด ์์ผ๋๊น์ = โฆ No, because I have no money
Person 1: ๋๋ ์ ํค์ด์ก์ด? = Why did you break up with me?
Person 2: ๋๋ฅผ ์ข์ํ์ง ์์์ผ๋๊น = โฆ Because I didnโt like you
Person 1: ์ ๋ฐ์ด ์ ๋ฒ๊ฒผ์ด์? = Why did your shoe come off?
Person 2: ๋งค๋ญ์ด ๋๋ฌด ๋์จํ๋๊น = โฆ Because the knot was too loose
Notice here that you can add โ~์โ to end of โ~(์ผ)๋๊น.โ Similar to when ~๋๋ฐ is used at the end of a sentence (as you learned in Lesson 77), using ~(์ผ)๋๊น like this can be seen as a little bit rude โ even if you attach ~์ to the end of it. Like ~๋๋ฐ, there is the feeling that the person is talking back. Of course, this all depends on the situation and the atmosphere of the conversation.
I said earlier that โ~(์ผ)๋๊นโ is commonly used instead of using โ~์/์ด์โ when the first clause is an excuse to why the second clause canโt happen. I feel that this is true most of the time, although it doesnโt always have to be an excuse. For example:
์ ๊ฐ ์์ ๋ฅผ ๋ค ํ์ผ๋๊น ์ด์ ์ํ๋ฅผ ๋ณผ ์ ์์ด์.
jega sugjeleul da heasseunigga ije yeonghwaleul bol su isseoyo.
I am finished my homework, therefore, I can see a movie now.
๋ฐ๋ง๋ถ์ด ์ง๊ธ ๋ ๊ณ ์์ง ์์ผ๋๊น ๋น๊น์ด ์ ๋์์.
bandisbul-i jigeum nalgo issji anheunigga bachggal-i an nawayo.
The firefly is not flying now, so the color/light isnโt coming out (not shining).
-(์ผ) ๋๊น
In this lesson, you will learn how to use ~(์ผ)๋๊น and ~(์ผ)๋ between two clauses to create a meaning that is similar to ~์/์ด์. Of course, just like every other grammatical principle, there are some subtle nuances that you should know about. Letโs get started.
Because of: ~(์ผ)๋๊น
In Lesson 37 you learned that you can place ~์/์ด์ between two clauses to create the meaning of โbecause,โ โsoโ or โtherefore.โ For example:
์ ๊ฐ ๋ฐฐ๊ฐ ์ ๊ณ ํ์ ๋ ๋จน๊ธฐ ์ซ์ด์.
Jega baega an gopaseo deo meoggi silh-eoyo.
I donโt want to eat anymore because I am full.
์ํ์ ๋ชป ๋ด์ ์ธ๊ณ ์ถ์ด์.
siheom-eul mos bwaseo ulgo sipeoyo.
I want to cry because I did poorly on the exam.
You can also place ~(์ผ)๋๊น between clauses to create a very similar meaning. For example:
์ ๊ฐ ๋ฐฐ๊ฐ ์ ๊ณ ํ๋๊น ๋ ๋จน๊ธฐ ์ซ์ด์.
Jega baega an gopeunigga deo meoggi silheoyo.
I donโt want to eat anymore because I am full.
The subtle difference between these two grammatical principles is that ~(์ผ)๋๊น is commonly used when the first clause is an excuse as to why the second clause occurs (usually an excuse as to why something canโt be done). As such, sometimes there is the slight feeling that the speaker is annoyed at the cause for something not happening. For example:
ํ๊ต์ ๊ฐ์ผ ๋๋๊น ์ง๊ธ ๋ชป ๋ง๋์.
hagyo-e gaya dwinigga jigeum mos mannayo.
I need to go to school, so I wonโt be able to meet.
์๋ฐฉ์ด ์์ฃผ ์๋๋ฌ์ฐ๋๊น ์ ๋ ์ ์ ๋ชป ์ค์ด์.
yeopbang-i aju siggeuleowonigga jeoneun jam-meul mos jass-eoyo.
The room next to us is very loud, so I couldnโt sleep.
Unlike ~ ์/์ด์, the clause preceding ~(์ผ)๋๊น can be conjugated into the past tense. For example:
์ด์ ๋๋ฌด ๋ฐ๋นด์ผ๋๊น ๋ชป ๊ฐ์ด์.
eoje neomu babbaseunigga mos gasseoyo.
I couldnโt go yesterday because I was so busy.
๋๋ฅผ ์ข์ํ์ง ์์์ผ๋๊น ํค์ด์ก์ด.
neoleul joh-ahaji anhasseunigga he-eojyeosseo.
I broke up with you because I didnโt like you.
It is also common to end a sentence with ~(์ผ)๋๊น. This is similar to ending a sentence with โ~์/์ด์,โ in that the speaker is actually creating an incomplete sentence where the end of the sentence can be assumed from context. In practice, this is typically used to answer a question, where the answer starts with โbecauseโฆโ For example:
Person 1: ์ง๊ธ ๋ง๋ ์ ์์ด์?
Can you meet now?
Person 2: ์๋์~ ๋ชป ๋ง๋์. ํ๊ต์ ๊ฐ์ผ ๋๋๊น์
No, because I have to go to school
Person 1: ๊ทธ๊ฒ์ ์ด ๊ฑฐ์ผ? = Are you going to buy that?
Person 2: ์๋์~ ๋ชป ์ฌ์. ๋์ด ์์ผ๋๊น์ = โฆ No, because I have no money
Person 1: ๋๋ ์ ํค์ด์ก์ด? = Why did you break up with me?
Person 2: ๋๋ฅผ ์ข์ํ์ง ์์์ผ๋๊น = โฆ Because I didnโt like you
Person 1: ์ ๋ฐ์ด ์ ๋ฒ๊ฒผ์ด์? = Why did your shoe come off?
Person 2: ๋งค๋ญ์ด ๋๋ฌด ๋์จํ๋๊น = โฆ Because the knot was too loose
Notice here that you can add โ~์โ to end of โ~(์ผ)๋๊น.โ Similar to when ~๋๋ฐ is used at the end of a sentence (as you learned in Lesson 77), using ~(์ผ)๋๊น like this can be seen as a little bit rude โ even if you attach ~์ to the end of it. Like ~๋๋ฐ, there is the feeling that the person is talking back. Of course, this all depends on the situation and the atmosphere of the conversation.
I said earlier that โ~(์ผ)๋๊นโ is commonly used instead of using โ~์/์ด์โ when the first clause is an excuse to why the second clause canโt happen. I feel that this is true most of the time, although it doesnโt always have to be an excuse. For example:
์ ๊ฐ ์์ ๋ฅผ ๋ค ํ์ผ๋๊น ์ด์ ์ํ๋ฅผ ๋ณผ ์ ์์ด์.
jega sugjeleul da heasseunigga ije yeonghwaleul bol su isseoyo.
I am finished my homework, therefore, I can see a movie now.
๋ฐ๋ง๋ถ์ด ์ง๊ธ ๋ ๊ณ ์์ง ์์ผ๋๊น ๋น๊น์ด ์ ๋์์.
bandisbul-i jigeum nalgo issji anheunigga bachggal-i an nawayo.
The firefly is not flying now, so the color/light isnโt coming out (not shining).
๐STUDY KOREAN LANGUAGE๐
Because/Therefore: V/A + ~์/์ด์
~์/์ด์ is added to the stem of a verb or adjective in a clause to connect it with the upcoming clause. First, letโs look at how โbecauseโ sentences are formed in English. When saying a sentence with โbecause,โ there are two clauses:
I want to eat
I am hungry
Both are independent clauses that can be sentences on their own. However, if we insert โbecauseโ between the two, we can create a sentence with two clauses:
I want to eat because I am hungry
The hardest part about saying these sentences in Korean is that the order is reversed. So, instead of saying:
I want to eat because I am hungry
I want to go to the park because I am bored
In Korean, we say:
Because I am hungry, I want to eat
Because I am bored, I want to go to the park
Now letโs look at these simple sentences in Korean. We have our two clauses again:
์ ๋ ๋ฐฅ์ ๋จน๊ณ ์ถ์ด์
jeoneun bab-eul meog-go sip-eo-yo.
I want to eat.
์ ๋ ๋ฐฐ๊ณ ํ์
jeoneun baegopayo.
I am hungry.
Same as in English; both are independent clauses and can be sentences on their own. However, by inserting ~์/์ด์ between the two, we can create the meaning of โbecause.โ For example:
์ ๋ ๋ฐฐ๊ณ ํ(+~์/์ด์) ์ ๋ ๋ฐฅ์ ๋จน๊ณ ์ถ์ด์
jeoneun baegopeu (+~a/eoseo) jeoneun bab-eul meoggo sipeoyo.
Example :
์ ๊ฐ ๋ฐฐ๊ณ ํ(์) ์ ๋ ๋ฐฅ์ ๋จน๊ณ ์ถ์ด์
jega baegopa(seo) jeoneun bab-eul meoggo sipeoyo.
Because I am hungry, I want to eat
์ ๊ฐ ๋ฐฐ๊ณ ํ(์) ์ ๊ฐ ๋ฐฅ์ ๋จน๊ณ ์ถ์ด์
jega baegopa(seo) jega bab-eul meoggo sipeoyo.
Because I am hungry, I want to eat.
Remember that ~์ด/๊ฐ should be added to the subject of any clause that is not the main clause of a sentence. ~๋/์ or ~์ด/๊ฐ can be added to the subject of the main clause of the sentence, depending on the specific meaning you are trying to create (although they both essentially have the same meaning).
Because/Therefore: V/A + ~์/์ด์
~์/์ด์ is added to the stem of a verb or adjective in a clause to connect it with the upcoming clause. First, letโs look at how โbecauseโ sentences are formed in English. When saying a sentence with โbecause,โ there are two clauses:
I want to eat
I am hungry
Both are independent clauses that can be sentences on their own. However, if we insert โbecauseโ between the two, we can create a sentence with two clauses:
I want to eat because I am hungry
The hardest part about saying these sentences in Korean is that the order is reversed. So, instead of saying:
I want to eat because I am hungry
I want to go to the park because I am bored
In Korean, we say:
Because I am hungry, I want to eat
Because I am bored, I want to go to the park
Now letโs look at these simple sentences in Korean. We have our two clauses again:
์ ๋ ๋ฐฅ์ ๋จน๊ณ ์ถ์ด์
jeoneun bab-eul meog-go sip-eo-yo.
I want to eat.
์ ๋ ๋ฐฐ๊ณ ํ์
jeoneun baegopayo.
I am hungry.
Same as in English; both are independent clauses and can be sentences on their own. However, by inserting ~์/์ด์ between the two, we can create the meaning of โbecause.โ For example:
์ ๋ ๋ฐฐ๊ณ ํ(+~์/์ด์) ์ ๋ ๋ฐฅ์ ๋จน๊ณ ์ถ์ด์
jeoneun baegopeu (+~a/eoseo) jeoneun bab-eul meoggo sipeoyo.
Example :
์ ๊ฐ ๋ฐฐ๊ณ ํ(์) ์ ๋ ๋ฐฅ์ ๋จน๊ณ ์ถ์ด์
jega baegopa(seo) jeoneun bab-eul meoggo sipeoyo.
Because I am hungry, I want to eat
์ ๊ฐ ๋ฐฐ๊ณ ํ(์) ์ ๊ฐ ๋ฐฅ์ ๋จน๊ณ ์ถ์ด์
jega baegopa(seo) jega bab-eul meoggo sipeoyo.
Because I am hungry, I want to eat.
Remember that ~์ด/๊ฐ should be added to the subject of any clause that is not the main clause of a sentence. ~๋/์ or ~์ด/๊ฐ can be added to the subject of the main clause of the sentence, depending on the specific meaning you are trying to create (although they both essentially have the same meaning).
๐STUDY KOREAN LANGUAGE๐
~์/์ด์ in the Past Tense
You cant conjugate a word into the past tense and then use ~์/์ด์. For example, the following is incorrect:
์ ๋ ๋ฐฐ๊ณ ํ (์์) ๋ฐฅ์ ๋จน์์ด์
jeoneun baegopass(aseo) bab-eul meog-eosseoyo.
I was hungry so I ate.
Instead, the tense of the first clause is inferred from the context of the sentence. For example:
์ ๋ ๋ฐฐ๊ณ ํ์ ๋ฐฅ์ ๋จน์์ด์
jeoneun baegopaseo bab-eul meogeosseoyo.
I was hungry, so I ate.
Notice that this sentence wouldnโt make sense if it were โI am hungry, so I ate.โ
The final clause of the sentence doesnโt necessarily need to be in the past tense in order to suggest that the first clause is in the past. For example, notice how the final clause below is in the present tense, but the first clause is in the past tense:
์ ์ฌ์ ์ ๋จน์ด์ ์ง๊ธ ๋จน๊ณ ์์ด์
jeomsim-eul an meogeoseo jigeum meoggo isseoyo.
I didnโt eat lunch, so Iโm eating now.
Notice that this sentence wouldnโt make sense if it were โIโm not eating lunch so Iโm eating now.โ
Also, it is possible that the final clause of the sentence be in the future tense to suggest that the first clause is in the past tense. For example:
๊ฑฐ๊ธฐ์ ์ ๊ฐ ๋ด์ ๋ด์ผ ๊ฐ ๊ฑฐ์์
geogi-e an ga bwaseo naeil gal geoyeyo.
I havenโt been there yet, so I will go tomorrow.
Notice that this sentence wouldnโt make sense if it were โIโm not going there yet so Iโll go tomorrow.โ
~์/์ด์ in the Past Tense
You cant conjugate a word into the past tense and then use ~์/์ด์. For example, the following is incorrect:
์ ๋ ๋ฐฐ๊ณ ํ (์์) ๋ฐฅ์ ๋จน์์ด์
jeoneun baegopass(aseo) bab-eul meog-eosseoyo.
I was hungry so I ate.
Instead, the tense of the first clause is inferred from the context of the sentence. For example:
์ ๋ ๋ฐฐ๊ณ ํ์ ๋ฐฅ์ ๋จน์์ด์
jeoneun baegopaseo bab-eul meogeosseoyo.
I was hungry, so I ate.
Notice that this sentence wouldnโt make sense if it were โI am hungry, so I ate.โ
The final clause of the sentence doesnโt necessarily need to be in the past tense in order to suggest that the first clause is in the past. For example, notice how the final clause below is in the present tense, but the first clause is in the past tense:
์ ์ฌ์ ์ ๋จน์ด์ ์ง๊ธ ๋จน๊ณ ์์ด์
jeomsim-eul an meogeoseo jigeum meoggo isseoyo.
I didnโt eat lunch, so Iโm eating now.
Notice that this sentence wouldnโt make sense if it were โIโm not eating lunch so Iโm eating now.โ
Also, it is possible that the final clause of the sentence be in the future tense to suggest that the first clause is in the past tense. For example:
๊ฑฐ๊ธฐ์ ์ ๊ฐ ๋ด์ ๋ด์ผ ๊ฐ ๊ฑฐ์์
geogi-e an ga bwaseo naeil gal geoyeyo.
I havenโt been there yet, so I will go tomorrow.
Notice that this sentence wouldnโt make sense if it were โIโm not going there yet so Iโll go tomorrow.โ
๐STUDY KOREAN LANGUAGE๐
Adding ~์/์ด์ to ์ด๋ค
When adding ~์/์ด์ to ์ด๋ค, the same principle as before applies. Again, letโs look at two clauses:
I want to go to the park.
์ ๋ ๊ณต์์ ๊ฐ๊ณ ์ถ์ด์.
jeoneun gongwon-e gago sipeoyo.
It is Sunday.
์ผ์์ผ์ด๋ค.
ilyo-il-i-da.
Again, both are independent clauses that can be sentences on their own. However, if we insert โbecauseโ between the two clauses, we can make:
I want to go to the park because it is Sunday
Which, in Korean, would be written as:
์ผ์์ผ์ด๋ค (+ ~์/์ด์) ์ ๋ ๊ณต์์ ๊ฐ๊ณ ์ถ์ด์
ilyo-il-ida (+ ~a/eoseo) jeoneun gongwon-e gago sipeoyo.
Which is done like this:
์ผ์์ผ์ด์ด์ ์ ๋ ๊ณต์์ ๊ฐ๊ณ ์ถ์ด์
ilyo-il-idaseo jeoneun gongwon-e gago sipeoyo.
It is Sunday, so I want to go to the park.
~์ด์ is always added to ์ด๋ค and never ~์์ because the last vowel of the stem of ์ด๋ค will always be โ์ด.โ So, for example:
์ผ์์ผ์ด์ด์ il-yo il-i-eoseo = On Sunday
๊ฑด๋ฌผ์ด์ด์ geonmul-i-eoseo = Building
๊ณต์์ด์ด์ gonwon-i-eoseo = Park
์์ฌ์ด์ด์ wisa-i-eoseo = Being a Doctor
์ฌ์์ด์ด์ yeoja-i-eoseo = Being a Woman
๋จ์์ด์ด์ namja-i-eoseo = Being a Man
When the word ์ด๋ค is attached to ends in a vowel (like in ์์ฌ, ์ฌ์ and ๋จ์) ์ด and ์ด can merge to form ์ฌ. For example:
์์ฌ์ฌ์ wisa-yeoseo = Being a Doctor
์ฌ์์ฌ์ yeoja-yeoseo = Because its a woman
๋จ์์ฌ์ namja-yeoseo = Being a Man
There is a difference simply because of ease of pronunciation. If you were to say โ์ผ์์ผ์ฌ์โ it is hard to pronounce because your tongue has to move from the ใน sound to the ์ฌ sound right away.
Adding ~์ด๋ผ(์) or ~๋ผ(์) has the exact same meaning of ~์ด์ด์ and ~์ฌ์ respectively. That is, you can add ~์ด๋ผ(์) to nouns ending in a consonant and ๋ผ(์) to nouns ending in a vowel. Both are possible, but I find that ~(์ด)๋ผ(์) is used more often in speech (not to say that it is not used in writing โ but when speaking, ~(์ด)๋ผ์ is more common than ~์ด์ด์ or ~์ฌ์). To me, ~(์ด)๋ผ์ just flows off my tongue better.
For example:
์ผ์์ผ์ด์ด์ ๊ณต์์ ๊ฐ๊ณ ์ถ์ด์.
ilyo-il-idaseo gongwon-e gago sipeoyo.
It is Sunday, so I want to go to the park.
์ผ์์ผ์ด๋ผ์ ๊ณต์์ ๊ฐ๊ณ ์ถ์ด์.
ilyo-il-ilaseo gongwon-e gago sipeoyo.
It is Sunday, so I want to go to the park.
Adding ~์/์ด์ to ์ด๋ค
When adding ~์/์ด์ to ์ด๋ค, the same principle as before applies. Again, letโs look at two clauses:
I want to go to the park.
์ ๋ ๊ณต์์ ๊ฐ๊ณ ์ถ์ด์.
jeoneun gongwon-e gago sipeoyo.
It is Sunday.
์ผ์์ผ์ด๋ค.
ilyo-il-i-da.
Again, both are independent clauses that can be sentences on their own. However, if we insert โbecauseโ between the two clauses, we can make:
I want to go to the park because it is Sunday
Which, in Korean, would be written as:
์ผ์์ผ์ด๋ค (+ ~์/์ด์) ์ ๋ ๊ณต์์ ๊ฐ๊ณ ์ถ์ด์
ilyo-il-ida (+ ~a/eoseo) jeoneun gongwon-e gago sipeoyo.
Which is done like this:
์ผ์์ผ์ด์ด์ ์ ๋ ๊ณต์์ ๊ฐ๊ณ ์ถ์ด์
ilyo-il-idaseo jeoneun gongwon-e gago sipeoyo.
It is Sunday, so I want to go to the park.
~์ด์ is always added to ์ด๋ค and never ~์์ because the last vowel of the stem of ์ด๋ค will always be โ์ด.โ So, for example:
์ผ์์ผ์ด์ด์ il-yo il-i-eoseo = On Sunday
๊ฑด๋ฌผ์ด์ด์ geonmul-i-eoseo = Building
๊ณต์์ด์ด์ gonwon-i-eoseo = Park
์์ฌ์ด์ด์ wisa-i-eoseo = Being a Doctor
์ฌ์์ด์ด์ yeoja-i-eoseo = Being a Woman
๋จ์์ด์ด์ namja-i-eoseo = Being a Man
When the word ์ด๋ค is attached to ends in a vowel (like in ์์ฌ, ์ฌ์ and ๋จ์) ์ด and ์ด can merge to form ์ฌ. For example:
์์ฌ์ฌ์ wisa-yeoseo = Being a Doctor
์ฌ์์ฌ์ yeoja-yeoseo = Because its a woman
๋จ์์ฌ์ namja-yeoseo = Being a Man
There is a difference simply because of ease of pronunciation. If you were to say โ์ผ์์ผ์ฌ์โ it is hard to pronounce because your tongue has to move from the ใน sound to the ์ฌ sound right away.
Adding ~์ด๋ผ(์) or ~๋ผ(์) has the exact same meaning of ~์ด์ด์ and ~์ฌ์ respectively. That is, you can add ~์ด๋ผ(์) to nouns ending in a consonant and ๋ผ(์) to nouns ending in a vowel. Both are possible, but I find that ~(์ด)๋ผ(์) is used more often in speech (not to say that it is not used in writing โ but when speaking, ~(์ด)๋ผ์ is more common than ~์ด์ด์ or ~์ฌ์). To me, ~(์ด)๋ผ์ just flows off my tongue better.
For example:
์ผ์์ผ์ด์ด์ ๊ณต์์ ๊ฐ๊ณ ์ถ์ด์.
ilyo-il-idaseo gongwon-e gago sipeoyo.
It is Sunday, so I want to go to the park.
์ผ์์ผ์ด๋ผ์ ๊ณต์์ ๊ฐ๊ณ ์ถ์ด์.
ilyo-il-ilaseo gongwon-e gago sipeoyo.
It is Sunday, so I want to go to the park.
Happy fasting to all muslim people around the world ๐ stay home, stay safe and stay healthy ๐ค
๐STUDY KOREAN LANGUAGE๐
-(์ผ)ใน๊น ๋ณด๋ค (i am worried about/that)
This form is attached to a verb and indicates the speakers is conjecture or intentions concerning the action or condition being talked about.
-(์ผ)ใน๊น ๋ด(์) is formed by attaching -์์ to -(์ผ)ใน๊น ๋ณด๋ค. It shows that the action in the second clause is done because of fears about the action or condition in the first clause.
"is thinking of doing, maybe i'll ... " usually first person -(์ผ)ใน๊น ๋ด(์) : for fear ... ; for fear thay ... ; (afraid/concerned) that ...
Structure :
A/V (์ผ)ใน๊น ๋ด(์)
Example :
1) ๋ฆ์๋๋ฐ ํ์๋ฅผ ํ๊น ๋ณด๋ค.
neuj-eossneunde taegsi-leul talgga buda.
It is late so i'm thinking of taking a taxi.
2) ๋จ์ด์ง๊น ๋ด ์์ ์ก๊ณ ๊ฒ์ด์.
nam-eojilgga bwa noneul jabgo geosseoyo.
It looked like he might fall so i help his hand and go.
3) ์๊น ๊ทธ ๋ฐฉ์์ ํ์ ์๊น ๋ด์.
agga geu bang-eseo hanjam jalgga bwayo.
I think i'll have a nap in that room.
(you just showed me).
-(์ผ)ใน๊น ๋ณด๋ค (i am worried about/that)
This form is attached to a verb and indicates the speakers is conjecture or intentions concerning the action or condition being talked about.
-(์ผ)ใน๊น ๋ด(์) is formed by attaching -์์ to -(์ผ)ใน๊น ๋ณด๋ค. It shows that the action in the second clause is done because of fears about the action or condition in the first clause.
"is thinking of doing, maybe i'll ... " usually first person -(์ผ)ใน๊น ๋ด(์) : for fear ... ; for fear thay ... ; (afraid/concerned) that ...
Structure :
A/V (์ผ)ใน๊น ๋ด(์)
Example :
1) ๋ฆ์๋๋ฐ ํ์๋ฅผ ํ๊น ๋ณด๋ค.
neuj-eossneunde taegsi-leul talgga buda.
It is late so i'm thinking of taking a taxi.
2) ๋จ์ด์ง๊น ๋ด ์์ ์ก๊ณ ๊ฒ์ด์.
nam-eojilgga bwa noneul jabgo geosseoyo.
It looked like he might fall so i help his hand and go.
3) ์๊น ๊ทธ ๋ฐฉ์์ ํ์ ์๊น ๋ด์.
agga geu bang-eseo hanjam jalgga bwayo.
I think i'll have a nap in that room.
(you just showed me).
๐STUDY KOREAN LANGUAGE๐
-๊ณ ํด์ -one of the reasons, because of this (amongst others things)
This grammar pattern can be used to "state the primary reason for an action or event in the following clause while also indicating there are also other reasons."
In other words, the first clause is ONE of numerous reasons that caused the second clause. In addition, this first clause gives the primary reason for the second
-and hints at other reasons. This pattern is equivalent to 'A is one of the reasons why B' or 'among other things...'
Structure :
Note that you can also use the structure ๊ณ -๊ณ ํด์ to list more than two or more reasons.
Examples:
1) ๋น๋ ์ค๊ณ ํด์ ์จ์ข ์ผ ์ง์ ์์์ด์.
bido ogo haeseo onjongil jib-e isseosseoyo.
it was raining and all so i stayed home the whole day.
2) ๋ ์ฌ๋์ ์ฅ๋ฏธ๋ ๊ฐ๊ณ ํด์ ์์ฃผ ๋ง๋์.
do salameun jwimido gatgo haeseo jaju mannaseo.
The two of them have the same hobbies and all so they meet often.
3) ์๊ฐ์ด ์๊ณ ํด์ ๋ชป ๊ฐ์.
sigani eobsgo haeseo mot gayo.
i dont have time (amongst other reasons), so i can't go.
-๊ณ ํด์ -one of the reasons, because of this (amongst others things)
This grammar pattern can be used to "state the primary reason for an action or event in the following clause while also indicating there are also other reasons."
In other words, the first clause is ONE of numerous reasons that caused the second clause. In addition, this first clause gives the primary reason for the second
-and hints at other reasons. This pattern is equivalent to 'A is one of the reasons why B' or 'among other things...'
Structure :
Note that you can also use the structure ๊ณ -๊ณ ํด์ to list more than two or more reasons.
Examples:
1) ๋น๋ ์ค๊ณ ํด์ ์จ์ข ์ผ ์ง์ ์์์ด์.
bido ogo haeseo onjongil jib-e isseosseoyo.
it was raining and all so i stayed home the whole day.
2) ๋ ์ฌ๋์ ์ฅ๋ฏธ๋ ๊ฐ๊ณ ํด์ ์์ฃผ ๋ง๋์.
do salameun jwimido gatgo haeseo jaju mannaseo.
The two of them have the same hobbies and all so they meet often.
3) ์๊ฐ์ด ์๊ณ ํด์ ๋ชป ๊ฐ์.
sigani eobsgo haeseo mot gayo.
i dont have time (amongst other reasons), so i can't go.
Salam Syawal to all muslim people who are celebrating this festive season! โจ ๐ Happy Eid Adha Selamat Hari Raya ๐ฅฐ
#Aidilfitri ๐
#Aidilfitri ๐
๐ััฯ
โั ะบฯััฮฑฮท โฮฑฮทgฯ
ฮฑgั๐ pinned Deleted message
Which level are you ?
Anonymous Poll
78%
Beginner
14%
Elementary
6%
Intermediate
1%
Advanced
1%
Proficient
๐ััฯ
โั ะบฯััฮฑฮท โฮฑฮทgฯ
ฮฑgั๐ pinned ยซWhich level are you ?ยป
Check out ๐ฐ๐ทSKL Beginner๐: https://t.me/joinchat/EEvyNhGqt2zH4BEW2PrikQ
๐ััฯ
โั ะบฯััฮฑฮท โฮฑฮทgฯ
ฮฑgั๐
Audio
sound of the consonants
#beginnernote
#beginnernote
Channel name was changed to ยซ๐ััฯ
โั ะบฯััฮฑฮท โฮฑฮทgฯ
ฮฑgั๐ยป