🗽 Whereas the U.S. requires other Governments to follow its instructions, and considers their own instructions to be moral demands, Russia and China and their allies reject — on principle — any country’s dictating to another.
The main ideological conflict in the world used to be between capitalism versus communism. After the end of the Soviet Union in 1991, that became replaced by the ideological conflict being between imperialism and anti-imperialism. With the expansion of America’s NATO military alliance against Russia, after 1991 — after the communist dictatorship there had ended — to include as new members all of the Soviet Union’s former Warsaw Pact allies in Europe, and with America’s aim now being to bring into NATO the former Soviet allies to the south of Russia, such as Azerbaijan and Georgia, American imperialism is viewed in Russia increasingly as an existential threat, which it certainly is.
The basic difference between the U.S. Government and its allies, on the one hand, and between Russia and China and their allies, on the other, is the same difference in either case: whereas the U.S. and its allies require other Governments to follow their instructions, and consider their own instructions to be moral demands (and thereby binding, actually commands instead of mere suggestions), Russia and China and their allies reject — on principle — any country’s dictating to another. They don’t consider it to be moral, at all, but instead profoundly immoral — they consider it to be imperialistic, dictatorial, bullying, hostile toward international democracy — and they simply won’t accept it; they reject it morally, outright. Iran, too, feels that way about the matter. So, too, do many other countries. That’s the basic difference: the imperialists versus the anti-imperialists.
In other words: the U.S. and its allies consider imperialism — the supposed right of a nation to command another nation — to be something that should be within the bounds of, and accepted by, international law. The U.S. Empire doesn’t call itself an “Empire,” but it is one, and its empire is therefore called instead “the Washington Consensus”, which is a “consensus” in hostility against whatever countries the U.S. Government wants to become regime-changed — to turn into an American colony. The “Washington Consensus” is actually an imposed ‘consensus’. It is a consensus against nations that disobey that ‘consensus’.
#Brazil #China #ClimateChange #Imperialism #UnitedStates #EricZuesse
🔗 READ MORE by Eric Zuesse
The main ideological conflict in the world used to be between capitalism versus communism. After the end of the Soviet Union in 1991, that became replaced by the ideological conflict being between imperialism and anti-imperialism. With the expansion of America’s NATO military alliance against Russia, after 1991 — after the communist dictatorship there had ended — to include as new members all of the Soviet Union’s former Warsaw Pact allies in Europe, and with America’s aim now being to bring into NATO the former Soviet allies to the south of Russia, such as Azerbaijan and Georgia, American imperialism is viewed in Russia increasingly as an existential threat, which it certainly is.
The basic difference between the U.S. Government and its allies, on the one hand, and between Russia and China and their allies, on the other, is the same difference in either case: whereas the U.S. and its allies require other Governments to follow their instructions, and consider their own instructions to be moral demands (and thereby binding, actually commands instead of mere suggestions), Russia and China and their allies reject — on principle — any country’s dictating to another. They don’t consider it to be moral, at all, but instead profoundly immoral — they consider it to be imperialistic, dictatorial, bullying, hostile toward international democracy — and they simply won’t accept it; they reject it morally, outright. Iran, too, feels that way about the matter. So, too, do many other countries. That’s the basic difference: the imperialists versus the anti-imperialists.
In other words: the U.S. and its allies consider imperialism — the supposed right of a nation to command another nation — to be something that should be within the bounds of, and accepted by, international law. The U.S. Empire doesn’t call itself an “Empire,” but it is one, and its empire is therefore called instead “the Washington Consensus”, which is a “consensus” in hostility against whatever countries the U.S. Government wants to become regime-changed — to turn into an American colony. The “Washington Consensus” is actually an imposed ‘consensus’. It is a consensus against nations that disobey that ‘consensus’.
#Brazil #China #ClimateChange #Imperialism #UnitedStates #EricZuesse
🔗 READ MORE by Eric Zuesse
Strategic Culture Foundation
U.S. versus China, and U.S. versus Russia
The main ideological conflict in the world used to be between capitalism versus communism. After the end of the Soviet Union in 1991, that became…
🇧🇷♻️🌎 With nothing to hold governments or the UN accountable, protection remains elusive when juxtaposed against the reassurance of neoliberal profit.
For the second consecutive year, Latin America has been established to be the most dangerous region for environmental activists. According to a recent annual report by Global Witness titled “Last Life on Defence”, 227 environmental activists and indigenous leaders were killed in 2020, with three out of every four killings occurring in Latin America.
Colombia once again led the statistics in the region with 65 environmental activists murdered, among them indigenous and afro-descent individuals, as well as small scale farmers. In Peru and Brazil, almost three quarters of the murders took place in the Amazon regions of the respective countries, indicating that indigenous populations remain in the crosshairs of attackers. Nicaragua’s increase in killings – from 5 in 2019 to 12 in 2020, made the country the most dangerous in the region per capita in terms of environmental activists. Read more by Ramona Wadi ⬇️
#Brazil #LatinAmerica #ecology #HumanRights #neoliberalism
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2021/10/11/violence-against-environmental-activists-escalates-alongside-political-impunity/
@strategic_culture
For the second consecutive year, Latin America has been established to be the most dangerous region for environmental activists. According to a recent annual report by Global Witness titled “Last Life on Defence”, 227 environmental activists and indigenous leaders were killed in 2020, with three out of every four killings occurring in Latin America.
Colombia once again led the statistics in the region with 65 environmental activists murdered, among them indigenous and afro-descent individuals, as well as small scale farmers. In Peru and Brazil, almost three quarters of the murders took place in the Amazon regions of the respective countries, indicating that indigenous populations remain in the crosshairs of attackers. Nicaragua’s increase in killings – from 5 in 2019 to 12 in 2020, made the country the most dangerous in the region per capita in terms of environmental activists. Read more by Ramona Wadi ⬇️
#Brazil #LatinAmerica #ecology #HumanRights #neoliberalism
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2021/10/11/violence-against-environmental-activists-escalates-alongside-political-impunity/
@strategic_culture
🇧🇷🌳 It is only the indigenous communities who are clarifying the importance of their inclusion in political decision-making with regards to the environment.
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2021/11/10/state-backed-violence-against-indigenous-communities-in-brazil-contradicts-plans-for-protection/
#Brazil #ClimateChange #JairBolsonaro
@strategic_culture
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2021/11/10/state-backed-violence-against-indigenous-communities-in-brazil-contradicts-plans-for-protection/
#Brazil #ClimateChange #JairBolsonaro
@strategic_culture
Strategic Culture Foundation
State-Backed Violence Against Indigenous Communities in Brazil Contradicts Plans for Protection
It is only the indigenous communities who are clarifying the importance of their inclusion in political decision-making with regards to the environment. The Indigenous Missionary…
⚠️ There is far more to the current multi-modal geopolitical war than just what’s happening in Ukraine.
This conflict has led to a myriad of downstream effects and moves which are just as important as what the encirclement of Bakhmut means.
For years the wildcard in the BRICS Alliance has beenIndia 🇮🇳
💬 Read more by Tom Luongo
#India #Brazil #BRICS #geopolitics
@strategic_culture
This conflict has led to a myriad of downstream effects and moves which are just as important as what the encirclement of Bakhmut means.
For years the wildcard in the BRICS Alliance has been
💬 Read more by Tom Luongo
#India #Brazil #BRICS #geopolitics
@strategic_culture
Strategic Culture Foundation
India: The Next Front in the War on the BRICS
By Tom LUONGO There is far more to the current multi-modal geopolitical war than just what’s happening in Ukraine. This conflict has led to a…
🤑 Whether the Chinese want to eat them, use them as lab rats or put them into zoos, the sheer scale of this order shows that China is now a major player in the monkey business.
💬 Declan Hayes writes
#Brazil #China #Crisis #DeDollarization #Economy #SriLanka
✅ Subscribe
💬 Declan Hayes writes
#Brazil #China #Crisis #DeDollarization #Economy #SriLanka
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Strategic Culture Foundation
100,000 Sri Lankan Monkeys Threaten the Yankee Dollar
Whether the Chinese want to eat them, use them as lab rats or put them into zoos, the sheer scale of this order shows that…
☣️ In the light of the findings of Russian Ministry of Defence experts regarding international activities of Western biolaboratories, it may be relevant to take a closer look at some facts that unfolded a few years ago in Brazil.
💬 Read more by Raphael Machado
#BigPharma #Brazil #medicine #WHO
☁️ More analysis
🌐 Subscribe
🌐 Join us on VK
💬 Read more by Raphael Machado
#BigPharma #Brazil #medicine #WHO
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Telegraph
Brazilian Biosecurity Threatened: Oxitec and the New Dengue Outbreak
In the light of the findings of Russian Ministry of Defence experts regarding international activities of Western biolaboratories, it may be relevant to take a closer look at some facts that unfolded a few years ago in Brazil. ❗️Join us on Telegram, Twitter…
🇧🇷🇮🇱 Brazil and Israel are experiencing strong diplomatic tensions. In a recent statement during a visit to Africa, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva compared Israel’s practices in Gaza with the Holocaust against Jews committed by Nazi Germany. His words were extremely disapproved by the Zionist State and the Collective West, leading to a diplomatic crisis.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared Lula persona non grata and summoned the Brazilian ambassador to Israel for clarifications. Then, the Brazilian government reacted by recalling its ambassador, leaving Brazil without diplomatic representation in Tel Aviv.
Brazilian President accuses Netanyahu of committing Nazi-like crimes against Gazans, leading to a diplomatic standoff 🌀
💬 Read more by Lucas Leiroz @lucasleiroz
#Brazil #Lula #Netanyahu #Israel #Gaza
🌐 More analysis
🌐 Subscribe
🌐 Join us on VK
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared Lula persona non grata and summoned the Brazilian ambassador to Israel for clarifications. Then, the Brazilian government reacted by recalling its ambassador, leaving Brazil without diplomatic representation in Tel Aviv.
Brazilian President accuses Netanyahu of committing Nazi-like crimes against Gazans, leading to a diplomatic standoff 🌀
💬 Read more by Lucas Leiroz @lucasleiroz
#Brazil #Lula #Netanyahu #Israel #Gaza
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Telegraph
Brazil’s Lula Exposes Israeli Crimes
Brazilian President accuses Netanyahu of committing Nazi-like crimes against Gazans, leading to a diplomatic standoff. ❗️Join us on Telegram, Twitter, and VK.Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram.…
🇧🇷🇫🇷 In recent days, since Macron’s visit to Brazil and the excessively warm welcome he received at the end of March (which even prompted countless memes on the internet), there has been debate about the advantages and disadvantages of Franco-Brazilian relations, as well as Macron’s real purpose in this rapprochement.
With Brazil entangled in these various agreements and bilateral relations with Atlantic partners, it will be much easier to put pressure on Brazil at various levels, including key votes at the UN and the Security Council. Threats of sanctions, or even the breaking of agreements, will do “wonders” to convince “pragmatic” characters, but lacking in faith in sovereignty, of the “advantages” of drawing ever closer to the West and NATO.
And it’s also obvious that this is, to a large extent, the result of timidity in relation to the BRICS, the future role of the BRICS and Brazil’s role in the BRICS.
Brazil does not see the enemies of its friends as its enemies. And there’s no problem with that.
💬 Raphael Machado writes
#Brazil #France #West #BRICS
💡 Click for more politics
🚀 Subscribe
🌐 Join us on VK
With Brazil entangled in these various agreements and bilateral relations with Atlantic partners, it will be much easier to put pressure on Brazil at various levels, including key votes at the UN and the Security Council. Threats of sanctions, or even the breaking of agreements, will do “wonders” to convince “pragmatic” characters, but lacking in faith in sovereignty, of the “advantages” of drawing ever closer to the West and NATO.
And it’s also obvious that this is, to a large extent, the result of timidity in relation to the BRICS, the future role of the BRICS and Brazil’s role in the BRICS.
Brazil does not see the enemies of its friends as its enemies. And there’s no problem with that.
💬 Raphael Machado writes
#Brazil #France #West #BRICS
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Telegraph
Brazil in Macron’s sights
Brazil does not see the enemies of its friends as its enemies. And there’s no problem with that. ❗️Join us on Telegram, Twitter, and VK.Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su In recent days, since Macron’s visit to our country and the excessively warm welcome…
🇧🇷 In Brazil two anti-Communist fantasies were created: that the Brazilian Armed Forces are practically Communist, because they are Positivist, and that both Lula and FHC were in a fake antagonism because they wanted to impose Communism into Brazil.
💬 Bruna Frascolla writes
#Brazil
💡 Click for more politics
🚀 Subscribe
🌐 Join us on VK
💬 Bruna Frascolla writes
#Brazil
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Telegraph
Floods in the southern Brazil trigger an outbreak of anarchist propaganda on the Right
In Brazil two anti-Communist fantasies were created: that the Brazilian Armed Forces are practically Communist, because they are Positivist, and that both Lula and FHC were in a fake antagonism because they wanted to impose Communism into Brazil. ❗️Join us…