Oracle on ASM vs Oracle on NFS.
Пост от Jeffrey Steiner, архитектора из NetApp, автора многих TR по работе Oracle. В целом из названия всё ясно. Накидаю цитат, которые доносят основную мысль поста.
“Broadly speaking, if someone has a massive FC SAN infrastructure in place and ASM was already embedded in established business practices, I wouldn’t try to change that. It would be a waste of money and it would be throwing away staff experience.
If a project involves a wholly new infrastructure, I’d rather go with an IP protocol. It costs less, and it’s easier to manage, especially where Cloud is involved.”
“Personally, if I needed to design an architecture for 3 or 4 large mission-critical, IO-intensive production databases I’d probably use ASM over FC-SCSI or FC-NVMe. If the requirement is a 3000 database DBaaS project that changes frequently, I’d probably choose NFS.”
Больше деталей с плюсами и минусами каждого из подходов по ссылке.
#Oracle #NFS #ASM
https://words.ofsteiner.com/2019/02/25/oracle-on-asm-vs-oracle-on-nfs/
Пост от Jeffrey Steiner, архитектора из NetApp, автора многих TR по работе Oracle. В целом из названия всё ясно. Накидаю цитат, которые доносят основную мысль поста.
“Broadly speaking, if someone has a massive FC SAN infrastructure in place and ASM was already embedded in established business practices, I wouldn’t try to change that. It would be a waste of money and it would be throwing away staff experience.
If a project involves a wholly new infrastructure, I’d rather go with an IP protocol. It costs less, and it’s easier to manage, especially where Cloud is involved.”
“Personally, if I needed to design an architecture for 3 or 4 large mission-critical, IO-intensive production databases I’d probably use ASM over FC-SCSI or FC-NVMe. If the requirement is a 3000 database DBaaS project that changes frequently, I’d probably choose NFS.”
Больше деталей с плюсами и минусами каждого из подходов по ссылке.
#Oracle #NFS #ASM
https://words.ofsteiner.com/2019/02/25/oracle-on-asm-vs-oracle-on-nfs/