Astonishing! One for us all to share.
https://news.starknakedbrief.co.uk/p/the-silent-bureaucrat-pulling-the
https://news.starknakedbrief.co.uk/p/the-silent-bureaucrat-pulling-the
news.starknakedbrief.co.uk
The Quiet Bureaucrat Pulling the Strings Behind Britain's "Dodgy" State-Backed Weather and Climate Service
Meet Penelope Endersby, chief executive of the Meteorological Office (Met Office).
🤬5👍3🤡2
Paul explains the instability of the electricity grid and gives a lesson for Ed Miliband from a hamster!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_6xBJJUNr0A
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_6xBJJUNr0A
YouTube
£90 Billion Lost & A lesson from a hamster for Ed Miliband
Here I explain the instability of the electricity grid and give a lesson for Ed Miliband from a hamster!
X(twitter) link
https://x.com/PaulBur68330214/status/1898798920949534947
This video refers to a video from Kathryn Porter:-
https://www.youtube.com/…
X(twitter) link
https://x.com/PaulBur68330214/status/1898798920949534947
This video refers to a video from Kathryn Porter:-
https://www.youtube.com/…
👍6
https://expose-news.com/2025/03/15/how-climate-change-industry-shapes-the-narrative/
Great article from Prof. Norman Fenton on the BBC propaganda machine.
Great article from Prof. Norman Fenton on the BBC propaganda machine.
👍5
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-downfall-of-climate-change-poster-boy-michael-mann/
From Thursday 20th March 2025.
From Thursday 20th March 2025.
The Spectator
The downfall of climate change poster boy Michael Mann
Even if you’ve never heard of Michael Mann, you will have felt his baleful influence on your energy bills. He is the inventor of the hockey stick chart, which shows a sharp increase in late 20th century global temperatures, like the blade of an ice hockey…
🔥4❤1
Will just leave this one here for you to make up your own minds about. 😬
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr788kljlklo
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr788kljlklo
BBC News
Could taking carbon out of the sea cool down the planet?
A pilot project will test whether it is a useful way of fighting climate change.
🤡19😱1🤮1🥴1🤣1
An excellent discussion about how birds are affected by wind turbines. Useful info for anyone challenging a wind farm installation.
https://youtu.be/wWAkyHsbnjM?si=I6C-Cgj4YAA9g24U&utm_source=MTQxZ
https://youtu.be/wWAkyHsbnjM?si=I6C-Cgj4YAA9g24U&utm_source=MTQxZ
YouTube
Wind Farms A License To Kill
Paper Links:-
Paper 1
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/V4EYKKAB4ZGHGSXHVFZU?target=10.1111/1365-2664.14739
Paper 2
https://www.bto.org/our-work/science/publications/reports/research-reports/00766-population-impacts-windfarms-red-kites-wales
Paper 1
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/V4EYKKAB4ZGHGSXHVFZU?target=10.1111/1365-2664.14739
Paper 2
https://www.bto.org/our-work/science/publications/reports/research-reports/00766-population-impacts-windfarms-red-kites-wales
👍4
Forwarded from UK Citizen
We continue to challenge Net Zero policies at a local level as this is where the true power lies. This was a speech to a community committee at Leeds City Council on Monday 30th June...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiQNKsYoZ0w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiQNKsYoZ0w
YouTube
Petition Falls on Deaf Ears as the Net Zero Money Machine Heats Up | UK Column News
* Full news and all the source links: https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-2nd-july-2025
- UK Parliament: Make all forms of 'geo-engineering' affecting the environment illegal
- UK Parliament (YouTube): E-petition debate relating to geo-engineering…
- UK Parliament: Make all forms of 'geo-engineering' affecting the environment illegal
- UK Parliament (YouTube): E-petition debate relating to geo-engineering…
❤5👍1
Forwarded from UK Citizen
The full presentation can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/live/Pk4dPjZpCEg?si=CJQ3g_IvCyrXA6qQ
YouTube
Leeds City Council - Outer North East Community Committee - 30th June 2025
❤3
For the cost of Milibrain's Carbon Capture folly (£30bn) we could have 6 nuclear power stations delivered in 8 years, which don't need carbon capture and which would provide nearly all of our summertime demand for electricity at vastly lower cost.
Net Zero is a Cult and its high priest is Miliband.
A manmade CO2 Climate Crisis is the lie that is being used to tax away your wealth and regulate away your freedoms.
#StopNetZero
https://youtu.be/EgHbCqzQGkc?t=4557
Net Zero is a Cult and its high priest is Miliband.
A manmade CO2 Climate Crisis is the lie that is being used to tax away your wealth and regulate away your freedoms.
#StopNetZero
https://youtu.be/EgHbCqzQGkc?t=4557
YouTube
Energy Expert: NUCLEAR Is the Answer, NET ZERO Is the Problem | Kathryn Porter x Peter McCormack
Kathryn Porter, energy analyst and founder of Watt-Logic, joins The Peter McCormack Show for a data-driven takedown of the UK’s broken energy system. In this episode, Kathryn exposes how Net Zero ideology, civil service incompetence, and corporate rent-seeking…
👍8
StopNetZero.org
For the cost of Milibrain's Carbon Capture folly (£30bn) we could have 6 nuclear power stations delivered in 8 years, which don't need carbon capture and which would provide nearly all of our summertime demand for electricity at vastly lower cost. Net Zero…
Why not write to your MP?
Dear [MP’s Name],
Re: Urgent Concerns Regarding Ed Miliband’s £30 Billion Carbon Capture Plan
I am writing to express my serious concern about the actions of the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, Ed Miliband, and to urge you to challenge what I believe may amount to misfeasance or malfeasance in public office.
Mr Miliband’s proposal to spend £30 billion of taxpayers' money on carbon capture and storage (CCS) is deeply misguided. CCS is an unproven and unreliable technology, with a track record of failure and underperformance. A comprehensive 2022 report by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis found that “the majority of CCS projects have underperformed, failed outright, or simply never materialised.”
In contrast, a similar investment—£30 billion—could fund the construction of approximately six modern nuclear power stations. South Korea’s APR-1400 reactor model, successfully deployed in the United Arab Emirates, offers a compelling example of cost-effective nuclear development. The four Barakah reactors, with a total capacity of 5.6 GW, are expected to supply around 25% of the UAE’s electricity at a cost of approximately £18–20 billion—and crucially, were delivered close to schedule and budget.
France’s historical nuclear program also proves that a consistent, standardised rollout of nuclear infrastructure can deliver low-carbon energy at scale, affordably. By the 1990s, France was producing over 70% of its electricity from nuclear, thanks to efficient planning and strong political will.
Unlike CCS, nuclear power requires no speculative technology to sequester emissions. It produces consistent, reliable base-load electricity, and during summer months could cover the vast majority of the UK’s energy needs. Furthermore, nuclear assets are ideal for long-term institutional investors—including pension funds—because of their predictable, inflation-linked returns. By contrast, CCS, wind, and solar remain volatile, intermittent, and risk-laden from an investment perspective.
Given the overwhelming evidence against CCS as a viable large-scale solution, Mr Miliband’s decision to prioritise it over proven, cost-effective alternatives like nuclear is deeply troubling. I believe this course of action represents a negligent misuse of public funds, driven more by ideology than sound science or economics.
I urge you to raise this matter in Parliament, question the rationale behind this spending commitment, and push for a reassessment of our national energy priorities. The UK deserves an energy strategy that is grounded in technological reality and fiscal responsibility.
Thank you for your continued service to our constituency. I look forward to hearing your views on this matter.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Full Name]
Dear [MP’s Name],
Re: Urgent Concerns Regarding Ed Miliband’s £30 Billion Carbon Capture Plan
I am writing to express my serious concern about the actions of the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, Ed Miliband, and to urge you to challenge what I believe may amount to misfeasance or malfeasance in public office.
Mr Miliband’s proposal to spend £30 billion of taxpayers' money on carbon capture and storage (CCS) is deeply misguided. CCS is an unproven and unreliable technology, with a track record of failure and underperformance. A comprehensive 2022 report by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis found that “the majority of CCS projects have underperformed, failed outright, or simply never materialised.”
In contrast, a similar investment—£30 billion—could fund the construction of approximately six modern nuclear power stations. South Korea’s APR-1400 reactor model, successfully deployed in the United Arab Emirates, offers a compelling example of cost-effective nuclear development. The four Barakah reactors, with a total capacity of 5.6 GW, are expected to supply around 25% of the UAE’s electricity at a cost of approximately £18–20 billion—and crucially, were delivered close to schedule and budget.
France’s historical nuclear program also proves that a consistent, standardised rollout of nuclear infrastructure can deliver low-carbon energy at scale, affordably. By the 1990s, France was producing over 70% of its electricity from nuclear, thanks to efficient planning and strong political will.
Unlike CCS, nuclear power requires no speculative technology to sequester emissions. It produces consistent, reliable base-load electricity, and during summer months could cover the vast majority of the UK’s energy needs. Furthermore, nuclear assets are ideal for long-term institutional investors—including pension funds—because of their predictable, inflation-linked returns. By contrast, CCS, wind, and solar remain volatile, intermittent, and risk-laden from an investment perspective.
Given the overwhelming evidence against CCS as a viable large-scale solution, Mr Miliband’s decision to prioritise it over proven, cost-effective alternatives like nuclear is deeply troubling. I believe this course of action represents a negligent misuse of public funds, driven more by ideology than sound science or economics.
I urge you to raise this matter in Parliament, question the rationale behind this spending commitment, and push for a reassessment of our national energy priorities. The UK deserves an energy strategy that is grounded in technological reality and fiscal responsibility.
Thank you for your continued service to our constituency. I look forward to hearing your views on this matter.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Full Name]
❤3👍2
Great news from the US!
EPA Releases Proposal to Rescind Obama-Era Endangerment Finding, Regulations that Paved the Way for Electric Vehicle Mandates - https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-releases-proposal-rescind-obama-era-endangerment-finding-regulations-paved-way.
You can find a full video here: https://yorkvoice.org/library/magazine/international-stories/epa-moves-to-end-climate-regulations-under-clean-air-act
EPA Releases Proposal to Rescind Obama-Era Endangerment Finding, Regulations that Paved the Way for Electric Vehicle Mandates - https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-releases-proposal-rescind-obama-era-endangerment-finding-regulations-paved-way.
You can find a full video here: https://yorkvoice.org/library/magazine/international-stories/epa-moves-to-end-climate-regulations-under-clean-air-act
EPA
EPA Releases Proposal to Rescind Obama-Era Endangerment Finding, Regulations that Paved the Way for Electric Vehicle Mandates
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin released the agency’s proposal to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding, which has been used to justify over $1 trillion in regulations.