The major earthquake in Myanmar this morning occurred in a region where very large earthquakes, well over magnitude 8 have occurred in the past. The recent event changed stress distribution across the region, likely adding more stress to the North and South.
π16π±5π5β€3π―3π2π2π₯1π’1
External factors to seismic activity deserve attention.
"average variation of the cosmic ray detection rates correlates with the global seismic activity"
https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364682623000664
statistical confidence level is more than six sigma
https://scitechdaily.com/seismic-signals-from-space-intriguing-correlation-between-earthquakes-and-cosmic-radiation-discovered/
"average variation of the cosmic ray detection rates correlates with the global seismic activity"
https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364682623000664
statistical confidence level is more than six sigma
https://scitechdaily.com/seismic-signals-from-space-intriguing-correlation-between-earthquakes-and-cosmic-radiation-discovered/
SciTechDaily
Seismic Signals From Space: Intriguing Correlation Between Earthquakes and Cosmic Radiation Discovered
Scientists have found a strong statistical link between changes in cosmic radiation and seismic activity, potentially aiding in earthquake prediction. However, the ability to predict specific locations remains unclear, and the discovery has led to intriguingβ¦
π13β€2π1π1
We're currently using AI to find a correlation between M β₯ 7.4 earthquakes and clustering of planetary conjunctions. We used the period 2000-2024.
The statistical analysis shows:
- Baseline probability of a major earthquake in any 7-day period: 12.27%
- Expected clusters with earthquakes: 72.14
- Actual clusters with earthquakes: 103
- Chi-square test: p-value = 0.014452
This result is statistically significant (p < 0.05), indicating a positive correlation between conjunction clusters and major earthquakes.
This aligns with our own research and earlier statistics.
The statistical analysis shows:
- Baseline probability of a major earthquake in any 7-day period: 12.27%
- Expected clusters with earthquakes: 72.14
- Actual clusters with earthquakes: 103
- Chi-square test: p-value = 0.014452
This result is statistically significant (p < 0.05), indicating a positive correlation between conjunction clusters and major earthquakes.
This aligns with our own research and earlier statistics.
π₯9π6π1π―1
Training AI to let it define conjunction clusters reveals a statistically significant correlation for the period 2000-2024. This cluster definition is slightly different from our previous definition.
The results show:
- Total extended window duration: 4,344.31 days
- Total observation duration: 8,878.62 days
- Expected probability: 48.93% (the proportion of time covered by extended windows)
- Observed successes: 92 out of 156 earthquakes (59.0%)
- Binomial test p-value: 0.0129
AI conclusion: "This means we can reject the null hypothesis that earthquakes occur randomly with respect to planetary conjunction clusters."
Image illustrates 2016.
The results show:
- Total extended window duration: 4,344.31 days
- Total observation duration: 8,878.62 days
- Expected probability: 48.93% (the proportion of time covered by extended windows)
- Observed successes: 92 out of 156 earthquakes (59.0%)
- Binomial test p-value: 0.0129
AI conclusion: "This means we can reject the null hypothesis that earthquakes occur randomly with respect to planetary conjunction clusters."
Image illustrates 2016.
π19π1π1
A significant temporal cluster of stronger (Mβ₯5.5) earthquakes occurred with the green peaks (lunar conjunctions), which I discussed in detail in the latest video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvD0-JWhNpA&t=339s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvD0-JWhNpA&t=339s
π15π1
Preliminary results show notable temporal clustering on the 13th. This time-frame was discussed in the April 7 video at 3m48s:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=J_Nqkz2HYnU&t=228s
https://youtube.com/watch?v=J_Nqkz2HYnU&t=228s
π14π3
While Earth's atmosphere is a different medium with different mechanisms than Earth's crust, there are interesting parallels to consider between earthquakes and lightning, as both manifest as a sudden discharge resulting from energy built-up.
https://ssgeos.org/articles/earthquake-and-lightning-parallels.htm
https://ssgeos.org/articles/earthquake-and-lightning-parallels.htm
ssgeos.org
Earthquake and Lightning Parallels | SSGEOS
Solar System Geometry Survey
π17π1
On this day in 1906 San Francisco was devastated by a M 7.9 #earthquake. At that time, 3 M β₯ 7.0 earthquakes occurred in just 5 days.
To date 1906 is seismically still the most active year on record with no less than 22 magnitude β₯ 7.0 and 7 magnitude β₯ 7.8 earthquakes, 5(!) of which reached magnitude β₯ 8.
At the time, Uranus and Neptune were on opposite sides of the Solar System. Large earthquakes occurred repeatedly when Earth and the Moon made critical geometry with these outer planets. The San Francisco earthquake is just one example.
Uranus and Neptune are on opposite sides of the Solar System roughly every 172 years.
https://ssgeos.org/archive/a1906/19060418131226-offshore-northern-california-79.htm
To date 1906 is seismically still the most active year on record with no less than 22 magnitude β₯ 7.0 and 7 magnitude β₯ 7.8 earthquakes, 5(!) of which reached magnitude β₯ 8.
At the time, Uranus and Neptune were on opposite sides of the Solar System. Large earthquakes occurred repeatedly when Earth and the Moon made critical geometry with these outer planets. The San Francisco earthquake is just one example.
Uranus and Neptune are on opposite sides of the Solar System roughly every 172 years.
https://ssgeos.org/archive/a1906/19060418131226-offshore-northern-california-79.htm
π26π2β€1π1
Strong clusters of M β₯ 5.5 #earthquakes in this time-frame. Latest video for more information: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2hfCIyJra0
π11π4π3β€1
A 2004 study estimated a 35-70% probability of a Mw > 7.0 earthquake in the Sea of Marmara near Istanbul in the next 30 years (2004-2034). The seismic gap is indicated on the map by red arrows. Based on this study we can conclude that there is reason for concern.
https://earth-planets-space.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40623-017-0648-9
https://earth-planets-space.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40623-017-0648-9
π12π7π’3β€2π1
The Mw 6.2 #earthquake in Western Turkey is part of a significant cluster of stronger earthquakes that started on the 22nd. For more information on the cluster of geometric interaction on 21-22 April, see our 16 April video at 2:33: https://youtube.com/watch?v=D2hfCIyJra0&t=133s
π38π1π1π1
The strongest #earthquake in the last two weeks was M 6.6 at the Southeast Indian Ridge. Note the temporal clustering of M β₯ 5.5 earthquakes depicted on the #SSGI graph. Stronger earthquakes tend to occur in clusters, rather than on average.
π22π4β€3π1π1
Some clustering of stronger (M β₯ 5.5) tremors today, following yesterday's lunar geometry.
Yesterday's video explanation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tK3udLd4O-o
Yesterday's video explanation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tK3udLd4O-o
π14π6π6β€1
An obvious cluster of stronger (M β₯ 5.5) #earthquakes occurred yesterday following the sequence of planetary and lunar geometry from 9 to 12 May. Stronger tremors tend to occur in temporal clusters (without spatial component), i.e in a short time in different regions.
For a detailed analysis of this #SSGI graph, check out
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ezv20mRKdSg
For a detailed analysis of this #SSGI graph, check out
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ezv20mRKdSg
π21β€1π1
In this time-frame clustering of stronger (M β₯ 5.5) #earthquakes occurred primarily after lunar peaks (green). The largest #earthquake was M 6.5 near the north coast of New Guinea, P.N.G. on the 20th. #SSGI
π12π9π3π3