Forwarded from π¬π§ SITREP - Independent OSINT Channel π¬π§
β‘οΈπ·πΊ πΊπ¦ π΄ Is #Ukraine or #IS guilty of the #Crocus Massacreβ‘οΈ
πΈThere will almost certainly not be a universally accepted end result. To the facts:
1οΈβ£ The perpetrators were caught in the #Bryasnk region and most likely wanted to flee to #Ukraine.
2οΈβ£ The #US knew about attack planning and issued a travel warning for their citizens.
3οΈβ£ #IS terrorist involvement was almost immediately claimed by Western entities without providing any evidence, especially without #IS source.
4οΈβ£ The #IS Terror Organisation itself only commented in detail yesterday and took responsibility. (Videoπ)
5οΈβ£ #The investigation is ongoing!
βοΈAccording to the current state of knowledge, prima facie evidence (at first sight) suggests that #Ukraine is involved. IS involvement has not been proven.
πΉThe belated admission by IS doesn't change anything, because IS is also known for being free riders.
πΉEven if #IS were involved, that wouldn't rule out #Ukraine or the #US or #UK being involved.
π‘ #IS is pragmatic and its main enemy is #Russia. Let us remember that #IS only began to falter in #Syria when #Russia intervened and destroyed its economic structure and stopped oil sales to #Turkey by bombing oil convoys.
π‘ The #US are also pragmatic and changes partners as it sees fit. Osama Bin Laden and Sadam Hussein are just 2 examples. During the Battle of Mosul in #Iraq, the #US allowed #IS troops to withdraw towards #Syria without bombing them. A short time later, Palmyra was retaken by #IS.
π‘ #IS militants were treated in #Israel and some are fighting on the side of #Ukraine.
βοΈThus, there are no fixed fronts. Cooperation between #Ukraine and #IS and also the participation of the #US or #UK are conceivable.
βοΈ In Roman law, Ukraine must shatter the proof prima facie. The statements available so far are not suitable for this.
πΈThese are the core facts. I warn against getting bogged down in details. For example, it is completely irrelevant whether the perpetrators behaved like #IS militants or not, since #IS now recruits anyone who is halfway suitable. The fact that the #US knew about planned terrorist attacks is a fact that is completely unsuitable for drawing any further conclusions.
π In conclusion, the further investigations have to be awaited and #Ukraine is forced to act in the current situation because "prima facie" is against it.
t.me/sitreports /#ass/
Join SITREPπΊMap Reports - Top Videos - Analyses
πΈThere will almost certainly not be a universally accepted end result. To the facts:
βοΈAccording to the current state of knowledge, prima facie evidence (at first sight) suggests that #Ukraine is involved. IS involvement has not been proven.
πΉThe belated admission by IS doesn't change anything, because IS is also known for being free riders.
πΉEven if #IS were involved, that wouldn't rule out #Ukraine or the #US or #UK being involved.
βοΈThus, there are no fixed fronts. Cooperation between #Ukraine and #IS and also the participation of the #US or #UK are conceivable.
βοΈ In Roman law, Ukraine must shatter the proof prima facie. The statements available so far are not suitable for this.
πΈThese are the core facts. I warn against getting bogged down in details. For example, it is completely irrelevant whether the perpetrators behaved like #IS militants or not, since #IS now recruits anyone who is halfway suitable. The fact that the #US knew about planned terrorist attacks is a fact that is completely unsuitable for drawing any further conclusions.
π In conclusion, the further investigations have to be awaited and #Ukraine is forced to act in the current situation because "prima facie" is against it.
t.me/sitreports /#ass/
Join SITREPπΊMap Reports - Top Videos - Analyses
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Telegram
π¬π§ SITREP - Independent OSINT Channel π¬π§