🇺🇸🏴‍☠️⚔️🇮🇷 Iranian TV: The American-Zionist enemy targeted the bridge B1 in Karaj for the second time within hours.

The bridge is often described as the highest bridge in West Asiaand was was inaugurated earlier that year.

@Slavyangrad

🇮🇷 | Dr. Masoud Pezeshkian's Letter to the People of the United States: Iran Has Never Initiated a War:

Addressed to the people of the United States and all those who, amidst a flood of distortions and fabricated narratives, continue to seek the truth and hope for a better life:

Iran is one of the oldest continuous civilizations in human history. Despite its historical and geographical advantages over different eras, Iran has never chosen the path of aggression, expansionism, colonialism, or domination in its modern history.

Even after enduring occupation, invasion, and continuous pressure from global powers, and despite having military superiority over many of its neighbors, Iran has never been the initiator of war; yet it has firmly and courageously repelled aggressors.

The people of Iran bear no hostility toward other nations, including the people of the United States, Europe, or neighboring countries. Iranians have historically distinguished between governments and the people they govern, even when facing repeated foreign interventions and pressures. This is a deeply rooted principle in Iranian culture and collective conscience, not a temporary political stance.

For this reason, portraying Iran as a “threat” is inconsistent with historical facts and present realities. Such perceptions are the product of the political and economic desires of powerful actors, who create enemies to justify pressure, maintain military dominance, sustain the weapons industry, and control strategic markets. In such a context, if a threat does not exist, it is manufactured.

In this framework, the United States has concentrated the largest number of troops, bases, and military capabilities around Iran—a country that, at least since the founding of the United States, has never initiated a war.

Recent U.S. aggressions launched from these bases have shown how threatening this military presence is. Naturally, no country would refrain from strengthening its defensive capabilities under such conditions.

What Iran has done and continues to do is a measured response based on “legitimate defense” and is by no means an act of initiating war or aggression.

Relations between Iran and the U.S. were not initially hostile. The turning point, however, was the 1953 coup (28 Mordad), the illegal U.S. intervention to prevent the nationalization of Iranian resources. That coup disrupted Iran’s democratic process, reinstated dictatorship, and planted deep seeds of distrust toward U.S. policies among Iranians.

This distrust intensified with U.S. support for the Shah’s regime, backing Saddam Hussein during the 1980s imposed war, imposing the longest sanctions in modern history, and ultimately, unjustified military aggression—twice during ongoing negotiations.

Despite all these pressures, they failed to weaken Iran. On the contrary, the country strengthened in many areas: literacy rates tripled from around 30% before the revolution to over 90%; higher education expanded significantly; remarkable advancements were made in modern technologies; healthcare improved; and infrastructure developed at unprecedented speed. These are measurable facts standing independent of fabricated narratives.

At the same time, the destructive and inhumane effects of sanctions and aggressions on the lives of resilient Iranians cannot be ignored. Ongoing military attacks and recent bombings deeply affect people’s lives and perspectives. It is a human truth: when war causes irreparable harm to lives, homes, and futures, people do not remain indifferent to its perpetrators.

A fundamental question arises: Which of the American people’s interests is served by this war? Was there a real threat from Iran that justified such actions? Does the killing of innocent children, destruction of medical facilities for cancer patients, or pride in bombing a nation and returning it to the “Stone Age” serve any purpose other than further undermining the global standing of the United States?

@Slavyangrad

🇺🇸 US Defense Secretary Hegseth fired more than a dozen generals, including the commander of the Army’s ground forces.

Source: PressTV

🇮🇷⚡️🇺🇸🇮🇱 Image of the wing of the second destroyed F-15 fighter — IRIB

🐣 Terminator saves Jesus, an instant Easter classic.

Happy Good Friday y’all!

🔗

Join us | @MyLordBebo

🇺🇸🇮🇶 IMPORTANT: FPV drone usage against US forces continues!

Iraqi pro-Iranian militia flies over the Victoria base for objective damage control of previous strikes and, at the end, the FPV drone hits fuel tanks.

If they carry on with this, they can’t repair the base quicker than they destroy it.

-> In contrast to mainland Russia, where such strikes are rarer, the US base is in the middle of essentially hostile territory. Iraqi-Iranian militia is all around. This will be tougher.

🔗

Join us | @MyLordBebo

🇮🇷⚡️🇮🇱🇺🇸 A planned vote at the UN Security Council on a draft resolution authorizing the "use of force" in the Strait of Hormuz has been abruptly postponed, exposing deep divisions among major powers over how to respond to complications arising from the imposed war on Iran.

The draft, submitted by Bahrain and backed by the United States in UNSC, would further escalate the US-Israeli war on Iran. However, the delay, officially attributed to the Good Friday holiday, comes despite the predetermined voting day, raising questions about underlying political disagreements.

China has warned that authorizing such measures risks further escalation, while Russia has denounced the text as "biased", signaling potential obstacles to its authorization.

Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron dismissed the idea of a military operation in the strait as unrealistic, cautioning that it would be prolonged and expose global shipping to greater danger.

With no new vote date announced and veto threats looming, the future of the resolution remains uncertain, highlighting the growing complexity the US has created at a critical global energy chokepoint.