🇺🇸🇺🇦After Zelensky arrived in the United States, he was criticized by Donald Trump and his son.

At a rally of his supporters, the presidential candidate called the Ukrainian president a “salesman.”

"I see Zelensky has arrived. I think Zelensky is the greatest salesman in history. Every time he comes to our country, he goes back with $60 billion. Billions!" Trump said.

And his son wrote a post criticizing Zelensky for his words in an interview with the New Yorker magazine, where he said that Trump "doesn't really know how to stop the war." Zelensky also called Trump's ally J.D. Vance "radical" in this interview, for suggesting ending the war in Ukraine along the front lines.

"So a foreign leader who has received billions of dollars in funding from American taxpayers comes to our country and has the audacity to attack the Republican candidate for President? And he does this right after a pro-Ukrainian bigot tried to kill my father? Disgraceful!" Donald Trump Jr. wrote.

Let us recall that Zelensky stated that he plans to meet with Trump during his visit to the United States to show him his "victory plan."

🇷🇺⚔️🇺🇦 Russian Marines ended the Kursk Safari for this column of Kiev Regime soldiers.

🔴 @DDGeopolitics

🇮🇱💥🇱🇧 Israeli Zionist Regime continues to bomb Lebanon today!

🔴 @DDGeopolitics

🇮🇱🇵🇸 CIVILIANS STREWN IN POOLS OF BLOOD AS ISRAEL TARGETS PALESTINIANS IN HOMES, SHOPPING IN MARKET STREET (00:13 1st video) in Gaza Strip's Nuseirat refugee camp, murdering at least 6, including women, children, and paramedics killed while evacuating about a dozen wounded, like shell-shocked, shaking, bloodied child in 2nd video.

Stretching genocide to sea, IDF naval boats open fire on civilians off camp's coast, leaving little girl in agony with bullet wound gushing blood, as West's darling and "Only democracy in Middle East" commits massacres in two countries at once.

Boost us here @IntelRepublic

⚡️🇩🇪🗳🤓🤡📊😮

WHO REALLY WON THE STATE ELECTIONS IN GERMAN BRANDENBURG?

✍️ Written by SITREP ✍️

Officially, the Social Democratic Party's (SPD) top candidate and ruling Prime Minister Dietmar Woidke is praised as the winner. As is often the case, the reality differs from the official version.

The first question is how to define an election winner?

1) Is it the one with the most seats in parliament?
2) Is it the one who has the most voting winnings?
3) Is it the one who will probably appoint the Prime Minister and form the government?

Certainly, there are other definitions. In ours, the SPD has the most seats, the BSW (Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance), which ran for the election for the first time, has the most increases in votes, the (Alternative for Germany) AfD has the second most and whether there will even be a new prime minister is currently unclear.

Therefore, let's take a look at indisputable facts:

With the AfD, everyone had clearly ruled out collaboration. This means that an AfD prime minister forming the government would have been impossible. However, the AfD has the largest increase in votes compared to the last election (without BSW).

Greens, Left and Free Democratic Party (FDP) represented in the German Bundestag failed to pass the 5% hurdle and, alternatively, were unable to obtain a direct mandate, which would still have enabled a presence in the state parliament with members according to quota.

As a result of the fails, the AfD gets more than 1/3 of the parliamentary seats and has a blocking minority and can prevent qualified 2/3 majorities in parliament. If the Greens and/or the Left were represented in parliament, the AfD would have received less than 1/3 of the seats.

The fact is that for a majority government, the 3 non-AfD parties would have to participate in the government.

The fact is that the popular, incumbent Prime Minister, Dietmar Woidke, threatened before the election that if his SPD did not become the strongest party, he would no longer be available as Prime Minister.

It is also a fact that the incumbent Saxon CDU Prime Minister Michael Kretschmer called for the election of the SPD.

The fact is that Sahra Wagenknecht's election promise is demanding something like a commitment to peace from possible coalition partners at the state level, which excludes the stationing of US missiles and further arms deliveries to Ukraine, without being able to de facto prevent both.

The fact is that, according to recent statements, the other parties will not comply with the afore mentioned demands. This also applies to Saxony and Thuringia.

Apart from these indisputable facts:

It remains unclear for now whether Sarah Wagenknecht (BSW) would tolerate minority governments or whether she would break her election promise. The latter would seriously damage the reputation of BSW.

📌 Now form your own opinion about who won the election!

📱 For the Military Hardcore
👉 Join Global Depth to boost your TG Feed

GLOBAL DEPTH from HK
This channel aims to unite interested individuals from around the world in an attempt to connect the dots. Subscriber participation is always welcome.