Will Shackel
1 subscriber
187 photos
52 videos
70 links
Founder of
@nuclearforaus
Download Telegram
BOOK NOW FOR AN EVENING WITH NUCLEAR ENGINEER, MISS AMERICA 2023 GRACE STANKE.

🔗https://nuclear.com/Tour?recruiter_id=106906

📍Perth [SOLD OUT]
📍Brisbane Jan 31 2025
📍Melbourne Feb 1 2025
📍Adelaide Feb 4 2025
📍Sydney Feb 6 2025

Early bird tickets selling fast for $10.
Australia's new Chief Scientist Tony Haymet has told the Australian Financial Review "I think we should be open to any form of energy" including nuclear power.

✍️Sign our petition today: http://nuclear.com/petition
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
$600bn, 4% of the grid, Not ready til the 2040s
👆These are all LIES about nuclear power

Here's the facts:
1/ '$600bn Cost'
This figure is from the 'Smart' Energy Council (renewable lobby group). It extrapolates the cost of Hinkley C (the most expensive nuclear power plant ever) and literally doubles it. Even the CSIRO assumes lower nuclear capital costs for Australia.

2/ '4% of the grid'
This figure is also from the 'Smart' Energy Council from dividing 11GW of nuclear capacity by 300GW of renewable capacity. However, Capacity ≠ Generation. 1GW of renewable capacity generates roughly a third of the power of 1GW of nuclear capacity.

3/ 'Not ready til the 2040s'
The IAEA predicts it would take 10-15 years for a new to nuclear country to have nuclear power. The is the advice the Australian Government relies on for nuclear yet is being ignored by the PM & Energy Minister.

Learn more about nuclear:
http://NuclearForAustralia.com/the_facts

✍️Sign to lift the ban:
https://nuclearforaustralia.com/petition
This $600bn figure comes from extrapolating the cost of the most expensive nuclear plant ever and doubling it.

It’s embarrassing that a world leader would rely on numbers that flimsy to justify nuclear being illegal in Australia.

Even the CSIRO assumes a lower capital cost.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
FACTCHECK: Nuclear won’t cost $600bn.

This figure comes from extrapolating the cost of the most expensive nuclear plant ever and doubling it.

Even the CSIRO assumes a lower capital cost.

When will our leaders stop repeating and apologise for this dodgy number?
@UKLabour
is a great example of something to aspire to.
And
@AustralianLabor
whilst you’re at it ditch the smoke. Cooling towers release water vapour.

I know that there are many Labor members who see through this stuff. It’s time they spoke up and let campaign HQ know how embarrassing this is for their movement.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Where is truth in political advertising?

This $600 billion figure was calculated by extrapolating the cost of the most expensive nuclear plant ever and doubling it.

In fact, even the CSIRO assumes nuclear costs FIVE TIMES less.

These ads should all be pulled.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The lie continues…

Nuclear won’t cost $600 billion.

That’s based on extrapolating the cost of the most expensive nuclear power project ever and doubling it.

Even the CSIRO assumes a cost of 5x less.

You won’t hear an expert using these numbers…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
FACTCHECK: Nuclear won't cost $600 billion

It's based on extrapolating the cost of the most expensive nuclear power plant ever and doubling it.

It assumes nuclear costs 5x more than even what the CSIRO predicts.

The nuclear fear campaign must stop.
The claim that nuclear costs $600bn extrapolates the cost of the most expensive nuclear plant and doubling it.

It assumes nuclear costs 5x more than even the CSIRO’s prediction.

It’s from the ‘Smart’ Energy Council which is funded by organisations with alleged links to slavery.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Yes, Australia is the only Top 20 economy ignoring nuclear.

In addition to the countries using it currently…
-Germany imports nuclear power from France & is considering restarts
-Indonesia, Italy & Saudi Arabia are signed up to nuclear
-Turkey is building a nuclear plant
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
FACTCHECK: The $600bn figure is a lie.

It’s based on extrapolating the cost of the most expensive nuclear power plant ever and doubling it.

That assumes nuclear will cost 5x more than even the CSIRO’s prediction.

The nuclear fear campaign must stop.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Nuclear is illegal.

Renewables are heavily subsidised.

The private sector didn’t decide to ignore nuclear and go to 100% renewables, ideological politicians did.

✍️Sign to lift the ban:
http://nuclearforaustralia.com/petition
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
FACTCHECK: Small Modular Reactors do exist.

There are 3 small modular reactors in operation today in China & Russia with 80+ designs for SMRs currently in development.

We should be embracing new technologies, not running away from them.
Last night the PM gaslit people into thinking Keir Starmer regrets using nuclear power.

This is what Keir has actually said:
“We're firing up nuclear power to drive growth, jobs and more affordable energy - putting money back in your pocket”
Also what’s the source for the 20 year claim?
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
How do they say this with a straight face?

The $600bn nuclear figure extrapolates the cost of the most expensive nuclear power plant ever and doubles it.

It even contradicts their own source at the CSIRO which assumes nuclear costs 5x less.
✍️Sign to lift the nuclear ban: