Once again, nuclear disinformation goes unchecked by Australian media.

This claim that nuclear in Australia would cost $600 billion assumed that nuclear costed more than 5x more than even the CSIRO's estimate.

The ABC should issue an apology and correction for repeating it once again.

The Australian Conservation Foundation argue for a policy would literally be worse for the climate than shutting down all renewables in Australia.

They want to shut down Australia's uranium export industry that produces the equivalent clean energy to around 70% of Australia's total electricity demand.

They're no friend to the environment.

The United States has lower electricity emissions than Australia.

How? They have nuclear power and we don't.

Australia can't be a clean energy superpower by banning one of the biggest sources of clean energy.

Congratulations South Korea 🇰🇷👏

Once again shows that nuclear is needed in the mix to phase out fossil fuels.

📺 Watch my full evidence:

This has been edited for brevity. Cuts are indicated with dissolves.

Another important disclaimer: I am not a nuclear expert, I’ve never said I am a nuclear expert. I’m referring to Nuclear for Australia’s expert group:

The first of which is set to come online next year!

Australia has lost COP to Turkey 🇹🇷 which is building four nuclear reactors.

Whilst it's disappointing we won't have the world's nuclear community in Adelaide, it's reassuring that the Energy Minister will face an irony in Turkey if he tries to shut down global nuclear progress.

continue to refuse opportunities to meet with Australian nuclear experts.

No wonder there's so much disinformation in the debate. How can you have an informed position on nuclear power without engaging with experts?

📺 Watch my full evidence:
https://vist.ly/4f4qk

The first of which is set to come online next year!

Australia has lost COP to Turkey 🇹🇷 which is building four nuclear reactors.

Whilst it's disappointing we won't have the world's nuclear community in Adelaide, it's reassuring that the Energy Minister will face an irony in Turkey if he tries to shut down global nuclear progress.

Australia’s nuclear ban makes us irrelevant to the rest of the world.

India is planning to increase their nuclear power capacity tenfold by 2047.

They’re looking to collaborate, yet the outdated ideology of our leaders prevents us.

Never believe a politician who says they're serious about the climate but Australia doesn't need nuclear.

The government has had to admit today that current projections suggest they'll only reach 48% emission reduction by 2035 compared to their recently announced target of 62-70%.

Why is the government shooting themselves in the foot with the nuclear power ban? We need as much clean energy we can get including nuclear power.

Introducing Jordan! As Nuclear for Australia grows, I'm thrilled to welcome Jordan to the team as our Supporter Relations Coordinator. Our over 115,000 have always been at the heart of everything we do. With this new dedicated role we've got huge plans to increase our engagement and supercharge our impact.

Thanks for the shout-out Simon!

I'm proud to be a nuclear fan, in the same way you're a 100% renewable fan.

Neither of us are experts but I'd argue you've got a lot more political influence than I do...

Also just like the information integrity committee isn’t it funny how they never present any evidence of misinformation.

On the contrary, the anti-nuclear cause is one of the biggest misinformation machines Australia has ever seen:

So-called ‘pro-climate’ orgs like these want to shut down experts talking about nuclear in Australia.

For them, it’s not about the cause but the industry they lobby for and are paid by.

If it was about the cause, they’d support all sources of clean energy including nuclear.

It's water vapour, not smoke!

I hope I'm not triggering any nuclear people here.