Let's chat on X

The main danger of leadership is believing you're already out of reach

But the champion is the easiest target. When you become number one, you automatically become the center of attention. Everyone chasing you studies your patterns, your decisions, your strengths, and your weaknesses in detail. They have something you don't - complete information about you. While you take your position for granted and bask in your success, they spend their time studying you and honing their skills.

The best defense of leadership is to see your position not as a finish line, but as a starting point for the next move. To be better than yesterday. To demand more from yourself than ever before. Because someone who keeps growing and evolving is unpredictable by nature. You can't prepare for them - they don't even know what they'll be like tomorrow.

Only the paranoid survive. The ones who never let their guard down, even when standing on the highest pedestal. That's why the only healthy response to leadership is to never consider your position finally conquered and to keep a healthy fear of losing it.

UPD: Sooo, Nicky signed 5 more bearbricks and asked us to give them to some of you. Thinking about how to best set up a giveaway, we'll probably be running an interesting tournament for it soon.

If I had to choose just one factor that determines whether a person will achieve a breakthrough in absolutely any endeavor - it would be ambition.

Not intelligence, and certainly not innate talent. All of that is secondary and can be developed. But you can't force a person to move forward if they don't internally want more and consciously go where the odds of success are below 30%. And do it without complaining about circumstances and difficulties, accepting uncertainty as part of the path.

There are no people with a low bar who've achieved a breakthrough. I don't know a single one. All those who create products, drive progress, and lead strong teams - they're people who always want more.

And here's what we end up with. For some, the ceiling of their dreams is stability and the absence of problems. For others, the reward is the scale of the challenges and navigating chaos. That's exactly why people with the same starting point end up in completely different places ten years later. And it's clearly not because one of them had more talent. Ambition, guys. That's what it always comes down to.

Work can be part of education - and often its most valuable part

Today, young people choose a specialization at a very early age before they have had a chance to gain any real work experience. It’s a questionable bet that you make with the least amount of information you’ll ever have. But there’s a bigger problem than picking the wrong major: it’s the very structure of modern education.

It simply doesn't keep up with the speed at which the market changes. While the university develops, approves, and launches a new program, the market will have already managed to create new tools, professions, and requirements for specialists. AI is the most obvious example. Many of the professions and tools forming around AI today simply didn't exist in their current form just a few years ago.

iGaming, by the way, is a good example of the reverse sequence. For people to choose this field at 18 is practically impossible, there's most likely simply nowhere to systematically learn it. As a rule, a person first comes to work in the industry, encounters real tasks, tries different directions - and only then starts to understand what actually interests them and what knowledge they're missing. In my view, that kind of education is far more meaningful than spending five years on a major you picked at 18, only to graduate and find your profession has become automated away a couple of years back.

That's exactly why my advice to young people is to start working as early as possible. Every year spent exclusively on preparing for life is a year without real experience, mistakes, and feedback. Work is also a skill. And, like most skills, it grows not linearly but exponentially.

In a world where everyone has different starting conditions, the worst strategy is to accept your position

The world has indeed never been particularly fair: some people get a strong education, connections, and support from childhood, while others start from almost nothing. Pretending this difference doesn't exist is foolish, but the distortion in how we see it is almost always stronger than the difference itself: people systematically underestimate their own advantages far more than they overestimate others'.

If nothing and no one is truly holding you back right now - that's already a huge advantage. You can try launching a startup, you can work harder than everyone else, you can spend time on skills that won't pay off today but will affect your life a few years from now. As long as you have no serious obligations, you have a resource most people don't - the freedom to try and fail.

Moreover, your network is capital; your location is capital. What seems like boring routine to you might be an opportunity that someone else, from another part of the world, has spent years trying to get closer to.

So yes, you can't always change your starting conditions, but you can almost always decide how to use them. And what looks like a disadvantage today, with the right approach, becomes your strongest advantage.

Today our 1win team beat the world's #1 team, Team Spirit, 2-0 in the esports title CS2 and broke into the top 14 teams in the world

Exactly 3 months ago we decided to change our approach to the esports division, and the results didn't take long.

The team will get a $100k bonus from me for such a top performance.