The author should comprehensively list the limitations of the case and describe the significance of each limitation.

@Scientificwriting

The author should briefly summarize the published literature derived from the literature review and may provide a detailed summary of a few citations. A table listing the pertinent facts of the cases detected from the literature review is a simple method for providing extensive, detailed data in an interpretable form. The author should compare and contrast the nuances of the case report with the published literature and explain and justify the differences and similarities.

@Scientificwriting

The discussion section of a case report is in no way designed to provide comprehensive details of each citation of an all-inclusive and extensive literature review—this should be saved for review articles.

@Scientificwriting

All the references cited should be critically evaluated. Transferring an unread reference cited in another article is unethical and will place the author of the case report at risk of error and embarrassment. The author should next summarize the essential features of the case report, justify why this case is unique, and draw recommendations and conclusions.

@Scientificwriting

Conclusion

The author must provide a justified conclusion based on the evidence reviewed in the discussion section. The author must be careful not to make firm judgments and sweeping recommendations based on speculation, limited and tenuous information, or a few case reports. However, justifiable evidence-based recommendations should be stated.

@Scientificwriting

The author may suggest that clinicians be aware of the insight learned from the case or suggest heightened vigilance, prudent management, avoidance, further study before taking action, or new ideas for investigation. How the information discovered from the case report will apply to the author’s practice should be described.

@Scientificwriting

The conclusion should be concise and not exceed one paragraph. Guidelines for writing patient case reports in a checklist format can facilitate and enhance the manuscript writing process.

@Scientificwriting

Overall, patient case reports are valuable new and unusual information resources that may lead to vital research.

@Scientificwriting

🔔 انجمن علمی دانشجویی ANS برگزار می‌کند

🔴 وبینار "شرکت در کنفرانس های بین المللی"
⭕️" Participation in international conferences for medical students: Why, Where, How? "

📌قرار هست تا در این وبینار به موضوع اهمیتی که کنفرانس ها و به طور ویژه کنفرانس های بین المللی برای دانشجویان داره بپردازیم:
❓ما که دانشجو هستیم و فعلا پزشک نشدیم، کنفرانس به چه درد ما میخوره؟!!🤔
❓چه امتیازات و فرصت هایی رو میتونه برای دانشجو فراهم کنه؟
❓آیا از لحاظ بار علمی برای دانشجو مفید هست؟

📚همچنین درباره اینکه کدوم همایش ها برای دانشجویان مناسب ترن، تو کدوم همایش ها میشه نقش داشت، و چجوری میشه در این همایش ها شرکت کرد صحبت خواهیم ‌کرد. در آخر هم گذری میزنیم به کنفرانس هایی که به طور مرتبط با علوم اعصاب خودمختار برگزار میشن😊

علاوه بر این، میتونید هر سوالی که داشتید - از جمله سوالاتی که میخواید در وبینار بهشون پاسخ داده شه - داخل لینک از ما بپرسید.

📆تاریخ: پنجشنبه ۲۴ خرداد ماه ۱۴۰۳
🕰ساعت: ۱۲:۳۰

🔴ثبت نام از طریق لینک

#وبینار #پژوهش #همایش #SSRC #انجمن_ANS

🆔 @ANS_TUMS
🆔 @SSRC_News

🔔 انجمن علمی دانشجویی ANS برگزار می‌کند

🔴 کارگاه "فوت و فن نوشتن کیس ریپورت" با تدریس دکتر اکبر شفیعی مدیر پژوهشکده بیماری های قلب و عروق دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران

📌تو این کارگاه یاد میگیریم که:

✅️کیس ریپورت چیه و با چه هدفی نوشته میشه؟

✅️مقدمات اولیه ای که برای نوشتن یه کیس ریپورت خوب نیاز داریم چیاست؟

✅️چجوری برای کیس ریپورت ایده پیدا کنیم؟

✅ کیس ریپورتمون رو کجا چاپ کنیم؟

❗️ظرفیت ثبت نام محدود


📆 تاریخ: پنجشنبه ۱۸ مرداد ماه ۱۴۰۳

🕰 ساعت: ۹ الی ۱۳

📍به صورت حضوری در مرکز مراد

آدرس : بلوار کشاورز- خیابان وصال شیرازی- تقاطع خیابان ایتالیا- پلاک 56

هزینه ثبت نام:
تک نفره ۳۰۰هزارتومان
گروهی(بالای ۳ نفر) ۲۰۰ هزارتومان



🔴لینک ثبت نام:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf-JzQ0UJUZzoXP4Yjjw-27u0dCpOsFVRfc9UwDBMaFJStZaw/viewform?usp=sf_link



🆔 @ANS_TUMS
🆔 @SSRC_News

How a Manuscript should look like!

In 1854, many people in London got sick and died from cholera.

✳️ Dr. John Snow thought the sickness came from dirty water, not from bad air. ( Traditional opinion for cause of illness )

He made a map and saw that most sick people drank water from the Broad Street pump.

He told people to take off the pump handle so no one could use the water.

After that, fewer people got sick.

This is his famous quote :

In consequence of what I said,the handle of the pump was removed on the following day

✅️ This story is very important in the history of medicine and epidemiology.

✏️ Note : Both "Jon" and "John" are pronounced the same and usually refer to the same name, but "John" is the more traditional spelling. "Jon" is a more modern or informal variant used more commonly nowadays. Typically, "Jon Snow" refers to the fictional character from Game of Thrones, while "John Snow" refers to the famous English physician known for his work in epidemiology.

@scientificwriting

⭕️ Epidemiology is essentially occurrence research.

✅️ The object of epidemiologic research is to study the occurrence of illness and its relationship to determinants.

🔆 The origins of epidemiology lie in unraveling the causes of infectious disease epidemics and the emergence of public health as an empirical discipline.

@scientificwriting

🔆 Clinical epidemiology deals with questions relevant to clinical practice: questions about

1) diagnosis
2) causes
3) prognosis
4) treatment of disease

✅️ Research should be :

1) relevant (deal with problems encountered in clinical practice)
2) valid ( the results are trueand, thus, not biased)
3) precise ( the results lie within a limited range of uncertainty)

@scientificwriting

✅️ Clinical Epidemiology

❓️ How can we use an epidemiological approach in the clinic?

❓️ How much can you rely on test results while ignoring the clinical signs of disease?

Case Example:

A 45-year-old male with no significant medical history presented with sudden-onset chest pain. His doctor suspected a rare disease (prevalence: 0.01%) and ordered a new, high-quality test (Sensitivity = 90%, Specificity = 80%).

Sensitivity = 90%: among 100 diseased individuals, the test will be positive in 90 cases.

Specificity = 80%: among 100 healthy individuals, the test will be negative in 80 cases.

💥 The test result was positive.

❓️ What should be the next step?
❓️ How much can you rely on this test, knowing that most medical tests usually have even lower sensitivity and specificity?

As you can see, there are two types of positive results (true or false). For a proper clinical approach, you must consider both and calculate the precision (positive predictive value):

Precision = 8100 / (8100 + 17,998,200) × 100 ≈ 0.045%

This means you can rely on it with only about 0.045% precision.

✅️ This example shows that the problem with this test is not its material or quality, but rather the disease it measures. For rare diseases, such tests are not useful. The best approach is to save resources and rely on clinical expertise.

🔰معاونت تحقیقات و فناوری دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران با همکاری مرکز پژوهش‌های علمی و فناوری دانشجویان با افتخار برگزار می‌کند:

🔺بزرگداشت هفته پژوهش و فناوری

📝سین برنامه‌های گرامیداشت هفته پژوهش- دوشنبه ۲۴ آذر ۱۴۰۴ | دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران

✔️رویداد بینشانه| روایت تلاش بی‌وقفه برای ساختن ظرفیت‌های آینده‌ساز

✔️اختتامیه رویداد بزرگ Tums Thesis

✔️نمایشگاه دستاوردهای پژوهشی

✔️اختتامیه رویداد روایت بیمار من

✔️رویداد Reverse Pitch(اطلاع‌رسانی به زودی)

✔️کارگاه رابطین صنعت

🌐لینک ثبت‌نام جهت حضور در هفته پژوهش:
https://vcr.tums.ac.ir/researchweek

🔺اطلاع از آخرین اخبار و رویدادهای مرکز پژوهش های علمی و فناوری دانشجویان در بسترهای اطلاع رسانی

📱| سایت | اینستاگرام | تلگرام

سیزدهمین کنگره سالیانه مرکز قلب تهران
همراه با هشتمین سمپوزیوم مراقبت‌های ویژه قلبی و نخستین سمپوزیوم دریچه قلب مرکز قلب تهران

🗓 ۸-۱۰ بهمن ۱۴۰۴
📍 مرکز قلب تهران
🎓 دارای ۱۵ امتیاز بازآموزی

🔗 thccongress.com | ثبت‌نام: icme.ir