⚡⚡KanekoaTheGreat

The New York Times is saying I'm a "qanon influencer" and an election misinformation superspreader on X.

😂😂😂

I shared a 32-page report on election fraud from the previous President.

Rather than disproving the report, The New York Times just calls me names.

Shouldn't people hear both sides of the debate to decide what's true?

Isn't that better than those in power labeling anything against their narrative as misinformation and censoring it?

For example, CISA's emails this week show they were worried about mail-in voting but still pushed Big Tech to censor users with similar worries.

Doesn't that show labeling things as misinformation is more about controlling the narrative than the truth?

I've written over sixty articles, made thousands of social media posts, and got billions of online views in the last three years, and I've never promoted qanon.

Yet Media Matters called me a qanon influencer, so all other garbage media outlets repeat their claim.

Their evidence?

I shared a JFK speech, and the video creator wrote the hashtag #WWG1WGA on it, even though the video had nothing to do with qanon.

It was a JFK speech.

They also say I'm a qanon influencer because I shared posts to a Telegram page with over 50 people, some of whom promoted qanon.

I can't control what other people write on the internet.

That's also how Telegram works.

I shared my post to a handful of channels, and others shared theirs.

I'm not responsible for the content others post.

But this is how the game is played.

Media Matters accuses me of being a qanon influencer.

Then, the ADL publishes a negative story, also labeling me a qanon influencer, citing Media Matters.
--------
Here's a link to the 32-page report on election fraud by the former President - read it, research each point, and come to your own conclusions:

https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1742670648433090764

Thread here :https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1750764227726594205.html