The children from the Embassy's school have participated in the cultural program organised by the Foreign Service Academy on the occasion of International Mother Language Day.
They recited the poem by Nikolay Nekrasov “Peasant Children” and the poem by Sergey Yesenin “The winter sings”.
They recited the poem by Nikolay Nekrasov “Peasant Children” and the poem by Sergey Yesenin “The winter sings”.
👍6🔥2
তিমুর কাইরগালিয়েভ রাশিয়ান দূতাবাস থেকে মাননীয় প্রধানমন্ত্রী শেখ হাসিনার কাছে আন্তর্জাতিক মাতৃভাষা দিবসের প্রচারের জন্য রাশিয়ান ভাষায় কৃতজ্ঞতা প্রকাশ করেছে🇷🇺
👍9🔥2
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
#Opinion by Russian MFA Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova
The Americans claim they “had nothing to do” with the explosions of the Nord Stream pipelines even though the findings by renowned investigative reporter Seymour Hersh are widely available.
We know that they know that everyone knows that this is a lie.
The problem is not that “the US” is the only logical answer to the oldest question in legal practice, Cui bono (who benefits?) that makes any sense; the problem is that the Americans are simply lying. I could tell you again about US Secretary of State Colin Powell’s vial hoax, but if you are tired of this story, I have plenty of others.
🇭🇹 There is this small nation, Haiti, and it has had bad luck. It was a colony – first Spanish, then French, and then for decades, it remained under American occupation. Each of these countries drained the island and its residents’ resources as much as they could, repaying them with poverty and devastation.
The Cold War was terrible in “warm” Haiti. François Duvalier, a former physician with the American Sanitary Mission, born a Haitian, was a dictator who established the most repressive government in Haiti and ordered arrests and massive human rights abuses. The details make one’s blood run cold: the detainees had their heads chopped off and were tortured by submerging them in baths of acid. Why didn't the Americans stand up for human rights then? Because they needed Duvalier as an anti-communist, to balance Fidel Castro's Cuba, as simple as that. Washington even provided the deranged dictator with money, while paying lip service to democracy.
In the 1990s, the Americans finally stopped respecting the sovereignty of the island republic altogether. In 1994, they pushed for Security Council authorisation for a special military operation in Haiti to restore President Jean-Bertrand Aristide to power because they wanted him there. They returned him to power. Later though, when they got tired of him, they just kidnapped him like a puppet and carted him off to Africa. This is how the George W. Bush administration helped build democracy in Haiti.
In 2021, Haitian President Jovenel Moise was assassinated; his wife, Martine, was also shot in the attack.
And what was found? Suspicions that the Americans were responsible again emerged in the Western information landscape immediately.
Also that week, the US Department of Justice issued a short press release declaring that several Americans associated with American PMC CTU Security had been arrested. Official Caracas reported that CTU had earlier been involved in the failed assassination attempt on Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro. And at the same time, at the Security Council meetings on Haiti, the US representative continued to declare their intention to contribute to the development of democracy, organising fair elections and supporting NGOs.
Only the Americans occupy a country on a whim, remove or imprison presidents, or dispose them through murder. Consider these statistics: Haiti is ranked 170th in terms of per capita GDP (of 199); every second HIV-infected resident of the Caribbean islands is Haitian.
This is a very thought-provoking story for Zelensky, who so affectionately embraced Joe Biden in the centre of Kiev. How much must one hate their own people to consider a prospect similar to that of long-suffering Haiti for themselves?
❓ So, to what extent is the US “not responsible” for sabotaging Nord Stream – as much as for the assassination of Haiti's president? Or for the vial hoax of the invasion of Iraq?
Read in full
The Americans claim they “had nothing to do” with the explosions of the Nord Stream pipelines even though the findings by renowned investigative reporter Seymour Hersh are widely available.
We know that they know that everyone knows that this is a lie.
The problem is not that “the US” is the only logical answer to the oldest question in legal practice, Cui bono (who benefits?) that makes any sense; the problem is that the Americans are simply lying. I could tell you again about US Secretary of State Colin Powell’s vial hoax, but if you are tired of this story, I have plenty of others.
🇭🇹 There is this small nation, Haiti, and it has had bad luck. It was a colony – first Spanish, then French, and then for decades, it remained under American occupation. Each of these countries drained the island and its residents’ resources as much as they could, repaying them with poverty and devastation.
The Cold War was terrible in “warm” Haiti. François Duvalier, a former physician with the American Sanitary Mission, born a Haitian, was a dictator who established the most repressive government in Haiti and ordered arrests and massive human rights abuses. The details make one’s blood run cold: the detainees had their heads chopped off and were tortured by submerging them in baths of acid. Why didn't the Americans stand up for human rights then? Because they needed Duvalier as an anti-communist, to balance Fidel Castro's Cuba, as simple as that. Washington even provided the deranged dictator with money, while paying lip service to democracy.
In the 1990s, the Americans finally stopped respecting the sovereignty of the island republic altogether. In 1994, they pushed for Security Council authorisation for a special military operation in Haiti to restore President Jean-Bertrand Aristide to power because they wanted him there. They returned him to power. Later though, when they got tired of him, they just kidnapped him like a puppet and carted him off to Africa. This is how the George W. Bush administration helped build democracy in Haiti.
In 2021, Haitian President Jovenel Moise was assassinated; his wife, Martine, was also shot in the attack.
And what was found? Suspicions that the Americans were responsible again emerged in the Western information landscape immediately.
Also that week, the US Department of Justice issued a short press release declaring that several Americans associated with American PMC CTU Security had been arrested. Official Caracas reported that CTU had earlier been involved in the failed assassination attempt on Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro. And at the same time, at the Security Council meetings on Haiti, the US representative continued to declare their intention to contribute to the development of democracy, organising fair elections and supporting NGOs.
Only the Americans occupy a country on a whim, remove or imprison presidents, or dispose them through murder. Consider these statistics: Haiti is ranked 170th in terms of per capita GDP (of 199); every second HIV-infected resident of the Caribbean islands is Haitian.
This is a very thought-provoking story for Zelensky, who so affectionately embraced Joe Biden in the centre of Kiev. How much must one hate their own people to consider a prospect similar to that of long-suffering Haiti for themselves?
❓ So, to what extent is the US “not responsible” for sabotaging Nord Stream – as much as for the assassination of Haiti's president? Or for the vial hoax of the invasion of Iraq?
Read in full
Telegraph
Opinion by Maria Zakharova
The Americans claim they “had nothing to do” with the explosions of the Nord Stream pipelines even though the findings by renowned investigative reporter Seymour Hersh are widely available. We know that they know that everyone knows that this is a lie. The…
👍2🤔1😱1
❗What's gonna happen in coming months in light of Putin's speech at the Federal Assembly?
_ As we predicted there is no change in the format of the SMO so it will continue, just with a larger number of troops and drones, its expansion is a certainty.
_ Withdrawal from the START treaty means that from today Russia can increase its nuclear arsenal after having cut it for decades, in light of NATO aggression it was a mistake that is going to be repaired, though it's unlikely there will be a shift towards quantity instead of continuing the modernization of the triad that was started a decade ago.
_ the divorce from the West is going to be permanent, when the president listed the most important trade routes for Russia in the next decade, the West was not mentioned of course, the president mentioned instead Central Asia, China, India, Pakistan, Iran.
_ the Russian military industry is going to be more important than ever in current international tensions and ongoing NATO aggression against Russia, it will return to the level of the peak of the Soviet era in terms of production per year of weapons and ammunitions.
_ Russia to consolidate its role as only defender of traditional values in the European continent, the president referred to Western degeneracy as an abomination, conservatives who don't want to give up to their values will increasingly look towards Russia for help against Satanists' oppression at home.
_ As we predicted there is no change in the format of the SMO so it will continue, just with a larger number of troops and drones, its expansion is a certainty.
_ Withdrawal from the START treaty means that from today Russia can increase its nuclear arsenal after having cut it for decades, in light of NATO aggression it was a mistake that is going to be repaired, though it's unlikely there will be a shift towards quantity instead of continuing the modernization of the triad that was started a decade ago.
_ the divorce from the West is going to be permanent, when the president listed the most important trade routes for Russia in the next decade, the West was not mentioned of course, the president mentioned instead Central Asia, China, India, Pakistan, Iran.
_ the Russian military industry is going to be more important than ever in current international tensions and ongoing NATO aggression against Russia, it will return to the level of the peak of the Soviet era in terms of production per year of weapons and ammunitions.
_ Russia to consolidate its role as only defender of traditional values in the European continent, the president referred to Western degeneracy as an abomination, conservatives who don't want to give up to their values will increasingly look towards Russia for help against Satanists' oppression at home.
👍3
🇷🇺🇺🇸Russia has suspended its participation in the Strategic Offensive Arms Treaty with the United States (START-3).
This document was the latest in a series of agreements between Moscow and Washington that ensured global security.
"This is not a threat, but an important signal to the United States and the West. Putin's decision concerns an area of exceptional importance for the security of the United States.
We warn you: the course of the West towards the strategic defeat of Russia is incompatible with the preservation of the current system of global nuclear security, the most important part of which is the START-3 treaty," Senator Alexei Pushkov said.
"If the United States and NATO take part in hostilities against Russia and talk about the need to defeat us on the battlefield, then there can be no question of allowing Americans to our nuclear facilities," agrees military–political publicist Mikhail Onufrienko.
He does not rule out that in response, Washington will start spreading rumors about Russia's plans to resort to "extremely aggressive measures." "For a long time, the West imposed the rules of the game on us. The situation needed to be reversed: let them now react to our actions and get out of it. Moscow has set its own conditions – and this is logical," the interlocutor believes.
This document was the latest in a series of agreements between Moscow and Washington that ensured global security.
"This is not a threat, but an important signal to the United States and the West. Putin's decision concerns an area of exceptional importance for the security of the United States.
We warn you: the course of the West towards the strategic defeat of Russia is incompatible with the preservation of the current system of global nuclear security, the most important part of which is the START-3 treaty," Senator Alexei Pushkov said.
"If the United States and NATO take part in hostilities against Russia and talk about the need to defeat us on the battlefield, then there can be no question of allowing Americans to our nuclear facilities," agrees military–political publicist Mikhail Onufrienko.
He does not rule out that in response, Washington will start spreading rumors about Russia's plans to resort to "extremely aggressive measures." "For a long time, the West imposed the rules of the game on us. The situation needed to be reversed: let them now react to our actions and get out of it. Moscow has set its own conditions – and this is logical," the interlocutor believes.
🔥1😁1
❗️West prevents UN Security Council meeting on Nord Stream sabotage at 'convenient time', Russian mission says
🤬3🤔1
Putin's Speech: From Russia's Economic Growth & Military Advancements to New START Suspension
Russian President Vladimir Putin on February 21 delivered a keynote speech addressing the Federal Assembly. Even though the West targeted Russia's economy, society, and military, it has failed to inflict damage on the nation, according to Putin.
"My personal impression is that that was a very self-confident speech of the president of a country which is not just struggling through a difficult war, but is developing and looking forward into the future with optimism," Dmitry Suslov, deputy director of the Center for European and International Studies at Russia’s Higher School of Economics and deputy director of research at the Russian Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, told Sputnik.
Read more analysis of Vladimir Putin's address to the Federal Assembly
Russian President Vladimir Putin on February 21 delivered a keynote speech addressing the Federal Assembly. Even though the West targeted Russia's economy, society, and military, it has failed to inflict damage on the nation, according to Putin.
"My personal impression is that that was a very self-confident speech of the president of a country which is not just struggling through a difficult war, but is developing and looking forward into the future with optimism," Dmitry Suslov, deputy director of the Center for European and International Studies at Russia’s Higher School of Economics and deputy director of research at the Russian Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, told Sputnik.
Read more analysis of Vladimir Putin's address to the Federal Assembly
🔥1
Putin Has A Point: The West’s Liberal-Globalist Elite & Their “Woke” Army Promote Pedophilia
Russia treasures its children’s physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual well-being, which is why its people oppose pushing “woke” ideology about non-traditional sexual identities onto kids, including that which normalizes this and even encourages self-harm. Whether in school or elsewhere in society, such content is strictly banned in order to protect children. The Western liberal-globalist elite and their “woke” army will thus never succeed in promoting pedophilia in Russia.
By Andrew Korybko
Russia treasures its children’s physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual well-being, which is why its people oppose pushing “woke” ideology about non-traditional sexual identities onto kids, including that which normalizes this and even encourages self-harm. Whether in school or elsewhere in society, such content is strictly banned in order to protect children. The Western liberal-globalist elite and their “woke” army will thus never succeed in promoting pedophilia in Russia.
By Andrew Korybko
Geopolitica.RU
Putin Has A Point: The West’s Liberal-Globalist Elite & Their “Woke”
Russia treasures its children’s physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual well-being, which is why its people oppose pushing “woke” ideology about non-traditional sexual identities onto kids,
🔥2
Fake news:
The Russian army launched a missile attack on Kramatorsk railway station in April 2022, killing more than sixty civilians. This was reported by the international organization Human Rights Watch (HRW).
The fact:
The missile strike was carried out by the Ukrainian army. We have already exposed this fake. The pictures from the scene clearly show that the train station was hit by a Tochka U missile, which has been decommissioned by the Russian army. In 2019, the last brigade of the Russian Armed Forces to retain Tochka U missiles was rearmed with Iskander missile systems.
After irrefutable evidence emerged that the attack on the train station had been carried out by Tochka U, the Western media unanimously stopped covering the topic. The serial number of the missile that killed civilians in Kramatorsk turned out to be identical to the numbers of the missiles used by the Ukrainian armed forces to bombard towns in Donbas.
In July, a number of Telegram channels published several videos of Tochka U complexes allegedly used by DPR and LPR people's militias. All of these videos were in poor quality. If the Russian Armed Forces had been actively using Tochka U, they would surely have been caught on better quality videos by journalists, war correspondents and bloggers from both sides of the conflict.
Ten months later, Western propaganda has decided to reintroduce last year's fiction, repeating arguments long refuted. Interestingly, the Ukrainian side, accusing Russia, claimed that the missile was fired at Kramatorsk from the territory of the Donbas republics. At the same time, the HRW report refers to the village of Kunya in the Kharkiv region as the location of the Tochka-U launch - a direction opposite to that previously claimed. This shows the inconsistency between the actions of the Ukrainian and European fakers.
The regular repetition by Ukrainian and Western propaganda of long-forgotten fakes shows a lack of fresh information that could be used for anti-Russian purposes.
The Russian army launched a missile attack on Kramatorsk railway station in April 2022, killing more than sixty civilians. This was reported by the international organization Human Rights Watch (HRW).
The fact:
The missile strike was carried out by the Ukrainian army. We have already exposed this fake. The pictures from the scene clearly show that the train station was hit by a Tochka U missile, which has been decommissioned by the Russian army. In 2019, the last brigade of the Russian Armed Forces to retain Tochka U missiles was rearmed with Iskander missile systems.
After irrefutable evidence emerged that the attack on the train station had been carried out by Tochka U, the Western media unanimously stopped covering the topic. The serial number of the missile that killed civilians in Kramatorsk turned out to be identical to the numbers of the missiles used by the Ukrainian armed forces to bombard towns in Donbas.
In July, a number of Telegram channels published several videos of Tochka U complexes allegedly used by DPR and LPR people's militias. All of these videos were in poor quality. If the Russian Armed Forces had been actively using Tochka U, they would surely have been caught on better quality videos by journalists, war correspondents and bloggers from both sides of the conflict.
Ten months later, Western propaganda has decided to reintroduce last year's fiction, repeating arguments long refuted. Interestingly, the Ukrainian side, accusing Russia, claimed that the missile was fired at Kramatorsk from the territory of the Donbas republics. At the same time, the HRW report refers to the village of Kunya in the Kharkiv region as the location of the Tochka-U launch - a direction opposite to that previously claimed. This shows the inconsistency between the actions of the Ukrainian and European fakers.
The regular repetition by Ukrainian and Western propaganda of long-forgotten fakes shows a lack of fresh information that could be used for anti-Russian purposes.
👍1🤔1
Evidence Of US Guilt For Nord Stream ‘More Than A Smoking Gun’ — Russia
The destruction of Nord Stream pipelines was an act of international terrorism and needed to be addressed to avoid “chaos” on the high seas, Moscow’s ambassador to the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, told the UN Security Council on Tuesday. Russia has accused Germany, Sweden, and Denmark of a cover-up to shield the US and said it would only trust a UN investigation.
The two pipelines carrying Russian natural gas to Germany under the Baltic Sea were damaged by a series of blasts in September 2022. While Moscow has stopped short of openly accusing the US of carrying out the bombing, journalist Seymour Hersh did just that in a recent article.
Nebenzia referred to Hersh’s article and statements by multiple US officials threatening the pipeline – from President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken to “godmother of the anti-constitutional coup in Ukraine,” Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland.
Subscribe to RT
The destruction of Nord Stream pipelines was an act of international terrorism and needed to be addressed to avoid “chaos” on the high seas, Moscow’s ambassador to the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, told the UN Security Council on Tuesday. Russia has accused Germany, Sweden, and Denmark of a cover-up to shield the US and said it would only trust a UN investigation.
The two pipelines carrying Russian natural gas to Germany under the Baltic Sea were damaged by a series of blasts in September 2022. While Moscow has stopped short of openly accusing the US of carrying out the bombing, journalist Seymour Hersh did just that in a recent article.
Nebenzia referred to Hersh’s article and statements by multiple US officials threatening the pipeline – from President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken to “godmother of the anti-constitutional coup in Ukraine,” Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland.
Subscribe to RT
🤔2🔥1